HomeMy WebLinkAboutCAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - 06-03C D - CORRESPONDENCE -Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
Project Development Plan
REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT 17 ADDITIONAL DWELLING UNITS (5 2-BEDROOM AND 12 3-BEDROOM) AND 3,100 S.F. OF
NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACE TO THE EXISTING CAMBRIDGE HOUSE APARTMENTS. THE PROJECT INCLUDES TWO SEPARATE
BUILDINGS. THE EXISTING POOL HOUSE WILL BE CONVERTED TO 5 TWO-BEDROOM UNITS. ADDITIONALLY, A NEW 5-STORY
BUILDING WILL BE CONSTRUCTED ON THE EAST EDGE OF THE PROPERTY, ABUTTING SOUTH SHIELDS STREET, WITH GROUND
FLOOR NON-RESIDENTIAL SPACE AND 12 THREE-BEDROOM APARTMENT UNITS ON THE SECOND THROUGH FIFTH STORIES.
Project Type:
Project Desc:
File ID: 06-03C/D Planner: Steve Olt DMS Project Num: CP031474
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
1 Light & Power [4/28/04]
[12/12/03] The developer will need to coordinate power requirements,
transformer locations, and electric development charges with Light & Power
Engineering (970)221-6700.
Active 1 Doug Martine 12/12/2003
2 Light & Power [4/28/04]
[12/12/03] The existing transformers serving Cambridge apartments will
need to be relocated. The existing wood fence enclosure around these
transformers is not Light & Power approved anyway.
Active 1 Doug Martine 12/12/2003
3 General [12/18/03] .REQUIRED ACCESS:
A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage,
and maintained unobstructed.
The criteria for a required fire lane contain several conditions that must be
met.
1. Buildings three stories or more in height must have access to a 30 foot
unobstructed access roadway on at least (1) one side for aerial operations.
2. Inside turning radius shall be 25 feet and outside turning radius shall be
50 feet.
3. Compacted road base shall be used during the construction phase only.
The permanent fire lane shall consist of asphalt or concrete and shall be
required to support 40 tons
4. The fire lane shall be platted as an Emergency Access Easement on
the final plat.
1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; FCLUC; PFA Policy 85-5 (B)
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
3/7/2011 Page 1
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
4 General [12/18/03] ADDRESS NUMERALS:
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and
posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background.
(Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable).
NOTE: If addressed off 1113 W. Plum St., an addressing pattern that
coincides with existing buildings shall be maintained.
1997 UFC 901.4.4
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
5 General [12/18/03] WATER SUPPLY: Commercial
No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant.
Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an
approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons
of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
6 General [12/18/03] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS:
Buildings that are three or more stories in height shall be fire sprinklered.
There shall be a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can
support a smaller fire line.
1997 UFC 1003.2.9; 902.2.1
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
7 General [12/18/03] FIRE ALARM REQUIREMENTS:
A fire alarm system is required for this proposed project. 1997 UFC
1007.2.9.1.1
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
8 General [12/18/03] KNOX BOX:
Poudre Fire Authority requires a Knox Box to be mounted on the front of
every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm
system.
1997 UFC 902.4; PFA POLICY 88-20
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
9 Zoning [7/6/04]
[4/28/04]
7-7-04 - comment still applies
[12/19/03] The tree cut-outs don't count as landscape dislands and don't
break up the parking aisles into 15 or fewer spaces in a row. Please review -
also it creates 2 non-conforming spaces that are too short - but people will
still attempt to park in them - but not be able to pull all the way forward.
Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
3/7/2011 Page 2
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
10 Zoning [4/28/04]
[12/19/03] North end parking aisle shows 16 spaces, southe nd shows 17,
only 15 in a row without an intervening island are allowed
Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
11 Zoning [12/19/03] Would prefer the site plan to only show site itmes, not landscape
items - the landscaping is/should be shown on the landscape plan
Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
12 Zoning [4/28/04]
[12/19/03] Plant Notes #4 - add ot working - value of landscpaing "and
installation"
Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
13 Zoning [12/19/03] On the south end where the diamond cut-out for the tree is
located there is only 2.5 ft og sidewalk - check with engineering on their
standards
Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
14 Zoning [7/6/04] Same comment
[12/19/03] Label building envelope, footprint, dimensions, distance to
property lines
Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
15 General [12/23/03] Project title needs to be consistent between the plan sets. All sets
should read "Cambridge House Lofts" or whatever the project title is that you
decide on.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
16 Existing Site Plan [12/23/03] Remove landscaping. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
17 Existing Site Plan [12/23/03] See appendix E6 for scanability requirements. Correct all
overlapping labeling and increase the font size to meet the minimum.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
18 Existing Site Plan [12/23/03] Sidewalk is shown between the two driveway entrances on Plum
but no sidewalk to the east and west of those same drives. Is there any
existing out there? If so, please show. If not, why not?
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
19 Existing Site Plan [12/23/03] Dimension Scott Avenue ROW, both existing and proposed. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
20 Site Plan [12/23/03] Show all easements, label and dimension. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
3/7/2011 Page 3
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
21 Site Plan [12/23/03] Remove landscaping. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
22 Site Plan [12/23/03] Remove contours. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
23 Site Plan [5/10/04] Repeat comment. The site plan is not scannable and will not be
approved until it meets the criteria set forth in appendix E6. The font is so
small in some places that I cannot read it or review it. More comments could
follow when it becomes legible.
[12/23/03] Correct all overlapping labeling and increase font size to meet the
minimum requirement. See appendix E6 for additional scanability
requirements.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
24 Site Plan [12/23/03] Dimension Scott Avenue ROW, existing and proposed. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
25 Site Plan [12/23/03] Please contact Tom Reiff in Transportation Planning regarding the
sidewalk along Plum street east and west of the existing drive entrances as
well as the sidewalk along the southern property boundary. The proposed
tree well narrows the 6' sidewalk down to 2.5' and does not meet our
minimum standards.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
26 Landscape Plan [7/13/04] Please correct the easement along Plum to be a 24' Public Access
and Utility Easement (see utility and plat plans) and show the emergency
access easement.
[5/10/04] Repeat comment.
[12/23/03] Show all utilities and easements (dimensioned and labeled).
Active 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
27 Landscape Plan [12/23/03] Remove contours. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
28 Landscape Plan [5/10/04] Repeat comment. The landscape plan will not be approved until all
requirements in Appendix E6 have been met.
[12/23/03] See appendix E6 for scanability requirements.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
29 Plat [5/10/04] Repeat comment. Corrections required, see redlines.
[12/23/03] Most of the plat language shown is incorrect. Please see the
attached for the correct plat language.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
3/7/2011 Page 4
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
30 Plat [12/23/03] Spell out all abbreviated easement labels. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
31 Plat [5/10/04] Repeat comment. Labeled incorrectly.
[12/23/03] Change the "Pedestrian Access Easement" along Plum Street to
read "Public Access Easement".
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
32 Plat [5/10/04] Repeat comment. Labeled incorrectly and missing width
dimensions. Also, the emergency access lane is shown extending into the
parking stalls and over the curb on the utility plans. This, for obvious
reasons, will not work. Please locate the emergency access lanes out of
these areas and in an area free of all obstructions.
[12/23/03] Dedicate the fire lane on the plat, label as "Emergency Access
Easement".
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
33 Plat [5/18/04]
[12/23/03] Provide two ties to aliquot corners.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
34 Utility Plans [12/23/03] Correct the preamble title to read "Utility Plans for " Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
35 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Correction required, see redlines.
[12/23/03] Provide two project bench marks referencing the City's datum.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
36 Utility Plans [12/23/03] See Bob Zakely for revegatation methods and specific notes
required on the plans.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
37 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Because you've added a horizontal control sheet, you can put all
the dimensioning on there and just show the emergency access easement on
all the other sheets (it should help keep your sheets legible). Make sure that
the EAE is located in an area free of all obstructions (parking stalls, curb and
gutter, etc).
[12/23/03] Show, dimension, and label the fire lane required by PFA.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
3/7/2011 Page 5
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
38 Utility Plans [12/23/03] See the attached checklist for other comments. The highlighted
items were reviewed with the first round of review. The remaining items are
reviewed after hearing and in the final compliance review.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
39 Utility Plans [12/23/03] Sheet 3, Add the street cut note:
Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the
field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with
City street repair standards.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
40 Utility Plans [12/23/03] Provide details: 701, 702, 707, 1601, 1602, 1606 Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
41 General [5/18/04] It was agreed that a Public Access Easement would be dedicated
to the back of walk in lieu of dedicating the additional ROW at this time.
Please dedicate this easement on the plat.
[12/23/03] This project is responsible for dedicating their half of the current
local street width (51' total) and for the design and construction of Scott
Avenue. There is currently 20' of ROW for Scott Avenue. That means that
this project needs to dedicate an additional 15.5', or (51-20)/2. However, you
may dedicate the additional width as a Public Access, Utility, and Drainage
Easement instead so that the applicant still retains the currect use of the
property as currently shown.
In addition, this project is responsible for dedicating their half of a minor
collector with parking along Plum. There is currently 40' of ROW and a total
of 76' is needed. That means that this project must dedicate an additional 18'
of ROW on Plum. They do NOT need to dedicate the utility easement along
Plum.
No additional ROW along Shields is required.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
42 Tree Preservation
Standards
[12/29/03] Contact Tim Buchanan, City Forester for an evaluation of existing
trees to be removed. If trees are being mitigated then mitigation trees need
to be shown and labeled on landscape plan. Limits of development (LOD),
details showing protective fencing and tree protection notes are also needed
in utility set. Notes may be obtained from the City Forester. L.U.C. 3.2.1(F),
3.2.1(G)
Active 1 Doug Moore 12/29/2003
3/7/2011 Page 6
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
43 General [12/29/03] Lighting Plan needed. Recommend that ground access to
stairwells be well lit, avoid landscape materials that provide concealment,
provide openings - viewports - in stairwell design. Need specific type and
location of plant materials.
Active 1 Joseph Gerdom 12/29/2003
44 General [12/30/03] Parking stall dimensions must be in accordance with LCUASS,
figure 19-7. I've included a comment from the modification submittal that
came through in September of 2003:
[9/25/03] Upon submittal of a PDP, parking stall dimensions must meet the
minimum standards as shown in Chapter 19 of LCUASS. Please label and
dimension all drive aisle widths as well as all parking stall lengths and widths
so that we can determine whether or not the parking stalls meet minimum
requirements.
12/31/3: A variance request must be submitted in accordance with LCUASS
if the parking dimensions do not meet standards.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/30/2003
45 General [12/30/03] Use a tapping saddle to make the fire line connection to the
existing water main. Label fire line as Ductile Iron Pipe (D.I.P.).
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
46 General [12/30/03] Separate water and sewer services are required for each use (i.e.
commercial verses residential).
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
47 General [5/20/04] Curb stops must be with in a utility easement and the meter pit may
not be located more than 2 feet from the curb stop. Provide flow calculation
for the sizing of the proposed water service for the residential portion of this
development.
[12/30/03] Curb stop and meter pit may not be located in the sidewalk or any
other traveled way.
See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
48 General [12/30/03] Provide a 10 foot utility easement on either side of the existing
sanitary sewer main. Maintain 10 foot clear separation between the existing
sanitary sewer main and any permanent structure (i.e. trash enclosure,
canopies, etc.). Will existing sanitary sewer manhole covers need to be
raised or lowered? If so, provide all detail necessary.) Provide a water tight
manhole cover for the existing manhole which will be located in the proposed
curb and gutter.
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
3/7/2011 Page 7
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
49 General [12/30/03] Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distances on the
landscape plans.
See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
50 General [12/31/03] A variance request will need to be submitted by a licensed
engineer if the emergency access easement does not meet standards.
[9/25/03] From the modification request: Upon submittal of a PDP, the fire
lane must meet the minimum requirements as shown in 7.8 of LCUASS and
the Emergency Access section 3.6.6 in the COFC Land Use Code. Such
emergency access lanes must be in a dedicated emergency access
easement (can be done by separate document). Please contact PFA to
determine if such easements are required. Please label and dimension the
width and inner/outer radii of the emergency access lane so that we can
determine whether or not the lane meets minimum requirements.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/31/2003
51 Traffic Study [12/31/03] Please provide a copy of the TIS as one was not received by the
Engineering Dept. with this submittal.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/31/2003
52 Landscape Plan [12/18/03] The tree cut-outs don't count as landscaped islands and son't
break up the parking into rows of 15 or fewer spaces
Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/31/2003
53 General [12/31/03] No comments. Active 1 Garold Smith 12/31/2003
54 Traffic Study [12/15/03] The TIS dated 12/08/03 is acceptable. No issues from Traffic
Operations
Active 1 Eric Bracke 12/31/2003
55 Drainage Stormwater is ready for hearing. Additional comments may follow during final
plan submittal.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 01/01/2004
56 Drainage Please coordinate the landscape plan with the utility plans. Shrubs are
proposed over the concrete pan.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 01/01/2004
57 Erosion/Sediment
Control
1. Please provide required calculations to support plan and surety
calculations at final plan review.
2. The site slopes west to east, yet there is no protection along Shields
Street. What protection will be provided there to protect areas downstream?
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 01/01/2004
3/7/2011 Page 8
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
58 General [1/8/04] The Conceptual Landscape Plan calls the project "Cambridge House
PUD." The Existing Site Plan and the proposed Site Plan calls the project
"Cambridge Lofts." The elevation sheet calls the project "Cambridge House
Lofts." All sheets need to use the same name. Also, the project is a Project
Development Plan, not a PUD. We have therefore entered the name in our
system as "Cambridge Lofts Apartments PDP." Please change the title of all
drawing sets, including civil engineering drawings to this name. If you don't
like the name we chose, you can choose a different one. Let us know what
you want the name to be and make sure all the drawing sheets say the new
name.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
59 Plat [1/8/04] The plat is not a minor subdivision. We don't do minor subdivisions
anymore. The plat should also be titled "Cambridge Lofts Apartments PDP."
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
60 General [1/8/04] Shrubs are shown within an area shown on the utility plans to be a
concrete channel at the southeast corner of the site. Please resolve this
conflict.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
61 General [1/8/04] Don't show any trees on the site plan, only show them on the
landscape plan. This includes not showing existing trees.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
62 General [1/8/04] Advance Planning, Current Planning and Transportation Planning all
need to review a detail at a larger scale fo the sidewalk and landscape areas
on the east and south sides of the new Shields Street building. As currently
shown, it's just too small of a scale to get an understanding of what's exactly
proposed. It's not clear what's proposed within the planting beds, and the
paving patterns are a little confusing at this scale.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
63 General [1/8/04] Along the northeastern corner of the site, extend a sidewalk along
the street frontage. If the existing tree is in the way, it can be removed,
because it is considered a nusiance species of tree. Tim Buchanan, the City
Forester should be contacted first.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
64 General [1/8/04] The new tree porposed along the south property line midway
between the new building and the existing apartments is not considered to be
feasible to have there because of the location of the sewer line in that vicinity.
You should remove this tree from the plans. The landscape diamond should
remain where shown, but have a shrub.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
3/7/2011 Page 9
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
65 General [1/8/04] Scott Avenue is a public street directly west of the site. It is gravel
and the right of way is only 25 feet wide. At some point in the long mid to
long term future, Scott Avenue will likely be widened and improved by the
creation of some sort of Special Improvement District or some other
mechanism. Although such improvements would not likely happen anytime
soon, such widening would impact the parking along the west edge of
Cambridge House Apartments. If Scott Avenue were to have a right of way
width in accordance with the local residential street standard, the right of way
would need to be 51 feet wide. This would mean that an addition 15.5 feet
would be needed from the Cambridge House apartments property to
accomplish this. One potential solution staff is considering would be to have
this project dedicate a 15.5 foot wide access easement along the western
edge of the property. The conditions by which the City would exercise the
use of this area would need to be carfully spelled out in the development
agreement. It would also need to be clarified in the developent agreement
that the loss of on-site parking as a result of Scott Street being built would
need to be somehow accommodated by on-street parking, or some other
solution that doesn't adversely affect Cambridge House Apartment. I'm in the
process of coordinate schedules, we should meet on this issue next week.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
66 General [1/8/04] The scale on the conceptual landscape plan and the site plan seems
to be the same but one is labeled at 1"=20' and the other is labeled at 1"=30'.
Please clarify.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
67 General [1/8/04] Specify colors of materials on the elevations and bring in samples of
the brick and concrete block.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
68 General [1/8/04] We can tentatively plan to take the project to the Feburary 19th
Planning and Zoning Board meeting, provided we come to an agreement on
how best to deal with Scott Avenue.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
69 General [1/8/04] OK. Active 1 Beth Sowder 01/08/2004
70 General [1/8/04] No comment. Active 1 Craig Foreman 01/08/2004
71 General [1/8/04] No Concerns. Active 1 Carl Jenkins 01/08/2004
3/7/2011 Page 10
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
72 General [1/8/04] Any relocation, cutoff's or installation of gas facilities will be at
developers expense.
Active 1 Len Hilderbrand 01/08/2004
73 General [1/8/04] No trees planted with in 4' of gas lines. (existing or future mains,
services, etc.)
Active 1 Len Hilderbrand 01/08/2004
74 General [1/8/04] Plat shows wrong legals for area/ 67W Should be/ 15. 7N. 69W Active 1 Len Hilderbrand 01/08/2004
75 General [1/8/04] Water Conservation has no comments. Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
76 General [1/8/04] See the attached comment sheet from Building Inspection. Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
77 Plat [1/9/04] All of the plat language is wrong. Please see the attached for the
correct language.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
78 Plat [1/9/04] Correct the project title. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
79 Plat [1/9/04] Spell out all abbreviations. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
80 Plat [1/9/04] Dedicate the emergency access lane required by PFA. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
81 Plat [1/9/04] See comments under General that effect the plat. See redlines. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
82 General [1/9/04] See attached redlines from Current Planning. Active 1 Troy Jones 01/09/2004
83 General [1/9/04] The sidewalk along the south side of the new building must be a
minimum of 6 feet wide [LUC 3.2.2(C)(5)].
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/09/2004
84 Transportation [7/13/04] The additional ramps along the walkway connecting Shields St. to
the existing Cambridge House apartment complex are still not shown on the
utility plans. Please correct.
[5/18/04] A few additional access ramps still need to be added to the plans
(see red lines).
[1/12/04] Please include all access ramps associated with sidewalks on all
the plan sets including the utility and site plans.
Active 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
3/7/2011 Page 11
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
85 Transportation [5/18/04]
[1/12/04] Plum Street is classified as a collector on the Master Street Plan.
Please dedicate your half of the 76 foot right of way. This should be
measured from the centerline of Plum Street.
Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
86 Transportation [5/18/04] Please remove the proposed new vertical v-shaped curbs shown
on the utility plans along the Scott R.O.W. These verical curbs were intended
for landscaping that is not longer required.
[1/12/04] Given the planned future connection of Scott Avenue to W.
Elizabeth, please replace the proposed shade trees along Scott Avenue with
ornamental trees.
Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
87 Transportation [7/13/04] Utilitiy plans need to clearing show how the sidewalks changes
along Plum Street will connect to the existing sidewalk.
[5/18/04] There are minor discrepancies between the utility plans and the site
and landscape plans. Please clean up the
Plum Street sidewalk configuration between the plan sets. Keep in mind that
the sidewalk needs to continue to the edge of the property line and connect to
the existing sidewalk.
[1/12/04] The sidewalk along Plum Street will need to continue to the edge of
the property line to the east. Please include a sidewalk that crosses the
driveway to the eastern property line (see red lines for alignment).
Active 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
88 Transportation [1/12/04] Please provide an enlarged section for the Shields Street sidewalk
and landscaped frontage. Also the sidewalk on the south side of the building
should be a minimum of 6 feet in width to accommodate the high pedestrian
traffic.
Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
89 Zoning [4/28/04] Please remove the small print referencing landscaping on the site
plan. Does not need to be on site plan and is too small to read anyway.
Active 2 Jenny Nuckols 04/28/2004
90 Site Plan [7/13/04] Please correct the easement along Plum to be a 24' Public Access
and Utility Easement (see utility and plat plans).
[5/10/04] Site plan does not match the utility plans.
Active 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
3/7/2011 Page 12
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
91 Landscape Plan [5/10/04] The landscape plan does not match the utility plan. Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
92 Utility Plans [7/14/04] Correction required to the emergency access easement variance.
The min widths and radii were not met at the "pinch" point and it needs to be
reworded to reflect that.
[5/10/04] Sheet 2 - please be a little more specific on the variance granted in
line 48. Include the section, the actual requirement, and then the variance
itself. Also, include the variance to the emergency access easement
miminum widths and radii granted by PFA.
Active 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
93 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 3 - Label all easements with what the easement is for (Utility,
Emergency Access Easement, etc).
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
94 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 3 - Correct all overlapped labeling. Remove the landscaping. Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
95 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 4 - is unscannable. Remove landscaping. Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
96 Landscape Plan [5/10/04] Planters along Shields street must be located outside the existing
utility easement or are these tree grates? Please label accordingly.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
97 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 5 - Remove the landscaping. Block out background around
text. Correct a misspelled word.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
98 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Cover Sheet - Please provide the name, address, and phone
number of the Owner and/or Developer.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
99 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 4 - Please provide finish grade elevations for all lot corners
and finish floors/top of foundation of all buildings for all lots.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
100 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 4 - Please provide the statement: The top of foundation
elevations shown are the mimimum elevations required for protection from
the 100-year storm.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
101 Utility Plans Please provide site specific details for the sidewalk chase and concrete
channel. See redlined plans. Also, provide a valley pan detail.
Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 05/17/2004
102 Utility Plans Please provide a F.F. elevation for the proposed building. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 05/17/2004
3/7/2011 Page 13
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
103 Utility Plans 1. Please provide a project schedule indicating when various BMPs will be
installed within the framework of the construction. You dont need to use
specific dates (months), you can just use project phases, etc.
Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 05/17/2004
104 Utility Plans [5/18/04] Parking lot lighting levels are below required 1.0fc. Also, important
in making revisions - evaluate location of plant materials. Need photometrics
for area next to stairs.
Active 2 Joseph Gerdom 05/18/2004
106 Plat [5/18/04] Instead of having a 15' utility easement and 24' public access
easement along Plum, just make one combined 24' Public Access and Utility
Easement.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/18/2004
108 Plat [5/18/04] Label Scott Avenue as 25' ROW. Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/18/2004
109 Plat [7/13/04] [5/18/04] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close. Active 2 Susan Joy 05/18/2004
110 Plat [5/18/04] From Technical Services: The need for a block in a 2 lot
subdivision is unnecessary.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/18/2004
111 Plat [7/14/04]
[5/21/04] Will there be any restaurants in the building? If so, provide grease
interceptor.
Active 2 Roger Buffington 05/21/2004
112 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] The (Final Compliance) Landscape Plan does not necessarily
satisfy the City Forester's requirement for tree mitigation for the loss of 4
existing significant trees. Based on the previous Landscape Plan, Tim
Buchanan stated that 12 new trees need to be upsized to 3.0" caliper for
adequate mitigation. The current plan shows 7 new deciduous trees to be
upsized to 3.0" caliper and 5 new ornamental trees to be upsized to 2.5"
caliper. Mr. Buchanan must determine if the current plan satisfies the Land
Use Code requirement for tree mitigation.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
113 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] The proposed "Fallgold" Ash at the northwest corner of the site is
too close to the west edge of the driveway into the development. It must be a
minimum of 8' from edge of driveway. The "Fallgold" Ash is not shown in the
Plant Legend. Also, this proposed tree may be in conflict with a future Scott
Avenue entension.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
3/7/2011 Page 14
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
114 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] There are 3 Ash trees shown in the planting island just west of the
existing church. The assumption is that they are to be "Summit" Ash and
should be labeled as such on the plan.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
115 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] Plan Note #4 must be revised to include the reference to 125% of
the "materials & labor" for the landscaping.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
116 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] It is difficult to follow the alignment of the existing (proposed?)
sidewalk along the south side of West Plum Street, north of the 3 buildings in
this development.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
117 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] Please add a scale on this sheet for the Full Landscape Plan. It
should be, presumably, 1" = 30.0'.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
118 Site Plan [5/24/04] On the Site Plan, eliminate the labeling for plant material around
the new building. The plant material is not shown but the labeling still is.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
119 Site Plan [5/24/04] Under the Land Use Statistics on the Site Plan, the Maximum
Building Height is shown to be 56'-0". This is inconsistent with the Exterior
Elevations Plan, which shows the building to be 58'-0" high.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
120 Building Elevations [5/24/04] The Exterior Elevations Plan shows the building to be 58'-0" high.
This is inconsistent with the Site Plan, which indicates a Maximum Building
Height of 56'-0" under the Land Use Statistics.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
121 Site Plan [5/24/04] The Planning & Zoning Certificate block is not needed on the Site
Plan and should be removed.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
122 Site Plan [5/25/04] There are numerous words misspelled in the General Notes on the
Site Plan (please see red-lined plan).
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/25/2004
123 Plat [7/13/04] Repeat from last round of redlines: What are all the extra leaders
for?
Active 3 Susan Joy 07/13/2004
124 Plat [7/13/04] From Technical Services: Typo in Legal, section 12 should be
section 15 (see redlines).
Active 3 Susan Joy 07/13/2004
125 General [7/13/04] Ready for mylars with the remaining items addressed (do not need
to resubmit).
Active 3 Susan Joy 07/13/2004
3/7/2011 Page 15
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
126 Drainage The F.F. elevation for the building needs to be 18-inches above the flowline of
the gutter in Shields. This is required due to the flow depth allowed in an
arterial street to be 18-inches in the 100-year storm.
Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 07/13/2004
127 Drainage Please change detail of 5-foot chase to have a 6-inch concrete support. See
redlined plans.
Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 07/13/2004
128 Utility Plans [7/14/04] Check labeling of water services. A 1" water service is not
adequate for 12 units.
Active 3 Roger Buffington 07/14/2004
129 General [7/14/04] No issues. Active 3 Doug Moore 07/14/2004
130 General [7/21/04] The Current Planning Department is ready for mylars of the Site
Plan, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations, and subdivision plat (3 sets, at
least 1 with original signatures) to be submitted.
Active 3 Steve Olt 07/21/2004
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
1 Light & Power [4/28/04]
[12/12/03] The developer will need to coordinate power requirements,
transformer locations, and electric development charges with Light & Power
Engineering (970)221-6700.
Active 1 Doug Martine 12/12/2003
2 Light & Power [4/28/04]
[12/12/03] The existing transformers serving Cambridge apartments will
need to be relocated. The existing wood fence enclosure around these
transformers is not Light & Power approved anyway.
Active 1 Doug Martine 12/12/2003
3/7/2011 Page 16
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
3 General [12/18/03] .REQUIRED ACCESS:
A fire lane is required. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage,
and maintained unobstructed.
The criteria for a required fire lane contain several conditions that must be
met.
1. Buildings three stories or more in height must have access to a 30 foot
unobstructed access roadway on at least (1) one side for aerial operations.
2. Inside turning radius shall be 25 feet and outside turning radius shall be
50 feet.
3. Compacted road base shall be used during the construction phase only.
The permanent fire lane shall consist of asphalt or concrete and shall be
required to support 40 tons
4. The fire lane shall be platted as an Emergency Access Easement on
the final plat.
1997 UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; FCLUC; PFA Policy 85-5 (B)
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
4 General [12/18/03] ADDRESS NUMERALS:
Address numerals shall be visible from the street fronting the property, and
posted with a minimum of 6 inch numerals on a contrasting background.
(Bronze numerals on brown brick are not acceptable).
NOTE: If addressed off 1113 W. Plum St., an addressing pattern that
coincides with existing buildings shall be maintained.
1997 UFC 901.4.4
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
5 General [12/18/03] WATER SUPPLY: Commercial
No commercial building can be greater then 300 feet from a fire hydrant.
Fire hydrants are required with a maximum spacing of 600 feet along an
approved roadway. Each hydrant must be capable of delivering 1500 gallons
of water per minute at a residual pressure of 20 psi. 1997 UFC 901.2.2.2
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
6 General [12/18/03] SPRINKLER REQUIREMENTS:
Buildings that are three or more stories in height shall be fire sprinklered.
There shall be a minimum 6-inch fire line unless hydraulic calculations can
support a smaller fire line.
1997 UFC 1003.2.9; 902.2.1
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
7 General [12/18/03] FIRE ALARM REQUIREMENTS:
A fire alarm system is required for this proposed project. 1997 UFC
1007.2.9.1.1
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
3/7/2011 Page 17
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
8 General [12/18/03] KNOX BOX:
Poudre Fire Authority requires a Knox Box to be mounted on the front of
every new building equipped with a required fire sprinkler system or fire alarm
system.
1997 UFC 902.4; PFA POLICY 88-20
Active 1 Michael Chavez 12/18/2003
9 Zoning [7/6/04]
[4/28/04]
7-7-04 - comment still applies
[12/19/03] The tree cut-outs don't count as landscape dislands and don't
break up the parking aisles into 15 or fewer spaces in a row. Please review -
also it creates 2 non-conforming spaces that are too short - but people will
still attempt to park in them - but not be able to pull all the way forward.
Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
10 Zoning [4/28/04]
[12/19/03] North end parking aisle shows 16 spaces, southe nd shows 17,
only 15 in a row without an intervening island are allowed
Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
11 Zoning [12/19/03] Would prefer the site plan to only show site itmes, not landscape
items - the landscaping is/should be shown on the landscape plan
Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
12 Zoning [4/28/04]
[12/19/03] Plant Notes #4 - add ot working - value of landscpaing "and
installation"
Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
13 Zoning [12/19/03] On the south end where the diamond cut-out for the tree is
located there is only 2.5 ft og sidewalk - check with engineering on their
standards
Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
14 Zoning [7/6/04] Same comment
[12/19/03] Label building envelope, footprint, dimensions, distance to
property lines
Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/19/2003
15 General [12/23/03] Project title needs to be consistent between the plan sets. All sets
should read "Cambridge House Lofts" or whatever the project title is that you
decide on.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
3/7/2011 Page 18
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
16 Existing Site Plan [12/23/03] Remove landscaping. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
17 Existing Site Plan [12/23/03] See appendix E6 for scanability requirements. Correct all
overlapping labeling and increase the font size to meet the minimum.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
18 Existing Site Plan [12/23/03] Sidewalk is shown between the two driveway entrances on Plum
but no sidewalk to the east and west of those same drives. Is there any
existing out there? If so, please show. If not, why not?
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
19 Existing Site Plan [12/23/03] Dimension Scott Avenue ROW, both existing and proposed. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
20 Site Plan [12/23/03] Show all easements, label and dimension. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
21 Site Plan [12/23/03] Remove landscaping. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
22 Site Plan [12/23/03] Remove contours. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
23 Site Plan [5/10/04] Repeat comment. The site plan is not scannable and will not be
approved until it meets the criteria set forth in appendix E6. The font is so
small in some places that I cannot read it or review it. More comments could
follow when it becomes legible.
[12/23/03] Correct all overlapping labeling and increase font size to meet the
minimum requirement. See appendix E6 for additional scanability
requirements.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
24 Site Plan [12/23/03] Dimension Scott Avenue ROW, existing and proposed. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
25 Site Plan [12/23/03] Please contact Tom Reiff in Transportation Planning regarding the
sidewalk along Plum street east and west of the existing drive entrances as
well as the sidewalk along the southern property boundary. The proposed
tree well narrows the 6' sidewalk down to 2.5' and does not meet our
minimum standards.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
3/7/2011 Page 19
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
26 Landscape Plan [7/13/04] Please correct the easement along Plum to be a 24' Public Access
and Utility Easement (see utility and plat plans) and show the emergency
access easement.
[5/10/04] Repeat comment.
[12/23/03] Show all utilities and easements (dimensioned and labeled).
Active 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
27 Landscape Plan [12/23/03] Remove contours. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
28 Landscape Plan [5/10/04] Repeat comment. The landscape plan will not be approved until all
requirements in Appendix E6 have been met.
[12/23/03] See appendix E6 for scanability requirements.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
29 Plat [5/10/04] Repeat comment. Corrections required, see redlines.
[12/23/03] Most of the plat language shown is incorrect. Please see the
attached for the correct plat language.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
30 Plat [12/23/03] Spell out all abbreviated easement labels. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
31 Plat [5/10/04] Repeat comment. Labeled incorrectly.
[12/23/03] Change the "Pedestrian Access Easement" along Plum Street to
read "Public Access Easement".
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
32 Plat [5/10/04] Repeat comment. Labeled incorrectly and missing width
dimensions. Also, the emergency access lane is shown extending into the
parking stalls and over the curb on the utility plans. This, for obvious
reasons, will not work. Please locate the emergency access lanes out of
these areas and in an area free of all obstructions.
[12/23/03] Dedicate the fire lane on the plat, label as "Emergency Access
Easement".
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
33 Plat [5/18/04]
[12/23/03] Provide two ties to aliquot corners.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
34 Utility Plans [12/23/03] Correct the preamble title to read "Utility Plans for " Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
3/7/2011 Page 20
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
35 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Correction required, see redlines.
[12/23/03] Provide two project bench marks referencing the City's datum.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
36 Utility Plans [12/23/03] See Bob Zakely for revegatation methods and specific notes
required on the plans.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
37 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Because you've added a horizontal control sheet, you can put all
the dimensioning on there and just show the emergency access easement on
all the other sheets (it should help keep your sheets legible). Make sure that
the EAE is located in an area free of all obstructions (parking stalls, curb and
gutter, etc).
[12/23/03] Show, dimension, and label the fire lane required by PFA.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
38 Utility Plans [12/23/03] See the attached checklist for other comments. The highlighted
items were reviewed with the first round of review. The remaining items are
reviewed after hearing and in the final compliance review.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
39 Utility Plans [12/23/03] Sheet 3, Add the street cut note:
Limits of street cut are approximate. Final limits are to be determined in the
field by the City Engineering Inspector. All repairs to be in accordance with
City street repair standards.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
40 Utility Plans [12/23/03] Provide details: 701, 702, 707, 1601, 1602, 1606 Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
3/7/2011 Page 21
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
41 General [5/18/04] It was agreed that a Public Access Easement would be dedicated
to the back of walk in lieu of dedicating the additional ROW at this time.
Please dedicate this easement on the plat.
[12/23/03] This project is responsible for dedicating their half of the current
local street width (51' total) and for the design and construction of Scott
Avenue. There is currently 20' of ROW for Scott Avenue. That means that
this project needs to dedicate an additional 15.5', or (51-20)/2. However, you
may dedicate the additional width as a Public Access, Utility, and Drainage
Easement instead so that the applicant still retains the currect use of the
property as currently shown.
In addition, this project is responsible for dedicating their half of a minor
collector with parking along Plum. There is currently 40' of ROW and a total
of 76' is needed. That means that this project must dedicate an additional 18'
of ROW on Plum. They do NOT need to dedicate the utility easement along
Plum.
No additional ROW along Shields is required.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/23/2003
42 Tree Preservation
Standards
[12/29/03] Contact Tim Buchanan, City Forester for an evaluation of existing
trees to be removed. If trees are being mitigated then mitigation trees need
to be shown and labeled on landscape plan. Limits of development (LOD),
details showing protective fencing and tree protection notes are also needed
in utility set. Notes may be obtained from the City Forester. L.U.C. 3.2.1(F),
3.2.1(G)
Active 1 Doug Moore 12/29/2003
43 General [12/29/03] Lighting Plan needed. Recommend that ground access to
stairwells be well lit, avoid landscape materials that provide concealment,
provide openings - viewports - in stairwell design. Need specific type and
location of plant materials.
Active 1 Joseph Gerdom 12/29/2003
3/7/2011 Page 22
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
44 General [12/30/03] Parking stall dimensions must be in accordance with LCUASS,
figure 19-7. I've included a comment from the modification submittal that
came through in September of 2003:
[9/25/03] Upon submittal of a PDP, parking stall dimensions must meet the
minimum standards as shown in Chapter 19 of LCUASS. Please label and
dimension all drive aisle widths as well as all parking stall lengths and widths
so that we can determine whether or not the parking stalls meet minimum
requirements.
12/31/3: A variance request must be submitted in accordance with LCUASS
if the parking dimensions do not meet standards.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/30/2003
45 General [12/30/03] Use a tapping saddle to make the fire line connection to the
existing water main. Label fire line as Ductile Iron Pipe (D.I.P.).
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
46 General [12/30/03] Separate water and sewer services are required for each use (i.e.
commercial verses residential).
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
47 General [5/20/04] Curb stops must be with in a utility easement and the meter pit may
not be located more than 2 feet from the curb stop. Provide flow calculation
for the sizing of the proposed water service for the residential portion of this
development.
[12/30/03] Curb stop and meter pit may not be located in the sidewalk or any
other traveled way.
See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
48 General [12/30/03] Provide a 10 foot utility easement on either side of the existing
sanitary sewer main. Maintain 10 foot clear separation between the existing
sanitary sewer main and any permanent structure (i.e. trash enclosure,
canopies, etc.). Will existing sanitary sewer manhole covers need to be
raised or lowered? If so, provide all detail necessary.) Provide a water tight
manhole cover for the existing manhole which will be located in the proposed
curb and gutter.
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
49 General [12/30/03] Maintain the required landscape/utility separation distances on the
landscape plans.
See site, landscape and utility plans for other comments.
Resolved 1 Jeff Hill 12/30/2003
3/7/2011 Page 23
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
50 General [12/31/03] A variance request will need to be submitted by a licensed
engineer if the emergency access easement does not meet standards.
[9/25/03] From the modification request: Upon submittal of a PDP, the fire
lane must meet the minimum requirements as shown in 7.8 of LCUASS and
the Emergency Access section 3.6.6 in the COFC Land Use Code. Such
emergency access lanes must be in a dedicated emergency access
easement (can be done by separate document). Please contact PFA to
determine if such easements are required. Please label and dimension the
width and inner/outer radii of the emergency access lane so that we can
determine whether or not the lane meets minimum requirements.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/31/2003
51 Traffic Study [12/31/03] Please provide a copy of the TIS as one was not received by the
Engineering Dept. with this submittal.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 12/31/2003
52 Landscape Plan [12/18/03] The tree cut-outs don't count as landscaped islands and son't
break up the parking into rows of 15 or fewer spaces
Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 12/31/2003
53 General [12/31/03] No comments. Active 1 Garold Smith 12/31/2003
54 Traffic Study [12/15/03] The TIS dated 12/08/03 is acceptable. No issues from Traffic
Operations
Active 1 Eric Bracke 12/31/2003
55 Drainage Stormwater is ready for hearing. Additional comments may follow during final
plan submittal.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 01/01/2004
56 Drainage Please coordinate the landscape plan with the utility plans. Shrubs are
proposed over the concrete pan.
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 01/01/2004
57 Erosion/Sediment
Control
1. Please provide required calculations to support plan and surety
calculations at final plan review.
2. The site slopes west to east, yet there is no protection along Shields
Street. What protection will be provided there to protect areas downstream?
Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 01/01/2004
3/7/2011 Page 24
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
58 General [1/8/04] The Conceptual Landscape Plan calls the project "Cambridge House
PUD." The Existing Site Plan and the proposed Site Plan calls the project
"Cambridge Lofts." The elevation sheet calls the project "Cambridge House
Lofts." All sheets need to use the same name. Also, the project is a Project
Development Plan, not a PUD. We have therefore entered the name in our
system as "Cambridge Lofts Apartments PDP." Please change the title of all
drawing sets, including civil engineering drawings to this name. If you don't
like the name we chose, you can choose a different one. Let us know what
you want the name to be and make sure all the drawing sheets say the new
name.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
59 Plat [1/8/04] The plat is not a minor subdivision. We don't do minor subdivisions
anymore. The plat should also be titled "Cambridge Lofts Apartments PDP."
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
60 General [1/8/04] Shrubs are shown within an area shown on the utility plans to be a
concrete channel at the southeast corner of the site. Please resolve this
conflict.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
61 General [1/8/04] Don't show any trees on the site plan, only show them on the
landscape plan. This includes not showing existing trees.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
62 General [1/8/04] Advance Planning, Current Planning and Transportation Planning all
need to review a detail at a larger scale fo the sidewalk and landscape areas
on the east and south sides of the new Shields Street building. As currently
shown, it's just too small of a scale to get an understanding of what's exactly
proposed. It's not clear what's proposed within the planting beds, and the
paving patterns are a little confusing at this scale.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
63 General [1/8/04] Along the northeastern corner of the site, extend a sidewalk along
the street frontage. If the existing tree is in the way, it can be removed,
because it is considered a nusiance species of tree. Tim Buchanan, the City
Forester should be contacted first.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
64 General [1/8/04] The new tree porposed along the south property line midway
between the new building and the existing apartments is not considered to be
feasible to have there because of the location of the sewer line in that vicinity.
You should remove this tree from the plans. The landscape diamond should
remain where shown, but have a shrub.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
3/7/2011 Page 25
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
65 General [1/8/04] Scott Avenue is a public street directly west of the site. It is gravel
and the right of way is only 25 feet wide. At some point in the long mid to
long term future, Scott Avenue will likely be widened and improved by the
creation of some sort of Special Improvement District or some other
mechanism. Although such improvements would not likely happen anytime
soon, such widening would impact the parking along the west edge of
Cambridge House Apartments. If Scott Avenue were to have a right of way
width in accordance with the local residential street standard, the right of way
would need to be 51 feet wide. This would mean that an addition 15.5 feet
would be needed from the Cambridge House apartments property to
accomplish this. One potential solution staff is considering would be to have
this project dedicate a 15.5 foot wide access easement along the western
edge of the property. The conditions by which the City would exercise the
use of this area would need to be carfully spelled out in the development
agreement. It would also need to be clarified in the developent agreement
that the loss of on-site parking as a result of Scott Street being built would
need to be somehow accommodated by on-street parking, or some other
solution that doesn't adversely affect Cambridge House Apartment. I'm in the
process of coordinate schedules, we should meet on this issue next week.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
66 General [1/8/04] The scale on the conceptual landscape plan and the site plan seems
to be the same but one is labeled at 1"=20' and the other is labeled at 1"=30'.
Please clarify.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
67 General [1/8/04] Specify colors of materials on the elevations and bring in samples of
the brick and concrete block.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
68 General [1/8/04] We can tentatively plan to take the project to the Feburary 19th
Planning and Zoning Board meeting, provided we come to an agreement on
how best to deal with Scott Avenue.
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
69 General [1/8/04] OK. Active 1 Beth Sowder 01/08/2004
70 General [1/8/04] No comment. Active 1 Craig Foreman 01/08/2004
71 General [1/8/04] No Concerns. Active 1 Carl Jenkins 01/08/2004
3/7/2011 Page 26
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
72 General [1/8/04] Any relocation, cutoff's or installation of gas facilities will be at
developers expense.
Active 1 Len Hilderbrand 01/08/2004
73 General [1/8/04] No trees planted with in 4' of gas lines. (existing or future mains,
services, etc.)
Active 1 Len Hilderbrand 01/08/2004
74 General [1/8/04] Plat shows wrong legals for area/ 67W Should be/ 15. 7N. 69W Active 1 Len Hilderbrand 01/08/2004
75 General [1/8/04] Water Conservation has no comments. Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
76 General [1/8/04] See the attached comment sheet from Building Inspection. Active 1 Troy Jones 01/08/2004
77 Plat [1/9/04] All of the plat language is wrong. Please see the attached for the
correct language.
Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
78 Plat [1/9/04] Correct the project title. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
79 Plat [1/9/04] Spell out all abbreviations. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
80 Plat [1/9/04] Dedicate the emergency access lane required by PFA. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
81 Plat [1/9/04] See comments under General that effect the plat. See redlines. Resolved 1 Susan Joy 01/09/2004
82 General [1/9/04] See attached redlines from Current Planning. Active 1 Troy Jones 01/09/2004
83 General [1/9/04] The sidewalk along the south side of the new building must be a
minimum of 6 feet wide [LUC 3.2.2(C)(5)].
Active 1 Troy Jones 01/09/2004
84 Transportation [7/13/04] The additional ramps along the walkway connecting Shields St. to
the existing Cambridge House apartment complex are still not shown on the
utility plans. Please correct.
[5/18/04] A few additional access ramps still need to be added to the plans
(see red lines).
[1/12/04] Please include all access ramps associated with sidewalks on all
the plan sets including the utility and site plans.
Active 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
3/7/2011 Page 27
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
85 Transportation [5/18/04]
[1/12/04] Plum Street is classified as a collector on the Master Street Plan.
Please dedicate your half of the 76 foot right of way. This should be
measured from the centerline of Plum Street.
Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
86 Transportation [5/18/04] Please remove the proposed new vertical v-shaped curbs shown
on the utility plans along the Scott R.O.W. These verical curbs were intended
for landscaping that is not longer required.
[1/12/04] Given the planned future connection of Scott Avenue to W.
Elizabeth, please replace the proposed shade trees along Scott Avenue with
ornamental trees.
Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
87 Transportation [7/13/04] Utilitiy plans need to clearing show how the sidewalks changes
along Plum Street will connect to the existing sidewalk.
[5/18/04] There are minor discrepancies between the utility plans and the site
and landscape plans. Please clean up the
Plum Street sidewalk configuration between the plan sets. Keep in mind that
the sidewalk needs to continue to the edge of the property line and connect to
the existing sidewalk.
[1/12/04] The sidewalk along Plum Street will need to continue to the edge of
the property line to the east. Please include a sidewalk that crosses the
driveway to the eastern property line (see red lines for alignment).
Active 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
88 Transportation [1/12/04] Please provide an enlarged section for the Shields Street sidewalk
and landscaped frontage. Also the sidewalk on the south side of the building
should be a minimum of 6 feet in width to accommodate the high pedestrian
traffic.
Resolved 1 Tom Reiff 01/12/2004
89 Zoning [4/28/04] Please remove the small print referencing landscaping on the site
plan. Does not need to be on site plan and is too small to read anyway.
Active 2 Jenny Nuckols 04/28/2004
90 Site Plan [7/13/04] Please correct the easement along Plum to be a 24' Public Access
and Utility Easement (see utility and plat plans).
[5/10/04] Site plan does not match the utility plans.
Active 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
3/7/2011 Page 28
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
91 Landscape Plan [5/10/04] The landscape plan does not match the utility plan. Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
92 Utility Plans [7/14/04] Correction required to the emergency access easement variance.
The min widths and radii were not met at the "pinch" point and it needs to be
reworded to reflect that.
[5/10/04] Sheet 2 - please be a little more specific on the variance granted in
line 48. Include the section, the actual requirement, and then the variance
itself. Also, include the variance to the emergency access easement
miminum widths and radii granted by PFA.
Active 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
93 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 3 - Label all easements with what the easement is for (Utility,
Emergency Access Easement, etc).
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
94 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 3 - Correct all overlapped labeling. Remove the landscaping. Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
95 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 4 - is unscannable. Remove landscaping. Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
96 Landscape Plan [5/10/04] Planters along Shields street must be located outside the existing
utility easement or are these tree grates? Please label accordingly.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
97 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 5 - Remove the landscaping. Block out background around
text. Correct a misspelled word.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
98 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Cover Sheet - Please provide the name, address, and phone
number of the Owner and/or Developer.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
99 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 4 - Please provide finish grade elevations for all lot corners
and finish floors/top of foundation of all buildings for all lots.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
100 Utility Plans [5/10/04] Sheet 4 - Please provide the statement: The top of foundation
elevations shown are the mimimum elevations required for protection from
the 100-year storm.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/10/2004
101 Utility Plans Please provide site specific details for the sidewalk chase and concrete
channel. See redlined plans. Also, provide a valley pan detail.
Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 05/17/2004
102 Utility Plans Please provide a F.F. elevation for the proposed building. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 05/17/2004
3/7/2011 Page 29
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
103 Utility Plans 1. Please provide a project schedule indicating when various BMPs will be
installed within the framework of the construction. You dont need to use
specific dates (months), you can just use project phases, etc.
Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 05/17/2004
104 Utility Plans [5/18/04] Parking lot lighting levels are below required 1.0fc. Also, important
in making revisions - evaluate location of plant materials. Need photometrics
for area next to stairs.
Active 2 Joseph Gerdom 05/18/2004
106 Plat [5/18/04] Instead of having a 15' utility easement and 24' public access
easement along Plum, just make one combined 24' Public Access and Utility
Easement.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/18/2004
108 Plat [5/18/04] Label Scott Avenue as 25' ROW. Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/18/2004
109 Plat [7/13/04] [5/18/04] From Technical Services: Boundary and legal close. Active 2 Susan Joy 05/18/2004
110 Plat [5/18/04] From Technical Services: The need for a block in a 2 lot
subdivision is unnecessary.
Resolved 2 Susan Joy 05/18/2004
111 Plat [7/14/04]
[5/21/04] Will there be any restaurants in the building? If so, provide grease
interceptor.
Active 2 Roger Buffington 05/21/2004
112 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] The (Final Compliance) Landscape Plan does not necessarily
satisfy the City Forester's requirement for tree mitigation for the loss of 4
existing significant trees. Based on the previous Landscape Plan, Tim
Buchanan stated that 12 new trees need to be upsized to 3.0" caliper for
adequate mitigation. The current plan shows 7 new deciduous trees to be
upsized to 3.0" caliper and 5 new ornamental trees to be upsized to 2.5"
caliper. Mr. Buchanan must determine if the current plan satisfies the Land
Use Code requirement for tree mitigation.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
113 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] The proposed "Fallgold" Ash at the northwest corner of the site is
too close to the west edge of the driveway into the development. It must be a
minimum of 8' from edge of driveway. The "Fallgold" Ash is not shown in the
Plant Legend. Also, this proposed tree may be in conflict with a future Scott
Avenue entension.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
3/7/2011 Page 30
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
114 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] There are 3 Ash trees shown in the planting island just west of the
existing church. The assumption is that they are to be "Summit" Ash and
should be labeled as such on the plan.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
115 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] Plan Note #4 must be revised to include the reference to 125% of
the "materials & labor" for the landscaping.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
116 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] It is difficult to follow the alignment of the existing (proposed?)
sidewalk along the south side of West Plum Street, north of the 3 buildings in
this development.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
117 Landscape Plan [5/24/04] Please add a scale on this sheet for the Full Landscape Plan. It
should be, presumably, 1" = 30.0'.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
118 Site Plan [5/24/04] On the Site Plan, eliminate the labeling for plant material around
the new building. The plant material is not shown but the labeling still is.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
119 Site Plan [5/24/04] Under the Land Use Statistics on the Site Plan, the Maximum
Building Height is shown to be 56'-0". This is inconsistent with the Exterior
Elevations Plan, which shows the building to be 58'-0" high.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
120 Building Elevations [5/24/04] The Exterior Elevations Plan shows the building to be 58'-0" high.
This is inconsistent with the Site Plan, which indicates a Maximum Building
Height of 56'-0" under the Land Use Statistics.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
121 Site Plan [5/24/04] The Planning & Zoning Certificate block is not needed on the Site
Plan and should be removed.
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/24/2004
122 Site Plan [5/25/04] There are numerous words misspelled in the General Notes on the
Site Plan (please see red-lined plan).
Active 2 Steve Olt 05/25/2004
123 Plat [7/13/04] Repeat from last round of redlines: What are all the extra leaders
for?
Active 3 Susan Joy 07/13/2004
124 Plat [7/13/04] From Technical Services: Typo in Legal, section 12 should be
section 15 (see redlines).
Active 3 Susan Joy 07/13/2004
125 General [7/13/04] Ready for mylars with the remaining items addressed (do not need
to resubmit).
Active 3 Susan Joy 07/13/2004
3/7/2011 Page 31
Project: CAMBRIDGE LOFTS APARTMENTS PDP & FC - TYPE I (LUC)
ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date
126 Drainage The F.F. elevation for the building needs to be 18-inches above the flowline of
the gutter in Shields. This is required due to the flow depth allowed in an
arterial street to be 18-inches in the 100-year storm.
Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 07/13/2004
127 Drainage Please change detail of 5-foot chase to have a 6-inch concrete support. See
redlined plans.
Resolved 3 Wes Lamarque 07/13/2004
128 Utility Plans [7/14/04] Check labeling of water services. A 1" water service is not
adequate for 12 units.
Active 3 Roger Buffington 07/14/2004
129 General [7/14/04] No issues. Active 3 Doug Moore 07/14/2004
130 General [7/21/04] The Current Planning Department is ready for mylars of the Site
Plan, Landscape Plan, Building Elevations, and subdivision plat (3 sets, at
least 1 with original signatures) to be submitted.
Active 3 Steve Olt 07/21/2004
3/7/2011 Page 32