The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutJACOB FAMILY SERVICES REDWOOD CENTER - 56 93 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... conifer NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... redwood NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/11/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 54 0 -- 28 THRU 173 88 -- 0 RIGHT 0 49 -- 37 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 -- 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(Pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) C (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- ----------------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 31 605 584 584 553 RIGHT 41 982 982 982 941 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 59 994 994 994 935 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... conifer NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... redwood DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/11/93 ; am pm hort OTHER INFORMATION.... I 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 z zzzzzXzzzzzzzzXXXzzzzzzXXXZXzzzzzzzzzXXXXXXXtXzzzzzzzXXXXXXXzzzzzzzz IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... conifer NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... redwood NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/11/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am om short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 26 0 -- 47 THRU 83 150 -- 0 RIGHT 0 15 -- 51 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES t 1 -- 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 -------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 52 663 652 652 600 RIGHT 56 935 935 935 879 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 29 990 990 990 962 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... conifer NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... redwood DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/11/93 m pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... M A 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... conifer NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... blue spruce NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...._. 9/11/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am A>m l short OTHER INFORMATION .... �/�/ INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 36 0 -- 80 THRU 147 86 -- 0 RIGHT 0 39 -- 51 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 -- 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET SB LEFT 88 645 629 629 541 A RIGHT 56 989 989 989 933 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 40 996 996 996 957 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... conifer NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... blue spruce DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/11/93 : am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS YYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYxYYYYYYYYYYYYYxxYYYYYYYYYY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... conifer NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... blue spruce NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 9/11/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 68 0 -- 47 THRU 62 136 -- 0 RIGHT 0 82 -- 24 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 1 1 -- 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 Paoe-1 -------------------------------------------------------------------- xxxxxxxx POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE -------- RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET SB LEFT 52 630 601 601 549 A RIGHT 26 914 914 914 888 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 75 968 968 968 893 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... conifer NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... blue spru DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 9/11/93 am pm short OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT #x#x#xxzxxxxxxxxxxxx#xzxxxxxxxzxx####zxxxxx#xxzzxxx##xzx#xxx#x INTERSECTION..hickory/north college AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST ....... mid DATE.......... N1/93 TIME......... am pm 1993 short COMMENT....... ---------------- ------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB LT 10 0 50 0 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 0 0 511 860 : R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 RT 59 0 0 15 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 ------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT TH TH RT X RT PD PD WB LT SB LT TH TH RT RT PD PD GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW ------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE SB T 12.0 TR 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT xxxxx###xxxx####xxxxxxx#xx#x:xxxxxx INTERSECTION..hickory/north college AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST....... mjd DATE.......... 9/tj.,(93 TIME.......... amp 1993 short COMMENT....... ------------ VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 20 0 80 0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 1060 855 R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 RT 80 0 0 15 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE GRADE HV Y/N min T (%) (%) N 17.5 3 EB 0.00 1.00 N 17.5 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 8.5 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 8.5 3 SB --------------------- 0.00 2.00 ------------------------- CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X TH X RT X PD WB LT X TH X RT PD 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 15.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY EB L 0.026 0.283 11.8 B 12.2 R 0.152 0.283 12.3 B NB L 0.174 0.617 3.6 A 4.0 T 0.271 0.617 4.0 A SB TR 0.466 0.617 4.8 A 4.8 ------------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION: Delay4.8 (sec/veh) V/C 0.367 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T N 0 0 0.90 5 N 17.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 17.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 8.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 8.5 3 ----------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT X TH X RT PD SB LT TH X RT X PD 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0./ ---------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE APP. LOS LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS B EB L 0.052 0.283 11.9 B 12.4 B R 0.206 0.283 12.5 8 A NB L 0.275 0.617 4.2 A 5.3 8 T 0.563 0.617 5.4 B A SB TR 0.463 0.617 4.8 A 4.8 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------- LOS = A INTERSECTION: Delay = 5.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.450 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx INTERSECTION..conifer/north college AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mjd 1/ DATE ......... .9/11/93 TIME......... am 1993 short COMMENT....... ------------------- -------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 0 119 0 29 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 0 0 520 890 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 41 104 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 --------------- GRADE ----- HV EB 0.00 1.00 WB 0.00 1.00 NB 0.00 2.00 SB -------------------- 0.00 2.00 PH-1 PH-2 EB LT TH RT PD WB LT X TH RT X PD GREEN 15.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0. LANE GRP WB L R NB TR SB L T INTERSECTION 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T N 0 0 0.90 5 N 22.8 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 22.8 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 11.3 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 11.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT TH X RT X PD SB LT X TH X RT X PO 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.-0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ----------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS 0.307 0.283 13.0 B 12.7 B 0.106 0.283 12.1 B 0.340 0.617 4.3 A 4.3 A 0.066 0.617 3.5 A 4.8 A 0.472 0.617 4.9 A ---------------------------------------------------------- Delay = 5.3 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.420 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx INTERSECTION-conifer/north college AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... mid DATE.......... 9/1}.m1 O TIME .......... am 993 short COMMENT....... VOLUMES EB WB NB LT 0 133 0 TH 0 0 1070 RT 0 70 125 RR -------------------- 0 0 0 EB WB NB SB GRADE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 HV (%) 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 PH-1 PH-2 EB LT TH RT PO WB LT X TH RT X PD GREEN 15.0 0. YELLOW 5.0 0. GEOMETRY SB : EB WB NB SB 55 : 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 880 : 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.( 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T N 0 0 0.90 5 N 22.8 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 22.8 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 11.3 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 11.3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT TH X RT X PD SB LT X TH X RT X PD 0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0. ------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WB L 0.344 0.283 13.2 B 12.9 B R 0.180 0.283 12.4 B NB TR 0.644 0.617 6.0 B 6.0 B SB L 0.416 0.617 5.6 B 4.9 A T 0.467 0.617 4.8 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 6.1 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.550 LOS = B APPENDIX B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT YYZYYZYYYYYYYYZYZYZYYYYYYZYZYYYYZYZ INTERSECTION..hickory/north college AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mJd DATE ........ ..9m pm TIME am pm 1993 short COMMENT....... ----------------------------------- ZYYZZYYYYZYYYYYYYYx VOLUMES - GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB LT 9 0 47 0: L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T TH 0 0 467 813 : R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 TR RT 56 0 0 14 : 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 --------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. (%) (%) Y/N N. Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 17.5 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 17.5 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 8.5 SB 0.00 -------------------------------------------------------------- 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 8.5 EB LT TH RT PD WB LT TH RT PO GREEN YELLOW PH-1 X X 15.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 LANE GRP EB L R NB L T SB TR INTERSECTION V/C 0.023 0. 144 0.149 0.248 0.440 SB 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ARR. TYPE 3 3 3 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT X TH X RT PD SB LT TH X RT X PO 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY 0.283 11.8 B 12.2 0.283 12.2 B 0.617 3.7 A 3.9 0.617 4.0 A 0.617 4.7 A 4.7 ------------------------------------------ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 APP. LOS B A A Delay = 4.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.347 LOS = A 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT YYYZYYYYYYZYYYYZYZYYYYYZYYYZYZZYYYYYYYYYYYYYYZYYYYYYZYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYZYYYZ INTERSECTION..hickory/north college AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mjd DATE.......... 9/1 TIME ......... .am p 1993 short COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 19 0 75 0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 TH 0 0 1000 794 R 12.0 R 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12. RT 76 0 0 14 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 12.1, RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------ GRADE HV EB 0.00 1.00 WB 0.00 1.00 NB 0.00 2.00 SB 0.00 2.00 PH-1 EB LT X TH RT X PD WB LT TH RT PD GREEN 15.0 YELLOW 5.0 PH-2 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ----------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T N 0 0 0.90 5 N 17.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 17.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 8.5 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 8.5 3 ---------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT X TH X RT PD SB LT TH X RT X PO 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 -------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0., LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY EB L 0.049 0.283 11.9 B 12.3 R 0.196 0.283 12.4 B NB L 0.230 0.617 4.0 A 5.1 T 0.531 0.617 5.2 B SB TR 0.430 0.617 4.6 A 4.6 ------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 5.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.425 APP. LOS B B A LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT XXXiXiiiiiXXXXXXiiXXXXXiiXiiXXXXXiiXiXiiiXXXXXXXiiiiXXXXXXXiiXXXXXXXXXiiii INTERSECTION..conifer/north college AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mjd DATE..........9 17/9 TIME....... pm L")short COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WS NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 0 75 0 26 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 0 0 488 843 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 RT 0 26 89 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 GRADE (%) EB 0.00 WB 0.00 NB 0.00 SB 0.00 HV (%) 1.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 PH-1 PH-2 EB LT TH RT PD WB LT X TH RT X PD GREEN 15.0 YELLOW 5.0 LANE GRP WB L R NB TR SB L T ADJUSTMENT FACTORS ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T N 0 0 0.90 5 N 22.8 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 22.8 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 11.3 3 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 11.3 3 ---------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 NB LT TH X RT X PD SB LT X TH X RT X PO 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY 0.194 0.283 12.4 B 12.3 0.067 0.283 11.9 B 0.314 0.617 4.2 A 4.2 0.056 0.617 3.5 A 4.7 0.447 0.617 4.7 A ----------------------------------------------- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 APP. LOS B A A INTERSECTION: Delay = 5.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.368 LOS = A 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT INTERSECTION-conifer/north college AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mJd DATE .......... 9/11J9 TIME IME..........am //116611� 99 short COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES - GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 0 116 0 37 : 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 TH 0 0 1010 833 : 12.0 R 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.r RT 0 65 80 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 T 12.1 RR 0 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 22.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 22.8 3 NB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 11.3 3 SB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 N 11.3 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT NB LT TH TH X RT RT X PO PD WB LT X SB LT X TH TH X RT X RT X PD PD GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 35.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.r ------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS WB L 0.300 0.283 12.9 B 12.7 B R 0.167 0.283 12.3 B NB TR 0.585 0.617 5.5 B 5.5 B SB L 0.208 0.617 3.9 A 4.7 A T 0.442 0.617 4.7 A -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 5.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.495 LOS = 8 APPENDIX A I L; Lo Loc HICKORY 1 } 10/20 —� 59/80 —,,4, 00 to �o W D z W W U W J J O U S 1- O z 0 00 co �n o L0 00 'I*,— 00N Al /7A Nd^" I �-119/13�QNIFER / } v 68/36—)� O 62/147 ---� o � 00 N Lo W m U W az coI0 r� N Z 82 39 ILo 1�— 15 49 136/86 �--150/8 26/54--,#f 83/173 AM/PM SHORT RANGE (1996) PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 2 Table 2 1993 Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM North College/Conifer (signal) A B North College/Hickory (signal) A B Conifer/Blue Spruce (stop sign) SB LT A A SB RT A A EB LT A A Table 3 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM North College/Conifer (signal) B B North College/Hickory (signal) A B Conifer/Blue Spruce (stop sign) SB LT A A SB RT A A EB LT A A Conifer/Redwood (stop sign) SB LT A A SB RT A A EB LT A A 1993 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 1 Based upon the location of the Jacob Center in Fort Collins, it was assumed that 90 percent of the trips would be from/to the south. Figure 2 shows the 1996 peak hour traffic at the key intersections. Figure 2 also includes the traffic forecasts related to the Greenbriar residential development. The traffic generated by the Jacob Center is very small compared to the expected traffic in the area. Table 3 shows the short range peak hour operation at the key intersections. The peak hour operation will be acceptable at all key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. Due to the very small impact of the Jacob Center on the area intersections, a long range peak hour analyses was not deemed necessary. Operation at the Conifer/Blue Spruce and Conifer/Redwood intersections will be acceptable with stop sign control. Operation at the North College signalized intersections will be a function of background traffic and future development in the North College Avenue corridor. The Jacob Center traffic will be insignificant compared to these other traffic components. It is concluded that the traffic generated by the Jacob Center will be very small and that all key intersections will operate acceptably. Table 1 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Jacob Center 50 11 6 6 11 p n MEMORANDUM 0 b .7 a o To: John Carlson, Executive Director, Jacob Family W N Services 01 Fort Collins Transportation Division o u 10 o Fort Collins PlanningDepartment z From: Matt Delich 5 w p Date: September 13, 1993 J LU Subject: Jacob Center traffic analyses (File: 9357MEM1) z W a This memorandum documents the traffic engineering a considerations related to the proposed Jacob Center to be a located at 1225 Redwood Street in Fort Collins. This building m is currently vacant, but was occupied by New Beginnings of Cn Fort Collins, a substance abuse rehabilitation facility. M Jacob Center is a residential child care facility for children (primarily teenagers) awaiting placement into a foster home. City staff requested information on trip generation and the operation at nearby intersections, specifically the College/ Conifer intersection. The Jacob Center trip generation is primarily related to staff travel to/from the facility at peak hours of the street. Information supplied by Jacob Family Services indicates that the daytime staff consists of it employees, and the evening and night staff is 4 employees. Weekend staff is 4 employees between 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM and 2 employees between 8:00 PM and 8:00 AM. There is no other routine travel to/from the z site other than staff. Using this information and assuming W each staff person will drive a private automobile, the daily Z and peak hour weekday trip generation was determined. Table CD 1 shows the trip generation estimates. W a. z J > Employees will primarily access this facility from Conifer via North College Avenue. A small portion may access from Lemay Avenue. For analysis purposes, it was assumed that C.3 o all employees will use North College Avenue. Figure 1 shows .� F the August 1993 peak hour traffic counts at the North College/ W °` Conifer and North College/Hickory intersections. The Conifer/ c 0 (n Blue Spruce count, shown in Figure 1, was taken from the . ¢ "Greenbriar Site Access Study," April 1993. The North C` College/Conifer and North College/Hickory intersections are signal controlled. Table 2 shows the current peak hour 3 L; M operation at these key intersections. These intersections W s < operate acceptably. Acceptable operation is defined as level CC '- of service D or better. Calculation forms are provided in Q Appendix A.