Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAT HOME PROFESSIONS IP SITE PLAN REVIEW - 10 93 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... caribou NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/20/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am e 1993 Q995 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 6 40 4 100 THRU 1 1 438 419 RIGHT 2 60 98 6 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ----------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ----- LANES 2 2 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + k CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 7 138 Ill > 116 Ill > 109 105 >D ' THROUGH 1 182 160 > 160 > 159 > L RIGHT 2 593 593 593 / 591 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 44 162 141 > 142 141 > \ 97 97 >E E THROUGH 1 194 170 > 170 > 169 > D RIGHT 66 548 548 548 482 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 110 634 634 634 524 A NB LEFT 4 719 719 719 714 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... caribou NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/20/93 : am pm 1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM:- UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET........,. caribou NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/20/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. at P- 1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 4 74 3 34 THRU 1 1 363 387 RIGHT 2 98 25 4 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c p M SH R SH (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ------- ----------------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET E8 LEFT 4 199 159 > 182 169 > 176 165 >0 THROUGH 1 269 260 > 260 > 259 > RIGHT 2 618 618 618 615 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 81 239 230 > 230 230 > 148 148 >D D THROUGH 1 273 264 > 264 > 263 > C RIGHT 108 629 629 629 522 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 37 749 749 749 712 A NB LEFT 3 746 746 746 743 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... caribou NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline — DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/20/93 am om 1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... lowe NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/20/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am(pp3 1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION..._ INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 18 -- 1 0 THRU 0 -- 503 514 RIGHT 11 -- 0 6 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 -- 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c p M SH R SH (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS MINOR STREET EB LEFT 20 161 161 161 141 U RIGHT 12 527 527 527 515 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1 646 646 646 645 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... lowe NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline /� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/20/93 : am( m)7 1993 995 OTHER INFORMATION.... �/ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paqe-1 #####XX#X#####ZXZ##Z##ZXZXX####Z#ZZZX#######ZZZZZXZZZ####ZZ#ZZZ#ZX### IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... lowe NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/20/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. ai Pm 1993(1995 \` J OTHEk INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TkAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- --- LEFT 3 -- 4 0 THRU 0 -- 461 424 RIGHT 1 -- 0 11 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB 58 ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 -- 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 3 206 205 205 201 C RIGHT 1 587 587 587 586 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 4 711 711 711 707 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... lowe NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..._ timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/20/93 am pm 1993 99 OTHER INFORMATION.... APPENDIX B 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 XYY##XXX#XXYYXY##Y#XXYYYYXYYXY###X#YXYXYYXXY#Y#YYX#XXYXYXXXXYXXX###X> IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... caribou NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..... . 2/20/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am om 199 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 1 21 2 61 THRU 1 1 379 385 RIGHT 1 37 65 1 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + k Ll + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c p M SH R SH (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS MINOR STREET EB LEFT 1 192 173 > 195 173 > 193 172 >D I THROUGH 1 239 225 > 225 > 224 > L RIGHT 1 621 621 621 620 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 23 218 204 > 205 204 > 181 181 >D D THROUGH 1 251 236 > 236 > 235 > C RIGHT 41 600 600 600 559 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 67 704 704 704 637 A NB LEFT 2 751 751 751 749 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... caribou NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/20/93 : am pm 1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 #XX####XZXX###XXXX##ZZ#ZX#####Z#X###Z#X#YXXX####XXX######XZZZX#X##ZZ# IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... caribou NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/20/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.................:am)pm 199 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WEST- BOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------- -------------------- - EB WB NP. SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 1 46 1 25 THRU 1 1 297 281 RIGHT 1 62 17 1 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE -------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 1 1 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 1 297 273 THROUGH 1 369 362 RIGHT 1 711 711 MINOR STREET WB LEFT 51 330 323 THROUGH 1 374 366 RIGHT 68 690 690 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 28 817 817 NB LEFT 1 848 848 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 311 273 > 309 272 >B , > 362 > 361 > B 711 710 A > 323 323 > 272 272 >C C > 366 > 365 > B 690 622 A 817 790 A 848 847 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... caribou NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/20/93 ; am pm 1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... lowe NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/20/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB 56 ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 14 -- 1 0 THRU 0 -- 478 488 R16HI 9 -- 0 5 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------ ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 -- 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE . Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (PcPh) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 15 177 177 177 162 0 RIGHT 10 545 545 545 535 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1 667 667 667 666 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... lowe NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberline DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/20/9a am(p��1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... �/ 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 uuu.... ww auu.uu*ww•.ua...... suuu...*"* uu..u.ua• IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 45 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... lowe NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... timberline NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 2/20/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.................amjpm 993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 2 -- 2 0 THRU 0 -- 439 404 RIGHT 1 -- 0 6 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 -- 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 2 223 223 223 220 C RIGHT 1 603 603 603 602 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 2 730 730 730 728 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... lowe NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... timberlin��-� DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 2/20/93 ;(am)p 1993 1995 OTHER INFORMATION.... ��// APPENDIX A } a N LOWE STREET / 1 3 3 18 /11 z � � �Lo ~ a SITE I w oz ~ I� a � �o 98/60 NOM. �-- 74/40 CARIBOU 4/6 -)� ) f r NOM. <r co co 2/2 � ` r)" co M 1995 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AM / PM Figure 3 Table ; Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out "At Home Professions" Phase 1- 17 employees 60 7 2 2 6 Expansion - 25 employees 85 10 2 2 9 Total 145 17 4 4 15 Table 4 1995 Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Timberline/Caribou EB LT/T D D EB RT A A WB LT/T D E WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Timberline/Lowe EB LT C D EB RT A A NB LT A A Intersection Timberline/Caribou EB LT/T EB RT WB LT/T WB RT SB LT NB LT Timberline/Lowe EB LT EB RT NB LT Table 1 Existing Peak Hour Operation Level of Service AM PM B D A A C D A A A A A A C D A A A A Table 2 Trip Generation (From Collindale Site Access Study) Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Phase 1 Office - 41 KSF 847 81 11 14 75 Phase 2 Industr. Park - 3.8 Ac 239 38 12 11 36 Phase 3 Industr. Park - 5.2 Ac 327 53 17 16 49 Phase 4 Industr. Park - 6.3 Ac 396 64 20 19 59 Phase 5 Industr. Park - 6.2 Ac 389 63 20 19 58 Total 2196 299 80 79 277 RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC N co co 0 1993 f 1 2/14 0/9 —� 00 N w J m Lo 1992 co 62/37 �00 Lo O N C 4 4_ �-- 46 /21 0/0 —14( CARIBC 0/0-2— C-4 C" U-) 0/0 —� rn N AM / PM Figure 2 COLLINDALE SITE PLAN BUSINESS PARK 6 Figure 1 background traffic on Timberline Road will increase at the rate of 2 percent per year. It also assumes that a mini - warehouse, proposed to be located at the Caribou/Automation intersection, will be built. Table 4 shows the operation at the key intersections using the traffic shown in Figure 3. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. The operation at the key intersections will not be significantly different than the current operation. Using the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual technique for unsignalized intersections, one of the minor street left-turn/through movements at the Timberline/Caribou intersection marginally falls into level of service E. Based upon recent research, the delay to this movement will be in the range of 12-22 seconds per approach vehicle. This is more appropriately defined as level of service C/D. It is concluded that the "At Home Professions" use is in conformance with the overall plan for the Collindale Business Park from a traffic engineering perspective. It is recommended that full -turn access at the Timberline/Lowe intersection continue. As traffic volumes on Timberline Road increase in the future and the Collindale Business Park continues to develop, this should be periodically evaluated. co M MEMORANDUM 0 00 o To: Jeff.Downs, Baldwin Construction N Allen Curtis, Architect $ Fort Collins Staff 0 0 From: Matt Delich ` o z Date: February 22, 1993 g Subject: At Home Professions traffic study (File: 9313MEM1) z W a "At Home Professions" is proposing to locate their a facility at the Collindale Business Park in Fort Collins. The z building is proposed to be built on Lot 4 in the southeast m quadrant of the Automation Way/Lowe Street intersection. M Figure 1 shows a schematic of the Collindale Business Park and A the location of the proposed "At Home Professions" building. The Collindale Business Park Site Access Study, July 1988, addressed the traffic related impacts of this development. This memorandum acts as an addendum to that study. Figure 2 shows the recent peak hour traffic counts at the Timberline/Lowe and Timberline/Caribou intersections. Both of these intersections function as full -turn, stop sign controlled intersections. They operate as indicated in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix A. This operation is deemed to be acceptable. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better.. While the Timberline/Lowe intersection currently functions as a full- turn intersection, it will at some time in the future become z Q a right-in/right-out intersection. Timing of this change will zbe a function of traffic volumes and improvements to E5 Timberline Road in the future. W UJ J Table 2 shows the trip generation from the Collindale Business Park Site Access Study. "At Home Professions" is in • the Phase 2 row of that table. It comprises approximately 1/2 v o of the land in Phase 2. Table 3 shows the trip generation - a from the Phase 1 portion of "At Home Professions" and the ii c future expansion. This trip generation was estimated using a Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE as a reference. The U) a Industrial Park code (130) was used with the number of employees as the trip generation variable. There are small • differences due to the change in the trip generation manual 3 LL editions and trip generation variable. However, it is = a concluded that the trip generation from "At Home Professions" t- cc is reasonably reflected in the site access study. t-- Figure 3 shows the short range (1995) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. This projection assumes that