Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPEDERSEN TOYOTA EXPANSION - PDP - PDP140007 - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSCommunity Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov.com/developmentreview June 27, 2014 Angie Milewski BHA Design 1603 Oakridge Dr Fort Collins, CO 80525 RE: Pedersen Toyota Expansion, PDP140007, Round Number 1 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Noah Beals, at 970-416-2313 or nbeals@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/16/2014 06/16/2014: Land Use Code (LUC) Section 4.21(E)(2)(a) Pedestrian-oriented outdoor spaces shall be placed next to activity areas that generate users (such as shops and street corners). These spaces shall be visible from street and sidewalks and should contain amenities such as art and shelters. Because of the size of this project and its connections to three different streets there should be at least two pedestrian-oriented outdoor spaces. There should be a pedestrian oriented space along college ave located currently where the permeable pavers are located this should include pedestrian access to the public sidewalk and to the entrance of the building. The other pedestrian-oriented space on the west side should be located closer to the pedestrian entrance and not the vehicle entrance of the building. Both areas should include greater detail on the pedestrian use such as seating, tables, art, or shelters. BHA – 2 Pedestrian-oriented outdoor spaces have been moved to the entrances of the retail additions, as well as one larger plaza area at the main entrance of the dealership. Each space will provide bench seating, differentiated paving from the sidewalks, tree canopy shading, and landscape features. Landscape features may include enhanced planting, planter pots, boulders, and/or sculptural element. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/17/2014 06/17/2014: In the landscape plan on the tree mitigation sheet the tree quantities still need to be completed. BHA – Tree mitigation quantities have been compiled and are listed in the tree mitigation table. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/17/2014 06/17/2014: LUC 3.2.2(J) Along S College Ave the 15 ft. average minimum landscape setback from the right of way is not being met. This is an average of how much of parking frontage is meeting the required landscaped area 15' setback. Please provide details of the calculations of the average landscape setback area. BHA – The average width of the landscape buffer along College equals 16.8’. At its minimum, it is 6.9’ wide, at its maximum it is 28’ wide. The landscaped buffer area exceeds the 15’ buffer area by 118 SF. Detailed exhibit of calculations has been provided. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/17/2014 06/17/2014: LUC 3.2.2(C)(4) On the site plan or in an additional detail the bicycle parking needs to be shown and labeled with the number of spaces. Are all the spaces on the 1st level? BHA – Bike parking is now shown and labeled with quantities on the site plan. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/17/2014 06/17/2014: LUC 3.2.4 The lighting plan also needs to include the average foot-candle for only the vehicle use areas. APS/GREGORY: The additional lighting statistics have been added to the photometric plan as requested. Is there no lighting on the fourth story of the parking structure? APS/GREGORY: It is our understanding that the upper 2-levels of the parking garage will be a future phase and not included as part of this project. When the upper 2-levels of the parking structure are constructed the fourth level will be open to the sky and will be illuminated in some fashion. A photometric study on that phase will be submitted in compliance with Fort Collins standards when that phase is to be constructed. At this point in time it is not clear to us how the 2nd level will be utilized under the phase 1 portion of this project, or how it will be prepared for the future additions of levels 3 & 4. Therefore, we do not know if the 2nd level will be open to the sky and illuminated as part of phase 1 or not. If it is to be open to the sky and illuminated we will utilize Pole lights to illuminate the area in question similar to the rest of the parking lot area. We have added a worst case 2nd level, open to sky, parking structure lighting scenario to the photometric plan on sheet E1.1. Is there any existing lighting that is remaining that was not included on the lighting plan? APS/GREGORY: Not that we are aware of. It is our understanding that all exterior lighting will be provided as new. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/17/2014 06/17/2014: LUC 3.2.5 Trash and recycling enclosure shall be provided with walk-in access and at least 20ft from a public sidewalk on a concrete pad. Where is the trash and recycling enclosure? BHA – Trash enclosure is now shown on the plan. It will be located on a concrete pad in the rear parking lot near the building. Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/18/2014 06/18/2014: LUC 3.5.1 Mechanical/Utility equipment (vents, flues, meters, boxes, transformers, conduit, RTU...) shall be screened. The plans need to identify the locations of such equipment and how they are screened. AW – Transformers and other equipment at ground level will be screened by split-face masonry enclosures. At the roof level, mechanical equipment will be screened by parapets. In the existing building, parapets will be extended higher to hide equipment. Please see exterior elevations. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/18/2014 06/18/2014: LUC 3.5.3(C)(1) Shall provide connecting walkway to main entrance of the building. BHA – A connecting walkway has been provided to the main entrance of the dealership from College. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/18/2014 06/18/2014: LUC 3.5.3(2) Buidlings have a required built-to-line. 30% of the building length shall meet the built-to-line. Along nonarterial street the build-to-line is 0-15ft. and along arterial street the build-to-line is 10-25ft. When there is more than one street along a property then a the building shall meet at least two of the built-to-line. Further there shall not be any vehicle use area between the building and the facades of the building. With this additional standard the average landscap setback standard already cited will need to be met. No vehicle use area, including inventory, should be included the landscape set back. Also pedestrian connection to college ave. The build-to-line is not being met along Kensington Dr with the new buildig it is 2' and 11" away. The new parking area on the west side of the building should not be in between the facade and the street. BHA – The build-to-line is being met along Kensington and Mason. The new retail building along Mason lies within 8’ to 20’ from the proposed ROW. The new retail building along Kensington is 15’ from the proposed ROW. Parking has been removed from the area between the building and Mason street on the west side of the site. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: LUC 3.5.3(E)(2)(a)1. Requires walls that face streets be subdivided every 30ft. in length to create a human scale. LUC 3.5.3(E)(3) Facades that face the street shall be broken up with architectural elements for at least 50% of the building The parking structure wall that faces S Mason Street needs to be refined to include more human scale architectural elements. The Blank walls along college both with the existing structure and Parking structure should be broken up with architectural elements to further create a human scale. AW – New faux columns made of split-face masonry have been added along exterior walls directly facing streets with smaller intermediate faux columns added so that it is broken up architecturally every 20’ to 30’. Aluminum windows frames (without glazing) have also been added along street fronts to create greater human scale and add refinement to relevant elevations. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Is the arch element at east entrance attached to the building? This seems to be a large sign rather than portion of the building. Please provide further details AW – Yes, the arch element is an entrance portal that is attached to the main building. At the entry and in between the front of the portal and the main building, there will be a finished ceiling and down lighting as well even though it will be part of the outdoor (unconditioned) space. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: LUC 3.5.3(E)(6) Requires buildings to have a recognizable "base" and "top" such as a sills and cornices/stepped parapets. There needs to be more emphasis on this the base and top. These are currently not recognizable. AW – A 4’-0” tall concrete masonry unit base has been added around the entire building to add a solid base, and the tops have been refined to further define sections of glazing and entries along the new retail spaces and renovated main building. This creates a recognizable rhythm and consistency along the top of buildings. The top of the parking garage is mainly defined by its simplicity in comparison to its busy core/middle levels which are now broken up by split-face masonry columns, aluminum window frames and simpler intermediate columns. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: The planning set will need to provide a cover sheet with a sheet index and signature blocks. Or the site plan with the signature blocks and sheet index. BHA – A Sheet Index has been added to the Site Plan Sheet. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Signs are not approved through this development process and a note will need to indicate this or remove the signs from the plans. BHA – A note has been added to the plans that all signage must be approved through the appropriate approval process. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: There will need to be a set of plans for the site, landscape, and elevations. To show the conditions of all phases. It is not clear at all what is happening during the each phase. Each phase will need to meet compliance with the LUC. BHA – Noted. The general footprint will be constructed in phase one. Future phases will consist of the upper three levels of the parking garage and minor extension of service bays (labeled & depicted with dashed line on plans). Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/12/2014 06/12/2014: Per the submitted site plan there is 174,600 sq ft of new building being added to the site, therefore the TDRF for PDP is less than was shown and calculated on the TDRF applicaiton. Unless the square footage changes this project will only owe $125 for the TDRF FDP fee because of the overpayment of the PDP fee. BHA – Noted. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: The sidewalk along College Ave should be extended as the 10 foot wide sidewalk further north and transition to a narrower sidewalk just before the property line. BHA – We have extended the 10’ walk to the property line and shown a barricade until the future walk is improved north of the property line. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Driveways need to be shown constructed with concrete to the property line/back of sidewalk. The radii shown seem greater than allowed – looks like just on Kensington. INT – Concrete is now shown to the property line and the radii at the Kensington entrance revised to 15 feet Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Additional clarification will be needed on the plans to identify what improvements are a part of phase 1 and what will be done with the area that will contain the structures being built with phase 2. BHA – Noted. The general footprint will be constructed in phase one. Future phases will consist of the upper three levels of the parking garage and minor extension of service bays (labeled & depicted with dashed line on plans). Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: The ramps at the two corners need to be replaced with directional ramps. INT – Directional ramps are now shown Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Are there any existing services that need to be removed? INT – The existing services noted to be abandoned or removed Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: No water or sewer services are shown for the car wash or the retail shop? INT – Water and sewer will be served via the existing dealership service lines Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Need to look at the sight distance from the access point onto Mason Street based on the future curb location. Will a sight distance easement be needed? INT – Sight distance has been verified using AASHTO design criteria and a variance request has been provided by Delich Associates to use this criteria in lieu of LCUASS Department: Forestry Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Thank you for arranging the first tree evaluation meeting. Please set up a second onsite meeting with the City Forester to complete the tree inventory and mitigation plan. As part of that meeting some further review of the north most Ash on Mason can occur to consider desirability of removal or retention. Initial discussion at the first meeting indicated the tree would remove but some further discussion could be beneficial in making a final determination. BHA – Noted and scheduled for 7-31-14. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Provide tree species diversity on final landscape plan and list percentages in the plant list. BHA – Tree species will be determined for final plan and species diversity will be shown on the final plan. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Please add this landscape note: The Developer shall replace dead or dying street trees after planting until final maintenance inspection and acceptance by the City of Fort Collins Forestry Division. All City street trees in the project must be established, of an approved species and of acceptable condition prior to acceptance. BHA – Note has been added to the Tree Protection Notes on the Tree Mitigation Plan. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Please add the table associated with tree protection specification LUC3.2.1 G 7 BHA – Table has been added to the Tree Protection Notes on the Tree Mitigation Plan. Department: Internal Services Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/23/2014 06/23/2014: Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting Pre-Submittal meetings are offered to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed. Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended: 2012 International Building Code (IBC) 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) 2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) 2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC) 2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC) 2012 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado 2011 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009. Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF. Frost Depth: 30 inches. Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B. Seismic Design: Category B. Climate Zone: Zone 5 Energy Code Use 1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2012 IRC Chapter 11 or 2012 IECC. 2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2012 IECC residential chapter. 3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2012 IECC commercial chapter. Fort Collins Green Code Amendments effective starting 1-1-2012. A copy of these requirements can be obtained at the Building Office or contact the above phone number. Pederson Toyota expansion – project specific concerns: 1. Fire-sprinkler systems are required for buildings more than 5k s.ft. unless fire containment is provided. 2. Building code and State statute CRS 9-5 requires project provide accessible units. 3. For an non-sprinkled parking garage that is attached to other buildings, the Building Code will limit the height to 3 stories and approx 30k per floor. 4. New Green Code requires: a. Upgraded insulation is required for buildings using electric heat or cooling. b. Exterior walls and roof must meet a STC (sound resistance) rating of 40 min. if building located within 1000ft to train tracks. c. Low-flow Watersense plumbing fixtures (toilet, faucets, shower heads) are required. d. Special combustion safety requirements for natural draft gas appliances. e. Low VOC interior finishes. City of Fort Collins Building Services Plan Review 416-2341 Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartine@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/10/2014 06/10/2014: The existing electric capacity to this service is 1600 amps at 120/208 volt three-phase. Additional electric capacity fee for any increase will apply. A Commercial Electric Service (C-1) form will need to be completed and supplied to Light & Power Engineering. INT - Noted Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/10/2014 06/10/2014: Relocation of the electric transformer will be at the owner's expense. The space shown on the utility plan for the relocated transformer may not be adequate. Based on likely electric capacity, and the resulting likely transformer size, the minimum east to west dimension required will be at least 10 feet. If the transformer is larger, additional space will be necessary. The transformer can be sized upon receipt of a completed C-1 form. Contact Light & Power Engineering at (970)221-6700 with any questions. INT – Noted. The final location of the transformer will be coordinated prior to final plan approval. Department: Outside Agencies Contact: Gloria Hice-Idler, , Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/16/2014 06/16/2014: I've reviewed the above submittal. Based upon the TIS, it appears that the intersection of Kensington and College will see an increase of traffic of more than 20%. Per the State Highway Access Code, the increase allows CDOT to re-evaluate the access and to require a new access permit. The review of the intersection indicates that no new highway improvements are necessary, but the applicant should be required to obtain a new access permit. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. P 970.350.2148 | C 970.381.2475 | F 970.350.2198 1420 2nd Street, Greeley, CO 80631 gloria.hice-idler@state.co.us INT – If required, a new access permit will be obtained prior to final plan approval Department: PFA Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: STRUCTURES EXCEEDING 30' Due to the height of the parking garage, a 30' wide fire lane is required adjacent to the longest side of the structure. This requirement has not been satisfactorily met with the proposed site plan and further discussion is needed. Additionally, the 30' EAE width requirement shall be reflected on the plat. IFC Appendix D; Poudre Fire Authority Administrative Policy 85-5: In order to accommodate the access requirements for aerial fire apparatus (ladder trucks), required fire lanes shall be 30 foot wide minimum on at least one long side of the building. At least one of the required access routes meeting this condition shall be located within a minimum of 15 feet and a maximum of 30 feet from the building, and shall be positioned parallel to one entire side of the building. INT – Parking spaces have been eliminated at the northwest corner of the parking structure and the drive aisle realigned closer to the structure. A 30 foot EAE has been provided along the north and south sides of the building. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, , dmogen@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/27/2014 06/27/2014: The discussions up to this point have indicated that significant changes to the plans are expected; therefore, these plans and numbers have not been reviewed in detail. INT - Noted Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/27/2014 06/27/2014: Underground detention is not allowed without approval through a formal variance request. This request will need to include justification of the variance through presentation of alternatives to the underground detention. INT – A variance request has been provided within the Drainage Report. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/27/2014 06/27/2014: EDB is not considered LID . Please refer back to conceptual comment #5 for details on meeting the LID requirement. INT – Urban Drainage indicates that EDBs are considered “somewhat” of an LID. To supplement the EDB we have added a soft pond bottom section to promote infiltration. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/27/2014 06/27/2014: Per conceptual comment #1, please provide a simple plan view exhibit documenting existing, proposed, and net change in impervious areas. INT – An exhibit will be provided during Final Plan review in order to generate the fees associated with any change in impervious area Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/27/2014 06/27/2014: The retaining wall around the detention pond in the NW corner is at or near the 50% maximum listed on page 7 of the Landscape Design Standards and Guidelines for Detention Facilities. Please consider using as little retaining wall as possible and using articulated block or other methods to maximize aesthetic value. INT – Articulated block or other methods will be specified with the final plans Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/27/2014 06/27/2014: A Stormwater Maintenance Plan (SWMP) is required at final plan stage. Please contact Jesse Schlam at 224-6015 for requirements. INT - Noted Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: No comments. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Please correct the sub-title as marked on sheet 1. This should match the Subdivision Plat. See redlines. INT – Title corrected Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum. Please state the project datum on sheets 1 & 2, and provide an equation to get from NAVD88 to NGVD29 unadjusted, i.e. NAVD88 = NGVD29 Unadjusted + _______. INT – An adjustment equation has been added Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. INT - Corrected Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: There are text over text issues. See redlines. INT - Corrected Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: There is text that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See redlines. INT - Corrected Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Please change the right of way widths shown on sheet 5. Mason Street is platted as a 60' right of way. See redlines. INT - Corrected Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Please add the subdivision information for the surrounding properties as marked on sheet 1. See redlines. BHA – Added the subdivision information for surrounding properties to plans. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 06/20/2014 06/20/2014: Please make changes as marked. See redlines. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. King – Comments addressed unless otherwise noted Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Please correct the legal description as marked. This should match the Subdivision Plat. See redlines. BHA – The legal description has been corrected. Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Please add the subdivision information for the surrounding properties as marked. See redlines. BHA – Added the subdivision information for surrounding properties to plans. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: There are line over text issues. See redlines. BHA – Line over text has been corrected. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: There are text over text issues. See redlines. BHA – Text over text has been corrected. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Mask text within hatching. See redlines. BHA – Text within hatching has been masked. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 06/19/2014 06/19/2014: Why is the City of Fort Collins shown as an owner in the Owner's Certification? BHA – Owner has been updated to Pedersen Properties LTD. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: Sheet 2 of 5 Section C Traffic Signing and Pavement Marking Construction Notes: Notes 6, 11, and 14 need to edited to read "Local Entity TRAFFIC Engineer" instead of Local Entity Engineer. INT – Notes have been revised Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: Transportation Planning notes that the submittal is well done, improvements are considerable, and this submittal appears to meet the intent of the Mid Town Plan. INT - Noted Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: The curb ramps at the intersection corners need to be directional. INT – Curb ramps have been changed to directional Topic: Traffic Impact Study Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: TIS reviewed and conclusions noted. BHA – Noted. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/25/2014 06/25/2014: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcgov.com BHA – Noted. Irrigation plans will be provided for the Final Plan submittal. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: Show all existing water and sewer mains and services. INT – All known services have been noted on the plans Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: Show/label existing curb stops and meter pit. INT – Known locations of curb stop and meter pit has been noted on the plans for the existing dealership. However, the site survey and subsequent field visit did not indicate the locations for the existing Self Storage office building. Additional field reconnaissance and coordination may be required. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: Protect the existing sewer service clean-outs in the paved/paver areas by converting to traffic-rated clean-outs. Add traffic-rated clean-out detail. INT – Traffic rated cleanouts have been noted and details will be provided with the final plans Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: Will the 6" fire line be adequate for the entire building? Water pressure in that area is approximately 65 psi. INT – The MEP has indicated that the existing fire line is adequate or an internal pump will be provided. Final calculations will be performed during the final plan stage. Topic: General Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: Explain the phasing shown on the site plan. Will Phase 1 include a building addition that covers the entire footprint or will the portion labeled Phase 1 Detail/Carwash be a separate building at that time? BHA – Noted. The general footprint will be constructed in phase one. Future phases will consist of the upper three levels of the parking garage and minor extension of service bays (labeled & depicted with dashed line on plans). Department: Zoning Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, avandeutekom@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/24/2014 06/24/2014: I understand you would like to phase this project however, I will still need the landscape, parking, handicap parking and bicycle parking calculations of both phases with drawings in order to approve this development plan along with a phasing plan. BHA – Noted. The general footprint will be constructed in phase one. Future phases will consist of the upper three levels of the parking garage and minor extension of service bays (labeled & depicted with dashed line on plans).