HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOX HILLS 2ND FILING RF SITE PLAN REVIEW - 36 93C - MINUTES/NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGNEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
Did You Notification
of this meeting?
Addre s.
Name Address Zip
Yes
No
Yes
No
lilf,S//X-6��
19 Pv Plo eP/'
,�/f1Zo,f D tJ 7�� /rtr►^^P „� o✓ OFU La .�
D)4110 M0ju26S3j cc�d"Q`� " vs
�ick w L' L=c� �i y� ►o � )a»ds F' i �cb
✓
v
o tel t✓ 1101 6aksgvvI c - os
(/
U
65 6 blA Kt^69AMpescfi y ,05 UP,"M �05a(o
� �1 w�lbn �i
✓
M k l
L
i
l
15. Will the architectural covenants and guidelines for these
houses be similar to those at Taft Canyon? That is what we
expect. The lot sizes, house sizes, and quality should be the
same as those at Taft Canyon.
The covenants will include an element for architectural control,
similar to the Taft Canyon covenants.
16. Are the County proposals approved yet?
No,•they are scheduled for sometime in January and early Spring.
17. Will there be a turn lane on CR 38E constructed with this
proposal?
It is very likely that the traffic study will indicate that a
turning lane will be necessary for this development and it will
then be constructed.
18. I have concerns about storm drainage.
A storm drainage report and a drainage and grading plan will be
submitted for the City's review and approval. Developed flows will
have to be conveyed off the property and into an approved detention
pond to be released at the 2 yr historic rate. .
19. We would prefer it if the road connecting Taft Hill
Subdivision to this one were kept low key. It shouldn't be
any wider than 28' and it should be built as a "lane" without
curb, gutter, or walk. . It really serves the purpose of a
second point of access for emergency vehicles and doubles as
a pedestrian/vehicular access for neighbors. It is not a major
road and most people will use CR 38E rather than winding
through the Taft Canyon Subdivision to get to Taft Hill or
38E.
J
7. How are you going.to prevent people from cutting through our
subdivision (Springfield Subdivision) to get to Horsetooth
Road? People already cut through because the left turn at
Taft Hill and CR 38E is impossible. What are you proposing to
do about this, because you will become part of the problem.
The County and City are working on installing a signal at that
intersection, which should eliminate the need for most people to
cut through Springfield Subdivision. I'm not sure about the timing
of the signal, but it could be in place prior to any houses being
built here.
8. Construction traffic should not be allowed to cut through
Springfield or Taft Canyon subdivisions.
We agree.
9. We would request that the City, County, or this developer put
up signs saying "No Through Traffic" to help cut down on the
problem.
10. Is there some way that you could redesign the entry way to our
subdivision (Springfield) to slow traffic down as it enters
from CR 38E? It is such a large expanse of asphalt that the
traffic is still moving 50 mph when they come down our street.
We want you to think seriously about things that you can do to
help us with the problem that we have with traffic on our
streets and to make sure that this development does not
contribute to the problem.
We will look into some of these ideas and talk to the County about
the possibility of signs.
11. A signal at CR 38E and Taft Hill Road would really help.
12. I did not receive notification about the County subdivision
proposals to the west of your proposal.
The City sent out letters for this proposal, not for the County
subdivisions to the west. You may be out of the notification area
for the County projects.
13. Would development of the County section (Fox Hill 1st) also
trigger extension of the road into Taft Canyon?
Yes, that property also needs two points of access according to the
Fire Code.
14. Who is the owner of this property?
Springfield 6th Filing Joint Venture.
2
0
Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary
Fox Hill Annexation and RF Cluster Plan
The following are comments, concerns, and questions expressed at a
neighborhood information meeting held on December 1, 1993 at
Johnson Elementary School. The proposed project is for 33 single
family lots on 35 acres, located south of County Road 38E and west
of Taft Canyon subdivision.
Note: All responses are by the applicant, unless otherwise noted.
1. How does this property get contiguity to. the City to qualify
for annexation?
There is a 10' strip of land, which is in the City, along the
western border of Taft Canyon subdivision. The City acquired it
and annexed it for the purposes of constructing a City Trail at
some time in the future.
2. Could this develop in the County?
The property is eligible for annexation, and the County would
recommend that .the property be annexed and developed in the City.
There is an Intergovernmental Agreement between the City and County
which directs that this kind of development occur in the City if
the property is contiguous to the City and is within the Urban
Growth Area.
3. Will CR 38E be widened? What is the ultimate width?
This development. will be obligated to dedicate additional right-of-
way for CR 38E and to design and construct improvements (or pay for
improvements to be completed at a later date). On the Master
Street Plan, CR 38E is designated as a future 6 lane arterial.
4. My concern is that the traffic will increase in the area. It
is already out of control.
5. I am concerned that further development in the area will
provide incentives for developers, City Council, and Larimer
County to connect Overland Trail to CR 38E.
6. Do we have a choice as neighbors about the connection into
Taft Canyon?
The connection has always been planned to provide a second point of
access for this property. The right-of-way has already been
dedicated on Taft Canyon side to the property line in anticipation
of the connection and the street is stubbed in.
1
•