Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMAX FLATS - PDP - PDP120034 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - MODIFICATION REQUESTFebruary 20, 2013 Administrative Hearing Officer c/o City of Fort Collins Current Planning Department 281 North College Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80524 Re: MAX Flats Project Development Plan Please accept this request for a Modification of Standards to Section 3.2.2(J) of the Land Use Code. Background The MAX Flats PDP is located at 203 West Mulberry. The .70-acre lot is currently being used as a small auto dealership. The site will be redeveloped into an L-shaped building to be oriented to the corner of Mulberry and Mason Streets. The mixed use building will be 5 stories in height, with 64 dwelling units and approximately 1,500 sq. ft. of retail space propsed on the ground floor. Overall net density of the project is 91.4 dwelling units per acre. The project will provide 64 off- street spaces, located at the rear of the building and partially tucked under a parking structure. The site is in the C-C zoning district as well as within the TOD Overlay district. The Mulberry Station for the MAX BRT stop is located on the east side of the building. This modification requested is in accordance with the review procedures set forth in Section 2.8.2(H) of the Land Use Code as follows: Modification to section 3.2.2(J) Code Language: Section 3.2.2(J) Setbacks. Any vehicular use area containing six (6) or more parking spaces or one thousand eight hundred (1,800) or more square feet shall be set back from the street right-of-way and the side and rear yard lot line (except a lot line between buildings or uses with collective parking) consistent with the provisions of this Section, according to the following table: Minimum average of entire landscaped setback area (feet) Minimum width of setback at any point (feet) Along an arterial street 15 5 Along a nonarterial street 10 5 Along a lot line 5 5 MAX FlatsPDP Parking Setback Modification of Standards 2-20-13 Requested Modification: The property is in the TOD Overlay zone district, which does not require parking for the residential units. The MAX Flats project is providing 64 off-street parking spaces. 27 are standard (9’ x 19’) spaces and 37 are compact (8’ x 15’) spaces. Due to unique challenges with the 100’ wide site, there is scarcely sufficient room for the required drive aisle widths, parking stall depths and the parking structure. Because of these factors, the landscape area along the west property line ranges from 3.6’ to 4.7’ wide, with an everage of 4.15 feet. Given the above, we respectfully request that the MAX Flats PDP project be allowed to have an average setback of 4.15 feet instead of 5 feet along the west property line. Justification We feel that the granting of this modification of standards would not be detrimental to the public good, and the plan as submitted will not diverge from the standards of the Land Use Code that are authorized by this Division to be modified except in a nominal, inconsequential way when considered from the perspective of the entire development plan, and will continue to advance the purposes of the Land Use Code as contained in Section 1.2.2 for the following reasons:  The intent of the required 5’ vehicular use area setback is to provide sufficient space for visual screening and to enhance the appearance of the vehicle use area, The 4.7 feet of landscape area, in combination with a 6’ privacy fence, will provide a softened edge of landscape interior to the pakring area while mitigating the visual impact to the property to the west.  The modification is minor, when considered from the perspective of the entire development plan, which is in compliance with all applicable building design standards in terms of enhanced architecture, building articulation and quality materials.  The width of the landscape area in the proposed alternative plan is short, on average, by 8/10ths of a foot.  The parking plan as modified permits a development plan that accommodates off-street parking. While not required, the off-street spaces provided help reduce on-street parking demand, thus providing a benefit to the surrounding neighborhood.  We feel that the proposed alternative plan ensures sensitivity to the surrounding neighborhood by building an attractive, desirable product that the community can be proud of. Although not strictly a criteria for justification, the consruction of the project would be a benefit to the neighborhood. The resulting project enhances the established character of the neighborhood with an intensity of use that is consistent with the purpose statement of the C-C zone district which “provides a combination of retail, offices, services, cultural facilities, civic uses and higher density housing. Multi-story buildings are encouraged to provide a mix of residential and nonresidential uses. Offices and dwellings are encouraged to locate above ground-floor retail and services.” We look forward to working with you during this process and will be happy to answer any questions you may have.