HomeMy WebLinkAboutHAMPSHIRE POND PUD PRELIMINARY - 44 93 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY (3)HAMPSHIRE I ROAD
RECOMMENDED
GEOMETRY
w
Y
Q
80'
LEFT -TURN
195'
Access
rr�
LANE
«Z
Scale:
1" = 50'
a
E
m
Figure 3
APPENDIX C
1`985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZE0 INTERSECTIONS Page-1
twxxxxx hX xXx.R xXYxxX):>XxxXYx.F xXXxXx X:kxXXXxXxM'A:x l:x FxX XA:):X Yr:x xxxXxXiXxYY
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE
RUNNING SPEED,
MAJOR STREET..
35
PEAK
HOUR
FACTOR .....................
1
AREA
POPULATION -----------------
-----
100000
NAME
OF
THE EAST/WEST
STREET .........
drake
NAME
OF
THE NORTH/SOUTH
STREET -------
west access
NAME
OF
THE ANALYST ..................
mid
DATE
OF
THE ANALYSIS
(mm/dd/yy)......
7/25/93
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. arts pm long
OTHER INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EASI/WEST
CONTROL. TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
_________________________________________________
Ef: WE; NE SR
--- ---- --- ----
LEFT 0 50 --
THRU 660 1100 0 --
R1 GHQ '•0 30 --
NUMBER OF LANE:,
E: WE.
_______ _______ __-____ -__
CAPACITY AND LEVEL. -OF -SERVICE Page-3
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (ocoh) c (ocph) - (Pcph) C = c - v LOS
p M SH R SH
--------------- --------- ------------ ------------ --
MINOR STREET (I6_2b)
NB LEFT 6 83 77 > 77 > 72 > E
> 336 > 292 >C
RIGHT 33 727 727 > 727 > 694 > A
MAJOR STREET
WB LEFT 55 496 496 496 441 A
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
---------------------------------------------------------------------
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.. ... drake
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... west access
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/25/93 ; am pm long
OTHER INFORMATION_...
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
Y ZZZZZZZXXYYYXZZZZZZXYXXXXZZZYXZXYYYYXYZZXXXXYZYZZZXXZXYXXYXYZXZZZZZY
IDENTIFYING .INFORMATION -
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35
PEAK HOUR FACTOR .....................
1 -
AREA POPULATION ......................
100000, - -
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET .........
drake ..
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET .......
west access
NAME OF THE ANALYST ..................
mJd -
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)......
7/25/93
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................
am pm long
OTHER INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
--------------------------`--------------------------------------
INTERSECTION TYPE:.T-INTERSECTION
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
EB WB NB SB
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT 0 20 10 --
THRU 980 360 0 --
RIGHT 5 0 40 --
NUMBER OF LANES
---------------------------------------------------------------------
E6 WE• NP•
SR
------- --------------
LANES _ 1
-------
--
CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
- POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL : MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY - CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c '(pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS
p . _ M SH R SH
------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ -
MINOR STREET -. - (Z-22.� -ID
NB LEFT - 11 120 115 > 115 > 104 > 0 -
>- 327 > 272 >C
RIGHT 44 602 602 > 602 > 558 > A
MAJOR STREET. -
WB LEFT 22 325 325 325 303 B
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... drake
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET._ west access -
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS__ 7/25/93 ; am Pm long
OTHER INFORMATION....
1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1
XX###XX###XXX#########X######XX#X##X####XXX###X#XX####X###X##XXXX###X
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
AVERAGE 'RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET... 35
PEAK HOUR FACTOR. ..................... .i
AREA POPULATION...... ................... 100000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......... dra ke
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hampshire
NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. mid
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 7/25/93 -
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm long
OTHER INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL - -
-------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST -
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP 51GN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
EB WB NB SB
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT 20 25 5 55
THRU 660 1095 1 1
RIGHT 10 115 15 50
NUMBER OF LANES ANO LANE USAGE
_____________________________________________________________________
EB WR NB. SE-
----- ------ - -- -------
LANES -
CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3
---------------------------------------------------------------------
POTEN- ACTUAL
FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE.
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT. v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS
p M - SH ..R SH
------- -------- --------- _
MINOR STREET (I-7-Z7) C�L
NB LEFT 6 83 70 > 71 70 > 65 65 >E E
THROUGH 1 83 76 > 76 > 75 > E
RIGHT 17 727 727 727 710 A
MINOR STREET _ (s4-'34) L7
I \
SB LEFT 61 83 74 > 74 74 > 13 14 >E E
THROUGH 1 83 - 76 > 76 > 75 > E
RIGHT 55 522 522 522 467 A
MAJOR STREET
EB LEFT 22 242 242 -242 220 C
WB LEFT. 28 496 496 496 468 A
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... drake
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hampshire
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/25/93 ; am om long
OTHER INFORMATION_.._
- 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1:
x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx�xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxixxxxxx
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION '
-----------------------------------------------------`---------------
AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35
PEAK HOUR FACTOR...... ................ 1
AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... drake
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hampshire
.NAME OF THE ANALYST .............. .... mid
DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy) ...... 7/25/93
TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm long
OTHER INFORMATION....
INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL
INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG .
MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST
CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN
TRAFFIC VOLUMES
---------------
EB WB NB SB
---- ---- ---- ----
LEFT 35 10 10 95
THRU 980 355 1 1
RIGHT 5 50 20 15
NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE
-----------------------------------------------------------------
EB WB NB SP.
------- ------- ------- -------
LANES _ _
CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE
Paoe-3
POTEN- ACTUAL
_ FLOW- TIAL- MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE
RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY
MOVEMENT v(pcph). c-(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c= c - v LOS
p .M SH R SH
MINOR STREET
NB LEFT 11 106 98 > 99 98 > 87 87 >E E
THROUGH 1 108 102 > 102 > 101 > D
RIGHT 22 602 602 602 580 A
MINOR STREET I)A;
SB.LEFT 105 108 100 >. 100 100 > -6 -5 >F F
THROUGH 1 111 106 > 106 > - 104 > D
RIGHT 17 850 - 850 850 833 A
MAJOR STREET
EB LEFT 39 680 680 .680 642 A
WB LEFT 11 325 325 325 314 B
IDENTIFYING INFORMATION
NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... drake
NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hampshire
DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 7/25/95 am pm long
OTHER INFORMATION....
APPENDIX B
AM/PM
)�oUNbo (i T-o A)6A GSY i .. '_..
S VEra�Cc.E� � i
d
i
1
11^^
V7
a--- 3&o/rc zro
�-355 lo4S
O/S`D D�AKC
d
IO/2S
j (°
0
,
APPENDIX A
Table 1
Long Range Peak Hour Operation
Level of Service
Intersection AM PM
Drake/Hampshire
NB
LT/T
E (C/D)*
E (C/D)*
NB
RT
A
A
SB
LT/T
F (D/E)*
E (D)*
SB
RT
A
A
EB
LT
A
C
WB
LT
B
A
Drake/West Access
NB LT
NB RT
WB LT
D (C/D)* E (C/D)*
A A
B A
( )* Level of service based upon recent research regarding vehicle
delay.
00
M
tn
0
00
W
x
C2
J
W
G
-12
W
.T.
Q
1
c To:
n
O
M From:
c�
z
s
W
UJ
z
cD
M
w
J_
7
U
z
0
a
C)
0
a
2M
z
at
U
lL
U_
Q
2
F-
Date:
MEMORANDUM
Richard Storck, Storck Development
Rick Ensdorff, Fort Collins Transportation Division
Matt Delich
July 26, 1993
Subject: Hampshire Pond left turn analysis, long range
(File: 9334MEM3)
This memorandum documents the long range traffic
projections and analyses related to the Hampshire Pond
residential development in Fort Collins. This supplements my
memorandum dated June 14, 1993.
The peak hour traffic projections are shown in Appendix
A. The traffic volumes on Drake Road reflect the peak hours
in the year 2010. The turning movements at both intersections
reflect the traffic volumes from Hampshire Pond and an
increase in background traffic that might be expected to use
these intersections to access other future developments in
this area. The key intersections operate as indicated in
Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B.
Operation is generally acceptable when considering the
research on stop sign controlled intersections included in the
June 14, 1993 memorandum. During the morning peak hour,
southbound left turns on Hampshire Road could be delayed up
to 37 seconds per approach vehicle. Based upon these traffic
projections, signals would not be warranted at this
intersection. This level of delay would likely occur whether
or not Hampshire Pond developed. The delay is primarily a
function of background traffic and the amount of traffic from
the neighborhood on the north side of Drake Road.
Using the peak hour traffic volumes shown in Appendix A,
the same conclusions regarding the left -turn lane striping on
Drake Road between Hampshire Road and the West Access are
drawn. Figure 3 from the June 14, 1993 memorandum is provided
in Appendix C.