HomeMy WebLinkAboutORCHARD PARK APARTMENTS PUD AMENDED FINAL - 25 93 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSfTLJ J /r3
DENSITY CHART
Maximum
Criterion
CfQdit
If All Nelling Unit Are Within-
a
20r0
20001ealol On e•nnnq OrGOcrp ea regrpor ^AIOOCIngaMry
b
10 0
!�50 feeforcn e.nnnq..arW 1100 Mill
a J
C
10°.o
I a0(A reerorcn e.nnnq cr a0cra,ea •eq�ona trxc+'q comer
d
2091,
J500'eer Or an e.nnnq ar re Y^.ea negnoornOOO L CLmmun-NOcn orcc,.r
We
(,J)
10'G
000feel CIO scnap meennq c:tTe,eay,remMn Ccr^oy.fav earccren •p.].-r Te Stare of C_laaoo
f
20%
JC40 •eerora maia em0ly:.r-enlcenl«lne In (�G ��-rl e�
�, VVcj
I r��•-�
W
9
5'./0
1000 reef oracrnuccre center
h
20%
vo T'ranCcnn]
n®
pC
f
200,o
TsCMrtm&nnevO�Rtrr
• aaen w.afe oounopv n canngycyf ro eu]mq noon aev.00nvnr GeOn may a cornea m ralol.n
J : — Fa oraecn �.nase aooerN oounoov r' �f 0 b 10�. corv}:rN
1
O/
30.0
'Jb15%—:^_r pO�eCn vr`Css aOL«N OQynOOh Nj IOb 20 :Cp'ngyRy
0to20%—Facrascn.•nc]epcMrNoaunocjotoeAri%,ng,nv
20 fo 20% — Fa Lrcrxn Inca accem oo.ropv rc. ,f0 b a0z ccn.qu]r,
�j�
2: r0 JO% — FOr GIOM]cTi `rnOf Orpa«N aayrxn ^Cf .� r0 Sfi% CGnngy N.
l:
II1G_n ae aetnrXTRea Tpr Te paMCtvrN reayte Mn•Me..Cd «•«Q/yyeage «Tor Tla•llI• Tp COa�tar!On al aRbnr�rn.e ene,Sy
Mrem]pT•aIglC�ymm�ea M«Qy CLn]MCndf meaLye]al•p•O.T,al nOm.alNrea]Ysa WL.TrCze a�'4 Oaklf m[.Y ce eaTeo
for e..e.y 5 t rgc-an �n enygr use
l
Cxwa+sa' :LChlror eVery 50 ocre]�ncnraea �n Teaorcr
In I
==;Lurme me cer<Mn�gearrtv rota ocre]m Te aoncf+w cn cwonala recreorono w.Mrer l•2 cI TarO«cMraJe maoary
n
f Te COa�C� a-m�n ro peMn+r'7 pMmanMl a'hre aDen fpac • TR r^e.n T1 C.NI mr•r..�n reUYrM.WrR CaCL�a1 me a«C Mroge
LI T�I:f:er.Ia�DOG'eoge rO TerOfOl OeV]MOOmenroc cage M•«�rtprCMnage OCOOhd
O
n OOR OI me De are nprc.. a wle 10C Oy C,h c.
Mbr 2%bo"3 ✓h i!coaMc elvlg ynr�nve]rea
P
•OLR Of Te lara ae`TiaprMr a]gger �] fa d SOeni M nepnoorrlooa'acn+e] Ofta feNC ry s.n,Gn ae rbl LTdnr�L reawrsa aI C.h C.:ae.
enlera"s cor.,:p wwry i100 G«c'.«.rq unr�r..fuq
� /�
Q
ra ccmmm.. t I Ler,g R.oOe tcci « oafoac�nea urcMrcpsp �ela0lrv.,aer cr a.a. •rx7 trio la 10. r•GC/M rann.ey Mrer rnal
Oe,c Mnage of C OOnvi va m a mm of JO%
Z
as CCm.nrenenrrto..gmoo.IOae eooO oeG: ea O«eMrogec tiaq nymoe Of CwW"W lforfl A'anafv 9'MOno1CCO
^ouwq a ae•rrec Lv me City or FOR C:.ir1v cccurne ms oonlp Cs'ca>.i
Of
a a nm
'rae E' — I O lrw fas S 1rl+rf '
Cora unm
n na coe v+af Ts carnfxfea 1]Onln a V earx Tar !0 :.
tTe f1]ea000�eOlOOMN COnrar.frllnlfla•crt.agaonce OOOrtu rt•ay Oe sat*W M1]rR4 rppr�
!% — Fp areMr•nnQ a mrti�a}nq 0.IfLOe nnl�enGe] le a en•..arvrw•Q Iona yse.0e]mellG sOOnbnC �•b ]CGlal fpyglr0011M1• la �n
5
n e� cvx
:i — Fa �m,'•arrw encn.e]w.0e•n veeprq w.nT,]G-o-.x�.a lM d.•or.gacnce ,.n,u cworq rote wm
31 —For arR�'C ocmR.e ascot Teworganacs rt]ar t.R•v]acc�n cannnuvlce ae]«wrlan v+a rrdoMnVnr rf a]
mvmcre rtvvw
n o aLrern v d a!v re0wea aCi>t+g n Ts mumae IQ'nMy aaeC' � L�ceOlYrOerQOunG �.rTM Te N.L.+g a n an s+.rnea oarv.rlg
flrtcve o an mnory yse ro me crr••av ]mrCnus. c annul mw a eoro as ralo,.c
t :z — fp a0.v+q /jz arrored rtw oorlonginalRl�Ne.
Os — FOray.v'q S7�7a%orlM Oanrq ina]miave.
3% — Fa ao..Tg2: 49%01"Oanngna l - a
U ra cpnmirmx•] Lenq—ice morayae aeaweac_lama•Lr.es.•�q..on�nq ]y]ler. ]�a TeOw.vq'.r�n Mre•a o of'0s
TOTAL
0
DEFINITION:
All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached dwellings,
townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group
homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing
homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public rec-
reational uses as a principal use;..uses.providing meet'in9 places and plaeE5
for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers.
C RTERIAEach of the following applicable criteria must be
answered "yes" and implemented within the develop-
ment plan.
Yes No
1. On a gross acreage basis, is the
average residential density in the
project at least three ( dwelling
units per acre (calculated for L�f(
residential portion of the site only)?
2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM
PERCENTAGE POINTS AS CALCULATED ON
THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR
THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESI-
DENTIAL PROJECT? THE REQUIRED EARNED ❑
CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT
SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING:
30-40 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 3-4 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
40-50 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 4-5 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
50-60 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 5-6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
60-70 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 6-7 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
70-80 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 7-8 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
80-90 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 8-9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
90-100 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 9-10 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE;
0 OR MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS = 10 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS/ACRE.
2513
ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART
ALL CRITERIA
APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
CRITERION
Is the criterion appllca0le7
Will the criterion
be sotistiea?
If no, please explain
Yes No
NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY
1. Social Compatability
✓
v
2. Neighborhood Character
✓
3. Land Use Conflicts
✓
✓
4. Aaverse Traffic Impact
V
PLANS AND POLICIES
5. Comprehensive Plan V
PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY
6. Street Capacity
✓
�/
7. Utility Capacity
8. Design Standards
!/
✓
9. Emergency Access
✓
10. Security Lighting
11. Water Hazards
RESOURCE PROTECTION
12. Solis & Slope Hazard
43. Significant Vegetation
14. Wilclife Habitat
I
15. Historical Landmark
16. Mineral Deposit
17. Ecc•Sensitive Areas
I
18. Agricultural Lands
I
ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS
19. Air Quality
✓
V
to, I
I
I
20. Wc-.er Quality
✓
I
21. Noise
I
22. Gicte & Heat
23. Vibrations
I
24. Exterior Lighting
✓
V
I
25. Sewages & Wastes
I
SITE DESIGN
26. Community Organization
Ev
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
27. Site Organization
I
28. Natural Features
29. Eneray Conservation✓30.Shccows34.
Solcr Access
V 1 1
32. Privccv
v
V 1 1
33.Ocen Space Arrangement
VI
I
34. Buiic:ng Heignt
✓
✓ I I
35. Venlcuiar Movement
✓ I
36. Ve.^.Icuiar Design
✓
vI I
37, Pcn;;ng
V
I I
38. Act:ve Recreational Areas
j
39. Private Outaoor Areas
✓
✓ I
40. Pecesminn Convenience
�/
41. Pecestnan Conflicts
42. LcncsccelnoiOcen Areas
✓ I
43. Lc7=ocoina;Buildings
I
V I I
44. Lcncscooing/Screening
15. Puc..c Access
1A. SC-5
I
May 3, 1993
Planning and Zoning Board Members
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
RE: Orchard Park PUD (formerly Lilac Apartments)
Amended PUD
Dear Board Members: ujg*{-
This amended PUD is loca on the north side of La Porte Avenue
approximately one mile west of Shields Street. The development was
originally approved in September, 1972 for 35 units on 3.311 acres
(gross area) for a gross density of 10.6 DU/AC and a net density of
11.9 DU/AC.
The proposed amendment is for conver°,ion of five existing 3-bedroom
apartments (one in each of five buildups) into ten 1-bedroom apart-
ments. This would involve interior modifications only. The total
number of apartments in this development would increase from 35 to
40, giving a gross density of 12.08 DU/AC and a net density of 13.65
DU/AC. A total of 78 off-street parking spaces are provided, which
amounts to 1.95 spaces/unit.
Thank you for your consideration, and we look forward to your com-
ments.
Sincerely,
JIM SELL DESIGN
0-k4
Kay Force
im Sell DeS,���1,
IL E I:' Mini(„i�inn�nh, i(1`.1'a
(3liJ)•�'i1
clrY Loam � a
Y' !N
alYLLT qYN � __
I
�1�
I
f
a!•.IIPL!
�
4'
K'
I + +
s
/
r`
M
T
bull.
paGlf
\ /
k6
`!,
MiroLIIim GLIIMKe I.VW
I
L6AtJ. a' M.
L �
} � T+ T T
/
1 /
\
/
i'
1•LKYTOr
YM1
+ + .
Ar
Y MADa
_>\
\' X
e
.I
r
«arYa'�
r_
•' M
UP. i' M
.'
LAPORTE AVENUE
PROJECT NOTES
e�rNN,wo.
_
NOlaaOE
44
1
Lus4✓xn
e
�a:
PLANT NOTES
L Yu�q[weNw.Yaveeei Yiiw.la
PLANT KEY
/
1 / EXISTMC PLANTIN5
�—
I
I Dacasxu rAea
� � lrlll�rlwa
+
Maga NlgM
1 M'Bl1
/ \
NDII. a1rN Fae D11llrR p!N11[si
n..N YNO4r meNi
OWNER'S CERTIFICATION
a
Y'Y*L!
� �
s
� ruYYrO ume. *uaempnc—Da. Lv_
/
Ilr. M Y'D6®1'KD ILIRIT le 111E IL'L! .%ll'!N a CCgep
p Tr IrK nna'EIa1Y CYDlMD w TUE Y'p.L dT! uID
LYbMYE R41.b CdrRM w cRL f1-l]-t..1ND :piRT't.
,a\114aWEe
PYM WNW'.IB.IpN1�PN'tF4r'Yb/�L. +CCPSIc. rJ
11((
Al1MYTrlbIEAY
W EyN
\� Y
e YN PLANNING & ZONING APPROVAL
MnIV.®M M eLi1Ntl Y0 SGIW GC41b pTl U' }Y p RaR {:fi4L110.
. d a4e�aT p_. IIC
gewrYer w TK eLW11G Ym SDVIZ InaAp
VICINITY MAP
A Y! D aYl , �L•+
M
PROJECT STATISTICS
waver sw O
aYY a C,J\
ws ewwesr
are
ref w �%j
a
raan�Yn. wlr s
asurmv ms�
wrmwnwnaaewr
�o
auawsrro a.l
Pra[M A
\V I
V
PNKW lAWW1a lY
NSNV,rKOw K6rt Yn
WTM IdK � AP
D.l[QN .N`l�fMtGYM�I..MCG.rlI. K.
V
SN N Nows ar.
pr. C0.LM m.D
oenr..ew oeelw alunwra
/1
ILjV�l
a. mxm
w. GhIK. vLD
uINCID P..D.�
ru Deew
� l rpalt.N
Q
O
'NOlO!® 11CTIde
I �' N
f1AiAleTCw prt2 ClArM )A¢1M'.Y}'I YMNMD�n
�Di N 4LN p ly NK rYLDN]el MTO IM I-0IDAL'Wr
MN[I1'M,eNMIWN4m Cti' dr Pee.MMRi.G
M LLJIID NKIK NTION.MANfailDle MY n! O.114
4L NM®.O YJIfDrIIEMNe C[.11TBR UWtD N.
V
WAl NVl1 YrDV n!!'KLpM WMYN
F%e,Mi PYM.OE IM1I.W r0 PLRERY LP N nM NWJIf
6 M®vKrY tlwAfl di rK N2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
p p
V
6 T4LY p LLO II,ILL,[ N r.( qty}Ir!!} V. p T/
li'iJ
NDmWrvao alcxN rraNY.IP1wIRN Yuy
lV_Li
e.Yprl�.rN reL arY wlalar arLMN calmw
LYrot Nax p cctc anOD, aA4C11. DOr4lOb ll!
KVM LK pNYD NTRWpr V. YalM1b WIIr
IYE YID WIN MI lGW We CMMKD YrNN 11i
\ ,
MKVRr IefD YMCN eaia ar alOM.W YO eWM
ll! uMO1 Clllr rlDaCfOS arR, i102 W/'YY
i
aasrrrw�x eaaeeWm»ex nrw eee'Da
maem rlt neNr p nr saa«eaa aNraalw aan
Pare nDlr oe Lns
,ems �i-�wcwessea
ORCHARD PARK APT
AMENDED P.V.D.
FINAL S08LE & LANDSCAPE PLAN
�N
aw�
WN
A^� �
zl "PcrI iLn
O
�IL O
t j
3 c o
0 0
z Z i
W.
Vine Drive
L
>
Q
,►
Elm St
a�
co
'
ti
Z
z
co
Sycamor
St
r ■
>
Cher
'
0
0
—
'
���
,
,
c�
Ma
CL
■���
z
`�
jollies
Ct
t
c
a
a
_
yIon
Ct.
o>
m
u'
�
Q
--
Ave d—,
z c
v>
Leland
Ave
r
w
r
In
v
L
V
` W.Oak St
Briarw od Ct
m a
L W. OI Ive M
u Ct a
Woodf rd g
`n C t
W. Magnolia M
Ct m
0
0
0
t4�ORTE AVENUE CIO
Q
Go
LO
•�;
Grandview a
Q
_-
c
>
N
c
c
o
>
a
ichards ti
c
D.D.-U
-
Je
>
Cemetery v
a
pL
o
y.
coOf
J
M-unicipol
Golf Course
cr
MULBERRY RJENUEI
1
_ MIWO
r
Crestmore � N.Cresti
W. I Oak I St,
City Pork
Lake i
0
9`e v o 0
Ct side
>
a estview co
ITEM: ORCHARD PARK APTS PUD Noo
rth
Final
NUMBER: 25-93
Orchard Park Apartments PUD - Final, #25-93
June 28, 1993 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
without substantially impairing the purpose of this
section.
Staff finds that the proposed addition of five units, all being
created from existing living area, with no exterior changes, will
create minimal additional impacts. Parking supply has been
evaluated and found to be sufficient to support the additional
units. Based on location, it is not possible for the project to
obtain the necessary points, as the project is bordered on two
sides by the large Forney Industries complex and on the west by
rural residential. The existing density would also require a
variance as it is also greater than 10 DU/acre. There is a
neighborhood convenience store located at the intersection of Taft
Hill Road and Laporte Avenue, but this is not an approved shopping
center and therefore does not count towards the total points.
Staff finds that approval of a variance in this instance would not
be detrimental to the public good or the intent of the LDGS.
Therefore, staff finds that the variance to the Residential Density
Chart is justified on the basis of item #2 above and recommends
that the Board grant a variance to the Residential Density Chart.
3. Design
The proposal is to convert 5 three bedroom units, one in each of
the five buildings on site, into 10 one bedroom units. All work
will be internal to the existing buildings. No external changes
are proposed to the site or the landscaping. The site is well
landscaped with mature vegetation, Staff is not recommending any
changes to the existing site.
4. Storm Drainage
The City Storm Water Utility has reviewed the proposal and finds
that it adequately addresses their concerns as there is no increase
in the amount of impervious surface.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff finds that the proposed project meets the requirements of the
Land Development Guidance System, including the applicable criteria
of the All Development Chart, and that the additional units create
minimal impact on the existing apartment complex and surrounding
properties. Staff further finds that a variance to the Residential
Density Chart is justified. Therefore, staff recommends approval
of Orchard Park Apartments PUD, Amended Final- 425-93.
Orchard Park Apartments PUD - Final, #25-93
June 28, 1993 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: I; Forney Industries, in the County
S: N-C-L; Grandview Cemetery
W: R-P; existing single family residence
E: I; Forney Industries, in the County.
The property is zoned R-P, Planned Residential. There is an
existing apartment complex at this site which was approved in 1972
as the Lilac Apartments PUD for 35 dwelling units on 3.31 acres.
2. Land Use
The proposed use consists of an addition of 5 dwelling units to
increase the number of units from 35 to 40. The density of the
project would increase from 10.57 to 12.08 on this 3.31 acre site.
The addition of 5 units is a 14% increase in the number of units
and therefore the proposal does not meet the definition of a minor
change for administrative review and is an amended Final PUD.
The project meets the applicable criteria of the All Development
Chart of the LDGS. The PUD achieves a score of 90% on the
Residential Density Chart of the Land Development Guidance System.
For a density greater than 10 du/acre a minimum score of 100% is
required. The proposal earns points for being within 650' of a
Transfort stop, in proximity to City Park, in proximity to a major
employer (Forney Industries), in north Fort Collins, and having 25%
of its property boundary contiguous to existing urban development
(Grandview Cemetery). Therefore, a variance to the Residential
Density Chart is being requested for the proposed additional units.
The existing PUD was approved with the current density prior to the
requirements of the Density Chart.
The Planning and Zoning Board is empowered to grant variances under
the following circumstances:
(1) The applicant demonstrates that the plan as submitted is
equal to or better than such plan incorporating the
provision for which a variance is requested; or
(2) The strict application of any provision would result in
peculiar and exceptional practical difficulties to, or
exceptional and undue hardship upon, the owner of such
property, provided that the variance may be granted
without substantial detriment to the public good and
ITEM NO. 3
MEETING DATE 6/28/93
STAFF Kirsten Whetstone
6gi
City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Orchard Park Apartments PUD, Amended Final- #25-93
APPLICANT: Jim Sell Design
117 E. Mountain Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80524
OWNER: Krishna Murthy
Neil Gabriel
1124 East Elizabeth
Fort Collins, CO 80524
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for an amended Final PUD to add five dwelling
units to an existing 35 unit apartment complex, formerly known as
the Lilac Apartments, for a total of 40 units on 3.31 acres. The
applicant is proposing to convert 5 three bedroom units into 10 one
bedroom units. All work will be internal to the existing
buildings. No external changes will be made to either the site or
landscaping. The project is located on the north side of West
Laporte Avenue, approximately one quarter mile east of Taft Hill
Road, across from Grandview Cemetery. The property is zoned RP,
Planned Residential.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant proposes to convert 5 existing three bedroom dwelling
units into 10 one bedroom units, increasing the number of units
from 35 to 40. The increase in units is greater than the 1%
allowed for an administrative change to a PUD, therefore, this
proposal is considered an amended Final PUD. The proposal has been
reviewed against the applicable criteria of the All Development
Chart and the Residential Density Chart of the LDGS. Staff finds
that the proposed amendments to the Orchard Park Apartments PUD are
in substantial conformance with the approved Final PUD and that the
requirements of the All Development Criteria of the Land
Development Guidance System have been addressed. A variance to the
Residential Density Chart is recommended.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT