HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATERFIELD THIRD FILING - PDP - PDP130037 - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES1
2/11/2014
Q:\USERS\FORT COLLINS LAND USE\WATERFIELD\DECISION.DOC
CITY OF FORT COLLINS
TYPE 1 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING
FINDINGS AND DECISION
HEARING DATE: January 30, 2014
PROJECT NAME: Waterfield 3
rd
Filing
CASE NUMBER: PDP130037
APPLICANT: Jim Dullea and Curly Risheill
Parker Land Investments, LLC
c/o Ripley Design
401 West Mountain Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80521
OWNER: Parker Land Investments, LLC
9162 South Kenwood Court
Highlands Ranch, CO 80126
HEARING OFFICER: Kendra L. Carberry
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for approval of 190 dwelling units (152
single-family detached homes, 22 single-family homes served by an alley and 16 single-family
attached homes) on 74.59 acres on a parcel of land located generally at the northwest corner of
East Vine Drive and North Timberline Road. Merganser Drive will be extended to serve the site.
Access would also be gained from new streets that intersect with East Vine Drive and North
Timberline Road.
SUMMARY OF DECISION: Approved
ZONE DISTRICT: Low Density Mixed-Use Neighborhood (L-M-N)
HEARING: The Hearing Officer opened the hearing at approximately 5:00 p.m. on January 30,
2014, in Conference Room A, 281 North College Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado.
EVIDENCE: During the hearing, the Hearing Officer accepted the following evidence:
(1) Planning Department Staff Report; (2) application, plans, maps and other supporting
documents submitted by the applicant; and (3) an email from Don Homan dated January 30, 2014
(the Land Use Code (the "Code"), the Comprehensive Plan and the formally promulgated polices
of the City are all considered part of the record considered by the Hearing Officer).
2
2/11/2014
Q:\USERS\FORT COLLINS LAND USE\WATERFIELD\DECISION.DOC
TESTIMONY: The following persons testified at the hearing:
From the City: Ted Shepard, Ward Stanford
From the Applicant: Linda Ripley, Cody Snowden
From the Public: Kenneth Barker, Don Homan
FINDINGS
1. Evidence presented to the Hearing Officer established the fact that the hearing was
properly posted, legal notices mailed and notice published.
2. A neighborhood meeting was held on May 30, 2013 for this PDP and the Waterfield
Overall Development Plan ("ODP"). The residents that attended generally expressed concerns
over wetlands, traffic and density.
3. The PDP complies with the ODP.
4. The PDP complies with the applicable General Development Standards contained in
Article 3 of the Code.
a. The PDP complies with Section 3.2.1, Landscaping and Tree Protection, because
all public streets will be landscaped with street trees.
b. The PDP complies with Section 3.2.2, Access, Circulation and Parking, because:
the PDP includes construction of a segment of the City's future regional trail along the
Eaton Ditch, which turns south and connects to the path system that accesses the future
neighborhood center, the future public school, the future park and wetland open space; and
a soft path will circumnavigate the wetlands.
c. The PDP complies with Section 3.2.3(F), Solar Orientation, because Waterfield 3rd
Filing is designed in an alternative manner that enhances neighborhood continuity, fosters
non-vehicular access and preserves existing natural conditions.
d. The PDP complies with Section 3.3.1(B)(C), Plat Standards, Lots and Public
Dedications, because all lots gain access to a public street, and the general layout of lots,
roads, driveways, utilities, drainage facilities and other services are designed to enhance an
interconnected street system within and between future neighborhoods and to preserve
natural features.
e. The PDP complies with Section 3.5.1, Project Compatibility, because Waterfield
3rd Filing adjoins a parcel identified on the ODP as multi-family and zoned M-M-N, and a
buffer yard has been set aside to allow a landscape screen between the two uses.
f. The PDP complies with Section 3.6.2, Streets, Streetscapes, Alleys and Easements,
because: the 24 double frontage lots along an arterial street will not take access from an
arterial street; and the proposed lot depth, combined with fencing and landscaping, creates
3
2/11/2014
Q:\USERS\FORT COLLINS LAND USE\WATERFIELD\DECISION.DOC
an effective screen and protection from the noise, light and other negative impacts of the
arterial street equally well or better than a plan which otherwise complies with the lot
depth standard.
g. The PDP complies with Section 3.6.4, Transportation Level of Service
Requirements, because: the Transportation Impact Study addresses plans for New Vine
Drive, newly constructed and widened streets, impact on intersections in the area and the
levels of service for bicycle and pedestrian traffic; and Waterfield 3rd Filing is served by a
network of public streets which provide a high level of internal and external connectivity.
h. The PDP complies with Section 3.8.11, Fences and Walls, because: 24 lots will
have a 6' high solid wood fence along the rear property line adjoining either New Vine
Drive or North Timberline Road; these fences will feature a recess or projection of about 4'
for a length not to exceed the width of two lots; and masonry columns will be provided at
consistent intervals.
5. The PDP complies with the applicable Low Density Mixed-Use District standards
contained in Article 4 of the Code.
a. The PDP complies with Section 4.5(B)(2), Permitted Uses, because both single
family detached and single family attached residences are permitted uses in the L-M-N
zone district subject to Administrative Review.
b. The PDP complies with Section 4.5(D)(1), Density, because the PDP features 190
dwelling units on 74.59 acres for a gross density of 2.56 dwelling units per gross acre;
which is less than the maximum and more than minimum net density.
c. The PDP complies with Section 4.5(D)(2), Mix of Housing, because: a
Modification of Standard was granted by the Planning and Zoning Board in Conjunction
with the ODP on November 14, 2013, which allows the PDP to contain three housing
types instead of four, and the PDP complies with the Standard that a single housing type
not constitute more than 80% or less than 5% of the total number of dwelling units.
d. The PDP complies with Section 4.5(D)(3), Neighborhood Centers, because a
neighborhood center is shown on the northwest corner of the ODP, within ¾ of a mile, as
measured by street frontage, of 100% of the total number of dwelling units.
e. The PDP complies with Section 4.5(D)(6), Small Neighborhood Parks, because the
ODP includes a future public neighborhood park of 8.1 acres, and at least 90% of the
dwellings are within 1/3 of a mile of the future public neighborhood park.
f. The PDP complies with Section 4.5(E)(1)(a), Streets and Blocks, Street System
Block Size, because: the PDP features a network of streets including the shifting of East
Vine Drive as an arterial road from the section line ¼ mile north, bisecting the property,
with no block exceeding 12 acres; and the shifting will allow the existing East Vine Drive
to be downgraded to a collector street.
4
2/11/2014
Q:\USERS\FORT COLLINS LAND USE\WATERFIELD\DECISION.DOC
g. The PDP complies with Section 4.5(E)(1)(b), Mid-Block Pedestrian Connections,
because Blocks 5, 7, 8 and 9 exceed 700' in length along the street frontage or block face,
and each of these blocks features a mid-block bicycle and pedestrian connection at
intervals that do not exceed 650'.
DECISION
Based on the foregoing findings, the Hearing Officer hereby enters the following rulings:
1. The PDP is approved as submitted.
DATED this 11
th
day of February, 2014.
_____________________________________
Kendra L. Carberry
Hearing Officer