HomeMy WebLinkAboutWOODWARD TECHNOLOGY CENTER FP#3 - FDP - FDP140005 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 -Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov.com/developmentreview
2/28/2014
RE: Woodward Technology Center FP#3 - Woodward Campus, FDP140005, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your
submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the
individual commenter or direct your questions through the Project Planner, Jason Holland, at 970-224-6126
or jholland@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, jholland@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Add all mylar sheets to the sheet index that will be included in the planning set.
BHA – A sheet index has been added to the site plan cover sheet
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Because subsequent phases will be approved as minor amendments to this final
plan set, we would suggest adding to the notes: the modifications and alternative compliance
that were approved with the PDP. Also as a supplement to the land use table, adding the total
buildout and total parking data would be helpful so that these elements from the PDP will be
part of the final approval.
BHA – ODP and PDP modifications have been noted on the site plan, as well as the land use table for the
future anticipated phases.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: PRPA has the following comments: 1. Corrections need to be made where PRPA
easement width is mentioned. We have a 65 foot easement not 60 foot. Both drawing
packages mention the easement width.
BHA – PRPA easement labels changed to say 65’ on all sheets.
PRPA discussed that mature trees will not exceed the 15 foot maximum height within the
easement and also discussed that trees outside the easement could be trimmed if they are in
danger of falling or being blown into the power line.
BHA – All trees in PRPA easement have a max height less than 15’.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please add the basic "future" elements from the PDP to the site and landscape
plans -- the future parking and future landscape buffer areas.
BHA – ‘Future’ elements from the PDP have been added to the Final Plans.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please add the following note for site lighting: All exterior lighting fixtures
provided shall have a concealed, fully shielded light source and shall feature sharp cut-off
capability so as to minimize up-light, spill-light, glare and unnecessary diffusion.
BHA – Note added to Notes on Cover Sheet S0.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please show further detail as to how the rooftop mechanical equipment shown on
the building elevations will comply with LUC 3.5.1(I)(6) which states that "All rooftop mechanical
equipment shall be screened from public view from both above and below by integrating it into
building and roof design to the maximum extent feasible." Staff would suggest that this
equipment be screened with architectural panels so that the architectural design is continuous
and so the functional aspects of the mechanical equipment is not obvious.
Ghafari – Mechanical areas on the large roof are located to generally be screened by raised daylighting/PV
roof elements, or enclosed within mechanical penthouses. Remaining RTUs that are still visible will be clad
with panels to match the building materials and colors. Additional 3D images have been included with the
resubmittal to illustrate the views from several locations.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please add a general note indicating the reflectivity of glazing. Staff would also
suggest adding a general "or approved equal" note to the Product Matrix.
Ghafari – added
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
Comcast has indicated they currently have a line on the south side of East Lincoln in the right of
way. Comcast would like to go in joint trench with City power if Woodward would like Comcast
service.
Interwest – this information has been passed on to Woodward
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Sheri Langenberger, 970-221-6573, slangenberger@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: Street Maintenance Program has indicated that they have no comments at this
time, but would like to receive a copy of the Plat and utility plans with any future routings.
Interwest – Understood
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: Notes need to be added to the plans clarifying the extent of the improvements to
be constructed as it relates to the property line and tying into the Lincoln and Lemay
improvements that will be constructed by the City project. i.e. The stormdrain line shall be
constructed to the Property line and capped. Driveway improvements to be installed to the
property line.
Interwest – Notes have been added to the storm system plan and improvements are shown to the
property line where applicable. Driveway improvements along Lemay (North ¾ entrance and
Magnolia entrance) are shown to the R/W or edge of future handicap ramp. Coordination
between the Woodward contractor and the yet to be determined contractor for Lincoln
and Lemay construction will be required.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: The utility plans are showing the Pro shop staying. The parking lot associated with
this building extends into the right-of-way. The parking lot needs to be modified (a portion of
the asphalt should be saw cut and removed) so that the parking lot is not within the right-of-way
and the required parking lot buffer from the row line is provided.
Interwest – Notes are to be added to the Development Agreement stating that Woodward is
responsible for removing the portions of the existing parking lot from the right-of-way
should the construction of the ultimate Lincoln Ave improvements occur prior to the
removal of the Woodward construction offices. Specific notes and drawings are not
shown on the plans per staff.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: The site and landscape plans do not show the Pro Shop staying on the plans - if
this is the case it also needs to be shown on these plans as well.
BHA – Site and Landscape plans show Pro Shop to remain, as it is planned to serve as a construction
trailer while construction on the site continues.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: Which if any of the storm system is considered public? Just need to know so
when we are working on a DCP we know which portions of the system are to be inspected.
Interwest – All storm systems on site will be privately owned and maintained. This note has been
added to the Overall Utility Plan and storm sewer plan and profile sheets.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: In looking at the driveway out to Lincoln Ave and how it will work with the proposed
future ultimate improvements along Lincoln Ave I would suggest that the driveway be widened
out to 35 feet. I didn’t have a WB-67 turning template, but this width worked for a WB-50 turning
and a passenger car at that access. Just as was looked at for the access points previously.
Interwest – The driveway access at Lincoln has been widened to 35 feet to accommodate this turning
movement. Concrete shall be installed to the right of way in this location.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: Easement Exhibits.
Drainage Easement – The drainage easement needs to extend to the property line at the NE
corner of the production support building. There is a flared end section being shown to be
installed here and this pipe could be extended to the street (inlet) in the future.
Access Easement – Is this exhibit intended to be for what is to be dedicated as emergency
access easement? If so an additional exhibit is needed for what is to be dedicated at an
access easement (Magnolia extension as a minimum). And if this exhibit is intended to be the
exhibit for the access easement then an exhibit for emergency access easement is needed.
Interwest – The drainage easement has been extended to the property line. A separate public access
easement (in addition to the emergency access easement) has been prepared that includes
the Magnolia extension
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: I intend to add a paragraph to the development agreement identifying that the
Developer gives permission to the City to access the property adjacent to Lincoln Ave to
extend storm pipes, do grading work, landscaping work along Lincoln Ave in order to
complete the interim and future street improvements.
This comment has been shared with Woodward, and they will coordinate with the city during the
development agreement process.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: I have a concern regarding the locations shown on the site plan that indicate the
locations of future security gate locations. I see 3 options right now regarding this item. 1)
Provide more information at this time to show what will be installed, where the items would be
installed and how they will be utilized. 2) Make it clear that before the security gates are
approved and installed, that a minor amendment would need to be submitted, reviewed, and
approved to determine the details of this system. 3) Remove the notes regarding the security
gates.
If the details are shown now, my concerns are: When will the gates be closed and how will
they be used. The security gates would need to be located far enough back from the
right-of-way that there is room for the largest vehicle to be able to stop at the gate and not block
the sidewalk or impact the traffic movement on the street. And enough distance to
accommodate the anticipated number of vehicles that could be entering at any given time.
There also needs to be the ability for a vehicle that enters the driveway and is not allowed
access to be able to turn around and get off of the site.
BHA - Security gates are not anticipated with Phase One. Woodward intends to run electrical conduit to
these general areas in case they are required in the future. We have indicated the gate locations as
‘potential future security gate locations’, and that final review with additional details would be required by
Minor Amendment before they are approved and installed.
Department: Forestry
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Consider identifying the species of street trees by others along Lemay so the design of these
trees can be coordinated with the phase one Woodward design.
BHA – Species selection has not yet been made for the Lemay & Lincoln Streetscapes. We will review the
street tree species with Forestry as the plans are finalized.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Suggested tree type changes:
Swamp White Oak – sensitive to high pH soils
Autumn Purple Ash- problems with Emerald Ash Borer
Princess Kay Plum – poorer long term survival
BHA – Swamp White Oak has been replaced with Texas Red Oak and Crimson Spire Oak
Ash has been replaced with Pinnacle Birch (only 2)
Plum – replaced with hardier varieties, Moongold Apricot & Purple Leaf Mayday Tree
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Suggested that additional reviews of these trees occur with local nursery or horticultural
professionals to evaluate adaptability in the Fort Collins area:
Dakota Pinnacle Birch – not a lot of planting of this tree in the area has occurred so far; review
for borer and heat tolerance; good survival in mass planting is important
Douglas fir
Birch masses replace with hardier Sensation Boxelder & remaining used as specimen trees.
Fir is used sparingly and in wetter areas.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Tree location consideration:
Greenspire Linden when planted in parking lot islands can develop summer heat scorch.
Particularly with the hotter summer temperatures the area has recently been experiencing.
Linden replaced with Kentucky Coffeetree in islands
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Place an M for mitigation by all the upsized trees in the plant list. Check to see if 175 are
provided in the plant list as it may be one short. Also please place an M that could be shaded
by the direct label of mitigation trees to help identify where the mitigation trees are going on the
project.
BHA – M has been placed by all upsized trees in plans and plant list. 174 (75% of 232) trees have been
upsized for phase 1.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Please place the full tree mitigation table found on the previous approved Minor Amendment
Final Plan/Tree Mitigation Plan 9-27-13. This information provides a valuable overall summary
for a big picture reference with information from Lots 1-3 and Lot 4.
BHA – Full tree mitigation table has been placed on sheet L9
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Add the table that is referenced in tree protection note number 6 to the tree protection notes.
This table can be found in LUC 3.2.1 G 7
BHA – Table LUC 3.2.1 G7 has been placed next to note 6 on Sheet L9.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Will the existing trees along Lincoln be removed in phase one? They are shown to be retained
on the Minor Amendment Final Plan/Tree Mitigation Plan but not on Phase one landscape plan.
BHA – Existing trees along Lincoln to be removed with interim road improvements as noted in PDP.
These trees were accounted for in tree mitigation counts.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Plant note number 7: The separation standard for water and sewer service lines of 6 feet should
be added.
BHA – Note added to sheet L1.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/27/2014
02/27/2014:
Plant note number 11: Add information that says in effect that cultivation for soil improvement
shall not occur within in the drip line of any exiting tree.
BHA – Information added to Note 11 on sheet L1.
Department: Internal Services
Contact: Russell Hovland, 970-416-2341, rhovland@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Insp Plan Review
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/25/2014
02/25/2014: Building Permit Pre-Submittal Meeting
Pre-Submittal meetings are offered to assist the designer/builder by assuring, early on in the
design, that the new commercial or multi-family projects are on track to complying with all of the
adopted City codes and Standards listed below. The proposed project should be in the early
to mid-design stage for this meeting to be effective and is typically scheduled after the Current
Planning conceptual review meeting. Applicants of new commercial or multi-family projects are
advised to call 416-2341 to schedule a pre-submittal meeting. Applicants should be prepared
to present site plans, floor plans, and elevations and be able to discuss code issues of
occupancy, square footage and type of construction being proposed.
Construction shall comply with the following adopted codes as amended:
2012 International Building Code (IBC)
2012 International Residential Code (IRC)
2012 International Energy Conservation Code (IECC)
2012 International Mechanical Code (IMC)
2012 International Fuel Gas Code (IFGC)
2009 International Plumbing Code (IPC) as amended by the State of Colorado
2011 National Electrical Code (NEC) as amended by the State of Colorado
Accessibility: State Law CRS 9-5 & ICC/ANSI A117.1-2009.
Snow Load Live Load: 30 PSF / Ground Snow Load 30 PSF.
Frost Depth: 30 inches.
Wind Load: 100- MPH 3 Second Gust Exposure B.
Seismic Design: Category B.
Climate Zone: Zone 5
Energy Code Use
1. Single Family; Duplex; Townhomes: 2009 IRC Chapter 11 or 2009 IECC Chap 4.
2. Multi-family and Condominiums 3 stories max: 2009 IECC Chapter 4.
3. Commercial and Multi-family 4 stories and taller: 2009 IECC Chapter 5.
Fort Collins Green Code Amendments effective starting 1-1-2012. A copy of these
requirements can be obtained at the Building Office or contact the above phone number.
City of Fort Collins
Building Services
Plan Review
416-2341
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartine@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/14/2014
02/14/2014: No comments.
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Provide an updated plat showing recent changes to the Emergency Access
Easement.
BHA – There is no change to the plat anticipated. Easements are being reviewed and recorded by separate
document, and the Access Easement for emergency vehicles is included for review with the resubmittal.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 03/05/2014
03/05/2014: Redlines in both the plan and report need to be corrected. Please add a
sequence chart to the erosion control plan. If you need clarification concerning this, or if there
are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Interwest - The sequence chart has been added to details sheet DT-11 and redline comments from both
the Plans and Report have been addressed unless otherwise noted on the redlines.
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: Floodplain
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014:
1.Sheet OGP-1 and EC-1, please include the floodway line on the plans.
Interwest - The floodway line has been added
2.GP-9, The trash dumpsters must be anchored to prevent floatation (until LOMR approved).
Please show a detail for how these will be anchored.
Interwest - An anchor detail has been added to Sheet GP-9
3.EC-1, Please modify Note 4 to state that these must be outside the effective 100-year
floodplain. Note 4 and 7 have been updated as requested Please modify note 7 to specify that a floodplain
use permit is needed for each structure built in the 100-year floodplain.
4.Please provide a list of elevator, HVAC, mechanical, electrical equipment or openings that
are planned below the regulatory flood protection elevation so that we can discuss
requirements for flood protection. Please set up a meeting to discuss. Per our meeting
March 6, 2014, the project architect is preparing a Memorandum describing the
items noted to be below the proposed building finished floor along with notes regarding
their use or how they might be flood proofed in accordance with FEMA regulations.
This Memo will be provided prior to final plan and report approval.
5.FP-2 Because of the multiple floodplain analyses, please add a note to the legend
referencing the ACE report and date for the floodplain information shown on this plan.
Interwest - A note referencing the date of the updated floodplain by ACE has been added. This date is not
specifically associated with the CLOMR addendum report as this work is still ongoing.
6.FP-1, FP-2, Drainage Report, Please replace the table with the updated version and check
this table with the most updated ACE report. The regulatory flood protection elevation needs to
be referenced to the existing condition not the effective condition, per the variance. Let’s
review and discuss.
Interwest - The updated table has been added to the plans and report. Note
that the proposed FP elevations on the table are based on recent modeling but does not
reflect the anticipated CLOMR addendum elevations with the downstream bridge improvements.
A final version of the table will be provided prior to approval.
7.Drainage Report, p.3., Please provide the FEMA CLOMR Case # and date. Also discuss
CLOMR addendums by ACE upon which the building data in the table is based.
Interwest - The Case # has been added to the report. A final discussion of the CLOMR addendum will
be provided by ACE and included in the report prior to approval.
8.Drainage Report, P.3, last paragraph. Need to clarify the requirements related to the
effective, existing and proposed conditions. Let’s discuss.
Interwest - The expanded floodplain table footnotes clarify the requirements related to each condition and
which elevation controls in regard to establishing the minimum finished floor elevations for each building.
9.Drainage Report, P. 9, These are not the conditions for the variance; these are the
justifications for the variance. Please replace with the conditions of the variance.
Interwest - Conditions have been updated per the approved variance letter
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: To prevent clogging and to ensure longevity of the infiltration of the detention
ponds, please design forebays at the entrance points to collect debris and sediment.
Interwest - Forebays have been added where practical based on pond geometry and flow entry locations
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: Please ensure that all the overflow paths of the detention ponds will function and
be safe with other aspects of the site plan.
Interwest - The overflow paths have been evaluated including the overflow at the ITS main entrance. The
channel and bridge crossings proposed at this plaza entry can adequately convey the overflow and it is not
intended for this flow to sheet across the plaza itself.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: Most of the drainage swales are have cobble at the bottom of the swales. The
City does not recommend this design. Long term maintenance has shown to be a problem
with sediment build-up and weed control.
BHA – While we agree that the use of cobble swales at the bottom of grassy, mowed detention areas can
result in weed control issues, the cobble swales here are used as drainage areas as well as landscape
features in high-visibility areas near the building and parking lots. They are contained within mulch beds
with shrubs, trees, and perennials, so will receive a higher level of weed control similar to the adjacent
mulch beds. Lowflow areas within mowed grassy areas are instead treated with a soft pan instead of
cobble to aid maintenance.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
Please add a note stating that all storm sewers are private.
Interwest - This note has been added to the Overall Utility Plan and the storm sewer plans.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: Please specify the gravel to be used for the gravel trenches in the infiltration
ponds and swales.
Interwest - A note has been added to the typical detail on SHT DRN-2
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: Please specify that the close mesh grate is to be used for all area inlet C and Ds.
Interwest - This note has been added to the storm plan and profile sheets
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: Please specify type of "storage rock" to be used for the dry wells.
Interwest - A note has been added to the detail on SHT DT-8
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: Please add and show the 6 inches of topsoil and temporary erosion control
blanket on the riprap detail.
Interwest - This information has been added to the riprap detail.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: Please add a legend for the hatching in the infiltration ponds and swales.
Interwest - A legend for the cobble swales has been added to the grading plans.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/28/2014
02/28/2014: The swales that have a slope under 2% need either a soft pan or concrete pan.
Concrete pan would not be consistent with the design, so a soft pan is needed.
Interwest - A typical detail for a soft pan has been added to the grading plans for swales that are under 2%.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: There are line over text issues on sheet AE2-00-1. See redlines.
Ghafari – line over text issues have been corrected.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please correct the sanitary sewer sheet numbering. the sheet index shows
different numbering from the actual sewer sheets.
Interwest - Sanitary sewer sheet numbering has been corrected.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please correct the elevation for benchmark R402 on sheet GN-1. The elevation on
sheet CV-1 is correct.
Interwest - The benchmark elevation on GN-1 has been corrected.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please relate the coordinates shown on the horizontal control plans to the property
boundary.
Interwest - Northing and Easting building coordinates have been related to the property boundary.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please change the matchline reference along the east side of sheet GP-7 to GP-1
& GP-3. Please change the matchline reference along the east side of sheet GP-8 to GP-3 &
GP-5.
Interwest - The matchline references have been adjusted.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please rotate the matchline references 180 degrees on the profiles on sheets
STM-1 & STM-2.
Interwest - The matchline references have been rotated
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please change the stationing of 9+00 to 16+00 in the matchline reference on the
profile on sheet STM-3.
Interwest - The stationing has been corrected.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: There are line over text issues on sheets L3, L4 & L6. See redlines.
BHA – Line over text corrected.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: There are text over text issues on sheet L4. See redlines.
BHA – Line over text corrected.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: No comments.
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Provide water usage data for the ITS Bldg (8" water service). Include the average
and peak flowrates in gpm, average and peak day water use in gpd and annual water usage
volume in gallons/year.
Interwest - This data has been provided by Ghafari via an email dated 3/4/14.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Provide water usage data for the PSB Bldg (4" water service). Include the
average and peak flowrates in gpm, average and peak day water use in gpd and annual water
usage volume in gallons/year.
Interwest - This data has been provided by Ghafari via an email dated 3/4/14.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: At the existing sanitary MH in Lemay, include the elevation of the lower part of the
drop connection. It does not have to match the invert of the existing 15" sewer.
Interwest - The elevation of the lower part of the drop connection has been added.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Add steel casings at all locations where water or sanitary sewer mains are passing
below storm drains 24" and larger.
Interwest - Steel casings have been added to these crossing locations.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Which sanitary sewer service connections will contain process wastes. Provide
information on flow metering and sampling facilities that are planned.
Interwest - Only the sewer service that exits on the east face of the ITS will contain process wastes. A
sampling facility will be located inside the building.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Label tees for F Hydr's as swivel tees.
Interwest - All fire hydrant tees have been labeled as swivel tees.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Two of the 12" water main lowerings are showing a 4 degree deflection at a pipe
joint. That exceeds the allowable joint deflection for PVC pipe. Options would be to use
fittings or to start the deflection farther back from the low point.
Interwest - Maximum allowable joint deflection for PVC is 1 degree, a note has been added to the plans
and the lowerings reflect a 1 degree deflection.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Show the air release valve locations on the plans. A meeting is suggested to
review this to minimize the number and air release valves as practical.
Interwest - Air release valves have been added to the water line at STA 10+50 and STA 14+85.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Will there be any irrigation taps?
Interwest – A 2” irrigation tap and meter has been added at STA 13+80.to serve Phase One.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 02/20/2014
02/20/2014: Water service sizes will be reviewed once the water usage information requested
in Comments 1 and 2 is received. If the 8" meter is warranted, an 8" meter detail will be
provided to include on the plans.
Interwest – A 6-inch tap and 6-inch meter is proposed for the ITS building. A 1.5-inch tap and 1.5-inch
meter is proposed for the PSB.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 02/21/2014
02/21/2014: See redlined utility plans for other comments.
Interwest – Redline comments have been addressed
Department: Zoning
Contact: Noah Beals, 970-416-2313, nbeals@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Need to clarify what the word "Future" means.
BHA – The Woodward Campus will be developed and constructed in phases over time. Final plans indicate
in detail the planned improvements for Phase One, and general information from the PDP for future
phases. We have added information from the PDP regarding future anticipated phases to the site plan, and
specified that review of future design elements will be required by a Minor Amendment process prior to
approval or construction of those phases.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Existing building (clubhouse) on the civil plan but not the planning set. When will
this building and associated parking lot be removed?
BHA - Site and Landscape plans have been revised to show Pro Shop to remain, as it is planned to serve
as a construction trailer while construction on the site continues. Based on our discussions with city staff,
the development agreement will clarify the need to remove the pro shop if the Lincoln Corridor
improvements move ahead.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 02/26/2014
02/26/2014: Please design the EAE on the west side of the Production Support Building to a
large sidewalk not another asphalt vehicle use area.
BHA – Acknowledged