HomeMy WebLinkAboutAIR CARE COLO PDP - ENVIROTEST-INTERCHNG BUS PARK LOTS 15 & 16 REPLAT - 2-10 A - CORRESPONDENCE -Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
Final Compliance
Request for a 16,683 square foot, one story masonry and steel building to be constructed on 3.149 acres forAir Care Colorado, a Colorado emissions
testing facility. The proposed building will be an 8-lane facility with an administrative office. As the property is within a quarter mile of Interstate 25,
it will be subject to compliance with the I-25 Corridor standards in Section 3.9 of the Land Use Code, including building placement, landscaping and
building design. Located on lot 16 of the Interchange Business Park, on the South East Frontage Road, just south of the I-25 interchange with East
Mulberry. The zoning is C - Commercial.
Public Hearing was Published March 23, 2010
"This is a request to develop a vehicle emission testing facility on Lots 16 and a portion of Lot 15 of the Interchange Business Park. The facility would
be one story in height, 16,683 square feet in size, and consist of eight inspection bays and an office. The site is 3.15 acres in size and located at the
southeast quadrant of I-25 and the Southeast Frontage Road, south of the existing hotel."
Vested Rights were published May 16, 2011
"Air Care Colorado, File #2-10/A. This is a request to develop a vehicle emission testing facility on Lots 16 and a portion of Lot 15 of the Interchange
Business Park by Air Care Colorado. In addition to Air Care Colorado, two state agencies would be housed onsite; The Department of Public Health
and Environment, and the Department of Revenue. The site is 3.15 acres in size and located at the southeast quadrant of I-25 and the Southeast
Frontage Road. The parcel is zoned C, Commercial"
Project Type:
Project Desc:
File ID: 2-10/A Planner: Emma McArdle DMS Project Num: CP102220
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
1 Electric [3/15/10]
[1/20/10] Light & Power engineering will need a Commercial Service
Information (C-1) form completed outlining the characteristics of the electric
service. Will also need to coordinate the location for the electric transformer.
Depending on the electric load, the most likely transformer will be 84" wide x
73" deep, plus 3 ft. clearance on 3 sides and 8 ft. clearance in front. Please
contact Light & Power engineering at (970)221-6700 for more details.
Resolved 1 Doug Martine 01/20/2010
2 Electric [1/20/10] Once the plan is approved, an AutoCad drawing of the utility plan
needs to be sent to Pat Colburn. This can be sent via e-mail to
PCOLBURN@FCGOV.COM.
Resolved 1 Doug Martine 01/20/2010
3/7/2011 Page 1
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
3 Environmental
Planner
[1/20/10] No comments. Active 1 Dana Leavitt 01/20/2010
4 CDOT [1/20/10] Per email from Gloria Hice-Idler, "both accesses will require access
permits."
Active 1 Emma McArdle 01/20/2010
5 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward.
[1/26/10] This project is subject to any CDOT requirements and permits
regarding the ROW, access points, and/or turn lanes.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/26/2010
6 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward.
[1/26/10] Please refer to Transportation Planning's comments regarding
sidewalk requirements. Any sidewalk will need to be in either the ROW or an
access easement. If the easement is not dedicated on the plat associated
with this project it will need to be dedicated by separate document and will be
subject to all associated fees.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/26/2010
7 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward. I will provide the Development
Construction Permit (DCP) Application with this round of review. Once
completed and returned to me I will be able to begin the permit itself. As the
project approaches final approval we will be able to schedule a DCP meeting
which are held on Wednesday afternoons. Please refer to the DCP
Application and Brochure for more information the the DCP process.
[1/26/10] This project will need a Development Agreement as well as
Development Construction Permit prior to starting work on site. I have
provided the Development Agreement information sheet with this round of
review. Once completed and returned to me I will be able to start the
Development Agreement language. When the project is closer to final design,
we will begin work on the Development Construction Permit.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/26/2010
8 General [3/16/10] With this round of review I only received the Utility Plan Sheet from
the Utility Plan Set, not the full set, so I am only able to comment on the Utility
Sheet, therefore I am not able to confirm if the following comment has been
addressed.
[1/28/10] Please include all of the City of Fort Collins General Notes.
Numbers 26, 41, 47, & 48 were not included in the Utility Plans. If they do not
apply to this particular project they still must be included.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
3/7/2011 Page 2
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
9 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward. A Grading Plan was not included with
this submittal, therefore I am not able to confirm any changes have been
made.
[1/28/10] On the Grading Plan, please include spot elevations for all lot
corners, and finish floors/top of foundation elevations.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
10 General [3/16/10] With this round of review, I will not be able to confirm if less than
750 sq. ft. is draining through the drive entrances since a grading sheet was
not submitted. If the proposed swale between the parking and sidewalk is
approved by Stormwater a sidewalk chase will be needed where it crosses
the walk.
[1/28/10] According to the Larimer Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS),
no more than 750 sq. ft. may drain across/through a drive entrance measured
from behind the ROW line. It appears that with the current design, much
more than 750 sq. ft. is proposed to drain through both drive entrances. If the
grading can not be altered to bring the drainage area down to below 750 sq.
ft. a curb/sidewalk chase will be required. Also, CDOT may also have a
maximum drainage area that may be less than the 750 sq. ft. in LCUASS.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
11 General [1/28/10] Sidewalk ramps must align with each other when crossing drive
entrances. Please refer to Transportation Plannings comments regarding the
sidewalk and parkway width requirements for this project.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
12 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward. A Grading Plan was not included with
this submittal; therefore I am not able to confirm any changes have been
made.
[1/28/10] On the grading plan, please show the entire frontage road including
any existing drive entrances across the street from this project.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
13 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward. The full Utility Set was not submitted
with this round of review so I can not confirm this comment has been
addressed.
[1/28/10] The drive entrance proposed will be required to be built according
to Standard Drawing 707 in LCUASS. Provide Drawing 707 in the utility plan
set.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
3/7/2011 Page 3
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
14 General [1/28/10] On the utility set, are the water services proposed or existing? If
they are proposed, please show the approximate limits of the street cut/patch
and provide the following statement as a note on the Overall Utility Plan and
Grading sheet:
Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the
field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with
City street repair standards.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
15 General [1/28/10] Please label the existing ROW width on the Overall Utility Plan
sheet.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
16 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward as a reminder.
[1/28/10] The proposed driveway location must be approved by CDOT and
will require a CDOT access permit.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
17 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward as a reminder.
[1/28/10] Signature blocks from Elco and Boxelder may be required for their
approval of the project because their services are being impacted. Also,
CDOT may require a signature block on the Utility Plans.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
18 General [2/1/10] Please see the redlined Utility Plan set for complete comments. Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 02/01/2010
19 Zoning [2/2/10] The building does not meet building placement standards in LUC
3.5.3(B)(2); refer to Build-to lines.
Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
20 Zoning [2/2/10] Sign approval shall be on separate permit and based on LUC 3.8.7 Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
21 Zoning [2/2/10] Trash enclosure wall surface will need to match building surfaces. Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
22 Zoning [2/2/10] What is the building wall treatments more metal, drivit Etc? And
what color of all walls, fascia & roof? Mechanical screening on room must
match or complement roof color.
Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
23 Zoning [2/2/10] Landscaping notes need to include language related to Cert. of
Occupancy will not be issued with completion of landscaping or financial
security of bond, escrow, or letter of credit for 125% of the landscaping
(materials/install total).
Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 4
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
24 Zoning [2/2/10] All lighting, building/pole mounted, must meet LUC 3.2.4. Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
25 Zoning [2/2/10] Two HC parking spaces required, none shown. Per LUC 3.2.2(K)(5) Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 5
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
26 Fire [4/6/10] Thank you for showing the new hydrant location. Please note that
PFA requires a minimum of 3 feet of clearance around a hydrant and 15 feet
above the top of the hydrant (for maintenance/repair). The clearances apply
to landscape and vegetation when it's newly planted but also at maturity. We
recommend groundcover or plants/landscape of a similar size and height.
[3/16/10] Please show the new fire hydrant location (moved away from the
building) on the site plan. It's correct on Sheet C200. I realize this was a
recent change so I know the plans will be updated. This is just a reminder.
Thanks.
WATER SUPPLY
Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district
having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow
must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum
flow and spacing requirements include:
Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further
than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter
Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual
pressure, spaced not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers
thereafter
Residential outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual
pressure, spaced not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers
thereafter.
These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic
fire sprinkler systems.
Minimum clearance around a hydrant is 36 inches; this includes distance
from buildings, curb face and landscaping (excluding ground cover).
PLEASE NOTE: You can eliminate the hydrant shown on the far, "west" side
of the structure. The other two hydrants shown on Sheet C200 WILL be
required, with a slight location change for one of them. The FDC would best
be located on the south side of the building, near the hydrant shown off the
south corner of the building. However, that south hydrant should be moved to
the other side of the drive aisle, on the landscape peninsula, so that it's on
the same side of the drive as the FDC. That way, an engine can support the
sprinkler system (hydrant and FDC) without blocking the drive and cutting off
access to other apparatus. The hydrant is needed to support the automatic
fire sprinkler system. The second hydrant, shown on the north side of the
building, is needed due to the square footage of the structure. The single,
existing hydrant located across the frontage road would not be adequate to
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 6
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
fire fire in a 15,000-SF building.
2006 International Fire Code 508.1 and Appendix B
27 Fire REQUIRED ACCESS
Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall be provided for every facility, building or
portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the PFAs
jurisdiction when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of
the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus
access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building
or facility. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and
maintained unobstructed at all times. A fire lane plan shall be submitted for
approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already
contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the
following general requirements:
Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or
concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road
base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites.
Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and
enforceable.
Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement.
Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of
the fire lane (30 feet on at least one long side of the building when the
structures is three or more stories in height).
If the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic
fire-sprinkler system, the fire code official is authorized to increase the
dimension of 150 feet.
NOTE: The "fire lane" location shown on the site plan is acceptable. It must
also meet the above requirements for dedication, signage, construction and
maintenance.
2006 International Fire Code 503.1.1, 503.2.3, 503.3, 503.4 and Appendix D
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
28 Fire HMIA AND OCCUPANCY TYPE: Thank you for submitting the Hazardous
Materials Impact Analysis. The amounts, use/storage and containment will
determine occupancy type (S-1 vs. H) and related requirements.
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
29 Fire SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS
This proposed building shall be fire sprinklered. 2006 International Fire Code
Section 903
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 7
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
30 Fire FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
Fire department connections shall be installed in a pre-approved location and
located on the street or fire lane side of buildings, fully visible and
recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle
access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official. 2006 International
Fire Code 912.2 and PFA Fire Prevention Bureau Policy
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
31 Fire KEY BOXES REQUIRED
Poudre Fire Authority requires a key box (Knox Box) to be mounted in
approved location(s) on every new building equipped with a required
fire-sprinkler system or fire-alarm system.
2006 International Fire Code 506.1; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
32 Fire FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT
Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch
fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. NFPA 13
(2007) 23.1.3
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
33 Fire TURNING RADII
The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum
of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside 2006 International Fire Code 503.2.4 and
Appendix D103.3
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
34 Fire ADDRESS NUMERALS
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and
posted with a minimum six-inch high numerals on a contrasting background.
(Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable).
NOTE: If the address is mounted on a side of the building that does not front
the road, the street name is also required to be mounted along with the
numerals.
2006 International Fire Code 505.1
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
35 Fire IDENTIFICATION OF FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT
Fire protection equipment shall be identified in an approved manner. Rooms
containing controls for air-conditioning systems, electrical rooms, sprinkler
risers and valves, or other fire detection, suppression or control elements
shall be identified for the use of the fire department. 2006 International Fire
Code 510.1
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 8
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
36 Stormwater [2/3/10] Although the swale provides some water quality mitigation by
disconnecting impervious service, it does not provide sufficient water quality
treatment. Bio-swales would be better, but extended detention is the
preferred treatment. Bio-swales may be more expensive and harder to
maintain than extended detention and there is sufficient space for extended
detention. Please contact Wes at 416-2418 to discuss.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 02/03/2010
37 Stormwater [2/3/10] The front quarter of the site free releases without water quality
treatment. The landscaped area near the type-r inlet could be a location for
water quality treatment. Please contact Wes at 416-2418 to discuss.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 02/03/2010
38 Site Plan [2/3/10] The title of the site plan should reflect the subdivision name. The
subdivision plat name is changing. Please see revised plat.
Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
39 Site Plan [2/3/10] Please remove the data path from the vicinity map on the site plan. Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
40 Site Plan [2/3/10] The lot number on the site plan will change. Please see the revised
plat.
Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
41 Site Plan [3/16/10] There are minor line over text issues on site plan sheet A1.1
[2/3/10] There are many line over text issues on the site plan.
Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
42 Site Plan [2/3/10] Some of the smaller text & styles make it difficult to read. Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
43 Landscape Plan [2/3/10] The landscape plan title should reflect the subdivision name. The
subdivision plat name is changing. Please see revised plat.
Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
44 Landscape Plan [2/3/10] There are many line over text issues on the landscape plans. Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
45 Landscape Plan [2/3/10] Please change the "Site Plan" text on the landscape plans. Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
3/7/2011 Page 9
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
46 Landscape Plan [2/3/10] Autumn Blaze Maple does not survive in the soils found in Fort
Collins. It should be changed to Bur Oak, Catalp, Kentucky Coffeetree,
Accolade Elm or another adapted species. Shademaster Honeylocust and
Skyline Honeylocust do much better than the Sunburst Honeylocust specified
on this project.
Landscape Note (1) should be replaced with the following:
The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be
thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil
amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape
areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable
method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one
thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area.
Active 1 Tim Buchanan 02/03/2010
47 General [2/4/10] Detached sidewalks are required. The parkway and detached
sidewalk widths associated with a collector level street in the Larimer County
Urban Area Street Standards is appropriate for this location. 5' detached
sidewalk and an 8' parkway.
Active 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
48 General [2/4/10] Bicycle parking facilities are required. Requirements can be found in
the Land Use Code section 3.2.2. Bicycle parking must be on a hard surface,
convenient to the entrance, well light in a safe location and protected from the
elements when possible.
Resolved 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
49 General [2/4/10] Please coordination with the Colorado Department of Transportation
on this project. The right deceleration turn lane appears to direct vehicles into
what the project is showing as an exit only driveway. This posses a safety
hazard. CDOT contact is Gloria Hice-Idler at 970-350-2148.
Active 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
50 General [2/4/10] The detached sidewalk will need to be in either an access easement
or in public right of way. This is to ensure the general public has access to
utilize the sidewalk.
Active 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
3/7/2011 Page 10
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
51 General [2/4/10] Direct pedestrian connection to building is required per the Land
Use Code with no vehicle use between the building and street. See section
3.5.3 of the Land Use Code for complete information on relationship of
buildings to streets. See Planning Department comments and section 2.8.2 of
the Land Use Code for guidance on modifications to this standard. Please
provide data on the number of vehicles per day that visit the main office after
exiting the air care testing lanes. This data might be obtained from existing
facilities.
Active 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
52 General [2/4/10] Pedestrian and bicycle Level Of Service study is required. The
Traffic Evaluation dated November 17, 2009 does not include this study.
Resolved 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
53 Stormwater [4/7/10] Reminder.
[3/18/10] Reminder comment.
[2/5/10] A drainage easement is required for the limits of the water quality
mitigation.
Active 1 Wes Lamarque 02/05/2010
54 Floodplain [2/5/10] Please see the redlined plans and the marked up 50% checklist for
all comments related to the floodplain.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 02/05/2010
55 Traffic Study [2/10/10] Submitted TIS does not meet City/LCUASS TIS requirements. It
does not evaluate the intersections of Hwy 14 and the frontage Rd, the I-25
overpass, does not determine some existing or background conditions such
as LOS. This project is accessed from the CDOT frontage road and having
spoke with CDOT staff regarding the TIS, they have accepted it as adequate.
The project is in the City limits and therefore the TIS needs to meet LCUASS
criteria.
Active 1 Ward Stanford 02/10/2010
56 Traffic [2/10/10] A right turn pocket is shown on the Site Plan at the Exit driveway.
That curb line should be rebuilt to eliminate the turn lane, or as a minimum
striped out to keep entering motorists from being drawn to the wrong
driveway.
Active 1 Ward Stanford 02/10/2010
57 Traffic [2/10/10] The eastern most tree shown at the S. exit driveway showed be
relocated to not cause a sight distance issue for exiting/passing motorists.
Active 1 Ward Stanford 02/10/2010
58 Zoning [3/15/10] No Comments Active 2 Gary Lopez 03/15/2010
59 Elevation Plan [3/16/10] There are minor line over text issues on elevation plan A3.0 Resolved 2 Jeff County 03/16/2010
3/7/2011 Page 11
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
60 General [4/1/10] Even though the access easement for the sidewalk and the
emergency access easement are being dedicated via the plat, show the limits
of those easements and label them on the Utility sheet along with all of the
other existing/proposed easements.
[3/16/10] According to the re-submittal documents, the access easement for
the proposed sidewalk will be dedicated with the plat. If this is the case,
please label that easement on the Utility Plan/Set, it is not currently shown.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
61 General [3/16/10] What is the proposed grading behind the sidewalk? I did not
receive a grading sheet with this submittal so I have now way of knowing
what is proposed. The grade is required to be flat for at least 1 foot behind
the sidewalk before any significant grade change can take place such as the
proposed swale. Also, a sidewalk chase will need to be installed where the
swale crosses the walk. The chase will not need to be per the City of Fort
Collins Standard Detail, however we can certainly provide it if needed.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
62 General [4/1/10] Show and label the baricades and the end of the sidewalk on all
sheets in the utility set.
[3/16/10] The sidewalk connections to the North and South will need to be
properly terminated with Type III Barricades. Please show these barricades
on the Utility Plan set.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
63 General [3/16/10] On the Southern edge of the site where the proposed sidewalk
dead-ends to the adjacent property it is shown through an existing CATV box.
Unless you are proposing to move the box, the walk will need to be re-routed
so it does not interfere with the box. Please leave a minimum of 2 feet
between the sidewalk and the existing box as a shy-distance.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
64 General [3/16/10] I have provided Appendix E-4 from LCUASS. Please look very
carefully at the Utility Plan requirements and note what is required prior to
hearing and especially what is required at final. Since, I did not receive a
utility set with this round of review, issues are more likely to arise at final, so
please review the requirements to ensure a smooth final round of review. I
would very much encourage a round of Final review with Engineering (at a
minimum) due to the outstanding issues and concerns.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
3/7/2011 Page 12
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
65 General [3/31/10] Carried forward - not addressed on the Utility Plan sheet. The
modified note (note #4) is sufficient on the grading sheet, please also use the
modified note on the utility sheet.
[3/16/10] Since the Frontage Road is not a city roadway and the services
being affected by the street cuts are also not City lines please modify the
Street cut note to the following. I apologize for the confusion; however since
neither the street nor the lines are City property the note will need to be
modified.
"Limits of street cuts are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the
field by the appropriate governing bodies' inspector. All repairs are to be in
accordance with their street repair standards."
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
66 General [3/16/10] Engineering is okay with going to hearing. Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
67 General [3/17/10] Bicycle parking facilities should be located nearer the entrance.
The current location will not likely to be used by cyclists.
Active 2 Jennifer Petrik 03/17/2010
68 General [3/17/10] conflict between sidewalk and CA TV utility vault. Please correct to
show no conflict.
Resolved 2 Jennifer Petrik 03/17/2010
69 General [3/17/10] Please submit striping plan for review Active 2 Jennifer Petrik 03/17/2010
70 General [3/18/10] The American Lindens used in the native seed mix area are not
considered very drought tolerant. Bur Oak, Kentucky Coffeetree or Catalpa
would have better long term survival.
Active 2 Tim Buchanan 03/18/2010
71 Stormwater [3/18/10] Stormwater and Floodplain departments are ready for a hearing. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 03/18/2010
72 General [4/2/10] Add details 701 & 708 from LCUASS to the Utility set. Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/02/2010
73 General [4/2/10] Show both the access easement for the sidewalk as well as the
emergency access easement on the Utility Sheet. If these easements are
being dedicated via the plat their location should be known to include on the
Utility Plan. Label them as they type of easement they are and that they are
being dedicated by the associated plat.
Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 13
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
74 General [4/2/10] Show the baricades at the end of the proposed sidewalk on all
sheets and label it on the Utility sheet at a minimum.
Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/02/2010
75 General [4/5/10] On sheet C500 why is there a 6' attached sidewalk shown along with
HC ramps? Remove the attached walk and only show the detached walk and
HC ramps.
Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/05/2010
76 General [4/5/10] What is the proposed radii of the South side of the North drive? I can
not find it called out in any location?
Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/05/2010
77 Elevation Plan [4/7/10] Sheet A3.0 is titled as "Site Plan - Air Care Colorado", but it is an
Elevation Plan.
Active 3 Jeff County 04/07/2010
78 Utility Plans [4/7/10] Please correct the subtitle on the Utility Plans cover sheet. It shows
this site in the Northeast Quarter, and it should be the Northeast Quarter.
Active 3 Jeff County 04/07/2010
79 Utility Plans [4/7/10] Please correct the "Lot & Subdivision Name" on the Utility Plans. It
should read "Lot 2, Interchange Business Park Second Filing".
Active 3 Jeff County 04/07/2010
80 Utility Plans [4/7/10] No comments on Bicycle rack location. Active 3 Jennifer Petrik 04/07/2010
81 Floodplain [4/7/10] Please see floodplain checklist and redlines for all floodplain
comments.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
82 Stormwater [4/7/10] Please use the standard WQ outlet structure detail for the water
quality extended detention pond.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
83 Stormwater [4/7/10] Please add a note on the utility plan to core drill and grout the
connections between the existing inlets and the proposed storm sewers.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
84 Stormwater [4/7/10] Please add curb cut detail. Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
85 Stormwater [4/7/10] Please add an erosion control escrow calculation in the drainage
report. If you have any questions on how to calculate this, please call me at
416-2418.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
3/7/2011 Page 14
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
1 Electric [3/15/10]
[1/20/10] Light & Power engineering will need a Commercial Service
Information (C-1) form completed outlining the characteristics of the electric
service. Will also need to coordinate the location for the electric transformer.
Depending on the electric load, the most likely transformer will be 84" wide x
73" deep, plus 3 ft. clearance on 3 sides and 8 ft. clearance in front. Please
contact Light & Power engineering at (970)221-6700 for more details.
Resolved 1 Doug Martine 01/20/2010
2 Electric [1/20/10] Once the plan is approved, an AutoCad drawing of the utility plan
needs to be sent to Pat Colburn. This can be sent via e-mail to
PCOLBURN@FCGOV.COM.
Resolved 1 Doug Martine 01/20/2010
3 Environmental
Planner
[1/20/10] No comments. Active 1 Dana Leavitt 01/20/2010
4 CDOT [1/20/10] Per email from Gloria Hice-Idler, "both accesses will require access
permits."
Active 1 Emma McArdle 01/20/2010
5 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward.
[1/26/10] This project is subject to any CDOT requirements and permits
regarding the ROW, access points, and/or turn lanes.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/26/2010
6 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward.
[1/26/10] Please refer to Transportation Planning's comments regarding
sidewalk requirements. Any sidewalk will need to be in either the ROW or an
access easement. If the easement is not dedicated on the plat associated
with this project it will need to be dedicated by separate document and will be
subject to all associated fees.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/26/2010
3/7/2011 Page 15
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
7 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward. I will provide the Development
Construction Permit (DCP) Application with this round of review. Once
completed and returned to me I will be able to begin the permit itself. As the
project approaches final approval we will be able to schedule a DCP meeting
which are held on Wednesday afternoons. Please refer to the DCP
Application and Brochure for more information the the DCP process.
[1/26/10] This project will need a Development Agreement as well as
Development Construction Permit prior to starting work on site. I have
provided the Development Agreement information sheet with this round of
review. Once completed and returned to me I will be able to start the
Development Agreement language. When the project is closer to final design,
we will begin work on the Development Construction Permit.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/26/2010
8 General [3/16/10] With this round of review I only received the Utility Plan Sheet from
the Utility Plan Set, not the full set, so I am only able to comment on the Utility
Sheet, therefore I am not able to confirm if the following comment has been
addressed.
[1/28/10] Please include all of the City of Fort Collins General Notes.
Numbers 26, 41, 47, & 48 were not included in the Utility Plans. If they do not
apply to this particular project they still must be included.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
9 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward. A Grading Plan was not included with
this submittal, therefore I am not able to confirm any changes have been
made.
[1/28/10] On the Grading Plan, please include spot elevations for all lot
corners, and finish floors/top of foundation elevations.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
10 General [3/16/10] With this round of review, I will not be able to confirm if less than
750 sq. ft. is draining through the drive entrances since a grading sheet was
not submitted. If the proposed swale between the parking and sidewalk is
approved by Stormwater a sidewalk chase will be needed where it crosses
the walk.
[1/28/10] According to the Larimer Urban Area Street Standards (LCUASS),
no more than 750 sq. ft. may drain across/through a drive entrance measured
from behind the ROW line. It appears that with the current design, much
more than 750 sq. ft. is proposed to drain through both drive entrances. If the
grading can not be altered to bring the drainage area down to below 750 sq.
ft. a curb/sidewalk chase will be required. Also, CDOT may also have a
maximum drainage area that may be less than the 750 sq. ft. in LCUASS.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
3/7/2011 Page 16
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
11 General [1/28/10] Sidewalk ramps must align with each other when crossing drive
entrances. Please refer to Transportation Plannings comments regarding the
sidewalk and parkway width requirements for this project.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
12 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward. A Grading Plan was not included with
this submittal; therefore I am not able to confirm any changes have been
made.
[1/28/10] On the grading plan, please show the entire frontage road including
any existing drive entrances across the street from this project.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
13 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward. The full Utility Set was not submitted
with this round of review so I can not confirm this comment has been
addressed.
[1/28/10] The drive entrance proposed will be required to be built according
to Standard Drawing 707 in LCUASS. Provide Drawing 707 in the utility plan
set.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
14 General [1/28/10] On the utility set, are the water services proposed or existing? If
they are proposed, please show the approximate limits of the street cut/patch
and provide the following statement as a note on the Overall Utility Plan and
Grading sheet:
Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the
field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with
City street repair standards.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
15 General [1/28/10] Please label the existing ROW width on the Overall Utility Plan
sheet.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
16 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward as a reminder.
[1/28/10] The proposed driveway location must be approved by CDOT and
will require a CDOT access permit.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
17 General [3/16/10] Comment carried forward as a reminder.
[1/28/10] Signature blocks from Elco and Boxelder may be required for their
approval of the project because their services are being impacted. Also,
CDOT may require a signature block on the Utility Plans.
Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 01/28/2010
3/7/2011 Page 17
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
18 General [2/1/10] Please see the redlined Utility Plan set for complete comments. Resolved 1 Andrew Carney 02/01/2010
19 Zoning [2/2/10] The building does not meet building placement standards in LUC
3.5.3(B)(2); refer to Build-to lines.
Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
20 Zoning [2/2/10] Sign approval shall be on separate permit and based on LUC 3.8.7 Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
21 Zoning [2/2/10] Trash enclosure wall surface will need to match building surfaces. Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
22 Zoning [2/2/10] What is the building wall treatments more metal, drivit Etc? And
what color of all walls, fascia & roof? Mechanical screening on room must
match or complement roof color.
Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
23 Zoning [2/2/10] Landscaping notes need to include language related to Cert. of
Occupancy will not be issued with completion of landscaping or financial
security of bond, escrow, or letter of credit for 125% of the landscaping
(materials/install total).
Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
24 Zoning [2/2/10] All lighting, building/pole mounted, must meet LUC 3.2.4. Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
25 Zoning [2/2/10] Two HC parking spaces required, none shown. Per LUC 3.2.2(K)(5) Active 1 Gary Lopez 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 18
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
26 Fire [4/6/10] Thank you for showing the new hydrant location. Please note that
PFA requires a minimum of 3 feet of clearance around a hydrant and 15 feet
above the top of the hydrant (for maintenance/repair). The clearances apply
to landscape and vegetation when it's newly planted but also at maturity. We
recommend groundcover or plants/landscape of a similar size and height.
[3/16/10] Please show the new fire hydrant location (moved away from the
building) on the site plan. It's correct on Sheet C200. I realize this was a
recent change so I know the plans will be updated. This is just a reminder.
Thanks.
WATER SUPPLY
Fire hydrants, where required, must be the type approved by the water district
having jurisdiction and the Fire Department. Hydrant spacing and water flow
must meet minimum requirements based on type of occupancy. Minimum
flow and spacing requirements include:
Commercial, 1,500 gpm at 20 psi residual pressure, spaced not further
than 300 feet to the building, on 600-foot centers thereafter
Residential within Urban Growth Area, 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual
pressure, spaced not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers
thereafter
Residential outside Urban Growth Area, 500 gpm at 20 psi residual
pressure, spaced not further than 400 feet to the building, on 800-foot centers
thereafter.
These requirements may be modified if buildings are equipped with automatic
fire sprinkler systems.
Minimum clearance around a hydrant is 36 inches; this includes distance
from buildings, curb face and landscaping (excluding ground cover).
PLEASE NOTE: You can eliminate the hydrant shown on the far, "west" side
of the structure. The other two hydrants shown on Sheet C200 WILL be
required, with a slight location change for one of them. The FDC would best
be located on the south side of the building, near the hydrant shown off the
south corner of the building. However, that south hydrant should be moved to
the other side of the drive aisle, on the landscape peninsula, so that it's on
the same side of the drive as the FDC. That way, an engine can support the
sprinkler system (hydrant and FDC) without blocking the drive and cutting off
access to other apparatus. The hydrant is needed to support the automatic
fire sprinkler system. The second hydrant, shown on the north side of the
building, is needed due to the square footage of the structure. The single,
existing hydrant located across the frontage road would not be adequate to
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 19
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
fire fire in a 15,000-SF building.
2006 International Fire Code 508.1 and Appendix B
27 Fire REQUIRED ACCESS
Fire access roads (fire lanes) shall be provided for every facility, building or
portion of a building hereafter constructed or moved into or within the PFAs
jurisdiction when any portion of the facility or any portion of an exterior wall of
the first story of the building is located more than 150 feet from fire apparatus
access as measured by an approved route around the exterior of the building
or facility. This fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and
maintained unobstructed at all times. A fire lane plan shall be submitted for
approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already
contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the
following general requirements:
Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or
concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road
base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites.
Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and
enforceable.
Be designated on the plat as an Emergency Access Easement.
Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of
the fire lane (30 feet on at least one long side of the building when the
structures is three or more stories in height).
If the building is equipped throughout with an approved automatic
fire-sprinkler system, the fire code official is authorized to increase the
dimension of 150 feet.
NOTE: The "fire lane" location shown on the site plan is acceptable. It must
also meet the above requirements for dedication, signage, construction and
maintenance.
2006 International Fire Code 503.1.1, 503.2.3, 503.3, 503.4 and Appendix D
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
28 Fire HMIA AND OCCUPANCY TYPE: Thank you for submitting the Hazardous
Materials Impact Analysis. The amounts, use/storage and containment will
determine occupancy type (S-1 vs. H) and related requirements.
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
29 Fire SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS
This proposed building shall be fire sprinklered. 2006 International Fire Code
Section 903
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 20
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
30 Fire FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION
Fire department connections shall be installed in a pre-approved location and
located on the street or fire lane side of buildings, fully visible and
recognizable from the street or nearest point of fire department vehicle
access or as otherwise approved by the fire code official. 2006 International
Fire Code 912.2 and PFA Fire Prevention Bureau Policy
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
31 Fire KEY BOXES REQUIRED
Poudre Fire Authority requires a key box (Knox Box) to be mounted in
approved location(s) on every new building equipped with a required
fire-sprinkler system or fire-alarm system.
2006 International Fire Code 506.1; PFA BUREAU POLICY 88-20
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
32 Fire FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT
Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch
fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. NFPA 13
(2007) 23.1.3
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
33 Fire TURNING RADII
The required turning radii of a fire apparatus access road shall be a minimum
of 25 feet inside and 50 feet outside 2006 International Fire Code 503.2.4 and
Appendix D103.3
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
34 Fire ADDRESS NUMERALS
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and
posted with a minimum six-inch high numerals on a contrasting background.
(Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable).
NOTE: If the address is mounted on a side of the building that does not front
the road, the street name is also required to be mounted along with the
numerals.
2006 International Fire Code 505.1
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
35 Fire IDENTIFICATION OF FIRE PROTECTION EQUIPMENT
Fire protection equipment shall be identified in an approved manner. Rooms
containing controls for air-conditioning systems, electrical rooms, sprinkler
risers and valves, or other fire detection, suppression or control elements
shall be identified for the use of the fire department. 2006 International Fire
Code 510.1
Active 1 Carie Dann 02/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 21
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
36 Stormwater [2/3/10] Although the swale provides some water quality mitigation by
disconnecting impervious service, it does not provide sufficient water quality
treatment. Bio-swales would be better, but extended detention is the
preferred treatment. Bio-swales may be more expensive and harder to
maintain than extended detention and there is sufficient space for extended
detention. Please contact Wes at 416-2418 to discuss.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 02/03/2010
37 Stormwater [2/3/10] The front quarter of the site free releases without water quality
treatment. The landscaped area near the type-r inlet could be a location for
water quality treatment. Please contact Wes at 416-2418 to discuss.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 02/03/2010
38 Site Plan [2/3/10] The title of the site plan should reflect the subdivision name. The
subdivision plat name is changing. Please see revised plat.
Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
39 Site Plan [2/3/10] Please remove the data path from the vicinity map on the site plan. Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
40 Site Plan [2/3/10] The lot number on the site plan will change. Please see the revised
plat.
Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
41 Site Plan [3/16/10] There are minor line over text issues on site plan sheet A1.1
[2/3/10] There are many line over text issues on the site plan.
Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
42 Site Plan [2/3/10] Some of the smaller text & styles make it difficult to read. Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
43 Landscape Plan [2/3/10] The landscape plan title should reflect the subdivision name. The
subdivision plat name is changing. Please see revised plat.
Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
44 Landscape Plan [2/3/10] There are many line over text issues on the landscape plans. Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
45 Landscape Plan [2/3/10] Please change the "Site Plan" text on the landscape plans. Resolved 1 Jeff County 02/03/2010
3/7/2011 Page 22
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
46 Landscape Plan [2/3/10] Autumn Blaze Maple does not survive in the soils found in Fort
Collins. It should be changed to Bur Oak, Catalp, Kentucky Coffeetree,
Accolade Elm or another adapted species. Shademaster Honeylocust and
Skyline Honeylocust do much better than the Sunburst Honeylocust specified
on this project.
Landscape Note (1) should be replaced with the following:
The soil in all landscape areas, including parkways and medians, shall be
thoroughly loosened to a depth of not less than eight (8) inches and soil
amendment shall be thoroughly incorporated into the soil of all landscape
areas to a depth of at least six (6) inches by tilling, discing or other suitable
method, at a rate of at least three (3) cubic yards of soil amendment per one
thousand (1,000) square feet of landscape area.
Active 1 Tim Buchanan 02/03/2010
47 General [2/4/10] Detached sidewalks are required. The parkway and detached
sidewalk widths associated with a collector level street in the Larimer County
Urban Area Street Standards is appropriate for this location. 5' detached
sidewalk and an 8' parkway.
Active 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
48 General [2/4/10] Bicycle parking facilities are required. Requirements can be found in
the Land Use Code section 3.2.2. Bicycle parking must be on a hard surface,
convenient to the entrance, well light in a safe location and protected from the
elements when possible.
Resolved 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
49 General [2/4/10] Please coordination with the Colorado Department of Transportation
on this project. The right deceleration turn lane appears to direct vehicles into
what the project is showing as an exit only driveway. This posses a safety
hazard. CDOT contact is Gloria Hice-Idler at 970-350-2148.
Active 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
50 General [2/4/10] The detached sidewalk will need to be in either an access easement
or in public right of way. This is to ensure the general public has access to
utilize the sidewalk.
Active 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
3/7/2011 Page 23
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
51 General [2/4/10] Direct pedestrian connection to building is required per the Land
Use Code with no vehicle use between the building and street. See section
3.5.3 of the Land Use Code for complete information on relationship of
buildings to streets. See Planning Department comments and section 2.8.2 of
the Land Use Code for guidance on modifications to this standard. Please
provide data on the number of vehicles per day that visit the main office after
exiting the air care testing lanes. This data might be obtained from existing
facilities.
Active 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
52 General [2/4/10] Pedestrian and bicycle Level Of Service study is required. The
Traffic Evaluation dated November 17, 2009 does not include this study.
Resolved 1 Jennifer Petrik 02/04/2010
53 Stormwater [4/7/10] Reminder.
[3/18/10] Reminder comment.
[2/5/10] A drainage easement is required for the limits of the water quality
mitigation.
Active 1 Wes Lamarque 02/05/2010
54 Floodplain [2/5/10] Please see the redlined plans and the marked up 50% checklist for
all comments related to the floodplain.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 02/05/2010
55 Traffic Study [2/10/10] Submitted TIS does not meet City/LCUASS TIS requirements. It
does not evaluate the intersections of Hwy 14 and the frontage Rd, the I-25
overpass, does not determine some existing or background conditions such
as LOS. This project is accessed from the CDOT frontage road and having
spoke with CDOT staff regarding the TIS, they have accepted it as adequate.
The project is in the City limits and therefore the TIS needs to meet LCUASS
criteria.
Active 1 Ward Stanford 02/10/2010
56 Traffic [2/10/10] A right turn pocket is shown on the Site Plan at the Exit driveway.
That curb line should be rebuilt to eliminate the turn lane, or as a minimum
striped out to keep entering motorists from being drawn to the wrong
driveway.
Active 1 Ward Stanford 02/10/2010
57 Traffic [2/10/10] The eastern most tree shown at the S. exit driveway showed be
relocated to not cause a sight distance issue for exiting/passing motorists.
Active 1 Ward Stanford 02/10/2010
58 Zoning [3/15/10] No Comments Active 2 Gary Lopez 03/15/2010
59 Elevation Plan [3/16/10] There are minor line over text issues on elevation plan A3.0 Resolved 2 Jeff County 03/16/2010
3/7/2011 Page 24
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
60 General [4/1/10] Even though the access easement for the sidewalk and the
emergency access easement are being dedicated via the plat, show the limits
of those easements and label them on the Utility sheet along with all of the
other existing/proposed easements.
[3/16/10] According to the re-submittal documents, the access easement for
the proposed sidewalk will be dedicated with the plat. If this is the case,
please label that easement on the Utility Plan/Set, it is not currently shown.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
61 General [3/16/10] What is the proposed grading behind the sidewalk? I did not
receive a grading sheet with this submittal so I have now way of knowing
what is proposed. The grade is required to be flat for at least 1 foot behind
the sidewalk before any significant grade change can take place such as the
proposed swale. Also, a sidewalk chase will need to be installed where the
swale crosses the walk. The chase will not need to be per the City of Fort
Collins Standard Detail, however we can certainly provide it if needed.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
62 General [4/1/10] Show and label the baricades and the end of the sidewalk on all
sheets in the utility set.
[3/16/10] The sidewalk connections to the North and South will need to be
properly terminated with Type III Barricades. Please show these barricades
on the Utility Plan set.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
63 General [3/16/10] On the Southern edge of the site where the proposed sidewalk
dead-ends to the adjacent property it is shown through an existing CATV box.
Unless you are proposing to move the box, the walk will need to be re-routed
so it does not interfere with the box. Please leave a minimum of 2 feet
between the sidewalk and the existing box as a shy-distance.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
64 General [3/16/10] I have provided Appendix E-4 from LCUASS. Please look very
carefully at the Utility Plan requirements and note what is required prior to
hearing and especially what is required at final. Since, I did not receive a
utility set with this round of review, issues are more likely to arise at final, so
please review the requirements to ensure a smooth final round of review. I
would very much encourage a round of Final review with Engineering (at a
minimum) due to the outstanding issues and concerns.
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
3/7/2011 Page 25
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
65 General [3/31/10] Carried forward - not addressed on the Utility Plan sheet. The
modified note (note #4) is sufficient on the grading sheet, please also use the
modified note on the utility sheet.
[3/16/10] Since the Frontage Road is not a city roadway and the services
being affected by the street cuts are also not City lines please modify the
Street cut note to the following. I apologize for the confusion; however since
neither the street nor the lines are City property the note will need to be
modified.
"Limits of street cuts are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the
field by the appropriate governing bodies' inspector. All repairs are to be in
accordance with their street repair standards."
Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
66 General [3/16/10] Engineering is okay with going to hearing. Resolved 2 Andrew Carney 03/16/2010
67 General [3/17/10] Bicycle parking facilities should be located nearer the entrance.
The current location will not likely to be used by cyclists.
Active 2 Jennifer Petrik 03/17/2010
68 General [3/17/10] conflict between sidewalk and CA TV utility vault. Please correct to
show no conflict.
Resolved 2 Jennifer Petrik 03/17/2010
69 General [3/17/10] Please submit striping plan for review Active 2 Jennifer Petrik 03/17/2010
70 General [3/18/10] The American Lindens used in the native seed mix area are not
considered very drought tolerant. Bur Oak, Kentucky Coffeetree or Catalpa
would have better long term survival.
Active 2 Tim Buchanan 03/18/2010
71 Stormwater [3/18/10] Stormwater and Floodplain departments are ready for a hearing. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 03/18/2010
72 General [4/2/10] Add details 701 & 708 from LCUASS to the Utility set. Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/02/2010
73 General [4/2/10] Show both the access easement for the sidewalk as well as the
emergency access easement on the Utility Sheet. If these easements are
being dedicated via the plat their location should be known to include on the
Utility Plan. Label them as they type of easement they are and that they are
being dedicated by the associated plat.
Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/02/2010
3/7/2011 Page 26
Project: AIR CARE COLORADO PDP - TYPE I AND FINAL PLAN (aka Envirotest) (RE:INTERCHANGE BUSINESS PARK LOTS 15 & 16
REPLAT)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
74 General [4/2/10] Show the baricades at the end of the proposed sidewalk on all
sheets and label it on the Utility sheet at a minimum.
Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/02/2010
75 General [4/5/10] On sheet C500 why is there a 6' attached sidewalk shown along with
HC ramps? Remove the attached walk and only show the detached walk and
HC ramps.
Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/05/2010
76 General [4/5/10] What is the proposed radii of the South side of the North drive? I can
not find it called out in any location?
Resolved 3 Andrew Carney 04/05/2010
77 Elevation Plan [4/7/10] Sheet A3.0 is titled as "Site Plan - Air Care Colorado", but it is an
Elevation Plan.
Active 3 Jeff County 04/07/2010
78 Utility Plans [4/7/10] Please correct the subtitle on the Utility Plans cover sheet. It shows
this site in the Northeast Quarter, and it should be the Northeast Quarter.
Active 3 Jeff County 04/07/2010
79 Utility Plans [4/7/10] Please correct the "Lot & Subdivision Name" on the Utility Plans. It
should read "Lot 2, Interchange Business Park Second Filing".
Active 3 Jeff County 04/07/2010
80 Utility Plans [4/7/10] No comments on Bicycle rack location. Active 3 Jennifer Petrik 04/07/2010
81 Floodplain [4/7/10] Please see floodplain checklist and redlines for all floodplain
comments.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
82 Stormwater [4/7/10] Please use the standard WQ outlet structure detail for the water
quality extended detention pond.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
83 Stormwater [4/7/10] Please add a note on the utility plan to core drill and grout the
connections between the existing inlets and the proposed storm sewers.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
84 Stormwater [4/7/10] Please add curb cut detail. Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
85 Stormwater [4/7/10] Please add an erosion control escrow calculation in the drainage
report. If you have any questions on how to calculate this, please call me at
416-2418.
Active 3 Wes Lamarque 04/07/2010
3/7/2011 Page 27