HomeMy WebLinkAboutHAMPSHIRE POND PUD FINAL - 44 93A - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTS*****##**#**####*##**##***********#******##*#*#**##*#**##**#*****#
Plan revisions are due September 8, 1993 by 12:00 noon. Please
contact me for the number of folded revisions required for each
document.
PMT's, renderings, and 8 folded copies of final revisions (for the
Planning and Zoning Board packets) are due September 20, 1993.
Final documents (including the signed development agreement,
applicable mylars and utility plans) are due September 23, 1993 by
12:00 noon.
Please contact me at 221-6750 if you have questions or concerns
related to these comments. I would like to schedule a meeting with
you ap soon as possible, if necessary, to discuss these comments.
S' ely,
t v Olt
Project Planner
xc: Kerrie Ashbeck
Sherry Albertson -Clark
Advance Planning
Stormwater Utility
Transportation
Parks & Recreation
Natural Resources
Linda Ripley, Ripley Assoc.
Mike Jones, Northern Engineering
file/Project Planner
9. The Landscape Plan does not indicate what turfgrass areas and
planting beds are to be irrigated and how they are to be
irrigated. A standard note defining the intent should be added
to the plan.
10. Landscape Note 7 on the Landscape Plan should be expanded to
restrict fencing other than the three -rail fence, as
indicated, along rear lot lines abutting the detention pond
and trail easement. No double fences will be allowed. Is the
developer or the individual property owner responsible for the
installation of the three -rail fence?
11. Parkland fees of $779 per dwelling unit will apply and be
collected at the time of issuance of building permits. The new
fee amount was approved by City Council and went into effect
on August 1J, 1993.
12. Information about this, development's compliance with the
City's Solar Orientation Ordinance must be shown on both the
Site Plan and the subdivision plat, as per the requirements of
the Land Development Guidance System and the ordinance. All
lots except Lot 4 (being in excess of 15,OOO square feet) are
subject to the ordinance.
13. A future access to the east, into the City -owned property,
must be shown on all plans. The temporary turnarounds at the
ends of Water Blossom Lane and Marshwood Drive must be
addressed at this time.
14. In reference to Landscape Note 5 on the Landscape Plan . who
will install the second street tree on the corner lots?
15. What are -the materials and colors proposed for the three -rail
fence? What are the proposed color(s) for the privacy fence?
16. Landscape Note 2 on the Landscape Plan should indicate who
will install and maintain the common landscaping.
17. Phase lines should be shown on the Landscape Plan.
18. Standard noting about the timing for installation of
landscaping or the 125% collateral commitment must be added to
the Landscape Plan.
This completes the review comments at this time. Additional
comments may be forthcoming as the various departments and
reviewing agencies continue to review this request. Please be aware
of the following dates and deadlines to assure your ability to stay
on schedule for the September 27, 1993 Planning and Zoning Board
hearing:
w,'
5. The City Mapping Department has the following comments
relating to the subdivision plat:
a) The Point of Beginning must be shown.
b) The distance tie (230.00.1) from the northeast corner of
Section 28 to the P.O.B. must be shown.
c) The two outer boundary monuments along the north line of
the development and in the center of west Drake Road that are
shown as set do not meet State requirements.
d) The usage of Tracts A, D, E, F, I. and J are not stated or
clearly defined.
e) There are two Lot 11's in Block 5.
Please contact Jim Hoff or Wally Muscott at 221-6605 with
questions pertaining to necessary revisions to the subdivision
plat.
6. The Water/Wastewater Department's comments have been forwarded
to Northern Engineering on a red -lined set of utility plans.
Please return the red -lines to the City with your revisions.
7. A copy of the Stormwater Utility comments is attached to this
letter. It is important to note that Stormwater is saying that
there is a concern with the original submittal and its
completeness and that the project may not be able to stay on
the September 27th Planning and Zoning Board agenda for a
final decision. Please contact Glen Schlueter at 221-6589 to
discuss the storm drainage concerns.
8. The Engineering Department has the following comments relating
to the utility plans:
a) A copy of a soils report must be submitted, as required, or
a reference to the soils report submitted with the preliminary
must be provided. This same comment relates to a traffic
impact analysis.
b) The drainage report calls for phasing but shows no details.
c) The plans need to show the proposed phasing which, in turn,
will show temporary traffic control/turnaround easements,
utility phasing, and when West Drake Road improvements will be
constructed.
d) The street plans/profiles are generally well done except
for phasing details and using vertical curves or additional
grade breaks for algebraic differences of greater than 1%.
e) Again, phasing must be shown on the grading, drainage, and
erosion control plans.
Commu�_.y Planning and Environmental .._rvices
Planning Department
City of Fort Collins
August 18, 1993
Richard Storck
Storck development Corp.
P.O. Box 270218
Fort Collins, CO. 80524
Dear Rich,
Staff has reviewed your development proposal package for Hampshire
Pond P.U.D., Final that was submitted on August 2, 1993, and would
like to offer the following comments:
1. U.S West has stated that:
a) Tracts A, D, E, and F should be described as utility
easements.
b) They will require a 15' by 30' easement for three large
telephone equipment cabinets in the general vicinity of the
east or northeast side of the P.U.D.
A copy of the U.S. West comment sheet, with their general
development comments, is attached to this letter.
2. Tracts A, B. and C should be "public" access easements (as
well as drainage an/or utility, where appropriate).
3. Public Service Company of Colorado has the following comments:
a) Tracts A, D, E, and F must be dedicated as utility
easements.
b) The project identification sign at Hampshire Road and West
Drake Road must be set back a minimum of 8' from the west
right-of-way line of Hampshire Road.
c) The proposed front lot deciduous trees must be planted,
outside of the 8' front lot utility easements adjoining
residential streets.
d) The proposed trees in Tracts D, E, and F must be planted a
minimum of 4' away from any natural gas line.
4. Only one project identification sign is allowed per entrance
to the development.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750