Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRIVERSIDE COMMERICAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE - 09-07 A - CORRESPONDENCE -Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE PDP - Final Compliance Request to construct 24,400 square feet of personal storage units and two (2) 6,000 square feet, two story office buildings on 2.18 Acres at 1640 Riverside Avenue, approximately 700' north of the Prospect Road/Riverside Avenue intersection bounded on the north by an existing storage unit facility, on the east by the Union Pacific railroad, on the south by Rivendell School and on the west by Teledyne Waterpik. The property is Zoned I - Industrial. Project Type: Project Desc: File ID: 09-07/A Planner: Ted Shepard DMS Project Num: CP071989 ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 1 General [5/10/07] The transformer location looks good as shown on the landscape plan. Active 1 Janet McTague 05/10/2007 2 ZONING [8/20/08] I didn't receive a copy of the elevations [5/11/07] Elevations: Please note the building height at the peak of the roof. Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 05/11/2007 3 ZONING [8/20/08] I didn't receive a copy of the elevations [5/11/07] Elevations: Note colors on elevations: stucco, metal siding, cmu veneer. Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 05/11/2007 4 ZONING [5/11/07] Site Plan: Chain link fencing is not allowed. 3.8.11(B) Anote type of fencing will need to be used - wood, masonry. Please show elevation of proposed type of fencing. Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 05/11/2007 5 ZONING [5/11/07] Site Plan: one of the handicap parking spaces needs to be van accessible - an overall width of 16' and signed as "van accessible". Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 05/11/2007 6 ZONING [8/20/08] [5/11/07] Site Plan: Note the building dimensions, footprint and setback to property lines …for office buildings as well as the storage unit buildings. Active 1 Jenny Nuckols 05/11/2007 7 ZONING [5/11/07] Landscape plan: There are no street trees being shown - street trees are between the sidewalk and the curb - in the "parkway" area. No landscaping is being shown in this area. How wide is the sidewalk - does it meet Engineering requirements? Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 05/11/2007 8 ZONING [5/11/07] Landscape Plan: Parkng lot landscaping is required at 6%. Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 05/11/2007 3/7/2011 Page 1 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 9 ZONING [5/11/07] Landscape plan: recommendation …instead of using grass along the north side of the building that is adjacent to another storage building, consider rock - less water usage, less maintenance Resolved 1 Jenny Nuckols 05/11/2007 10 Engineering [5/18/07] Utility Plans need to be at 90 percent prior to scheduling a hearing since this is a PDP-FDP combined submittal. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/18/2007 11 Engineering - Utility Plans [5/18/07] Please retitle the Plan Set FIRST REPLAT OF PROSPECT RIVERSIDE SUBDIVISION - RIVERSIDE STORAGE. The City does not like to use address numbers in the title and the subdivision name is the best alternative for filing purposes. Update month and year on the cover sheet at next submittal. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/18/2007 12 Engineering - Utility Plans [5/18/07] Please list all consultants information on the cover sheet (geotech., traffic, owner, developer, architect etc …) Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/18/2007 13 Engineering - Utility Plans [10/15/07] Deeds of dedication were submitted however, they are not acceptable for recording. Hand writing is not legible, easement titles are incorrect and legal exhibits are not acceptable. Please see the documents for detailed comments. The two off-site drainage easements were incomplete. We will need either signed deeds of dedication or letters of intent for these off-site easements prior to scheduling a hearing. [5/18/07] This development is not being replated and will require a minimum of 4 dedications by separate document. 1. ROW dedication 2. Utility Easement dedication 3. Drainage easement dedication on-site detention area and 4. Off-site drainage easement for outlet pipe and rip rap pad. The 15 foot wide U.E. behind the ROW and the water/fire line U.E. across the site may combined into one legal description and dedication if desired or they may be seperated into two separate documents. Each dedication is a stand alone document and will require a deed of dedication and legal & map exhibit. The review fee of $250 per document must be submitted to the City with the next submittal and prior to scheduling a hearing. If you cannot get a deed of dedication signed by the adjacent owner for the off-site drainage easement in time for a hearing, you may submit a letter of intent signed by the owner as long as the review fee has been paid. Deed of dedication templates have been provided with the redlines for your use. I can also email them in Word Doc. format if requested. Active 1 Randy Maizland 05/18/2007 3/7/2011 Page 2 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 14 Engineering - Utility Plans [10/15/07] The detached walk is shown however, the ends that tie into the existing attached walk should taper with a larger sweeping radius otherwise pedestrians will simply cross over the parkway if built as shown on the plans. Please indicate radius or dimensions on the plan so a contractor can build it correctly. [5/18/07] Comments in the conceptual review meeting indicated that a standard width detached sidewalk is required for this development along the Riverside Ave. frontage. The City Land Use Code or the LCUASS do not provide for an option to widen existing attached walks where detached walks are feasible. The City cannot likely support a variance request for attached walks in this location without reasonable justification. Please revise the plans to show a standard width 6 foot detached walk in the ultimate location (back of walk adjacent to future ROW limits). The detached walk shall radius bend to match existing adjacent attached walks to the north and south. Street trees shall be planted in the ultimate location in the parkway between the sidewalk and street. Please revise all plans as needed TYP. Active 1 Randy Maizland 05/18/2007 15 Engineering - Utility Plans [5/21/07] PFA commented that all portions of all buildings need to be within 150 feet of a dedicated fire lane. I do not see any emergency access easements being dedicated with this project. Please consult with PFA and submit an emergency access easement deed of dedication and legal description if required. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 16 Engineering - Utility Plans [10/15/07] The plan now meets the standard for parking set back as shown. [5/21/07] Please dimension from the flowline on Riverside ave. to the first parking space on-site. The minimum standard parking setback per LCUASS 19-6 is 75 feet. This is based on the avg. ADT of 193 presented by your traffic engineer. Any setback less than 75 feet will require a variance request supported by adequate justification. Active 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 17 Engineering - Utility Plans [5/21/07] Please widen the on-site sidewalks behind the office buildings to a minimum of 6 feet wide. Sidewalks must be at least 6 feet wide where they are directly adjacent to parking stalls. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 18 Engineering - Utility Plans [10/15/07] E.O.P. works with concrete pans as shown. [5/21/07] Curb & gutter or a ribbon gutter is recommended at the rear of the site (easterly edge of pavement) to direct all sheet flows to the proposed rip-rap pads. Active 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 3/7/2011 Page 3 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 19 Engineering - Utility Plans [10/15/07] Comment has been addressed. Most walls appear to be fairly small however, any retaining walls over 30 inches will need to be by separate building permit. The DCP will not cover walls over 30 inches retaining height. [5/21/07] Small retaining walls are proposed at the northeast and southeast corners of the site. Please provide simple cross sections of the walls at the property lines to show that these wall foundadtions will not encroach across the property lines. Any retaining walls over 30 inches high will require a separate building permit and should be labeled on these plans (under sep. permit by Building Dept.) Active 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 20 Engineering - Utility Plans [10/15/07] The Wattle Installation detail on sheet 7 must be enlarged. Text is too small. [5/21/07] Detail sheet 7 does not meet LCUASS Appendix E requirements for text size and scannability. Please revise the deatials on sheet 7 so they will scan well and be legible. Active 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 21 Engineering - Utility Plans [5/21/07] Please add the following LCUASS standard details to sheet 8 for sidewalk, vertical curb & gutter, drive approach …. 701, 706 or 707, 1602. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 22 Engineering - Site Plan [5/21/07] Please revise the Legal Description on sheet 1 of the Site Plan .. Lot 1, First Replat, Prospect-Riverside Subdivision. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 23 Engineering - Site Plan [5/21/07] Please adequately show and label all on-site and off-site proposed easements on sheet 2 of the Site Plan. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 24 Engineering - Site Plan [10/15/07] Please modify points of connection to existing attached walk using larger radius bends. See redlines. [5/21/07] Revise the Site Plan to show a standard 6 foot wide detached walk in the ultimate location. Revise parking spaces to meet the minimum setback required by LCUASS 19-6 (75 feet min. from flowline). See Engineering- Utility Plan comments for clarification. Active 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 25 Engineering - Site Plan [5/21/07] Please show and label the existing and proposed right-of-way limits on the Site Plan measured from centerline of Riverside Ave. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 26 Engineering - Site Plan [5/21/07] Details on sheet 5 LCUASS 701, 1602 and 1601 do not meet LCUASS Appendix E requirements for text drafting and scannability. These details should really be removed from the Site Plan and added to the Utility Plan details. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 3/7/2011 Page 4 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 27 Engineering - Landscape Plan [5/21/07] Please revise all sidewalks and parking spaces on the Landscape Plan per the comments provided under Utility Plans regarding widths and locations. Street trees along Riverside Ave. shall be placed in the parkway between the street and sidewalk in the ultimate location. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 28 Engineering - Landscape Plan [5/21/07] Please show and label all access, drainage and utility easements on the Landscape Plan. Show the off-site drainage work proposed and any re-vegetation of the area disturbed during construction. Resolved 1 Randy Maizland 05/21/2007 29 Utility Plan [10/15/07] [5/21/07] Relocation of the existing streetlight will be at the developer's expense, in addition to normal electric development charges. Active 1 Doug Martine 05/21/2007 30 Utility Plan [5/21/07] The developer will need to complete a Commercial Service Information (C-1) form for each electric service. Also will need to coordinate electric facilities and development charges with Light & Power Engineering (221-6700). Active 1 Doug Martine 05/21/2007 31 Landscape Plan [5/21/07] The street tree in the R-O-W (2nd tree from the south) needs to be relocated to be a minimum of 40 ft. from the streetlight (15 ft. if the tree is an ornamental type). Active 1 Doug Martine 05/21/2007 3/7/2011 Page 5 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 32 Fire [10/17/07] I did not receive a plat that shows the Emergency Access Easement. [6/6/07] FIRE LANES: The storage structures are out of access to emergency vehicles. Therefore, all drive aisles shall be designated on the plat as Emergency Access Easement (fire lanes). The EAE shall begin at the drive cut from Riverside and include all drive aisles. The fire lane shall be visible by painting and signage, and maintained unobstructed at all times. A fire lane plan shall be submitted for approval prior to installation. In addition to the design criteria already contained in relevant standards and policies, any new fire lane must meet the following general requirements:  Be designed as a flat, hard, all-weather driving surface (asphalt or concrete) capable of supporting fire apparatus weights. Compacted road base shall be used only for temporary fire lanes or at construction sites.  Have appropriate maintenance agreements that are legally binding and enforceable.  Maintain the required minimum width of 20 feet throughout the length of the fire lane. If a fire lane cannot be provided, the buildings shall be fire sprinklered. 97UFC 901.2.2.1; 901.3; 901.4.2; 902.2.1 Active 1 Carie Dann 06/06/2007 33 Fire [6/6/07] OFFICE BUILDING CONTAINMENT: PFA will allow the two, two-story, 6,000 SF office buildings to be built with fire containment, instead of automatic sprinklers, if these structures are completely fire contained, which requires minimum one-hour fire separation between floors (fire door assemblies, dampers, heating, etc). Active 1 Carie Dann 06/06/2007 34 Fire [6/6/07] FIRE HYDRANT: The fire hydrant that was added internally among the storage units is not required. Active 1 Carie Dann 06/06/2007 35 Technical services [6/7/07] No Comments Active 1 Randy Maizland 06/07/2007 36 Stormwater [8/28/08] Reminder Comment. The letter submitted needs to be signed by the off-site property owner where the storm sewer is proposed. [10/18/07] Reminder: Need intent before hearing; final dedication before signing of mylars. [6/7/07] An off-site drainage easement is required for the outfall storm sewer. This easement should be 20 feet wide with the pipe centered in the easement. Active 1 Wes Lamarque 06/07/2007 3/7/2011 Page 6 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 37 Stormwater [6/7/07] Please revise the outfall storm sewer to be 12-inches in diameter and to include a total of 2 cleanouts. Normally, our minimum size storm sewer is 15-inches, but due to the small flow and an additional cleanout, 12-inches is OK. Ours crews indicated that 12-inches is the minimum size they can flush a storm sewer effectively. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 06/07/2007 38 Stormwater [6/7/07] Please provide the water quality volume in addition to the quantity detention. The City is OK with this reducing the freeboard, as long as there is still enough elevation for the emergency spillway to operate without flooding any of the buildings. This should raise the 100-year high water line only a few one-hundredths. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 06/07/2007 39 Stormwater [6/7/07] The northern edge slopes to tie the contours to the property to the north are very steep, 1:1 or greater. See redlines. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 06/07/2007 40 Water/Wastewater [6/8/07] Move sewer services to north part of the drive. Resolved 1 Roger Buffington 06/08/2007 41 Water/Wastewater [6/8/07] Install water main in south part of drive (10 feet from sewer services and 5 feet from curb and gutter). Resolved 1 Roger Buffington 06/08/2007 42 Water/Wastewater [6/8/07] Eliminate east portion of water main and east F Hyd. Resolved 1 Roger Buffington 06/08/2007 43 Water/Wastewater [6/8/07] Label clean-outs in drive as "traffic rated". Resolved 1 Roger Buffington 06/08/2007 44 Landscape Plan [6/8/07] Resolve tree / F Hyd confllict. Resolved 1 Roger Buffington 06/08/2007 45 Traffic -TIS [6/8/07] Submitted TIS does not conform to LCUASS standards and needs to be revised to standards. Active 1 Ward Stanford 06/08/2007 46 Traffic -TIS [6/8/07] As far as I can tell a Scoping Session was not conducted but needs to be held to discuss the scope of the TIS. Active 1 Ward Stanford 06/08/2007 47 Traffic -TIS [6/8/07]Some issues to revise: Review impact at Prospect & Riverside. Need to evaluate site and nearby intersection per Section 4.4 of the LCUASS. Traffic distribution and assignment discussion/diagrams. Active 1 Ward Stanford 06/08/2007 3/7/2011 Page 7 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 48 Stormwater [6/8/07] The south property line in the proposed condition will block flows that currently travel northeast. There should be a swale designed to City standards that intercepts these flows and carries them to the east along the property boundary. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 06/08/2007 49 Stormwater [10/18/07] Need to see easement before signing of mylars. [6/8/07] A drainage easement is required for the limits of the detention pond. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 06/08/2007 50 Stormwater [6/8/07] Please identify and show on the draiange plan the pond emergency spillway. Resolved 1 Wes Lamarque 06/08/2007 51 Landscape Plan [6/8/07] Kentucky Bluegrass is not theprefered type of grass for the detention pond. Use a water tolerant grass species, less water intensive. Active 1 Dana Leavitt 06/08/2007 52 Landscape Plan [10/3/07] Streetlight/tree reconfiguration looks fine. Active 2 Janet McTague 10/03/2007 53 Engineering [10/16/07] Please see redlines for additional minor comments related to drafting or labeling. Active 2 Randy Maizland 10/16/2007 54 Water/Wastewater [10/16/07] At point where the water main turns north toward the fire hydrant, install swivel tee rather than 90-deegree bend as noted on the redlined plans. Resolved 2 Roger Buffington 10/16/2007 55 Fire [10/17/07] Please contact me to discuss required signs for the fire lane, and also to decide what method PFA will use to gain access through the security gate (key card, Opticon, Knox Box, etc.). Active 2 Carie Dann 10/17/2007 56 Fire [10/18/07] No public hearing can be scheduled until the City has received letters of intent or signed deeds of dedication for the off-site drainage easements. Active 2 Randy Maizland 10/18/2007 57 Stormwater [10/18/07] The retaining wall at the northern edge of the detention pond will stick out of the ground on both the south and north sides. Due to the ponding depth being over a foot higher than the finished grade on either side of the retaining wall, the wall will need to be structurally strong enough to hold back the detention volume and be water proof. Please revise retaining wall in this location. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 10/18/2007 58 Stormwater [10/18/07] Please see other comments redlined in the plan set. Resolved 2 Wes Lamarque 10/18/2007 3/7/2011 Page 8 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 59 Water/Wastewater [8/19/08] Has the utility easement which covers the water main, fire hydrant and curb stops been submitted? Active 3 Roger Buffington 08/19/2008 60 Engineering [8/27/08] Please use Riverside Storage or Riverside Commercial as the main title on all of the plans consistently (Utility, Site, Landscape etc …). You may use address or legal description as the subtitle if you like. Active 3 Randy Maizland 08/27/2008 61 Engineering [8/27/08] There are several ROW and easement dedications labeled on the Utility Plan (ROW, U.E., Drainage etc …) I did not receive any of these documents for review with this submittal package. Please submit deeds, legal descriptions and exhibits for each of these documents with a review fee of $250 per document. The documents will need to be reviewed and basically ready to record with all fees paid prior to plan approval. Active 3 Randy Maizland 08/27/2008 62 Engineering [8/27/08] Please fix all line over text conflicts throughout the plan set. See redlines for clarification. Active 3 Randy Maizland 08/27/2008 63 Engineering [8/27/08] Please use the 2007 version of the LCUASS Drawing 1606 detail showing truncated domes in the ramps. Active 3 Randy Maizland 08/27/2008 64 Engineering [8/27/08] The standard revision blocks should all be cleared on final mylars. It appears they are being used to track changes during the review process now. No clouding or revision triangles should be shown on any of the final mylars. See redlines for clarification. Active 3 Randy Maizland 08/27/2008 65 Engineering [8/27/08] The page numbering system does not make sense on the Site and Landscape Plans. Please revise the page numbering system so that each plan set starts with sheet 1 of x and follows in sequence. See redlines for clarification. Active 3 Randy Maizland 08/27/2008 66 Engineering [8/27/08] The aerial photo vicinity map on the Site Plan cover sheet will not scan or copy well. A one line street map with street names and project site location is preferred. Active 3 Randy Maizland 08/27/2008 67 General [8/27/08] No comments. Active 3 Dana Leavitt 08/27/2008 68 Stormwater [8/28/08] The 100-HWL of the detention pond is labeled as 4936.15 and 4936.20 in various locations. Please clarify and make consistent. Active 3 Wes Lamarque 08/28/2008 3/7/2011 Page 9 Project: RIVERSIDE COMMERCIAL PDP TYPE I AND FINAL COMPLIANCE ID Topic Issue Status Round Comment By Initial Date 69 Stormwater [8/28/08] After hearing, Stormwater is ready for mylars. Active 3 Wes Lamarque 08/28/2008 3/7/2011 Page 10