Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutGREENBRIAR VILLAGE PUD - 19 93 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTScomments after that meeting. It is important to contact the Stormwater Utility and get their current requirements. Additional of the following dates and deadlines to assure your ability to stay on schedule for the June 28, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board hearing: Plan revisions are due June 9, 1993 by 12:00 noon. Please contact me for the number of folded revisions required for each document. PMT's, renderings, and 8 folded copies of final revisions (for the Planning and Zoning Board packets) are due June 21, 1993. Final documents (including the signed development agreement, applicable mylars and utility plans) are due June 24, 1993 by 12:00 noon. Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with you as soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments. 7S' e erely, t Olt Project Planner xc: Kerrie Ashbeck Sherry Albertson -Clark Advance Planning Stormwater Utility Transportation Jeff Laughren Stewart & Associated file/Project Planner credit, escrow or performance bond for 125% of the valuation as indicated on this plan prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy in that phase". All of the street trees on both sides of Butch Cassidy Court must be installed with Phase One. 3. The project phases, Phases One and Two, must be defined on this plan. Will all the sidewalks (on both sides of the street) be completed with Phase One? 4. Butch Cassidy Court must be identified on this plan. 5. Note 19 referring to the fencing is too ambiguous, open-ended and is not acceptable. This note does not clearly define where fencing can and will occur. The plan does define the areas to be fenced but Note 19 then contradicts maybe even doing any fencing. Also, Note 19 as written* does not commit the developer of Greenbriar Village P.U.D., First Filing to construct the perimeter fencing as shown. The Neighborhood Compatibility criteria in the All Development Chart of the Land Development Guidance System (page 5) states that "When a use is the first to develop on two adjacent vacant parcels, the first use shall provide the necessary buffer to any reasonable future use as determined by the City". The Greenbriar Village P.U.D. - Overall Development Plan identifies single family residential as the proposed use to the north and east of the •First Filing. It is the responsibility of the more intensive use to provide adequate buffering between the two different uses. The more intensive use in this case is the multi -family residential in the First Filing. Building Elevations 1. The title of this sheet should be Greenbriar Village P.U.D., First Filing. We are reviewing this architectural drawing for the entire First Filing that includes two phases. In order to avoid any misunderstanding in the future it should be clear that an approval would be for this one building type for all 10 buildings containing 40 dwelling units. Phase One could be interpreted to be only buildings 1 through 6 as shown on the Site Plan. 2. This drawing, for the architect's construction purposes, is obviously part of a set of construction documents that includes 6 drawings. For the City's purposes this is drawing 1 of 1 and should titled as such. This completes the review comments at this time. This letter reflects, essentially, the Planning Department's comments to make the Site and Landscape Plans current. Please be aware of the Engineering Department's comments and -equirements that were outlined at our meeting on May 25, 1993. You received the written 2. Note 12 must be eliminated, or it could be rewritten to say that "The developer reserves the right to request minor adjustments". The only "rights" are those provided in the L.D.G.S., which requires City approval. 3. What is meant by Note 6? What kind of "outside storage", other than what will be stored in the storage buildings, is being proposed that would necessitate screening? 4. By virtue of the fact that this will now be a combined Preliminary & Final the following two recommended conditions of approval for the preliminary plan that was postponed by the Planning and Zoning Board on May 24th must be addressed with your revisions (re -submittal): * The cul-de-sac at the east end of Butch Cassidy Court must conform to the City's street design standards or the applicant must submit a variance request to the Engineering Department with the Final P.U.D. submittal clearly describing the function of the cul-de-sac and showing proof of the ability for a narrow -street width to operate safely under all circumstances. * The off-street parking provisions for both Phases One and Two must meet the minimum off-street parking requirements as set forth in the City Code or the applicant must adjust the number of dwelling units to enable compliance with City Code .prior to gaining final approval from the Planning and Zoning Board. 5. Note 9 references the RP and RAMP Zoning Districts. Please enlighten me. What is the RAMP district and what is allowed? 6. What will be the building material and color .of the trash enclosures doors? 7. A note must be added stating that all proposed project fencing is shown on the Final Landscape Plan. Landscape Plan 1. The title of this drawing should be "Preliminary & Final Landscape Plan". The most recent landscape plan in the City's file is dated May 17, 1993 and appears to be the most complete. It would seem logical that revisions from this point forward be made to this document. 2. Landscape Notes 8 and 15 are not consistent. Note 15 does not allow any certificates of occupancy to be issued until all the landscaping shown on the entire plan is installed. A single, correct note should read ... "All landscaping for each phase of the project will be completed or secured with an irrevocable letter of Commu_-ry Planning and Environmental _trvices Planning Department City of Fort Collins May 25, 1993 Ed Zdenek ZTI Group 1220 South College Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80524 Dear Ed, I would like to take this opportunity to express the concerns and comments of City staff relating to the Greenbriar village P.U.D. - overall Development Plan and the Greenbriar Village P.U.D., First Filing - Preliminary & Final that you are intending to take to the Planning and Zoning Board on June 28, 1993 for a decision. As a result of the decision by the Board on May 24th night to postpone any action on the O.D.P. and the First Filing, Preliminary until June 28th, and your intent to gain final approval from the City to allow construction on this site, it is important to make you aware of the critical dates in the City's review process and the concerns that have to be addressed prior to submittal of revisions for this development. Staff's comments are as follows: Greenbriar Village P.U.D. - Overall Development Plan 1. The most recent O.D.P. in the City's file is dated May 17, 1993 and appears to be in good form. 2. The reference to an HB Zone north of Willox Lane is incorrect. That zoning district does not exist in that area. 3. Reference to the zoning districts affected by this development should be stated in the SITE STATISTICS. It is unclear what districts some of the phases are in. Greenbriar Village P.U.D., First Filing - Preliminary & Final Site Plan 1. The title of this drawing should be "Preliminary & Final Site Plan". The most recent site plan in the City's file is dated May 17, 1993 and appears to be the most complete. It would seem logical that revisions from this point forward be made to this document. 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750