Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHICKORY COMMONS - FDP - FDP130014 - CORRESPONDENCE - REVISIONS1 Response to comments January 15, 2014 Department: Current Planning Contact: Courtney Levingston, 970-416-2283, clevingston@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/10/2013 07/10/2013: On sheet 1 of 10, the date on both signature blocks say 2012, please change to 2013 before going to mylar. Response: We have made this change, see revised sheet. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Andrew Gingerich, 970-221-6603, agingerich@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/17/2013: Thank you for providing the NWCWD pipe in the profile of the Hemlock Storm Sewer. As mentioned previously please provide a NWCWD signature block and an appropriate crossing details or information required by the district. 05/28/2013: Sheet C6 - The plans callout a 42" North Weld County Water District Ductile Iron Pipe that crosses the proposed storm sewer. Please contact NWCWD to discuss there crossing requirements, signature block, pipe clearance, etc. The pipe needs to be shown in the profile. Response: We have discussed this with NWCWD, and have revised the plans based on their comments. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/17/2013: Cover still appears to be inadequate over the proposed storm sewer in the existing and future conditions specifically near the manhole for the outfall of the project. 05/28/2013: Sheet C6 - The storm profile appears to show inadequate cover over the storm pipe. Please include the proposed grade along Hemlock street in this profile and ensure that a minimum of 36" of clearance will be met in the ultimate condition. Response: The profiles have been adjusted to provide additional cover. Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 05/28/2013: The natural area easements have been paid for but will need to be recorded when the project is reaching final mylar. Response: We look forward to the recording of these easements. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: The following comments was made at PDP regarding the local street payment in lieu for Hemlock Street. Currently we are using an amount of $204/l.f. of frontage to cover local street obligations. I have copied it to the FDP comments as a reminder for the development agreement. 4/17/2012: Still Applicable; Hemlock has been preliminarily designed as a part of this submittal, however a local street portion estimate will still need to be prepared by the City for the future frontage improvements and that amount will need to be provided in a Bond, LOC, or Cash. 4/12/2011: As 2 mentioned in Conceptual Review, this project is responsible for improving the frontages of both Hickory and Hemlock. Currently, there are no plans to improve Hemlock Street and due to its existing condition; the City will not require any frontage improvements at this time. However, this project will still be required to preliminarily design Hemlock Street along its frontage as well as 500 feet offsite in either direction. Also, a local street portion estimate will be prepared by the City for the future frontage improvements, and that amount will need to be provided in a Bond, LOC, or Cash. Response: We look forward to working out the details of the development agreement. Department: Internal Services Contact: Todd Reidenbach, Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/09/2013 07/09/2013: Projects with three or more tenant units require the Unit Level Addressing form to be completed and submitted to the GIS Department once plans have met final approval through Development Review and are recorded with the City. This can occur anytime during construction, but before any utilities are set within the structure to ensure the meter banks match the official addressing for the structure. The Unit Level Addressing form can be obtained by contacting the GIS office at gis@fcgov.com or (970) 416-2483. Address numbers and their distribution will be determined by the GIS Department. Response: I filled out this form and submitted it directly to Todd Reidenbach on 12/11/2013. Department: Light And Power Contact: Doug Martine, 970-224-6152, dmartine@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/09/2013 05/09/2013: In order to confirm that the electric utility plan will be viable, and to determine the electric development charges, Light & Power Engineering will need specifics concerning the electric service to the commercial/industrial component. Light & Power Engineering can be reached at (970)221-6700. Response: The contractor will coordinate directly with Doug Martine with the specifics of the electrical demands for the commercial/industrial components of the buildings, when we know the power needs of our end users at the time of building permit. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/09/2013 05/09/2013: Upon final approval, please send an AutoCad drawing of the utility plan to Terry Cox at TCOX@FCGOV.COM. Response: Will do. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, jschlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 07/18/20 07/18/2013: The erosion control requirements are in the Stormwater Design Criteria under the Amendments of Volume 3 Chapter 7 Section 1.3.3. The current Erosion Control Materials Submitted does not meet these requirements. The Erosion Control Report was not included or submitted with this packet. See redlines for corrections in the Erosion Control Plan. Every BMP called out for on the plan 3 should have a detail to match it, this is not the case with the Detention Basin's Outlet structure where an area inlet BMP was called out for the outlet structure. The plan also lacked Intlet protection on the Storm sewer going through the parking lot. The site will also have to supply Erosion Control Escrow Calculations. If you need clarification concerning this section, or if there are any questions please contact Jesse Schlam 970-218-2932 or email @ jschlam@fcgov.com Response: The inlet protection devices are all shown as gravel filters, and the escrow calculations have been added to the Drainage Report. Topic: Erosion Control Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamarque@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 07/18/2013 07/18/2013: Please provide an electronic copy of the drainage report to review the water quality calculations. Response: Provided with this submittal. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/12/2013: This has not been corrected. 05/28/2013: Please mask the text shown in hatched areas. See redlines. Response: See revised MTA sheets 1 through 10 of 10. The requested revisions have been incorporated. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/12/2013: This has not been corrected. Please increase the text size on sheets 6 & 7. See redlines. 05/28/2013: Please increase the text size on sheet 7. See redlines. Response: See revised MTA sheets 1 through 10 of 10. The requested revisions have been incorporated. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/12/2013: This has not been corrected. 05/28/2013: There are line over text issues on sheets 7, 8 & 9. See redlines. Response: See revised MTA sheets 1 through 10 of 10. The requested revisions have been incorporated. Topic: Plat Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 07/12/2013 07/12/2013: The reception numbers for the easements by separate document, will need to be added prior to mylar. Response: These easements are in the process of being recorded. They should be done prior to us printing mylars, and we will ensure that we include those reception numbers on that plat mylar. 4 Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 05/29/2013 07/12/2013: By plan readable we mean, reading text from the bottom and/or right side of the sheet. This is standard drafting practice. All of the other sheets by your company have been plan readable. 05/29/2013: Please rotate the text 180 degrees on sheet 2, so that it is plan readable. See redlines. Response: Please see the revised sheet 2. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/02/2013 07/02/2013: Please add the following notes to the irrigation plan: 11. A master shut-off valve shall be installed downstream of the backflow device to shut off water to the system when not operating. 12. Irrigation controllers shall be "smart" controllers, using climate-based or soil moisture-based technology, selected from the Irrigation Association's current Smart Water Application Technologies (SWAT) tested products list or other similarly tested product list. Controllers shall be installed and programmed according to manufacturer's specifications. 13. A rain sensor shall be installed on each irrigation controller and installed according to the manufacturer's specifications. 10. Remote control valves shall have flow control Response: We have included these notes in the revised landscape plan. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/11/2013 07/11/2013: A working rain sensor located in an area to receive weather from all directions is still required. The requirements of a sprinkler audit will not be necessary, although as “as-built” is still required. Response: We have included this item in the revised landscape plan. Department: Water-Wastewater Engineering Contact: Roger Buffington, 970-221-6854, rbuffington@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/16/2013: Label all tees on fires lines. Call out and show thrust blocks at fire line tees. Increase the size of the valve symbols on the fire lines. 05/28/2013: Show/label all fittings and valves on the water mains and services. Response: The valve symbols have been increased in size and the tees/thrust blocks are shown and labeled. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/16/2013: Revise the insulation spec to require a material suitable for underground applications. Call out by manufacturer's material number and compressive strength. Provide the design calc's for the insulation thickness and width. 05/28/2013: All sanitary sewer with less than 4 feet of cover must be insulated. Show insulation in the plan & profile. Provide a detail showing the placement of the insulation. Include a 5 specification for the insulation suitable for underground applications. Provide the design showing the thickness and width of the insulation. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/16/2013: Show sewer service crossings. Is there a conflict between storm drain and sewer service to Bldg 5? 05/28/2013: Show all water & sanitary crossings on the storm profiles. Response: The crossings have been added. This crossing, while tight, is adequate. Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 05/28/2013 07/16/2013: It appears that this line may be in conflict with the sanitary sewer. 05/28/2013: Where is the profile for the storm extending east from Inlet 1? Response: The crossings have been added. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 07/16/2013 07/16/2013: See redlined utility plans for other comments. Response: The plans have been revised to address those comments. Department: Zoning Contact: Peter Barnes, 970-416-2355, pbarnes@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/09/2013 05/09/2013: no comments Response: Great, thanks.