Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLINDIMER SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY - 26 93 - CORRESPONDENCE - LEGAL COMMUNICATION•1 Mr. Mark Linder July 15, 1993 Page 2 This use may cause odors, insects and other conditions which might otherwise be considered a nuisance and incompatible with some residences. However, it is acknowledged that this equestrian use has long been established and existed at said location prior to the creation of the Common Interest Community. I would also recommend that the fifth sentence in subparagraph (c) be deleted because it seems to me that that sentence is precisely opposite from the promise which was made to the Planning and Zoning Board. In its place, I would recommend the following be inserted: The Declarant, for itself and for all subsequent Purchasers and Lot Owners, hereby waives any legal right' it has or may have to complain that said equestrian use constitutes a public or private nuisance or that said equestrian use should be regulated, abated, prohibited or enjoined as a nuisance or use incompatible with the Common Interest Community. Si ely, W. Paul Eckman Deputy City Attorney WPE:whm cc: Tom Peterson, Director of Planning Ted Shepard, City Planner City Attk City of Fort Collins July 15, 1993 Mr. Mark Linder 3500 JFK Parkway, Suite 221 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Re: Lindimer Subdivision Dear Mark: . Thank you for dropping off a copy of your protective covenants for the Lindimer Subdivision. My examination of Article XI, Section 1(c) has prompted this letter. Section (c) pertains to the notice regarding the equestrian use next door and, I presume, was intended to comply with the promise which you made to the Planning and Zoning Board that the future owners in your subdivision would be given full disclosure as to the nature and location of the horse stables and boarding operation, which statement would read as follows: The undersigned property owner understands that a horse stable and riding arena are located within close proximity of this residence. There are no plans to change this land use in the future. The undersigned agrees that certain normal conditions are associated with the operation of this facility, including certain noises, odors or conditions inherent to the use, riding and stabling of horses, and these conditions are acceptable and agreeable. My understanding of this assurance, which was made to the Planning and Zoning Board at its June 28, 1993 meeting, would be contained in a document signed by the purchasers of the properties at closing. Another perhaps better way to cover this disclosure would be to put this language (in a modified form) in the deed of conveyance from your corporation to the first property owners. That way, the disclosure is found in the chain of title to each of the lots, and there would be no question about its being applicable to bona fide purchasers in the future. I think that if you were to change the word "undersigned" to "grantee," the language above ' quoted would be acceptable to include in the initial conveying deeds. As to the language in the Declaration of Covenants found at Article XI, Section 1(c), I would recommend that the second and third sentences of that subparagraph be amended to read as follows: 300 LaPorte Avenue • P. O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6520