The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutHAMPSHIRE POND PUD PRELIMINARY - 44 93 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS2. look at the size of the individual lots in that development which also is adjacent to acreage development and have a similar standard for this particular P.U.D. One other concern would be that of landscaping. The area is in open field that has been both corn field and a pasture land. There are no significant trees or shrubs on the property itself. I have taken considerable time and effort to try to develop some greenery and habitat for both wildlife and screening and I think this should also be considered by the developer on this P.U.D. Thank you for listening to my concerns. I know there are many factors that weigh into your decisions. I would appreciate your attention particularly to the traffic concern and also transition from acreage to residential properties with larger lot size. If you have any further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me. I can be reached at my office at 493-5904 or my home at 223-4853. Sincerely yours, Larry Kieft, M.D. LDK/es Larry D. Kieft, M.D. 2333 W. Drake Fort Collins, CO 80526 August 2, 1993 Mr. Steve Olt Project Planner City of Fort Collins Planning Dept. 281 N. College Ave. Fort Collins, CO 80522 Dear Mr. Olt, As a land owner whose property is immediately adjacent to the proposed Hampshire Pond P.U.D., I would like to forward the following comments to you about that proposed pro- ject. It is my understanding that the proposed project involves 18 acres and will have 74 single family residential lots on that. I appreciated the opportunity to attend the initial meeting on June 21, 1993, when the developer introduced the project. I also appreciated the opportunity to review the plot that had been given to the city. Although I am pleased that the land will be developed in single residential units, I do have the following concerns. My first concern is about the traffic flow proposed by the developer. The plot as I have revieued.itshows one exit on Hampshire Road but then has a second exit on Feather - star Way. The proposed distance between these two exits is approximately 300 feet. As Drake Road has developed, there has been increasing traffic. My driveway is 100 feet from the proposed access to Drake Road. With the development of Fox Creek P.U.D. and now Hampshire Pond P.U.D. it seems that there will be increased traffic on Drake itself. I am concerned about the traffic in that particular area and the potential for accidents. My main concern is early in the morning when there is both school bus pick-up and traffic for work and again later in the afternoon when this recurs. It would seem imperative also that there be a stop light at the intersection of Drake Road and Hampshire Road to accommodate this increased traffic. It is already difficult to make a left hand turn from Hampshire with the Drake Crossing Shopping Center traffic as well as Drake traffic itself. The other suggestion that I would like to forward to the Traffic Department would be that a left hand arrow be installed at the inter- section of Drake and Taft Hill to accommodate traffic flow. The second concern I have is concerning the lot size of this development. The proper- ties immediately adjacent to this are all acreage properties. Our particular property is three acres. The other western boundary is bounded by property of eleven acres. On the south boundary are also large acreage properties. It is of concern to me that the developer has chosen to put 6,000 square foot lots immediately adjacent to these properties. It would seem better to have larger lots as a transition from large acreage plots to rather dense residential development. The plotting itself is less than imagin- ative and would be enhanced perhaps by some cul-de-sac development. I understand the need for solar orientation but I think other properties have been developed in a more creative way, while still meeting the city's requirements. The Fox Creek P.U.D. has 68 single family dwellings on 31 acres. This is certainly much less dense develop- ment than is being proposed in the Hampshire Pond P.U.D. It might be appropriate to 19. Question: As a developer, what does it take to lower the density of this development and provide less lots? Answer: We are looking at what is appropriate for this property from a numbers standpoint. 20. Question: Are you considering purchasing the City -owned property to the east if it went on the market? Answer: We are keeping our options open. 21. Question: When this development improves West Drake Road will the entire street frontage be improved and will we be responsible for the cost of any improvements? Answer: The City has not yet determined when the entire West Drake Road street frontage will be improved. There are essentially two methods used to improve streets. The first is a "special improvements district" that would evaluate and assess the cost of improvements to the adjacent property owners based on their street frontage. It is possible that this type of assessment can be paid over a period of time. The second method is a capital improvements project where the City generates money through a sales tax (or other mechanism) for the initial improvements. Records are kept and property owners could then be assessed a proportionate amount for street improvements when their property redevelops. 22. Question: What is your target date to start this project? Answer: The City review process will probably continue into October, 1993. Streets in the development may be under construction by the first part of 1994. 23. Question: What is your estimated time of completion for this development? Answer: We do not have an answer for the question at this time. 24. Question: Will the portions of the property that are not under construction at any given time be kept clean, maintained, and free of construction debris? Answer: Yes, that is the intent. 25. Question: Will these homes be similar to your homes to the north in Hampshire Court? Answer: Yes, they will be similar. The prices will range from $130,000 to $160,000. 11. Question: Will there be any kind of barrier, buffering, or fencing along the periphery of the development? Answer: There will be various types of fencing, depending on the situation, along the periphery of the development. 12. Comment: We live on one of the properties to the west and are concerned about people using our 3 acres and the amenities we have. 13. Comment: I think this development proposal is way too dense. I would like to see larger lots on this property. 14. Question: What are the plans for the City -owned property to the north and east? Answer: The City presently does not have any plans for that property. 15. Question: With the Fox Creek P.U.D. request there was the awareness that the intersection of West Drake Road and South Taft Hill Road would be affected. What will an additional 74 lots with this development do to that intersection? Answer: That will be determined when the traffic impact analysis is submitted to the City for review. 16. Question: Is a second point of access to the development from West Drake Road necessary unless another point of access is provided elsewhere or the homes are equipped with automatic fire sprinkler systems? Answer: That is correct. 17. Question: Have you considered any other layout or design of this property that would reflect a more creative appearance for development? Answer: Part of the driving force for the layout of this development is the need to comply with the City's solar orientation ordinance that requires a minimum of 65% of all single family or duplex residential lots to be oriented within 30 degrees of true north -south to allow for maximum solar gain. The criteria calls for front lot lines to be within 30 degrees of true east -west and this drives the street layout. 18. Question: The west access point can't be moved further east to allow for larger, deeper lots along the west side? Answer: There is a minimum separation requirement between two access points from an arterial street (West Drake Road) and the distance as shown is close to the minimum. 3. Question: Is there any requirement for physical separation between your west street access and our private driveway to the west of the proposed development? Answer: There is not a specific separation distance between a drive and a street like there would be between two streets. The required traffic impact analysis will help determine allowable access points and distances between them. 4. Question: The lots along the west side of the development are 6,000 square feet in size. Where do you pick up the lots sizes to 7,200 square feet? Answer: The larger lots begin on the east side of the westerly street in Hampshire Pond. They are generally in the interior portion of the development and along the West Drake Road frontage. 5. Question: Did you give any consideration to the larger lots being on the periphery of the development to provide neighborhood sensitivity and a transition to adjacent properties? Answer: The smaller lots are planned along the periphery of the development to take advantage of the adjacent open space areas, providing relief for the interior lots with additional square footage. 6. Comment: We can support residential development on this property but we are concerned about the smaller lots along our east property line. 7. Question: How will the intersection at West Drake Road and South Taft Hill Road accommodate these additional 74 lots? Answer: The required traffic impact analysis will determine the impacts of this development on the transportation network in the area. 8. Question: There will probably be more traffic that will use the westernmost access point to the development. Will the traffic impact analysis support this? Answer: That will be determined when the analysis is submitted to the City for review. 9. Comment: The traffic flow on West Drake Road is rather fast and, with an added volume of traffic, I am concerned about two access points to this development. 10. Question: What will be the footprint of these homes? Answer: The homes will be 1,600 to 2,000 square feet in size. City of Fort Collins Commu_ y Planning and Environmental vices Planning Department Neighborhood Information Meeting for HAMPSHIRE POND P.U.D. Date: June 21, 1993 Applicant: Richard Stork Storck Development Corp. 4401 McMurray Drive Fort Collins, CO. 80525 City Planner: Steve Olt Location: Fellowship Bible Church The Hampshire Pond P.U.D. request is for 74 single family residential lots on approximately 22 acres located south of West Drake Road and west of South Taft Hill Road. The purpose of this meeting was to introduce the potential applicant, with a development request, to all neighbors and potentially affected interests. The following questions and concerns were expressed at this meeting: 1. Question: How can you say that development could be almost twice as dense as this proposal when you already have minimal sized lots? Answer: The residential density of this proposal is between 3 to 4 dwelling units per acre. There is a variety of lots sizes on this proposal, with just a portion of the lots being the minimum size of 6,000 square feet. It would be possible to lay this development out with a density of 5 to 6 dwelling units per acre. 2. Question: Are the lots across the street, in Hampshire Court, larger than the lots proposed here? Answer: The lots on the south side of Hampshire Court are slightly larger, but the lots on the north side of the street are comparable to these lots. 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750 DENSITY CHART Maximum Criterion Cretlit If Ail�„eilin g UnrhAre Within' a 20/% 2000 rear of Or, e.nn gorcgorwea regroor^ooa wCoc'ng-M,« I D b 10% ,S leer or en eefmfgneryrnoo C 10% 4CCa reef of ensnnq Or.-,gcravep •eq�one: f.-ccc�rq Len,« d 200 15J0'eef of an ernnnq or,swr regr•oomooa:CM COr"mUNh oona^.Cm- •aU w r. b ' ^ e 10°a 'q0p test of afcnoa.meenrq cn �^e rsawra,••enn.rn•ec:r^a�.wn ern,certn.a.,,f cr n•e ira.e erC_c,000 t 20% 7C00 reef of amaw emof ",,,can,« rn 9 5% 10001", of a CMAO ewe eenr« h 209° vom con Covens f 209r0 '1^eCM.O &,.n.asO�mct A WaeCa`.M oounaovfcCmegj, f0.ufrng ypan afMUOm.nf G.afrrpyw ernfeamrarpfu.. 0 : -Fw orascnv.ror woo.m oos.nowv nm0 to 1 ° 30 /a '0 to 15%-For aou nf.nor aaw oovroavr 10 to 20%Car•nq,,,w 14fo 20%-Fa oraeCn moss wco« O� nm 20 to JO%cm"Qww. 201025%-Fa orof.cn visor wooem oovfacN no J0 to 40%ccn°7„n. /� r 25 ro JO% - Fw wawen vros Oraa«wr oo.,rarr, ros a0 ro 50%eonequ,v. �i(f k n.+ctn rx awnonmoffq marine aaroctf..+,ear,c.ron.rMsww Msrr f.ssage e.m«mrof,�fnseooncanon of ofr«ron,e Merry forfew.y5'L0.�commrrsa M«Qy cant«wn0,1r"eaYYM W.O,y mOfrom.o�.,,e°u,eawi.evC�.aS%oanfnmwaaamea ea<.'Vrf �n en«gy yr � _ccworsa:%ovv.srw eery 50 acres�ncrt,asammaao�ew m ( _c:cu,afe me O«cMgge OrrM rota aaefnme war.a+'ar cre ceArearorecrsOffwfa w.Mrorf•2 _f^d WfcM n�q. o a corn n I meaoa�c� v-.m�nro asw,evq pemfonMro,nnaoM woc.rrcr,.ssnms C.Ntmn..wi.. rew,MvnR tmct,un ins osrc snroq. of m�s.:aen soots areags ro merora tine.corner.focsoq.. Mr«-n osrcM,ogsccrxrra . wor merobcr,•wo s100 e, q ng r>e sn OnnegrfpprrOaj w.afc frQf.frot nss,,,n,cn ors nocfn«Mrraar.ue0 rr Gh C.:ce Mr«2%aaRl:J ay«V i1CO Cer grw.nQyrNlinver}p G rOaw �f Of me f,Oa,, M'f ge,,s to ae fOMff an ne.nrnarnoot:ocmesarfa /«VCel wnrlfae Mf c My wreary aY C.N C:: e ?nf«a 1%o ;o,e )100 o., cw.-Vy frryr,.Q Ia Camm�myr1.�ielfq mope ro Cev afO Ae° owcWngs a-e tola1 r Oer or OVM .nq,rrn fw fa. vfCamelafnu.er Mf«mat �+ Owc, rMq. asaa ,O m amm+ a30% Z 'OC�rll "Ofwfgn 10°M O OeCrgO D. CMfOq. Cry qla nym >♦ orabry gyyN Or Noe A'ar,ar a'S'n OKCO nou«sq as aenseo Cr efe Gh or Fan Ccs. cca ins ccr ra roa OrvO* r W - 5an� Woe'A'yryn �C10 un,n ,..,/� r 1 1 . 7oro non nrotoefllm C C.va oaf a Oe gear«man t ev sw Of atroce.f Orcc r comore an nmwfc w-ONOfaOC. Caorta a1W osarn'sa to,merabr,.,q: J% -Far a.rnmgwm,fpaffrfq oufvo.l+nrrncni.p.m.orv.wv ono we.aemvnc econanc w•c foaaroconraaan. ro �n S Or� J% - Fv �rsg mrn.r.un,ovwu..wm.ewror^^n`s caoca,a me ouorgawac..•.fu�e c�oorp info unm J% - Forvocvgooaoffr ue or me ouanpaaoce mrnre rot C,ncCnnfx,alc. wer,wffon momaarn.Mfnan aGlOvar.fay..r 'f 0 Glom a d o H,.aureo OCYq n ins mWI1C�.Im wa.cY aticea uso«r=ovsa wmn .re W ufq w n m er.aea OcrsuM fescue a m o�mr•,ur m ffs. of.ffav muaura. c oorfys rfspy a sartio as rawc t n —For aovnq l5%amoredms oorafq�n ann,cve: 5% -For oray.q 50.2a%or rrr oofsrq rnafmu%re. ]% — ew aow�q 25�a°'r. oe ins oanxsg Ana nncnie I U I rCcwmm�mM•acw'g-^_Ce,O aoMaeooaavw: famantPres.fa'gf.an'n�f•n+n.*.•cr �^e c�.e++sq �r•,n Mr«a W,Vn a 10% TOTAL coo H DEFINITION: All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public rec- reational uses as a principal use; uses _providing meeting Irlaces and plaees for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers. CRTERIA; Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the develop- ment plan. Yes No 1. On a gross acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project at least three (3) dwelling units per acre (calculated for ❑ residential portion of the site only)? 2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE POINTS AS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESI- DENTIAL PROJECT? THE REQUIRED EARNED ❑ CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: 30-40 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 3-4 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 40-50 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 4-5 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 50-60 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 5-6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 60-70 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 6-7 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 70-80 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 7-8 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 80-90 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 8-9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 90-100 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 9-10 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 100 OR MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS = 10 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS/ACRE. �4awP4,�+z, Spar ru9 - ik',eLl4%mi,4Arc4, ALL DEVELOPMENT: NUMBERED CRITERIA CHART ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion opplicoble? WIII the criterion be satisfied? If no, please explain q,e Yes No NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATABILITY 1. Social Compatibility 2. Neighborhood Character 3. Land Use Conflicts 4. Adverse Traffic Impact PLANS AND POLICIES 5. Comprehensive Plan PUBLIC FACILITIES & SAFETY 6. Street Capacity 7. Utility Capacity 8. Design Standards 9, Emergency Access 10. Security Lighting 11. Water Hazards RESOURCE PROTECTION 12. Soils & Slope Hazard 13. Significant Vegetation Wildlife Habitat 15. Historical Landmark I14. 16. Mineral Deposit 17. Eco-Sensitive Areas 48. Agricultural Lands ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS 19. Air Quality 20. Water Quality 21. Noise 22. Glare & Heat 23. Vibrations 24. Exterior Lighting 25. Sewages & Wastes SITE DESIGN 26. Community Organization 27. Site Organization 28. Natural Features 29. Energy Conservation 30.Shadows 31. Solar Access 32. Privacy en Space Arrangement laing Height nicular Movement r nicular DesignNing tive Recreational Areas 39. Private Outdoor Areas 40. Pedestrian Convenience 41. Pecestrian Contlicts 42. Lcnascaping/Open Areas 43. LonascopingBuildings 44. Landscaping/Screening ✓ i 45. Public Access I 46. Sicns I DENSITY CHART Maximum Earned Criterion Credit If All Dwelling Units Are Within: Credit a 20% 2000 lea l atoll ollislin(?ol of,ploved nuighlxa howl shopping cenler, 1 b 10% m,nln,l loll l,u,.ifWlgll...... lehq, VOrg7 C 1011/° .11NIIIInIrl ul nn uusllr.,1.n,tynnm,ingyu,.ul tlu,l.pnq)I.unlnr j j01JF Q d 20%, V�/r1o�V :,!,onllP•l.,l lrl,r.,i,ill,,,..11lf.1,l\4•In„„hIn,11n+.111,n11.I,i1111rYI1,IlYI wllk Vll:,.trim,..,. lylool'ty. O W/ e 101% 1(1IIl11.... hu.hold nluulv"..11IhlrUn41,Ilonu)nlsld III.! it in II.Illsn,yu. J.'. oh,m 111wsUnhe51111°af Culoludo Q/1 f 20% 30011 hn:r if l l go logo" "ll,l...... I:nh.ol,t r IIJ O �i g 5% It IOU Iint oluchtld ca¢n;Unru Yes Ell h 20% I loll u f l ul t Collins 1p O i 20°/O ule r:plllr,l ulp..... hlllr ll, tV 0 O A, .I to to I vJ a r,., h. n n u b u y Is I nI.11, loom, In n.rtn,g u. L. Iu Jvvnluf n, a •ut l u •. III u u ry hu unu n v l ni lulluws 11..1"ol,..liwl.liso,illofll,llylooto ll loVtills j 3O%, h. )n, 11) tonnhgnlhql W pinflo .Ills 1!y::. I UI I n,.lul.Is w1" Ills 1111u 30';% 1,to 1,1,l. gty thq, it, t51n2u';:. Ilnpn1,uC.lsvn,.e"Iit,if,wtvhnlln,wrvhas2gto'10 conhgn.q. ". ,, :'I, 1n:Ill:;, for 1 eoq°cts'I., sUpuspudy buun, hu y I v Is0 lu4U :. 20 ,anti,,oily: t 7S In :Ill ::. l ul Pu,jUI:L whus 1 nr q e ely l u n ml Inry has tl l to Sfl';:. r.unllgl Iity. pit cull be don Vi nllnlud II lal ILu p.opcl will nn lu,,u non lunowable energy usengo either Ihrougl I the application of alternative energy k syster, is or l0loogl,c:Omnntleaenelgycop u(val,un nlensuws boynnd lhnl novually lequiled Uy City Code, a5% bonus maybe earned to, every 5'%.1ed Idiot. n.61 (t,gy use C oIcI ll, AI, o 1'ii.1 to"n51„I .......... l,ll ll Ill, n, ll.l, l ill ill l,,I m Coll:nlnlu•11.n11.... el.tngo ul lhulul.rhuY:s,nlh.!p'o,l:,.Ilh, I 000\It vol,tllnlnLlU•,hanall,Se. entui V2 of Iholpe,cerrlage as a banns It the uhphun n cuu n n.L I. , h.usutvu lg pvu nnnoul. dLdu u, vn spn,.v lhul swots lhn ('It, s It isms nil n require, nests. calculate the percentage n of It its V115pn..I)IIt)to It in totollll•':el„I ll I.,!nlrllports on it III,, III's I Ie,(.,:nto c11So IHin,ls 11 p, lit al ll Ill II lol I IUvulnl a uunt but Igol a In l.o sin n t 1 n. noq,I noun moll I )ubllc hu, Ilt Iacili ins wl rich ale uol otherwise lectured by City Code. O onlo,2')Llwn.0go, Uvmy$100,.,, dwulblq,.n nl nr:uslwl If 1)od o1 too hit, it, Io . •Il i, n sl of II In,. Igor IS lot .o'•I .:..t 11. uu.gl.hulhl II oil I, 11'thlool, In• 11,:lv., os w-I Ii11I I rlo nil otrU,wiso mgnilad by Copy Culd o. P urne„11'1:.too ,nuslurum,.. S110 r nn dw111"yl anilnrnr•.L n1 vi toI.,onnniln on.I1, l....gprvl, It, fu, I'vul..,,u •.I.v ho.Il,oU or 11o",1it It u, poll lloln,ba, of 11wu11I,,gU,-its lo, ill. income tinkles enter that U PUlc autugunsot s nh lu o,...plr......... f AII':. locuunnillI, oI is Iining,un. to 110 lurUL,.o sLu, 111, Plnl o04lg1 ooI It tutnl oo, hoor uh two illlnil l hits for lypu'A"and lyp°'B"handicapped Z boosts{, ns dulinuJ by IOU i IIY 1,I I an i l tllu u . nl. � A. Iho Il ur 1. n 1. a ns Intl. ,ws l...... 6hnu,s IYpU'A o,A, -Tlldio ii�s ._ /�/1 typo"B 51111, 11„] _IYI,I, 11"Ill.lh 1 I I Ili no � i Ito shall lhu (nr I.1 „l .,,l I 1 n ., II IS hl: gnl• Ir rI Iho In .411':. I tt1U site f )I (1C1joce.1II „11,I,elly C ,,l mill IS. 11. .151V111: hl Ill, In Ig of I,la(.o, l l l N)1II I511 rUY bb CVIIIe111°I Ire tallaWlllg 3% For p,event.ngo,mitlgoting.... 150,,.11llnencui leg envlmnllle,tal, IUnd'seoefthellc, economic and Social factors)aaVed$elOits ple5()NohOn: S 39.6 of assuring rho l now iructnles will l ills kuepn q)Witt l❑lo Chula ter of r ho budlhng of place, while avoiding total units 3% 1ofP, oposing our phve use ut It ill ill, or plac it Itrol will load In its continuo, Ice. preservation and Improvement in an apprap, into nnannol It o tool Bon or all ul It to will Uri I nF Illy) n, 161) ....11lq,lU It 1,I(q.0 a plooded uh,Jugpound. ,floor I It boBdlog, of in an elevated parking situ[lo,o us an accussury I Ru to the 1,an n lly sitl:1, nu, u I to, o is rn0y big of nno11 cis,ullows' t 9",b I(,I Wuddlow or!" , it lnu, u of 111U p• a Hu, plw Slu it- h or a. 6% l u, pu,mvliw) SII or'M l thilpull,........n:hu,.tnw 3"e. 1 O, pwe i.Jn is %!I ,19t ,.I It puM1 lot 1.1l I ahn,.lue ) u Ilncum.nllnvinll5lot, I,,'it nh,In,nv:n lu ulgnu,.u,In.Mil..II,clneudn,pI'll .ilq)syslunuIorllill Jwuloor) units. on le, n bonus of lg%. TOTAL -30- //A,M/:5#1R9 FOMI, P? u . P 6 ACTIVITY: Residential Use DEFINITION H All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public rec- reational uses as a principal use; uses providing meeting places and places for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers. CRITERIA; Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the develop- ment plan. Yes No 1. On a gross acreage basis, is Lhe average residential density in the project at least three (3) dwelling units per acre (calculated for (� residential portion of the site only)? 5D ❑ 2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE POINTS AS CALCULATED ON TIIE FOLLOWING "D1=NS I I Y CHAR I " FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY 01- 111E RES 1- DENTIAL PROJECT? THE REQUIRED EARNED CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT rn SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: El ❑ 30-40 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 3-4 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 40-50 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 4-5 DWELIING UNITS/ACRE; 50-60 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 5-6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 60-70 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 6-7 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 70-80 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 7-8 DWEI_I_ING UNITS/ACRE; 80-90 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 8-9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 90-100 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 9-10 DWELLING IIN11S/ACRE; 100 OR MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS = 10 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS/ACRE. —29— r Steve Olt - Hampshire Pond Page -2- Pedestrian access easements have been provided to allow access to the Spring Creek Trail. Other site amenities include one street tree per lot and a thirty foot wide landscaped buffer along Drake Road. A six foot high wood privacy fence with stone columns will provide additional buffering for residents and enhance the streetscape along Drake Road. Stone columns, evergreen trees and foundation planting accent entryways. The name of the project will appear on one side of the main entry drive. The landscape along Drake Road and the access easements will be owned and maintained by a Homeowner's Association. In meeting with the neighbors to the west, Mr. & Mrs. Keifer, Storck Development has also agreed to install a 6' fence along the west property line as a buffer and for privacy. This is in addition to the existing dense landscaping the Keifers have already planted for privacy. In the past, Storck Development has developed The Village at Four Seasons, Hampshire Square and The Enclave and The Village at Golden Meadows. Current developments include The Village at Southridge and Hampshire Court. We believe there continues to be a market demand for the type and quality of homes we are known for and this location is ideal for the product we offer. We would like to begin construction in the fall of 1993. City land use policies achieved by the plan include contributing to a mix of housing types and densities as well as providing housing that is convenient to shopping, schools and recreation. We are pleased to submit this proposal for the Hampshire Pond housing development and look forward to your comments. Sincerely, STORCK DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION R ARD4 T { RRS:mam 'ON STORCK DEVELOPMENT C O R P O R A T I O N July 2. 1993 Mr. Steve Olt. Project Planner PlanninP_ & Zonin- Board City of Fort Collins P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins. CO 80522 RE: Hampshire Pond Preliminary P.U.D. Submittal Gentlemen: Hampshire Pond is a proposed development of 74 sin le family lots, located south of Drake Road and approximately 600 feet west of Taft Hill Road. It is planned for sin,-�l- family homes in the range of $130.000-8160.000 conveniently located near shopping, schools. and recreational opportunities. The average lot size is approximately 7.200 square feet and the gross density equals 4.13 dwelling units per acre. Elevations have been provided depictin<* the quality and architectural style of the proposed homes. The homes will be similar to those currently being built at Hampshire Court directly to the north. The primary access along Drake Road aligns with Hampshire Road to the north. There is also a secondary access to Drake Road and a local street connection to future development south and west of this project. The circulation is designed to utilize the land efficiently and to maximize the number of solar oriented lots. The relatively flat site slopes from northwest to southeast. falling approximately sixteen feet at an average slope of 1.25%. The one existing tree on the site. located alonm the west property line, is designated to remain. Surrounding land uses include sinLrle family housing and Drake Crossing Shopping center to the north, a regional detention facility and undeveloped land to the east, a Parks and Recreation trail easement and Spring Creek parallel the site alon<* the south and undeveloped property lies to the west. POST OFFICE BOX 270218 FORT COLLINS, COLORADO 80527 (303) 223-7555 SCHOOL PROJECTIONS PROPOSAL: HAMPSHIRE POND PUD - Preliminary DESCRIPTION: 74 single family homes on 18 acres DENSITY: 4.11 du/acre General Population 74 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 259 School Are Population Elementary - 74 (units) x .450 Junior High - 74 (units) x .210 Senior High - 74 (units) x .185 Affected Schools Olander Elementary Blevins Junior High Rocky Mountain Senior High (pupils/unit) = 33.3 (pupils/unit) = 15.54 (pupils/unit) = 13.69 Design Capacity Enrollment 568 478 900 682 1312 1191 DRAKE ROAD LANDSCAPE DETAIL ref•_ e•—°• C/4f1rN. >J eue—^rr ua yfM rES�RH C f" V I. PRIVACY FENCE is I c' Na: 51� wN®.Yns P,te Ro.J °oy. PLANT LIST �mro �mfn m wets ouYvcr9,rm ,'a. n �.k pekge_e.r. J.ab Ca,'. was A^.Itl C01 [r..P eaAIIpN .r.q.wr I.N el. IE rrr_ n_ res .ek mare. w' CA INr ,.A. bbele'f:,ul' Mfsf411s ,p. R d6_s IH II'a� rm r�m.gr rile ,I.I.a_ ,W- a �r r mmaemmm�.l iamwa 10f P� a 0 .yea.I_ r.r_n,,kre..ww. LANDSCAPE NOTES ,. wa q�llk Yq. b,...�Pa amkus, ir.WAs.Y 6. lY I.f[{a.aR O.,. b1.Y k..i.f Y Y M1M I9N. ,. Y.R.�I,��YIv�-m...'a.pi NeeM ®MWnrtiM .,a .. a. s M.a k nlP.l .s wa Fee wO a4 .wfFY •s.Rocures PROJECT ENTRY SIGN n. NOf'fO SCALE RO "°""' N °°`° NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES `�°I°" 9317.00Pi1n`°" �� HAMPSHIRE POND azo smmf mm sw sa fos. rr. couffs, coroRino soszf sc^� PRELRbIINARY 1 I (303) MY 158 Ofl/JISYAN°I=Na . pCNCCKFD R.: LANDSCAPE PLAN : RmARtD: up Aeeve nCINITY l p S,Td MTA: SITd V58 WTA. rwr w D 6R OIINLflS CLRTIY T�Ae•«e[�nn wo mm¢mxs azr rtxm w sTO .w ATTORmsrs CfRT(£fG£L: '� wmxsmum wevs�ns. APPAxOVL�, ixo wo T, rn w mnwrnuxs c ,xs _wr PROPERTY D£SCRIPTfON: �@ �: as BOIT »mri�`�v or � ry TIPMK SURFI YL'IlYI r �nr s ev �,� r NIYPSN/Rd COVFT 8V8DM5!➢N z l y e naAea wosvNc dNOP4WL UMRA PUD. I I I --------------� — c / I:1 PHASE I1 f ''� 2^ IIATdR BLOSSOY \\�� /m h— - —� ire I — � --- � --- --- ---J >•i✓i II'dT:`� 'et .m I C y 3 I .- G�� , • ,G �` GII ��,FII � / a�G , 1 PHASE II e6 \I, vl �-,>ffi }-� Y'4t�y" III1II9d'�" --1 \\e hi R m 8 �`01'®-�'- - • OTT Y055 ROS>�WNB I yyyy ,G yY, bit it 0 1 ^J d' - -- ---J PHASE III � `^� � I V YARSXIIDOD DRNd . j I I i o — v I ffi i� I M/ON TO ARIL e I1 i J x I !•r'y, 3°s�-e - tf >•y, 'dy,. ��t j,, F,r y�, IT GRAPHIC SCALE 4. ,.dAS A'6 roFD SPffiFC w[ d-.' roc rtnn NORTHERN ENGINEERING SERVICES " g3i �.00P'I pate HAMPSHIRE POND P.U.D. 420 SOUTH W M5 50TE 106. FT. COLLIn. COL°RAW 6°fl21, SITE PLAN I I 209 221 -e15B DESIGNER: G SCHOCM CHECMED BY: MFJ I DRAFTSIAAN ACA° PREPARED'JJLY,1993 5�eeli 'Se1 �t<. S! o Ut a tSa day �L v G le n n d D r G1. C! m �Corswold rt ;t p Merin0 C1. pri V� an oQ 1 Ct. pono Ct. organ Bk%J pr. �. cep O U Dr. Ct. GGa`t sdale o� ez 0 r`Seitu CI desdale 0 5 Ct. F U ot° L m 410 one ��• 9 Y = S r, ro G c ¢ ChOro/ois yo "s�� m `4 Game i ��o m Dr. Ct. f, fLo SCa borough F s Cr V a l l i Force- a., Ave. � u Concord ,�ooS Or' W o Vallev Fare _ D r 7U V) U s Dr. `�� C�oP ` '� ompshire g� Ct. y .�. o v E a o orrpshire O� O`N v c� o v c` o Lodi Ct. i Ct DRAKE ROAD U U 16 S! � Sty = O=_n Hast U- Frt mart = / ~ I St Ct. o v ' L n in C — h T T �— •'� r- H line Dr. -� S U i W U r x WQ� 4 � Hof I Cb Plea �� .♦ ' Ceweeee St e Kinnison . Drive Moffet Drive 6Pming� pie,-k e� Effingnom5t o m I o v o Primrose Devonshire Or. r.r°r c ITEM: HAMPSHIRE POND PUD North 44-93 NUMBER: Hampshire Pond PUD - Preliminary, #44-93 August 30, 1993 P & Z Meeting Page 4 occur. Also, a street connection into the City -owned property to the north and east must be accommodated with this request. Staff is recommending a condition stating that the developer of Hampshire Pond is required to provide adequate street right-of-way and a publicly dedicated temporary turnaround on this property and/or the City -owned property to the north and east (and south of West Drake Road) of Hampshire Pond prior to a final development request going before the Planning and Zoning Board for a decision. 6. Storm Drainage: This property is 22.79 acres in size, Stormwater Utility will be purchasing located on the southeast portion of acquisition becomes part of the City's planned for this area. 7. Parks & Recreation: overall. However, the City a 4.87 acre parcel of land the property. This land regional detention facility A 30' wide utility and public access easement is being dedicated on -site along the entire south property line to provide for the City bicycle/pedestrian trail that is planned for and currently under construction. There are two access easements, between Lots 14 & 15 and Lots 24 & 25, Block 3, that provide connections from local streets to the bicycle/pedestrian trail. RECOMMENDATION: This request earns 60% on the Residential Uses Density Point chart and meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. Staff considers this request to be compatible with surrounding land uses in the area. Therefore, staff recommends approval of Hampshire Pond P.U.D., Preliminary - #44-93, with one condition: 1. The developer of Hampshire Pond is required to provide adequate street right-of-way and a publicly dedicated temporary turnaround on this property and/or the City - owned property to the north and east (and south of West Drake Road) of Hampshire Pond prior to a final development request going before the Planning and Zoning Board for a decision. Hampshire Pond PUD - Preliminary, #44-93 August 30, 1993 P & Z Meeting Page 3 evergreen tree groupings along rear yard fences, and planting beds with a mix of deciduous and evergreen materials at the entries into the development. The developer is providing each homeowner with a certificate good for the installation of a 2" caliper shade tree per street frontage. signage: One project identification sign is being proposed and will be located on the west side of the main entry into the development at the intersection of West Drake Road and Hampshire Road. The signage will be individual letters mounted on the 6' high solid wood fence, centered between 2 stone columns, along a rear lot line. Solar orientation ordinance: There are 73 lots (of the total of 74 lots) in this development that are subject to the City's Solar Orientation Ordinance. Lot 4, Block 3 is larger than 15,000 square feet in size and is exempt from the ordinance. A total of 52 lots comply with the requirements of the ordinance, equalling 71%, and this exceeds the minimum 65% compliance requirement. 4. Neighborhood Compatibility: A neighborhood information meeting was held on June 24, 1993 and, although an extensive affected property owners notification mailing was done, there were only 8 participants (in addition to the applicant and his representatives) at the meeting. Minutes of the meeting are attached. Major concerns expressed centered around the density of the development, the lot sizes, additional traffic in the area of the West Drake Road/South Taft Hill Road intersection, and the mitigation of smaller lots adjacent to large acreage residential properties. Staff considers this request to be compatible with the land uses in the surrounding area. 5. Transportation: This development will be accessed from West Drake Road by two local public streets that will connect to a local public street network internally. There is a street connection planned, at the southwest corner, into the property to the west when development should Hampshire Pond PUD - Preliminary, #44-93 August 30, 1993 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background• The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: RP, BP; existing single family residential and shopping center (Hampshire Court, Drake Crossing) S: FA-1; large acreage residential in Larimer County E: RP; existing single family residential W: Rp, FA-1; existing large acreage single family residential in the City and Larimer County The property was annexed into the City with the West Drake Road Annexation in April, 1987 and zoned RP, Planned Residential with a planned unit development condition attached. No development proposals for this property have been submitted to the City prior to the current Hampshire Pond P.U.D. request. 2. Land Use• This is a request for preliminary approval of 74 single family lots on 17.93 acres. The development is divided into, and will be constructed in, three phases. The overall property under one ownership is 22.79 acres; however, the City Stormwater Utility is purchasing 4.87 acres from the developer for a regional detention facility. The gross residential density for the "developable" portion of the property is 4.13 dwelling units per acre. The request has been evaluated against the Residential Uses Density Point Chart and the Applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. It earns 60% of the maximum base criteria on the density point chart, earning points for: 1) all lots being within 2,000 feet of an existing neighborhood shopping center (Drake Crossing), 2) all lots being within 3,500 feet of a reserved neighborhood park (Cottonwood Glen), and 3) having approximately 25% of the property boundary being contiguous to existing urban development. The density point chart supports the proposed density for this request. 3. Design• Landscaping: A 45' landscape buffer, including a 4' wide detached sidewalk, is being provided along the West Drake Road frontage incorporating shade trees at 40' on -center in the parkway, ornamental and ITEM NO. 18 MEETING DATE 8/30/93 STAFF Steve Olt City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Hampshire Pond P.U.D., Preliminary - #44-93 APPLICANT: Richard R. Storck Storck Development Corp. 4401 McMurray Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80525 OWNER: Same as Applicant PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for preliminary planned unit development (P.U.D.) approval for 74 single family residential lots on 17.93 acres located south of West Drake Road and west of South Taft Hill Road. The property is zoned rp, Planned Residential with a P.U.D. condition attached. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with a condition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request for preliminary planned unit development (P.U.D.) approval for 74 single family residential lots on 17.93 developable acres (22.79 acres overall) located south of West Drake Road and west of South Taft Hill Road. It earns 60% on the Residential Uses Density Point Chart, supporting the proposed gross residential density of 4.13 dwelling units per acre, and meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. There is an extensive landscape buffer, with entry features, along the West Drake Road frontage and the developer is providing for one street tree per lot frontage throughout. One project identification sign is being proposed and will be located on the west side of the main entry into the development at the intersection of West Drake Road and Hampshire Road. The request is in compliance with the Solar Orientation Ordinance, with 71% of the applicable lots meeting the requirements. Staff considers this request to be compatible with the land uses in the surrounding area. The City Stormwater Utility is purchasing a 4.87 acre parcel from the developer to function as part of its regional detention facility for the area. A public access easement for a City bicycle/pedestrian trail is being dedicated along the entire south property boundary. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Boa 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT