Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANACE ( AKA BOARDWALK CROSSING AT MASON ST ) - 10-99 - CORRESPONDENCE -Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 7 zoning [2/25/05] They've added a second note #6 to the site plan to address this. It should be renumbered to #7. However, the note is not acceptable. It should simply state that pole mounted light fixtures will be down directional, and the pole height will be x feet. If shouldn't refer to a note on another sheet. Also, it refers to "lighting mounted on ground". I don't believe there's any ground-mounted lighting. [12/2/04] The wording of this note has been changed, but there are still pole fixtures shown that aren't addressed in the note as to down directional, height of poles, etc. [6/23/04] General Note #6 implies that all exterior lighting will be building mounted, yet there are pole fixtures shown on the site plan. If there are to be pole fixtures, then the note should address those as well (i.e., down directional, height of poles, etc). If there aren't going to be any poles, then remove them from the site plan. Resolved 1 Peter Barnes 06/23/2004 8 Transportation [7/6/04] Please label the 6' sidewalk for Mason Street and the 5' walk for Boardwalk on both the site and utility plans. Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 07/06/2004 9 Transportation [7/6/04] Please identify the locations and label the bike racks on all plan sets. Bike racks are required to be located near the building entrance in a visible secure location (one for each bldg.) Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 07/06/2004 10 Transportation [7/6/04] Is it wise to have a parking stall immediately in front of the trash enclosure where a vehicle could potentially be blocking the dumpster? Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 07/06/2004 11 General [7/6/04] Provide top of water main and bottom of sanitary sewer service at the water main crossing in Boardwalk Dr. Will a lowering of the water main be required at this crossing? Provide details if so. Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 07/06/2004 12 Transportation [7/6/04] The proposed evergreen trees along Mason Street appear to be growing into the sidewalk. This will most likely create a maintenance problem with constant pruning. Trees along sidewalks are required to be maintained at an 8' clearance above the sidewalk, which may look silly for the proposed evergreens. Please use deciduous trees or shrubs along the sidewalks. Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 07/06/2004 13 General [7/6/04] Provide a copy of the utility easement documentation for our review. Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 07/06/2004 3/7/2011 Page 2 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 14 General [7/6/04] Include the concrete encasement detail on the detail sheet. Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 07/06/2004 15 [12/8/04] [7/6/04] Coordinate landscape and site plan to reflect the same information as shown on the utility plans. Label the water shut off for the south building as a curb stop and not as a gate valve. See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments. Active 1 Jeff Hill 07/06/2004 16 General The site plan shows both building entrances accessing within the adjacent parking area, instead of directly onto the adjacnet streets (Mason, Boardwalk or the rear access to REI). Given the location within the Mason Street Corridor, direct building access should be considered on either Mason/Boardwalk and on the private drive to the south (for the southern building). Active 1 Bob Barkeen 07/06/2004 17 General [7/6/04] Parking lot requires a minimum of 1.0fc throughout. Western most line of parking falls below this. Also, the north-south driveway should meet this requirement. The driveway intersection with Mason (sw corner) is under 1fc - need better levels to illuminate sidewalk/vehicle intersection. Active 1 Joseph Gerdom 07/06/2004 18 General [7/6/04] Trash enclosure needs to be better illuminated - recommend the 1.0fc standard. Also, Honeylocust in center of parking will block lighting - would suggest fixture be moved to west property line to address lighting/landscape issues. Active 1 Joseph Gerdom 07/06/2004 19 site/landscape plan [7/7/04] After close inspection, I can see that an attempt was made to use different lineweights for existing features vs. proposed features, but at this quality of printing, they are nearly indiscernible. Please change the lineweight used for existing features so that they are more distinct from proposed ones. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 20 site/landscape plan [7/7/04] Please clarify the extents of phase 1. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 21 General [3/15/05] Just one location on northmost ramp where slope is a bit too steep. [12/2/04] Due to new ADA requirements, and difficulties encountered with constructing ped ramps at corners, additional detail and spot elevations are needed for the design of the corner ramps to ensure ADA compliance. [7/7/04] Please provide both directional ramps on the northwest corner of the site. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 3/7/2011 Page 3 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 22 General [7/7/04] Please dimension the parkways and sidewalks to meet or exceed LCUASS standards. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 23 General [12/2/04] [7/7/04] The southern retail building is overlapping an existing drainage easement, which is not allowed unless that portion of the drainage easement is proposed to be vacated, and the City agrees to vacate it. In order to vacate the easement the City will need a legal description of the portion of the easement to be vacated, and a letter requesting the vacation. The easement vacation would then be processed through Cameron Gloss, since this is a Type I project. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 24 General [12/2/04] Please show all easements on the site plan as well as the utility plan. [7/7/04] The plat shows a small utility easement off the 30’ access road that is not shown on the plan and may overlap the proposed building. Please show all easements on the plans. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 25 General [12/2/04] Please show this easement on the site plan. [7/7/04] Please dedicate a public access easement to the back of the sidewalk on Mason. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 26 General [12/2/04] Please note that a variance was granted to allow a 10' utility easement along Mason. [7/7/04] Please dedicate a total 15’ wide utility easement behind the ROW on Mason or request an engineering variance to that standard (approval of this variance requires additional time to obtain approval of all utilities). Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 27 General [7/7/04] Please find a common title for all the plan sheets that is unique (not used previously). Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 28 General [3/15/05] The only scanning issue that might still be a problem is the grey lines - they may not show up. If you'd like, some morning during the week you could bring in a set of plans and do a test scan to see. Ask at Technical Services. [12/2/04] There are still areas of the plans needing attention regarding scanability. [7/7/04] Please review appendix E-10 in LCUASS for the City’s scanability requirements for all plan sheets and revise plans as necessary. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 3/7/2011 Page 4 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 29 General [7/7/04] Please use the standard detail for an under-walk drain (attached). Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 30 General [7/7/04] Any work performed outside this property’s boundaries requires offsite easements. (sidewalk near southeast corner of site) Please provide a letter of intent from the adjacent property owner prior to hearing, and a copy of the completed easement prior to mylars being signed. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 31 General [5/17/05] [3/15/05] [12/2/04] [7/7/04] Please see redlines for any additional comments. Active 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 32 General [7/7/04] The city is revising its detail for the pedestrian ramps used at corners to meet ADA requirements. See attached memo. I will get you the finalized detail as soon as I receive it. Resolved 1 Katie Moore 07/07/2004 33 Drainage The Mail Creek Master Plan states that the release rate for detention ponds be the 2-year historic flow rate for the site, including half the street frontage. For this site, the designated .87 cfs for the area that drains into the 30-inch storm sewer will control. Please adjust the release rate for this site to be .87 cfs/acre. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 07/09/2004 34 Drainage Please document the total release rate for the site, including half the street frontage, and show how the overall sites release rate meets the .87 cfs/acre criteria. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 07/09/2004 35 Drainage [12/10/04] Please add a flow calculation for the sidewalk chase. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 07/09/2004 36 Drainage [5/17/05] [3/18/05] Repeat Comment [12/10/04] A drainage easement is required for the detention pond. The existing drainage easement needs to be vacated for the part that is in conflict with the proposed building. Active 1 Wes Lamarque 07/09/2004 3/7/2011 Page 5 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 37 Drainage 1. There are two “Grading, Sediment, and Erosion Control Plan” sheets in the back of the report and they are different. Which one is the real plan? 2. The area inlet to be installed in the new WQ pond will need protection when it is constructed. 3. The silt fencing along the east side of the new construction is very difficult to see on the plan. 4. Since the plan shows all of the BMP’s and no phasing, it is going to be assumed that all of them will be installed and kept in good working order and repair from the first shovel of dirt being moved until project completion. This should be reflected in your surety calculations. 5. There must be a project schedule on the plan indicating when various BMP’s are to be placed and/or removed in relation to construction sequencing. 6. What is the “Native Grass Area?” Is this to be reseeded/mulched, or is it to be landscaped? Please indicate on the plan. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 07/09/2004 38 General [7/13/04] In the event the southern building is moved to the east, thus eliminating the foundation plantings along this eastern wall, an alternative would be to include trees in tree grates along the sidewalk. Active 1 Bob Barkeen 07/13/2004 3/7/2011 Page 6 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 39 General [12/15/04] [7/20/04] PREMISES IDENTIFICATION: Approved numerals or addresses shall be provided for all new and existing building in such a position as to be plainly visible and legible from the street or road fronting the property. 1997 UFC 901.4.4 A. In Multi-story buildings the following requirements shall pertain. 1. The first floor units shall be designated with 100’s. 2. The second floor units with 200’s 3. The third floor units with 300’s, and so forth. B. All brass letters and numerals shall be posted on a black background. C. Some multi-family layouts may require address postings from the back side as well as the front of the buildings. D. A counter clockwise addressing pattern shall be maintained when ever possible. E. An addressing scheme shall be submitted to the fire department for approval prior to being posted on the building. Active 1 Michael Chavez 07/20/2004 40 General [12/15/04] [7/20/04] WATER SUPPLY: Commercial No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant. Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2 Active 1 Michael Chavez 07/20/2004 41 Electric [11/29/04] The developer is encouraged to coordinate location(s) for pad type electric transformers with Light & Power Engineering (970)221-6700. It appears space for transformer(s) is limited, so the developer is encouraged to coordinate this as soon as possible. Active 2 Doug Martine 11/29/2004 42 General [12/2/04] The easement dedicated for the sidewalk on Mason should be a public access easement rather than a pedestrian access easement. Resolved 2 Katie Moore 12/02/2004 43 General [12/3/04] No comment Active 2 Eric Bracke 12/03/2004 44 General [12/8/04] Is driveway entrance (north side Lot 1) going to function as access to bldg in NW corner - if so, doesn't seem wide enough for two way traffic. Active 2 Joseph Gerdom 12/08/2004 3/7/2011 Page 7 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 45 General [12/10/04] No further comments, but a question: Engineering staff mentioned that this applicant had (at one point) “reached out” to REI to explore the feasibility of completing a sidewalk connection to the east. Understanding that this would require a small off-site improvement on REI’s property, I am curious as to the status of this possible connection. Thanks. Resolved 2 David Averill 12/10/2004 46 Erosion/Sediment Control [12/10/04] 1. The Standard Erosion Control Notes have been revised. Please replace those currently on the plan with the newer version. 2. The surety calculation from the first submittal does not accurately reflect the construction on the current phase. Please recalculate. 3. The report states that gravel filters will be placed on the existing area/curb inlets in Lot 1. On the plan, the west bank inlet is indicated as having straw bales. This will not work, please show a gravel filter here. Also change the note on the plan indicating straw bales under your heading “BMP NOTES:” 4. There must be a project schedule on the plan showing the construction phasing/BMP’s to be used on this project. Please utilize the newly upgraded schedule form (available by email). Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 12/10/2004 47 Drainage [12/10/04] Please request a variance for the detention pond depth being greater than 12-inches in the parking lot with a valid reason or grade the pond to have only the maximum depth. Signs stating that depth of detention for those parking stalls would be required if greater than 12 inches. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 12/10/2004 48 Drainage [12/10/04] Please clarify basin areas. See redlined plans. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 12/10/2004 49 Drainage [12/10/04] Please move the proposed trees away from the existing storm sewer as mentioned in the meeting held on December 8th. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 12/10/2004 50 General [12/15/04] Fire Sprinkler Requirement - If the building on the corner of Boardwalk Drive and South Mason Street is part of this proposal (Lot 2) it will be required to be fire sprinklered. Active 2 Michael Chavez 12/15/2004 3/7/2011 Page 8 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 51 General [12/15/04] KNOX BOX: Poudre Fire Authority requires a “Knox Box” to be mounted on the front of every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm system. 1997 UFC 902.4; PFA POLICY 88-20 Active 2 Michael Chavez 12/15/2004 52 General [12/15/04] FIRE LINE REQUIREMENT: Buildings that are required to be fire sprinklered shall have a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can support a smaller fire line. Active 2 Michael Chavez 12/15/2004 53 General [2/25/05] No Comments. Active 3 Doug Martine 02/25/2005 54 General [5/17/05] The deeds need to be revised - see redline provided by our attorney. [3/15/05] Please submit deeds of dedication, sketches, and legal descriptions for all easements to be dedicated with this project (public access easement, 1' utility easement, drainage) and submit a sketch and legal for the drainage easment to be vacated. Active 3 Katie Moore 03/15/2005 55 Drainage [5/17/05] [3/18/05] The elevations on the water quality outlet structure do not match the elevations on the drainage plan or in the report. The WQ outlet structure will need to be revised. Active 3 Wes Lamarque 03/18/2005 56 Drainage [3/18/05] Rust proofing is required for the WQ outlet structure grate. Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 03/18/2005 57 Drainage [3/18/05] The diameter for the orifice on the outlet pipe does not match the calculation in the report. Please revise. Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 03/18/2005 58 General [3/20/05] No comments. Active 3 Roger Buffington 03/20/2005 59 General [3/22/05] All previous comments addressed and nothing new to add. Thanks. Active 3 David Averill 03/22/2005 60 General [3/23/05] No issues. Active 3 Doug Moore 03/23/2005 61 General [4/6/05] See red-lined Site and Landscape Plans for comments. Active 3 Steve Olt 04/06/2005 3/7/2011 Page 9 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 62 General [5/17/05] Please cross out "a plat of" on the easement exhibit. Active 4 Katie Moore 05/17/2005 63 General [5/17/05] Please provide a legal descrip Resolved 4 Katie Moore 05/17/2005 3/7/2011 Page 10 Project: BOARDWALK CROSSING, LOT 2, FILING 2 PDP AND FINAL COMPLIANCE(aka Boardwalk Crossing at Mason St) PDP - Subdivsion Plat Request for wireless telecommunications equipment on an existing smoke stack Project Type: Project Desc: File ID: 10-99 Planner: TED SHEPARD DMS Project Num: CP99055100 ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 1 Contact Light & Power as soon as possible with load, voltage and phase requirements. Final comments on this project will depend on requirements of all the other wireless facilities that are locating on this site. 1133 Riverside Wireless Telecommunications #10-99A 1133 Riverside WTE Cricket #10-99B 1133 Riverside Wireless Equip #10-99 Please let me know of any other Telecom providers that are requesting to locate at this site. Active 1 Alan Rutz 09/18/2001 3/7/2011 Page 1