HomeMy WebLinkAboutFORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP- TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS - 08/07 A - CORRESPONDENCE -Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
PDP - Final Compliance
Request for development of a 3 Story 23 unit Affordable Multi-Family Dwelling Apartment Building on 1.96 acres, for exclusive use by low income
persons with physical disabilities. Located South of E Harmony Road between S College and Hogan Drive at the NW corner of Venturi Lane. Zoned
HC-Harmony Corridor.
(project recorded as Fairway Estates Replat)
Project Type:
Project Desc:
File ID: 08-07/A Planner: Ted Shepard DMS Project Num: CP071969
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
1 Electric Utility [3/2/07] The nearest electric power system is at the S.E. corner of Harmony
& College. The developer may need to provide off-site easements from
College Ave. if adequate R-O-W and easement doesn't already exist.
Resolved 1 Doug Martine 03/02/2007
2 Electric Utility [3/2/07] The developer will need to coordinate the electrical power
requirements with Light & Power Engineering (221-6700).
Resolved 1 Doug Martine 03/02/2007
3 Traffic [3/5/07] No issues Active 1 Eric Bracke 03/05/2007
4 Fire [3/6/07] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS: This proposed building shall be fire
sprinklered.
Active 1 Carie Dann 03/06/2007
5 Fire [3/6/07] WATER SUPPLY: Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type
approved by the water district having jurisdiction and the Fire Department.
Hydrant spacing and water flow must meet minimum requirements based on
type of occupancy. Minimum flow and spacing requirements include:
Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further than
300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter; residential within
Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not
further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter; residential
outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not
further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers thereafter.
These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic
fire sprinkler systems.
97UFC 901.2.2.2
Active 1 Carie Dann 03/06/2007
6 Fire [3/6/07] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire
sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations
can support a smaller fire line.
Active 1 Carie Dann 03/06/2007
3/7/2011 Page 1
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
7 Fire [3/6/07] FIRE ALARM REQUIREMENTS: A fire alarm system is required for
this project.
Active 1 Carie Dann 03/06/2007
8 Fire [3/6/07] FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION: Fire department connections
shall be installed remote from the buildings, and located on the street or fire
lane side of buildings, fully visible and recognizable from the street or nearest
point of fire department vehicle access or as otherwise approved by the fire
code official. 2006 International Fire Code 912.2.1 and PFA Bureau Policy
Active 1 Carie Dann 03/06/2007
9 Fire [3/6/07] KNOX BOX REQUIRED: Poudre Fire Authority requires a Knox
Box to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a
required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 97UFC 902.4; PFA
BUREAU POLICY 88-20
Active 1 Carie Dann 03/06/2007
10 Fire [3/6/07] ADDRESS NUMERALS: Address numerals shall be visible from the
street fronting the property, and posted with a minimum of six-inch (6)
numerals on a contrasting background. (Bronze numerals on brown brick are
not acceptable).97UFC 901.4.4
Active 1 Carie Dann 03/06/2007
11 Fire [3/6/07] REQUIRED ACCESS
A fire lane is required. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage,
and maintained unobstructed at all times. A fire lane plan shall be submitted
for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already
contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the
following general requirements:
Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or
concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road
base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites.
Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and
enforceable.
Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement.
Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of
the fire lane (for buildings three or more stories in height, minimum width of
30 feet along at least one long side of the structure).
If a fire lane cannot be provided, the building shall be fire sprinklered.
97UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1
Active 1 Carie Dann 03/06/2007
12 Fire [3/13/07] Please add a bicycle rack for employees who mayb choose to ride a
bicycle to work.
Active 1 David Averill 03/13/2007
3/7/2011 Page 2
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
13 Fire [3/13/07] Add a type III barricade at thewestern terminus of the sidewalk on
the Harmony frontage.
Active 1 David Averill 03/13/2007
14 Fire [3/13/07] The alternative modes analysis in the TIS is acceptable. Active 1 David Averill 03/13/2007
15 General [3/13/07] The access ramp on the west side of the driveway needs to be
moved south to the back of right-of-way. The access ramps on both sides of
the driveway should then be designed to direct pedestrian at a diagonal
across the driveway, meeting ADA requirements.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
16 Plat [3/13/07] The right-of-way across the driveway should not jog 12' but should
transition across at a diagonal.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
17 Construction Plans [3/13/07] Driveways are required to be concrete in right-of-way. In
conjunction with the previous comment, concrete should be used up to
right-of-way which should transition (not jog) across the driveway.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
18 Construction Plans [3/13/07] On the horizontal control plan, please indicate (name) property
owners offsite on all sheets. (Is all the right-of-way required offsite to the
west on Sheet C1.21 under one property owner?)
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
19 Construction Plans [3/13/07] On the paving plan and demo sheets, please use a smooth
(non-jagged edge) for the sawcut edge to accurately define the limits. For the
paving plan, please include the existing striping along Harmony Road to
ascertain how the proposed street patching coincides with the lane
alignments along Harmony Road. In addition, add this note to the plan set:
"Limits of street repair are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in
the field by the City Engineering Inspector at the time the street cuts are
made. All repairs are to be done to City standards."
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
20 Construction Plans [5/2/07] A note was added regarding the pavement design for Harmony
Road to be done prior to demo of Harmony Road. This will likely not be the
case. The pavement design report should be noted as being conducted and
approved by the City during the time of construction.
[3/13/07] I assume both of the asphalt paving sections on sheet C1.41are on
private property. ("Drive Lane" is not for Harmony Road?) Please add
"(private on-site areas only)" to the end of the drive lane and parking
designations.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
3/7/2011 Page 3
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
21 Construction Plans [5/4/07] The revised plans along with the revised PDF information provided
by the engineer has resolved this issue. Please ensure that the revised PDF
information is reflected on the plan set. In addition, please correct some
clarity concerns with information being cut off between matchlines. Finally,
please add a note on the grading plan indicating that the existing median on
Harmony has a spill curb with a 1" drop over 1' (in case others in the future
may want to calculate cross-slope grades).
[3/13/07] The grading plan information on Harmony Road indicates cross
slope and flowline grades along Harmony Road that are not to standards
(4.89% cross slope, .49% flowline grade -- both are not to standards). This
will need to be addressed prior to a hearing. In addition, additional
information should be provided prior to hearing to show existing grades at
either side of the flowline of the proposed Harmony Road improvements. In
addition, existing cross slope information should be provided along Harmony
Road with lane configurations illustrated. The additional information will help
in evidence that drainage and rideability are maintained. At the time of final
submittal, additional information such as cross slopes and a flowline profile of
Harmony Road should then be provided.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
22 General [5/2/07] Have the letters of intent been received from all properties?
[3/13/07] Letters of intent are required from all offsite property owners
affected by the offsite sidewalk and/or right turn lane.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
23 Plat [3/13/07] The 15 access easement along Harmony Road behind the
right-of-way should also be a utility easement.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
24 General [3/13/07] Has a tree survey been conducted with the City Forrestor? Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
25 Construction Plans [3/13/07] On Sheet C2.00 is the median along Harmony Road not "turned
on" as was done with C2.01, or is it "off the page"? If off the page, can the
drawing be shifted to the south to povide enough space to show this
information?
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/13/2007
3/7/2011 Page 4
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
26 General [5/2/07] The response letter indicated that the applicant understands an
administrative approval for the right turn lane not meeting length criteria. This
is correct. This approval is done via the applicant's engineer preparing a
variance request as outline in our street construction standards. A variance
request needs to be submitted, again it is not viewed as a concern with
regards to the approval, provided the engineer adequately addresses our
variance criteria.
[3/14/07] A variance request is required for the right turn lane length falling
short of criteria. It is not anticipated though that there will be a concern in
granting it in discussion with the Traffic Engineer.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/14/2007
27 General [5/2/07] Please label the horizontal control plan sheets also as signing and
striping plans. There appears to be signage required which isn't shown on
the sheets.
[3/14/07] Provide a striping plan to show the right turn lane configuration in
conjunction with the existing travel and bike lanes.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/14/2007
28 Zoning [3/14/07] Modification required for parking. 36 spaces required; 24 shown. Resolved 1 Gary Lopez 03/14/2007
29 Zoning [3/14/07] Show bldg dimensions and distance to nearest property lines. Resolved 1 Gary Lopez 03/14/2007
30 Zoning [3/14/07] Indicate that no CO/TCO will be issued without landscape
completion or financial security in the amout of 125% of uncompleted
landscaping costs.
Resolved 1 Gary Lopez 03/14/2007
31 Site Plan [3/14/07] The 100' buffer has to be shown on the Site Plan and the
Landscape Plan. The top of the embankment as delineated by a qualified
ecologist needs to established and shown o nthe plan. The extent of the
buffer will also be shwon.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/14/2007
32 General [3/14/07] A Limits of Development (LOD) will be established and shown on
all plans - Site, Landscape and Utility plans.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/14/2007
33 General [4/30/07] Tim Buchanan has visited the site. His comments will need to
integrated into the plans.
[3/14/07] There are several trees on or adjacent to the site that need to be
evaluated by Tim Buchanan,C ity Forester. If required, mitigation for trees
deemed to be significant exisiting trees will be necessary.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/14/2007
3/7/2011 Page 5
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
34 General [3/14/07] Canopy street treesform the approved City Street Tree list need to
be used along Harmony in place of the ornamentals shown on the plan.
Additional landscape notes are needed. Contact Tim Buchanan, City Foreter
to get the required notes to place on the landscape plan
Active 1 Tim Buchanan 03/14/2007
36 Landscape Plan [4/30/07] Submittd plans - Sitre and Landscape, still show the detention pond
grading within the drip edge of existing trees.
[3/15/07] Refers to Grading Plan also. Grading for the water quality pond
extends up to the eastern property line, enchroaching inot thedrip edge of
several existing trees on the neighboring property. Refer to Section 3.2.1(F)
(G) of the LUC for the protection of significant existing trees. Contact Tim
Buchana, City Forester for an evaluation of theexisting trees.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
37 Landscape Plan [4/30/07] Needs to be added to the Landscape Plan with notes.
[3/15/07] Show the erosion cotrol matting on the Landscape Plan. Note
methods for installation and restoration on this plan.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
38 Landscape Plan [3/15/07] the signle row of Dwarf Cranberry along the edge of the parking lot
is insufficient to effectively detert people from using the open space and
walking down the property through the buffer to the creek.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
39 Landscape Plan [5/2/07] The site X-section has been reviewed. Additional plantings in
informal groupings across the site are needed to mitigate views per the LUC
as noted below.
[3/15/07] This project has to comply with Section 3.4.1(E)(1)(e). Of major
concern is the view into the sight from both sides of Mail Creek. Provide a
section through the site from the creek through the building. Mitigating the
bulk if the building , parking and site lighting have to be addressed.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
40 Photometric Plan
[4/30/07] While the photometric plan demonstrates that it meets the code,
the issue is the ability to see the fixture from the area around Mail Creek, on
and off the property.
[3/15/07] Current location/alignment of light fixtures in parking lots needs to
be reconfigured to mimize spill over lighting. Back shields will be needed to
minimize spill over lighting into the buffer area and from the area around Mail
Creek, per Section 3.4.1(E)(1)(e).
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
3/7/2011 Page 6
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
41 Landscape Plan [4/30/07] The landcape material on the south edge of the drive lane is not the
type of screening to be used next to the buffer. A monoculture plant grouping
is undesireable. A mix of plant materials, deciduous and evergreen plants
are needed in this area. This ties into the comment regarding the site
x-section. The buffer standards in 3.4.1E)(1) have not been adequately
addressed. Per 3.4.1(E)(1)(a) states "The project shall be designed to
preserve or enhance the ecological character or functioon and wildlife use of
the natural habitat or feature and to minimize or adequately mitigate the
foreseeable impacts of development. For this project, additional plants are
needed to screen the development activites from the natural habitat/feature.
[3/15/07] Additional plantings are needed within the buffer to maintain and
improve the quality of the buffer area. Native species are to be used within
the buffer zone. Per an earlier comment about the use of Dwarf Cranberry as
a barrier plant, using additional plantings adjacent to the parking lot in the
form of native species will help to deter people from actively using the buffer.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
42 Utility Plans [4/30/07] Show the LOD as a black line not a grey scale line. LOD is a
proposed condition, not an existing one.
[3/15/07] Add theLOD to the Demolition, Grading, Utility and Drainage
Control plans.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
43 Utility Plans [3/15/07] Add tree protection notes, Section 3.2.1(G) of the LUC to the
Demolition and Landscape Plan.
Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
44 Utility Plans [3/15/07] Add the existing vegetation to the grading plans. Resolved 1 Dana Leavitt 03/15/2007
45 Stormwater [8/2/07]
[6/22/07] Reminder Comment-Needed before signature of mylars.
[5/1/07] Repeat Comment.
[3/15/07] The outfall for the detention pond is not entirely on site. An offsite
drainage easement is required for the outfall from the property line to the
normal water service elevation of Mail Creek. Coordination needs to take
place between the offsite property owner, Stormwater department, and the
Environmental Planner regarding erosion protection and wildlife buffer
concerns.
Active 1 Wes Lamarque 03/15/2007
3/7/2011 Page 7
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
47 General [3/16/07] As a heads-up, the City is undergoing a design effort to widen
Harmony Road. This won't affect the development project per se, just that
the City may need to incorporate the designed right turn lane into their design
of their overall project.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/16/2007
48 Construction Plans [3/16/07] Please specify a type III barricade at the termination of the sidewalk
heading west of the site.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/16/2007
49 Plat [5/2/07] This does not appear to have been addressed as the area is
indicated as emergency access easement not access and emergency access
easement.
[3/16/07] Please ensure that an access easement is provided on the plat to
the western boundary of the site out to Harmony in order to facilitate
connectivity to the west.
Resolved 1 Marc Virata 03/16/2007
50 Electric Utility [6/7/07]
[4/24/07] The developer will need to provide a completed Commercial
Service (C-1) form specifying electric load requirements to Light & Power
Engineering. This form is available at Light & Power Engineering (221-6700).
It is my understanding that an elevator will be installed. For that reason, the
use of 3 phase power is strongly encouraged.
Active 2 Doug Martine 04/24/2007
51 Construction Plans [5/2/07] Please ensure a second project benchmark is indicated on the plan
set.
Resolved 2 Marc Virata 05/02/2007
52 General [5/2/07] On all documents, but especially the construction plans, please
ensure that the revision lists on the revision block is removed.
Resolved 2 Marc Virata 05/02/2007
53 General [5/2/07] The titles of the project varies across the planning, engineering and
surveying documents. Please coordinate to have one consistent title across
all documents.
Resolved 2 Marc Virata 05/02/2007
54 Fire [5/2/07] FIRE LINE: PFA minimum size requirement for the sprinkler line (fire
line) is 6 inches in diameter, UNLESS hydraulic calculations show a smaller
line can adequately support fire-flow needs. Your plans show a 4-inch fire
line. Please either provide hydraulic calculations that justify the 4-inch line or
supply a 6-inch line.
Resolved 2 Carie Dann 05/02/2007
3/7/2011 Page 8
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
55 Plat [6/22/07] The note shal lstate: Refer to Section 3.4.1(E) of the City of Fort
Collins Land Use Code for alloed activities with in the buffer zone.
[5/2/07] A note wil lbe added to the plat, describing the activities allowed
within the buffer adjacent to Mail Creek.
Active 2 Dana Leavitt 05/02/2007
56 Stormwater [8/2/07] Please provide a 3-foot concrete pan from just east of the pipe outlet
to the east property line. I did not see one on the grading plan. If it is desired
to keep the concrete ditch in place, than replacing any damaged or heaved
concrete needs to take place. If this is the option, than please add a note on
the grading plan that all damaged and heaved concrete in the ditch is to be
replaced along the property frontage.
[6/22/07] If a grass lined swale is the preferred option, a 3 foot drainage pan
would be required at the bottom of the swale due to the lack of longitudinal
slope.
[5/3/07] The concrete drainage ditch that is to remain on site needs to be in
good condition. The property owner will need to replace any sections that are
cracked and/or heaving. Another option is to extend the pipe all the way to
the east property line.
Active 2 Wes Lamarque 05/03/2007
57 Stormwater [5/3/07] Please use the City's standard water quality outlet structure detail.
The City does not incorporate micro pools into the water quality pond design.
Email me at wlamarque@fcgov.com any I will reply with the detail attached.
Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 05/03/2007
58 Stormwater [5/4/07] Please see other comments on the redlined plans. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 05/04/2007
59 General [5/4/07] There may be concerns regarding the separation distance of the
sidewalk along Harmony to the ditch. A follow-up to this comment will be
made. If it is viewed that the separation distance is fine, please provide on
the construction drawings a typical cross section showing the typical
separation distance from the sidewalk to the ditch and typical grade of the
ditch itself. In addition, please add a note indicating that the sidewalk shall
maintain a minimum separation distance of "X" throughout, to ensure the
contractor does not field manipulate the construction to narrow the separation
for whatever reason.
Resolved 2 Marc Virata 05/04/2007
3/7/2011 Page 9
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
60 Electric Utility [6/7/07] There are potentially serious problems with installing off-site electric
facilities to make power available to this site. These include obtaining an
off-site easement from an uncooperative owner, or installing a bore across
Harmony Rd. I am currently (6-07-07) working with the owner & developer's
representatives to resolve this issue.
Active 3 Doug Martine 06/07/2007
61 Fire [6/19/07] PFA has no further comments or concerns. Active 3 Carie Dann 06/19/2007
62 Construction Plans [6/21/07] The use of revision bubbles on the construction plans should be
removed with the final mylar plan set as we use revision bubbles for keeping
track of revisions (field changes) during the time of construction.
Resolved 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
63 Construction Plans [8/1/07] Seeing the format of the construction drawings, while perhaps not
ideal from a City perspective, will suffice. Please note though that the legend
indicates "Proposed Design Point" for what appears to be the revision
numbering, which I think needs to be corrected to avoid confusion.
[6/21/07] Ideally again, the revision list shown on the revision block should be
removed on the construction drawings as the revision block is intended for
keeping track of revision approvals after construction commences.
Active 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
64 Construction Plans [7/31/07] This was addressed on the construction plan set. The landscape
plan still has some issues with text overlapping shading. The plot of the plat
has some general text concerns and should be more crisp as was submitted
previously.
[6/21/07] There are general concerns with scanability and readability of the
plans, most notably the construction plan set. Please avoid overlaping text
with shading or other information wherever possible. Please consider using
varying lineweights in order to make the information clearer to read and
interpret. The previous construction plan submittal was much easier to read
and better met scanability requirements and should be followed.
Active 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
65 Plat [6/21/07] It appears Fort Collins Loveland Water District would need to be a
signatory on the plat for acceptance of the deed of an exclusive easement.
Resolved 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
66 General [7/31/07] The variance request is approved as of 7/31/07. Please modify
general note #48 to reflect the approval. No additional follow-up will be done
indicating the approval, unless desired by the developer/applicant.
[6/21/07] The variance request submitted is acceptable but needs to be
stamped in addition to the signature.
Active 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
3/7/2011 Page 10
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
67 General [6/21/07] The plans need to specify and resolve how the existing billboard will
be dealt with due to the sidewalk appearing to run directly through it.
Resolved 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
68 Site Plan [6/21/07] The site plan does not require the City Engineer's signature.
Please remove. The signature section on the site plan should be verified with
the project planner.
Resolved 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
69 Site Plan [6/21/07] Technical Services notices some scanability issues as well on the
site plan.
Resolved 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
70 General [7/31/07] Please provide legal descriptions of the proposed offsite
easements for verification of their sufficiency to encompass the area of
proposed improvements. I'm understanding that a reduced easement on the
Nacos property may be persued.
[6/21/07] All offsite easements will need to be in place before sign off on the
final plan documents.
Active 3 Marc Virata 06/21/2007
71 General [6/22/07] Minor revisions to the Site and Landscape Plans , see the redline
plans t oresolve.
Active 3 Dana Leavitt 06/22/2007
72 Site Plan [6/22/07] Scanning issues on the Site Plan, see redline comments. Refer to
the City's scanning standards, found in Appendix E-6. Please see JR in
Technical Services with any questions.
Active 3 Dana Leavitt 06/22/2007
73 Stormwater [6/22/07] Please bring the outlet pipe down to the normal water surface
elevation of the reservoir. The outlet will also need to be armored at the bank
with riprap. Please provide a detail.
Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 06/22/2007
74 Stormwater [6/22/07] The existing swale from the pond spillway to the reservoir needs to
be preserved. Please provide proposed grading that closely matches the
existing contours. This is to convey the pond spillway flows and more
importantly to preserve the natural slope in this buffer area.
Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 06/22/2007
75 Stormwater [6/22/07] Please bury the riprap channels in the detention pond and provide a
detail. The riprap is needed only to the toe-of-slope. See redlines.
Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 06/22/2007
76 Stormwater [8/2/07] Repeat
[6/22/07] Please show drainage easement on the drainage plan.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 06/22/2007
3/7/2011 Page 11
Project: FORT COLLINS SUPPORTIVE HOUSING PDP - TYPE II AND FINAL PLANS
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
77 Stormwater [8/2/07] Pipe outlet comments at Mail Creek:
1. The cut off wall is usually 36 inches or at least 30 inches to be below frost
line instead of the 24 inches indicated.
2. Please indicate that the rip rap will be buried as well as all of the
pipe/flared end section except the opening which should follow the slope.
The surface to be seeded with a normal pasture mix or a seed blanket.
3. The detail shows the pipe on a flat grade where in reality it would also be
sloped.
4. Please indicate the length of the cutoff wall. Is it to extend to outside of
the riprap or just the length of the flared end section? There are pros and
cons for both, just indicate which.
Active 4 Wes Lamarque 08/02/2007
78 Stormwater [8/2/07] There needs to be on-site drainage easements for the detention
pond and the storm sewer down to the property line in addition to the off-site
drainage easement. I think this was shown previously, but it is now removed
from the drainage plan. Please include the easements on the grading and
drainage plans.
Active 4 Wes Lamarque 08/02/2007
3/7/2011 Page 12