HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATERFIELD THIRD FILING - FDP - FDP140006 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 -land planning landscape architecture urban design entitlement
February 19, 2014
Mr. Ted Shepard
City of Fort Collins
Planning Department
281 North College Avenue
Fort Collins, CO 80521
Dear Ted
Response to City comments for the Waterfield PDP Round 1. Please see the below response to comments and the
revised drawings. If you have any questions regarding these responses or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to contact us.
Stephanie Sigler, Ripley Design Inc. responses in red 970-224-5828
Bud Curtis/ Cody Snowden, Northern Engineering responses in blue 970-221-4158
Comment Summary:
Department: Current Planning
Contact: Ted Shepard, 970-221-6343, tshepard@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 01/09/2014
01/09/2014: The six-foot wide trail that loops around the wetlands should be specified to be
either concrete or a soft path featuring gravel or crusher fines. A highly used amenity would
call for concrete. A more naturalistic ambiance, however, would call for a soft surface. Staff
would support either and the choice is up to the developer depending on how the usage of this
trail is envisioned. Asphalt that is not contained within vertical concrete curbs will deteriorate
and become an undesirable surface and become a maintenance liability.
Response: The trail has been modified to Crusher Fines in order to preserve the more naturalistic ambiance.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 01/09/2014
01/09/2014: Be sure to label the 10-foot wide community trail as being concrete.
Response: The community trail is labeled as concrete.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 01/09/2014
01/09/2014: Please label the irrigation lateral in the northeast area (Barker Lateral) as being
re-located.
Response: The irrigation ditch lateral has been labeled as relocated, reference civil sheets.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 01/09/2014
01/09/2014: Please add a table that lists the Tracts and state the purpose of each Tract. Also,
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 2 of 14
please note that the Tract designations refer to the same designations as on the plat.
Response: A table has been added to sheet 3 of 7.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 01/13/2014
01/13/2014: For all pedestrian connections, please label each as "Pedestrian Connection" and
state the width and surface treatment. These connections should be concrete. If asphalt is
selected, then the edges need to be secured with concrete curbs.
Response: The labels have been added
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 01/13/2014
01/13/2014: On the Landscape Plan, in the legend, please add a symbol for Evergreen Trees.
Please note that at Final, additional Evergreen Trees will be needed in the buffer yards.
Response: The legend has been updated and evergreen trees have been added to the buffer yards.
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 01/13/2014
01/13/2014: On the plat, please provide a key map on pages 4 - 10.
Response: A key map has been added
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 01/13/2014
01/13/2014: On the plat, please match the Site Plan and refer to "New Vine" Drive (Final Name
to be Determined by City Council by Resolution.)
Response: The plat has been updated.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970-221-6603, agingerich@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
1/10/2014: This will be discussed further at Final Compliance. 11/26/2013: Will the project be
phased for construction? If so, how many and which portions will be phased?
Response: Please see the added phasing plan
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
1/10/2014: Per conversations with Cody and Ward Stanford the 3/4 turn at Cape Teal and New
Vine should be removed and only a right in right out. This should be shown on the site plan for
hearing along with showing the ultimate right in right out at Garganey and Timberline on the Site
plan. 11/26/2013: Please show the appropriate line work for the medians on New Vine and
Timberline for the right in/right out and 3/4 turn lanes.
Response: The plan has been updated
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
1/10/2014: Please contact me to discuss what we would like to have specifically shown on
these sheets. 11/26/2013: Sheet R1 - At final review we will need to see 4 Flowline profiles for
timberline and new vine that includes both median flowlines and both outer roadway flowlines.
Response: The plan has been updated
Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 11/27/2013
1/10/2014: At final compliance please look at the tie-in to existing for Mandarin to ensure it will
be able to intersect with Conifer as it crosses the Ditch. 11/27/2013: Sheet R19 - Dedicate right
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 3 of 14
of way for Mandarin all the way to Conifer Street right of way. The roadway may be phased and
only constructed to the cul de sac shown. However, do not build a formal cul de sac, construct
the roadway and rollover curb as a normal street, end with a barricade and provide temporary
turnaround outside of the rollover curb with temporary asphalt, road base, etc. The turnaround
area may be dedicated as an access easement instead of the right of way as shown.
Response: Acknowledged
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
1/10/2014: As discussed with Cody from Northern Engineering it would be helpful to be
provided with an exhibit or overall map showing what is intended to be vacated and what is
intended to remain as well as how the legals will be prepared to hopefully save time and
frustration. 11/26/2013: Right of Way may not be vacated by Plat. It will need to be vacated by
separate document and go through City Council approval which includes two readings after the
project has been approved through public hearing.
Response: The plan has been updated
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
1/10/2014: As discussed with Cody from Northern Engineering it would be hepful to be
provided with an exhibit or overall map showing what is intended to be vacated and what is
intended to remain as well as how the legals will be prepared to hopefully save time and
frustration. 11/26/2013: Some right of way that is existing should not be vacated and should
remain. The right of way on Merganser, Conifer and the portion of Turnberry between conifer
and New vine should remain. Per state statute it is very likely that most of the "Tract J" on the
plat will be given back to Bull Run once it has been vacated. We should discuss further how
this project will approach this vacation, if at all. We will not support vacating the portion until
Merganser is constructed and accepted. Perhaps the applicant would pursue a separate
agreement or quick deed to transfer this land for Tract J.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
1/10/2014: Per the applicant the additional right of way along the west side of timberline is to be
vacated by separate document after public hearing and will not affect the site plan significantly
and will only be increasing the area of Tract along Timberline. 11/26/2013: Timberline is a 4
lane arterial per our master street plan so 115' of right of way is required and it appears the plat
is dedicating right of way for a 6 lane arterial.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Lindsay Ex, 970-224-6143, lex@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/27/2013
01/07/2014: Please change "Environmental Engineer" to Environmental Planner.
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 4 of 14
11/27/2013: Please add the Environmental Planner signature to the Utility Plans.
Response: The plan has been updated
Topic: General
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/27/2013
01/07/2014: The applicants did an excellent job addressing this comment - thank you! Staff
concurs with the ECS recommendation to develop a long term management plan and weed
management plan. This can be addressed further at final plan.
Response: Acknowledged
11/27/2013: 11/27/2013: The ECS for the project indicates the total wetland is 8.46 acres and
0.18 acres are proposed to be developed through the project. The wetland is
non-jurisdictional, per the ACOE letter, and only City regulations apply to this wetland. The
applicants have proposed to mitigate the 0.18 acres of wetlands through upland enhancements.
I've reviewed the ECS and the proposed plans and do think that the ecological value lost from
the 0.18 acres of wetlands could be replaced through upland habitat enhancements, especially
as the hydrology data from 2013 (and observations since the early 2000s) indicate the large
wetland may be drying up.
However, the plans as they are currently proposed need to provide a much higher level of
buffering and vegetation enhancements to achieve the standards set forth in Section 3.4.1 of
the Land Use Code. I've tried to graphically depict the areas where I think additional
enhancements are necessary, but perhaps a meeting with the applicants, Cedar Creek
Associates, and myself would be beneficial? Let me know if that would work for you.
The ECS also needs to address the removal of the Russian olives and how that will be
mitigated for, in accordance with recent Land Use Code updates.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 11/27/2013
11/27/2013: Please note that fugitive dust requirements from Larimer County may apply.
Contact their Health Department for more information.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014
01/07/2014: Environmental Planning is ready for a hearing.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 01/08/2014
01/08/2014: Environmental Planning staff will also work with the applicants and Parks to see if
there are additional options for plantings on the proposed park to the west of the wetland.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: Forestry
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 5 of 14
Contact: Tim Buchanan, 970-221-6361, tbuchanan@fcgov.com
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 01/10/2014
01/10/2014:
Please show stop sign locations and provide at least 20 feet between street trees and stop
signs. Also avoid locating street trees very close to intersection corners. Provide some set
back from corners for visibility. Separation between trees and driveways should be 8 feet.
Response: Acknowledged. More information will be provided with future submittals.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 01/10/2014
01/10/2014:
Provide typical lot details that show street tree location in reference to utility separation
standards, stop signs, streetlights and driveways.
Response: Typical lot details have been added and more information will be provided with future submittals.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 01/10/2014
01/10/2014:
Please add this landscape note it does not already exist.
Minor Changes in species and plant locations may be made during construction as required by
site conditions or availability of material. Overall quality and design concept shall be consistent
with approved landscape plans. Any changes will be provided to the Landscape Architect and
City of Fort Collins for review and approval.
Response: Note has been added.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014
01/07/2014: Light & Power has a large major duct bank running along the North side of Vine Dr.
adjacent to this site along with a 3-phase duct line running along the West side of Timberline
Rd. There are also 3-phase electric facilities in Merganser Dr. that were installed in an earlier
filing. Note that some of these facilities also serve the Bull Run Townhomes. Light & Power
does have a small portion of overhead running along the East side of Timberline with the rest of
the overhead in the area believed to be Poudre Valley REA.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014
01/07/2014: The plans are showing existing electric facilities. Have these been field located?
Some of the facilities don't seem to be in the right locations. Please have the electric facilities
field verified and shown on the plans.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014
01/07/2014: The plans show relocating several electric vaults. Just an fyi, sometimes it's
difficult to move these vaults without damaging them and most of the time the cable has to be
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 6 of 14
removed and new cable pulled in. Therefore in some areas it maybe more cost effective to
install new system and abandon some of the existing electric facilities. Just a fyi.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014
01/07/2014: Any relocation or modification to existing electric facilities will be at the developers
expense.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014
01/07/2014: Developer will be responsible for Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges and
any system modification charges where applicable.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014
01/07/2014: Water services are not shown on the utility plans. Will these be stubbed near the
lot line? If so, this can cause utility conflicts with vaults, streetlights and electric services. Light
& Power would prefer the water services NOT be installed near the lot line.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 01/07/2014
01/07/2014: Any commercial services for pumps, clubhouses, irrigation, etc. will require a C-1
Form and One-line diagram be submitted.
Contact Light & Power Engineering @ 970-221-6700 with any questions.
Response: Acknowledged
Department: PFA
Contact: Jim Lynxwiler, 970-416-2869, jlynxwiler@poudre-fire.org
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: PRIOR COMMENTS
All prior PFA comments have been addressed to this point.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: GARGANEY DRIVE TRAVEL WIDTHS
The proposed 14' travel lanes for Garganey Drive (on either side of median) may pose a
problem for emergency vehicle access. If parking is to be allowed on Garganey, then the net
available road width is insufficient to allow for fire apparatus movement and operations. Further
review and discussion is needed.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 7 of 14
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/19/2013
12/31/2013: Erosion Control Plan was reviewed since it was present. The plan lacked 1)
Sequence Chart 2) Phases for building such a large property. 117 Acres 3) addressing the
steep slopes and high velocity water ditches with adequate BMPs. The plan also had a number
of issues with the 1) Detail Sheets and 2) cluttered plans. Also a side note, the wetlands might
need a 404 permit. This should be determined sooner than later. For the FDP please submit
changes to the plans, escrow and report. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if
there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @
jschlam@fcgov.com
Response: Acknowledged. The wetlands do not need a 404 permit as they are not jurisdictional. A phasing plan has been
submitted.
11/19/2013: The site disturbs more than 10,000 sq-ft, therefore Erosion and Sediment Control
Materials need to be submitted for FDP. The erosion control requirements are in the
Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3.
Current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet requirements. Please submit;
Erosion Control Plan, Erosion Control Report, and an Escrow / Security Calculation. If you need
clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam
970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com
Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
01/10/2014: Per the meeting on 1/9/14, the PDP is ready for a public hearing. Please email a
pdf of the LID revisions labeled on the drainage plan for our file prior to hearing.
Response: Acknowledged
11/26/2013: Please quantify how the site is meeting the LID requirements. List LID measures
that are being proposed for the various sub-basins and preliminarily calculate the volume
required and where these measures will be located.
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/29/2013
11/29/2013: There is a "R" missing from sheets R20-R22 in the sheet index. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/29/2013
11/29/2013: Please change the benchmarks shown on sheet CS2 to Fort Collins benchmarks.
The benchmarks on sheets CS1 & CS2 should match. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/29/2013
11/29/2013: There are line over text issues on several sheets. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 8 of 14
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/29/2013
11/29/2013: Please change all "Vine Drive" for the proposed realignment to "New Vine" Drive
(Final Name To Be Determined By City Council By Resolution). See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/29/2013
11/29/2013: There are text over text issues on several sheets. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 12/02/2013
12/02/2013: There is text on several sheets that needs to be rotated 180 degrees. See
redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 12/02/2013
12/02/2013: There is cut off text on sheet R16. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 12/02/2013
12/02/2013: Please increase the size of the marked text on the cross sections. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 12/02/2013
01/13/2014: There is a line over text issue on sheet 7. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been revised.
12/02/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 3, 4 & 5. There are many more issues
than what is marked. Removing the contours would clean these sheets up a lot. See redlines.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please remove "P.U.D." from the title on all sheets.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please add "A Portion Of" to the sub-title on all sheets. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please add "except the south xx' of the East Vine Drive right of way" to the legal
description. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 9 of 14
12/04/2013: Please revise the legal description. See sheet 3.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: The boundary & legal description close.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please check the next to last call in the boundary. The legal description & plat do
not match for the distance. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please provide current acceptable monument records for the aliqout corners
shown on the Plat.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: If you are vacating Boxelder's easement (Reception #98090191), an
acknowledgement and signature from them will be necessary.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: If you are vacating Poudre School District's drainage easement (Reception
#98094713), an acknowledgement and signature from them will be necessary.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please update the title commitment information as appropriate.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 23 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please add a note for the ownership, maintenance and proposed usage ( i.e.
easements) for all Tracts & Outlots.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Conifer Street should remain. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Is the easement(as drawn in on sheet 3) dedicated by Waterfield P.U.D. Second
Filing being vacated by this Plat? See redlines.
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 10 of 14
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Waterfield P.U.D. Second Filing shows a Public Service Co. easement. Is it to be
vacated ? If so please show it on sheet 3 and provide an acknowledgement block for PSCO. If
not, show it on sheets 4 & 5.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please adjust the outer boundary shown along Vine Drive on sheet 3. See
redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Rights of way shown on sheet 3 as being vacated by the Plat, must be vacated by
City Council action.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please change all "Vine Drive" for the proposed realignment to "New Vine" Drive
(Final Name To Be Determined By City Council By Resolution). See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please change "Outlot A" to "Outlot B" on sheet 3. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Outer boundary bearings & distances would be helpful as an overview on sheet 3,
along with ties to section corners & section lines. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please add a key map to sheets 4-10.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please show the sidelines on all easements. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: All easements must be dimensioned and locatable. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 11 of 14
12/04/2013: Please add marks for all point of tangency. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please add bearings & distances to all lot lines. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 37 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: All existing streets must show dedication information.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 38 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Street names need to be shown on all sheets. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please label all surrounding subdivisions. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please label & describe the aliqout corners. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 41 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Is there non continuity in the curves on sheet 6? See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 42 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 43 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: The outer boundary distance along Timberline Road does not match the Waterfield
P.U.D. First Filing. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 44 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please label the line marked running parallel to Timberline Road on sheets 7 & 9.
See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 45 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: All centerlines must have bearings & distances and/or curve data.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 46 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: All street & alley rights of way must show the width.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 12 of 14
Comment Number: 47 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please show the record distance at the east end of Outlot A on sheet 9. See
redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 48 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please switch the bearings and distances marked on sheet 9. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 49 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please show the east right of way line of Timberline Road on sheets 7 & 9. See
redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 50 Comment Originated: 12/04/2013
12/04/2013: Please show Conifer Street across Outlot A on sheet 10. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 12/02/2013
01/13/2014: There are still issues on sheets 2 & 3. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been revised.
12/02/2013: There are line over text issues on sheet 2. See redlines.
Comment Number: 51 Comment Originated: 01/13/2014
01/13/2014: Please match the titles between the index and sheet 7. See redlines.
Response: Plans have been revised.
Comment Number: 52 Comment Originated: 01/13/2014
01/13/2014: Please mask all text within hatching on sheets 2 & 3. See redlines.
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Ward Stanford, 970-221-6820, wstanford@fcgov.com
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
01/08/2014: Comment continued for reference. Change can be made at FDP stage.
Response: Plans have been updated.
11/26/2013: New Vine Drive and also New Timberline Drive P&P sheets: Please design the
median noses to conform to LCUASS Standard Drawing 801. Can be done at FDP.
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
01/08/2014: Continued for reference.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 13 of 14
11/26/2013: No Signing and Striping Plans. Ok to provide at FDP stage.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 01/08/2014
01/08/2014: City is unable to allow the 3/4 movement on New Vine at Cape Teal. The
eastbound left at Merganser requires most of the space between Merganser and Cape Teal.
Inadequate space remains for a westbound left at Cape Teal. City is acceptable with it as a
Ri/Ro access. Needs to be revised before Hearing.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 01/08/2014
01/08/2014: Please revise the Eb & Wb left turn lane designs on new Vine @ Merganser, the
EbL @ Existing Timberline (interim) and the NbL on existing Timberline @ new Vine per the
emailed details. Call Ward Stanford (970-221-6820) with any questions or concerns. Can be
done at FDP.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Eric Garner, ,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: Sheet EX2: Existing District infrastructure is incorrectly labeled. The existing BSD
sanitary sewer is 10-inch diameter (10¿) , not 8-inch diameter (8¿)
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: Sheet EX2: Label existing District manholes using District labels. Beginning at
northernmost manhole (PDI 0820), and decline in increments of ten (10) to the final southwest
manhole located north of Vine Drive (PDI 0750). Please let me know if clarification is needed.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: Sheet DE3: The existing District sanitary sewer crossing Vine Drive is 16-inch
diameter, not 12-inch diameter shown.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: Sheet OU1: Coordinate callouts of existing District sanitary sewers with previous
comments; 10-inch and 12-inch. Sheet OU1 indicates 8-inch, 10-inch, and 15-inch.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: The District has more than adequate treatment plant capacity to service the
property referenced above. Any written agreements required to complete sanitary sewer
Waterfield
ODP Comment Responses
Page 14 of 14
connections to the property will be completed subsequent to the land approval process.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: The District is a participant in the region’s 208 Water Quality Planning Association.
The District is in full compliance with applicable federal and state water quality requirements.
Response: Acknowledged
Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 11/26/2013
11/26/2013: If there are questions, please contact me at 970-498-0604. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Eric Garner, P.E.
District Engineer
Response: Acknowledged
Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 11/27/2013
11/27/2013: Water service in this area is provided by the ELCO Water District. Revise the
drawings and notes on Shts OU1 and U1 to indicate connection to the ELCO main in the vicinity
of the cul-de-sac on Mandarin Drive.
Response: Plans have been updated.
Department: Zoning
Contact: Ali van Deutekom, 970-416-2743, avandeutekom,@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 11/27/2013
11/27/2013: No comments
Response: Acknowledged