Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutORCHARD PARK APARTMENTS PUD AMENDED FINAL - 25 93 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSfTLJ J /r3 DENSITY CHART Maximum Criterion CfQdit If All Nelling Unit Are Within- a 20r0 20001ealol On e•nnnq OrGOcrp ea regrpor ^AIOOCIngaMry b 10 0 !�50 feeforcn e.nnnq..arW 1100 Mill a J C 10°.o I a0(A reerorcn e.nnnq cr a0cra,ea •eq�ona trxc+'q comer d 2091, J500'eer Or an e.nnnq ar re Y^.ea negnoornOOO L CLmmun-NOcn orcc,.r We (,J) 10'G 000feel CIO scnap meennq c:tTe,eay,remMn Ccr^oy.fav earccren •p.].-r Te Stare of C_laaoo f 20% JC40 •eerora maia em0ly:.r-enlcenl«lne In (�G ��-rl e� �, VVcj I r��•-� W 9 5'./0 1000 reef oracrnuccre center h 20% vo T'ranCcnn] n® pC f 200,o TsCMrtm&nnevO�Rtrr • aaen w.afe oounopv n canngycyf ro eu]mq noon aev.00nvnr GeOn may a cornea m ralol.n J : — Fa oraecn �.nase aooerN oounoov r' �f 0 b 10�. corv}:rN 1 O/ 30.0 'Jb15%—:^_r pO�eCn vr`Css aOL«N OQynOOh Nj IOb 20 :Cp'ngyRy 0to20%—Facrascn.•nc]epcMrNoaunocjotoeAri%,ng,nv 20 fo 20% — Fa Lrcrxn Inca accem oo.ropv rc. ,f0 b a0z ccn.qu]r, �j� 2: r0 JO% — FOr GIOM]cTi `rnOf Orpa«N aayrxn ^Cf .� r0 Sfi% CGnngy N. l: II1G_n ae aetnrXTRea Tpr Te paMCtvrN reayte Mn•Me..Cd «•«Q/yyeage «Tor Tla•llI• Tp COa�tar!On al aRbnr�rn.e ene,Sy Mrem]pT•aIglC�ymm�ea M«Qy CLn]MCndf meaLye]al•p•O.T,al nOm.alNrea]Ysa WL.TrCze a�'4 Oaklf m[.Y ce eaTeo for e..e.y 5 t rgc-an �n enygr use l Cxwa+sa' :LChlror eVery 50 ocre]�ncnraea �n Teaorcr In I ==;Lurme me cer<Mn�gearrtv rota ocre]m Te aoncf+w cn cwonala recreorono w.Mrer l•2 cI TarO«cMraJe maoary n f Te COa�C� a-m�n ro peMn+r'7 pMmanMl a'hre aDen fpac • TR r^e.n T1 C.NI mr•r..�n reUYrM.WrR CaCL�a1 me a«C Mroge LI T�I:f:er.Ia�DOG'eoge rO TerOfOl OeV]MOOmenroc cage M•«�rtprCMnage OCOOhd O n OOR OI me De are nprc.. a wle 10C Oy C,h c. Mbr 2%bo"3 ✓h i!coaMc elvlg ynr�nve]rea P •OLR Of Te lara ae`TiaprMr a]gger �] fa d SOeni M nepnoorrlooa'acn+e] Ofta feNC ry s.n,Gn ae rbl LTdnr�L reawrsa aI C.h C.:ae. enlera"s cor.,:p wwry i100 G«c'.«.rq unr�r..fuq � /� Q ra ccmmm.. t I Ler,g R.oOe tcci « oafoac�nea urcMrcpsp �ela0lrv.,aer cr a.a. •rx7 trio la 10. r•GC/M rann.ey Mrer rnal Oe,c Mnage of C OOnvi va m a mm of JO% Z as CCm.nrenenrrto..gmoo.IOae eooO oeG: ea O«eMrogec tiaq nymoe Of CwW"W lforfl A'anafv 9'MOno1CCO ^ouwq a ae•rrec Lv me City or FOR C:.ir1v cccurne ms oonlp Cs'ca>.i Of a a nm 'rae E' — I O lrw fas S 1rl+rf ' Cora unm n na coe v+af Ts carnfxfea 1]Onln a V earx Tar !0 :. tTe f1]ea000�eOlOOMN COnrar.frllnlfla•crt.agaonce OOOrtu rt•ay Oe sat*W M1]rR4 rppr� !% — Fp areMr•nnQ a mrti�a}nq 0.IfLOe nnl�enGe] le a en•..arvrw•Q Iona yse.0e]mellG sOOnbnC �•b ]CGlal fpyglr0011M1• la �n 5 n e� cvx :i — Fa �m,'•arrw encn.e]w.0e•n veeprq w.nT,]G-o-.x�.a lM d.•or.gacnce ,.n,u cworq rote wm 31 —For arR�'C ocmR.e ascot Teworganacs rt]ar t.R•v]acc�n cannnuvlce ae]«wrlan v+a rrdoMnVnr rf a] mvmcre rtvvw n o aLrern v d a!v re0wea aCi>t+g n Ts mumae IQ'nMy aaeC' � L�ceOlYrOerQOunG �.rTM Te N.L.+g a n an s+.rnea oarv.rlg flrtcve o an mnory yse ro me crr••av ]mrCnus. c annul mw a eoro as ralo,.c t :z — fp a0.v+q /jz arrored rtw oorlonginalRl�Ne. Os — FOray.v'q S7�7a%orlM Oanrq ina]miave. 3% — Fa ao..Tg2: 49%01"Oanngna l - a U ra cpnmirmx•] Lenq—ice morayae aeaweac_lama•Lr.es.•�q..on�nq ]y]ler. ]�a TeOw.vq'.r�n Mre•a o of'0s TOTAL 0 DEFINITION: All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public rec- reational uses as a principal use;..uses.providing meet'in9 places and plaeE5 for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers. C RTERIAEach of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the develop- ment plan. Yes No 1. On a gross acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project at least three ( dwelling units per acre (calculated for L�f( residential portion of the site only)? 2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE POINTS AS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESI- DENTIAL PROJECT? THE REQUIRED EARNED ❑ CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: 30-40 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 3-4 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 40-50 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 4-5 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 50-60 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 5-6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 60-70 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 6-7 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 70-80 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 7-8 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 80-90 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 8-9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 90-100 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 9-10 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 0 OR MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS = 10 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS/ACRE. 2513 ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion appllca0le7 Will the criterion be sotistiea? If no, please explain Yes No NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY 1. Social Compatability ✓ v 2. Neighborhood Character ✓ 3. Land Use Conflicts ✓ ✓ 4. Aaverse Traffic Impact V PLANS AND POLICIES 5. Comprehensive Plan V PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY 6. Street Capacity ✓ �/ 7. Utility Capacity 8. Design Standards !/ ✓ 9. Emergency Access ✓ 10. Security Lighting 11. Water Hazards RESOURCE PROTECTION 12. Solis & Slope Hazard 43. Significant Vegetation 14. Wilclife Habitat I 15. Historical Landmark 16. Mineral Deposit 17. Ecc•Sensitive Areas I 18. Agricultural Lands I ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS 19. Air Quality ✓ V to, I I I 20. Wc-.er Quality ✓ I 21. Noise I 22. Gicte & Heat 23. Vibrations I 24. Exterior Lighting ✓ V I 25. Sewages & Wastes I SITE DESIGN 26. Community Organization Ev 1 I I I I I I 27. Site Organization I 28. Natural Features 29. Eneray Conservation✓30.Shccows34. Solcr Access V 1 1 32. Privccv v V 1 1 33.Ocen Space Arrangement VI I 34. Buiic:ng Heignt ✓ ✓ I I 35. Venlcuiar Movement ✓ I 36. Ve.^.Icuiar Design ✓ vI I 37, Pcn;;ng V I I 38. Act:ve Recreational Areas j 39. Private Outaoor Areas ✓ ✓ I 40. Pecesminn Convenience �/ 41. Pecestnan Conflicts 42. LcncsccelnoiOcen Areas ✓ I 43. Lc7=ocoina;Buildings I V I I 44. Lcncscooing/Screening 15. Puc..c Access 1A. SC-5 I May 3, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board Members Planning Department City of Fort Collins RE: Orchard Park PUD (formerly Lilac Apartments) Amended PUD Dear Board Members: ujg*{- This amended PUD is loca on the north side of La Porte Avenue approximately one mile west of Shields Street. The development was originally approved in September, 1972 for 35 units on 3.311 acres (gross area) for a gross density of 10.6 DU/AC and a net density of 11.9 DU/AC. The proposed amendment is for conver°,ion of five existing 3-bedroom apartments (one in each of five buildups) into ten 1-bedroom apart- ments. This would involve interior modifications only. The total number of apartments in this development would increase from 35 to 40, giving a gross density of 12.08 DU/AC and a net density of 13.65 DU/AC. A total of 78 off-street parking spaces are provided, which amounts to 1.95 spaces/unit. Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to your com- ments. Sincerely, JIM SELL DESIGN 0-k4 Kay Force im Sell DeS,���1, IL E I:' Mini(„i�inn�nh, i(1`.1'a (3liJ)•�'i1 clrY Loam � a Y' !N alYLLT qYN � __ I �1� I f a!•.IIPL! � 4' K' I + + s / r` M T bull. paGlf \ / k6 `!, MiroLIIim GLIIMKe I.VW I L6AtJ. a' M. L � } � T+ T T / 1 / \ / i' 1•LKYTOr YM1 + + . Ar Y MADa _>\ \' X e .I r «arYa'� r_ •' M UP. i' M .' LAPORTE AVENUE PROJECT NOTES e�rNN,wo. _ NOlaaOE 44 1 Lus4✓xn e �a: PLANT NOTES L Yu�q[weNw.Yaveeei Yiiw.la PLANT KEY / 1 / EXISTMC PLANTIN5 �— I I Dacasxu rAea � � lrlll�rlwa + Maga NlgM 1 M'Bl1 / \ NDII. a1rN Fae D11llrR p!N11[si n..N YNO4r meNi OWNER'S CERTIFICATION a Y'Y*L! � � s � ruYYrO ume. *uaempnc—Da. Lv_ / Ilr. M Y'D6®1'KD ILIRIT le 111E IL'L! .%ll'!N a CCgep p Tr IrK nna'EIa1Y CYDlMD w TUE Y'p.L dT! uID LYbMYE R41.b CdrRM w cRL f1-l]-t..1ND :piRT't. ,a\114aWEe PYM WNW'.IB.IpN1�PN'tF4r'Yb/�L. +CCPSIc. rJ 11(( Al1MYTrlbIEAY W EyN \� Y e YN PLANNING & ZONING APPROVAL MnIV.®M M eLi1Ntl Y0 SGIW GC41b pTl U' }Y p RaR {:fi4L110. . d a4e�aT p_. IIC gewrYer w TK eLW11G Ym SDVIZ InaAp VICINITY MAP A Y! D aYl , �L•+ M PROJECT STATISTICS waver sw O aYY a C,J\ ws ewwesr are ref w �%j a raan�Yn. wlr s asurmv ms� wrmwnwnaaewr �o auawsrro a.l Pra[M A \V I V PNKW lAWW1a lY NSNV,rKOw K6rt Yn WTM IdK � AP D.l[QN .N`l�fMtGYM�I..MCG.rlI. K. V SN N Nows ar. pr. C0.LM m.D oenr..ew oeelw alunwra /1 ILjV�l a. mxm w. GhIK. vLD uINCID P..D.� ru Deew � l rpalt.N Q O 'NOlO!® 11CTIde I �' N f1AiAleTCw prt2 ClArM )A¢1M'.Y}'I YMNMD�n �Di N 4LN p ly NK rYLDN]el MTO IM I-0IDAL'Wr MN[I1'M,eNMIWN4m Cti' dr Pee.MMRi.G M LLJIID NKIK NTION.MANfailDle MY n! O.114 4L NM®.O YJIfDrIIEMNe C[.11TBR UWtD N. V WAl NVl1 YrDV n!!'KLpM WMYN F%e,Mi PYM.OE IM1I.W r0 PLRERY LP N nM NWJIf 6 M®vKrY tlwAfl di rK N2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION p p V 6 T4LY p LLO II,ILL,[ N r.( qty}Ir!!} V. p T/ li'iJ NDmWrvao alcxN rraNY.IP1wIRN Yuy lV_Li e.Yprl�.rN reL arY wlalar arLMN calmw LYrot Nax p cctc anOD, aA4C11. DOr4lOb ll! KVM LK pNYD NTRWpr V. YalM1b WIIr IYE YID WIN MI lGW We CMMKD YrNN 11i \ , MKVRr IefD YMCN eaia ar alOM.W YO eWM ll! uMO1 Clllr rlDaCfOS arR, i102 W/'YY i aasrrrw�x eaaeeWm»ex nrw eee'Da maem rlt neNr p nr saa«eaa aNraalw aan Pare nDlr oe Lns ,ems �i-�wcwessea ORCHARD PARK APT AMENDED P.V.D. FINAL S08LE & LANDSCAPE PLAN �N aw� WN A^� � zl "PcrI iLn O �IL O t j 3 c o 0 0 z Z i W. Vine Drive L > Q ,► Elm St a� co ' ti Z z co Sycamor St r ■ > Cher ' 0 0 — ' ��� , , c� Ma CL ■��� z `� jollies Ct t c a a _ yIon Ct. o> m u' � Q -- Ave d—, z c v> Leland Ave r w r In v L V ` W.Oak St Briarw od Ct m a L W. OI Ive M u Ct a Woodf rd g `n C t W. Magnolia M Ct m 0 0 0 t4�ORTE AVENUE CIO Q Go LO •�; Grandview a Q _- c > N c c o > a ichards ti c D.D.-U - Je > Cemetery v a pL o y. coOf J M-unicipol Golf Course cr MULBERRY RJENUEI 1 _ MIWO r Crestmore � N.Cresti W. I Oak I St, City Pork Lake i 0 9`e v o 0 Ct side > a estview co ITEM: ORCHARD PARK APTS PUD Noo rth Final NUMBER: 25-93 Orchard Park Apartments PUD - Final, #25-93 June 28, 1993 P & Z Meeting Page 3 without substantially impairing the purpose of this section. Staff finds that the proposed addition of five units, all being created from existing living area, with no exterior changes, will create minimal additional impacts. Parking supply has been evaluated and found to be sufficient to support the additional units. Based on location, it is not possible for the project to obtain the necessary points, as the project is bordered on two sides by the large Forney Industries complex and on the west by rural residential. The existing density would also require a variance as it is also greater than 10 DU/acre. There is a neighborhood convenience store located at the intersection of Taft Hill Road and Laporte Avenue, but this is not an approved shopping center and therefore does not count towards the total points. Staff finds that approval of a variance in this instance would not be detrimental to the public good or the intent of the LDGS. Therefore, staff finds that the variance to the Residential Density Chart is justified on the basis of item #2 above and recommends that the Board grant a variance to the Residential Density Chart. 3. Design The proposal is to convert 5 three bedroom units, one in each of the five buildings on site, into 10 one bedroom units. All work will be internal to the existing buildings. No external changes are proposed to the site or the landscaping. The site is well landscaped with mature vegetation, Staff is not recommending any changes to the existing site. 4. Storm Drainage The City Storm Water Utility has reviewed the proposal and finds that it adequately addresses their concerns as there is no increase in the amount of impervious surface. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds that the proposed project meets the requirements of the Land Development Guidance System, including the applicable criteria of the All Development Chart, and that the additional units create minimal impact on the existing apartment complex and surrounding properties. Staff further finds that a variance to the Residential Density Chart is justified. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Orchard Park Apartments PUD, Amended Final- 425-93. Orchard Park Apartments PUD - Final, #25-93 June 28, 1993 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: I; Forney Industries, in the County S: N-C-L; Grandview Cemetery W: R-P; existing single family residence E: I; Forney Industries, in the County. The property is zoned R-P, Planned Residential. There is an existing apartment complex at this site which was approved in 1972 as the Lilac Apartments PUD for 35 dwelling units on 3.31 acres. 2. Land Use The proposed use consists of an addition of 5 dwelling units to increase the number of units from 35 to 40. The density of the project would increase from 10.57 to 12.08 on this 3.31 acre site. The addition of 5 units is a 14% increase in the number of units and therefore the proposal does not meet the definition of a minor change for administrative review and is an amended Final PUD. The project meets the applicable criteria of the All Development Chart of the LDGS. The PUD achieves a score of 90% on the Residential Density Chart of the Land Development Guidance System. For a density greater than 10 du/acre a minimum score of 100% is required. The proposal earns points for being within 650' of a Transfort stop, in proximity to City Park, in proximity to a major employer (Forney Industries), in north Fort Collins, and having 25% of its property boundary contiguous to existing urban development (Grandview Cemetery). Therefore, a variance to the Residential Density Chart is being requested for the proposed additional units. The existing PUD was approved with the current density prior to the requirements of the Density Chart. The Planning and Zoning Board is empowered to grant variances under the following circumstances: (1) The applicant demonstrates that the plan as submitted is equal to or better than such plan incorporating the provision for which a variance is requested; or (2) The strict application of any provision would result in peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or exceptional and undue hardship upon, the owner of such property, provided that the variance may be granted without substantial detriment to the public good and ITEM NO. 3 MEETING DATE 6/28/93 STAFF Kirsten Whetstone 6gi City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Orchard Park Apartments PUD, Amended Final- #25-93 APPLICANT: Jim Sell Design 117 E. Mountain Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80524 OWNER: Krishna Murthy Neil Gabriel 1124 East Elizabeth Fort Collins, CO 80524 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for an amended Final PUD to add five dwelling units to an existing 35 unit apartment complex, formerly known as the Lilac Apartments, for a total of 40 units on 3.31 acres. The applicant is proposing to convert 5 three bedroom units into 10 one bedroom units. All work will be internal to the existing buildings. No external changes will be made to either the site or landscaping. The project is located on the north side of West Laporte Avenue, approximately one quarter mile east of Taft Hill Road, across from Grandview Cemetery. The property is zoned RP, Planned Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The applicant proposes to convert 5 existing three bedroom dwelling units into 10 one bedroom units, increasing the number of units from 35 to 40. The increase in units is greater than the 1% allowed for an administrative change to a PUD, therefore, this proposal is considered an amended Final PUD. The proposal has been reviewed against the applicable criteria of the All Development Chart and the Residential Density Chart of the LDGS. Staff finds that the proposed amendments to the Orchard Park Apartments PUD are in substantial conformance with the approved Final PUD and that the requirements of the All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System have been addressed. A variance to the Residential Density Chart is recommended. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT