HomeMy WebLinkAboutFOX HILLS ANNEXATION AND ZONING - 36 93A AND B - REPORTS - INITIATING RESOLUTIONV
c
a,
�iii■■�ia�sai
iiP e Ff_
Powell PI.
o
— c C
COUNTY ROAD 38E — BQXTe,r P!
alai
P
■ fl r
e-) iiii��siael�!
rn
a
Hi r
o
westrid a
� '
ITEM: FOX H I L L S
ANNEXATION & ZONING ®�
NUMBER:36-93A, B
c
NOTICE
TO ALL PERSONS INTERESTED:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City Council of the City of Fort Collins has
adopted a Resolution initiating annexation proceedings for the Fox Hills
Annexation, said Annexation being more particularly described in said Resolution,
a copy of which precedes this Notice.
That, on February 15, 1994, at the hour of 6:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter
as the matter may come on for hearing in the Council Chambers in the City Hall,
300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado, the Fort Collins City Council will
hold a public hearing upon the annexation petition for the purpose of finding and
determining whether the property proposed to be annexed meets the applicable
requirements of Colorado law and is considered eligible for annexation. At such
hearing, any persons may appear and present such evidence as they may desire.
The City of Fort Collins will make reasonable accommodations for access to
City services, programs and activities and will make special communication
arrangements for persons with disabilities. Please call 221-6515 for assistance.
Dated this 4th day of January, A.D. 1994.
City Clerk
Passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Council of the City of Fort
Collins held this 4th day of January, A.D. 1994.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
Mayor
RESOLUTION 94-5
OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
FINDING SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE AND
INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
FOX HILLS ANNEXATION
WHEREAS, a written petition, together with four (4) prints of an annexation
map, was heretofore filed with the City Clerk requesting the annexation of
certain property to be known as the Fox Hills Annexation; and
WHEREAS, the Council of the City of Fort Collins desires to initiate
annexation proceedings in accordance with law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
as follows:
Section 1. That the Council of the City of Fort Collins hereby accepts the
annexation petition for the Fox Hills Annexation, more particularly described as
situate in the County of Larimer, State of Colorado, to wit:
A tract of land located in the Southwest Quarter of Section 33,
Township 7 North, Range 69 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City
of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, Colorado, considering the North
line of the Southeast Quarter of said Section 33 as bearing N
89°58'12" W is contained within the boundary lines which begin at a
point which bears N 89°58'12" W 2656.37 feet, and again S 00°56'00"
W 522.51 feet from the East Quarter Corner of said Section 33, and
run thence along the East line of said Southwest Quarter, S
00056'00" W 2128.05 feet to the South Quarter Corner of said Section
33, thence along the South line of said Section 33, N 89040'39" W
607.46 feet; thence N 00011'08" E 2566.99 feet along the East line
of a roadway as described in Book 1899 at Page 636 to a point on the
Southerly line of County Road 38-E; thence along said Southerly
line, N 85°00'00" E 272.87 feet; thence South 466.41 feet; thence
East 361.97 feet to the point of beginning, containing 33.1707
acres, more or less.
Section 2. That the Council hereby finds and determines that the annexation
petition and accompanying map are in substantial compliance with the Municipal
Annexation Act.
Section 3. That the Notice attached hereto be adopted as a part of this
Resolution. Said Notice establishes the date, time and place when a public
hearing will be held regarding the passage of an annexation ordinance pertaining
to the above described property. The City Clerk is directed to publish a copy
of this Resolution and said Notice as provided in the Municipal Annexation Act.
DATE: January 4, 1994
ITEM NUMBER: 23
Planning and Zoning Board Recommendation:
The Planning and Zoning Board will conduct a public hearing on the request for
annexation and zoning at its regular monthly meeting on January 25, 1994, and
will make its recommendation at that time. The Board's recommendation will be
forwarded to the City Council in time for the public hearing and first readings
of the annexation and zoning ordinances scheduled for February 15, 1994.
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
SUBJECT:
ITEM NUMBER: 23
DATE: January 4, 1994
STAFF: Ken Waido
Resolution 94-5 Finding Substantial Compliance and Initiating Annexation
Proceedings for the Fox Hills Annexation.
`i YGG1 LSD✓l� byf hL ✓L I�N�n`/ tHL/ U� t✓t%
GjthtL laiwJ` 5 GiYii41i411'0 -' r
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the Resolution.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant, Cityscape Urban Design, Inc, on behalf of the property owner,
Springfield Subdivision Sixth Filing, Joint Venture, has submitted a written
petition requesting annexation of approximately 33.17 acres located west of Taft
Hill Road and south of County Road 38E.
in keel i j
The proposed Resolution makes kfindin!gAtition substantially complies
with the Municipal Annexation 'f�rt dete s that a hearing should be
established regarding the annexation, a s that notice be given of the
hearing. The hearing will be held at the time o first reading of the annexation
and zoning ordinances. Not less than 30 days of prior notice is required by
Colorado law.
The property is located within the Fort Collins Urban Growth Area. According to
policies and agreements between the City of Fort Collins and Larimer County
contained in the INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR THE FORT COLLINS URBAN GROWTH
AREA, the City will consider the annexation property in the UGA when the property
is eligible for annexation according to state law. The property gains the
required 1/6 contiguity to existing city limits from a common boundary with the
Taft Canyon Second Annexation to the east.
The annexation petition provides that second reading on the annexation ordinance
will not be scheduled until after the Planning and Zoning Board has reviewed the
preliminary PUD for the property (see the third paragraph from the bottom on the
first page of petition). Because the Council has said that this procedure is
unacceptable, and the policy has been changed administratively, the petitioner
has been advised that the condition to delay second reading is not acceptable.
Nonetheless, unless the petitioner decides to withdraw the annexation petition,
state law provides that Council should review the petition and determine whether
it is in substantial compliance with the statutory requirements. If so, the
resolution should be approved by the Council. The decision as to whether to
actually annex the property would then be made at a earin on t - tion
ordinance. At that ime, until would determine whether or not the proposed
annexation would be in the best interests of the City.
W 4qt YAL VL �4Cl K%N OCt%L,j NO'i .4
yi