The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutWATERFIELD FOURTH FILING - FDP190009 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSTopic: Plat Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 07/09/2019: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Our redlines do not appear to be addressed. Please see our 5/7/19 redlines. 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in response letter. Topic: Site Plan Comment Number: 5 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 6 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Department: Water Conservation Contact: Eric Olson, 970-221-6704, eolson@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 06/24/2019 06/24/2019: Irrigation plans are required no later than at the time of building permit. The irrigation plans must comply with the provisions outlined in Section 3.2.1(J) of the Land Use Code. Direct questions concerning irrigation requirements to Eric Olson, at 221-6704 or eolson@fcqov.com Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-42909 sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: READY FOR MYLARS. Environmental Planning is ready for mylars. Page 12 of 12 Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please revise the Benchmark Statement on all sheets as marked. See redlines. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet titles on the noted sheets. See redlines. Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please remove all reference to "Old Vine Drive". Now that Suniga Road has it's name, Vine Drive's name will not change. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are sheet numbering issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are match line/station ing issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There is text that needs to be masked. Mask all text in hatched areas. See redlines. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Topic: General Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR FINAL APPROVAL: Our redlines do not appear to be addressed. Please see our 517/19 redlines. Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: INFORMATION ONLY: The project is still being reviewed. Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: INFORMATION ONLY: There appear to be sheets missing from the set. Page 11 of 12 Electric Capacity Fee, Building Site charges, and any necessary system modification charges will apply at owners' expense. Please see the Electric Estimating Calculator and Electric Construction Policies, Practices & Procedures at the following link: http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 04/29/2019 04/29/2019: FOR APPROVAL I recommend that a Utility Coordination meeting be held to discuss the separation requirements with other utilities. L&P only requires 3 ft separation from other utilities, however other utilities' clearances are not met in some locations. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/09/2019 05/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please change the electric running line to the parkway. In the alleys the running line should be where the vaults are placed. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/09/2019 05/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please show all of the streetlights on the landscape plan. Some streetlights are missing. Department: Building Inspection Plan Review Contact: Katy Hand, khand@fcgov.com Topic: Building Insp Plan Review Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: the attached units are subject to CRS 9-5 state accessibility. Provide a site -wide accessibility plan showing how the required accessibility points will be achieved throughout the site. khand@fcgov.com Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 Please visit our website for a list of current adopted building codes and local amendments: https://www.fcgov.com/building/codes.php Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: New homes and attached homes must be EV / PV ready (conduit in place). Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: All attached units (townhome, duplex, etc.) are required to be sprinkled (P2904 min). Department: Technical Services ALL COMMENTS HAVE NOT BEEN UPDATED AT TIME OF PRINTING. Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, icounty@fcgov.com Topic: Building Elevations Comment Number: 9 05/13/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Originated: 05/13/2019 Page 10 of 12 07/08/2019: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Lots less than 60 ft in width should only have one street tree per lot. There are certain instances where there are either no trees provided on these lots or more than 1 street tree. Specific locations will be provided on the redlines. Department: PFA Contact: Andrew Rosen, 970-416-2599, arosen@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/03/2019 07/03/2019: FOR FDP APPROVAL PHASING >The Phasing plan is noted on sheet 2.1 and appears appropriate. >Please note that any dead-end access roads greater than 660ft in length that may be created by Phasing may only be approved if the all the residences past that point are designed with a fire sprinkler system. HYDRANTS >The hydrant at the Clubhouse driveway is not shown on the overall utility plan but is appropriately located on the larger scale plan. Please add to the overall plan for consistency >Five required hydrants are not labeled on the overall Utility plan. Please add labels. ADDRESSING >After further discussion with GIS, the named alleys such as Ridgeside Lane will be required to attach to a street such as Oak Knoll Road to form a routable street network. 05/08/2019: >After the meeting at the PFA offices 5-7-2019, the hydrant locations are all verified and correct >There will be no parking in the Alleys >There will be no parking allowed on Meadow Boulevard or Blue Vine Boulevard in the areas where aerial access is required for the 3 story townhomes. >PFA will be included in phasing plans regarding access and hydrants 05/06/2019: The EAEs, including the Clubhouse Drive, are noted on the Site Plans. Thank you. No further action needed for EAEs. Department: Light And Power I BELIEVE THESE COMMENTS ARE RESOLVED. WILL VERIFY IN MEETING. Contact: Luke Unruh, 97041627249 lunruh@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 04/29/2019: INFORMATIONAL Comment Originated: 04/29/2019 Page 9 of 12 Comment Number: 22 7/5/2019: FOR FINAL APPROVAL Continued: Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 Forestry redlines will indicate additional locations where shade trees should replace ornamental trees. 5/6/2019: FOR APPROVAL Ornamental trees should only be used only when there isn't adequate space for a canopy shade tree in the parkway. For example, sheet 16 shows three chanticleer pears on Merganser Dr., but there are no apparent utility conflicts that would necessitate ornamental species in this stretch. Please replace ornamental trees in right of ways with shade trees when space allows. Please also note that canopy shade trees must encompass at least 50% of all trees on -site. Right now, the development is just shy of this requirement (currently 49.1 % of trees are canopy shade trees). Comment Number: 24 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 7/5/2019: FOR FINAL APPROVAL — UPDATED Continued: Thank you for updating the Tree Species Diversity table. There appears to be one error — there should be 33 Chinkapin Oaks {not 32� Please update the table. 5/7/2019: FOR APPROVAL In some cases, the Tree Species Diversity Table does not match the number of trees or correct species names in the plant list. Please update the quantities and species names to reflect what is proposed in the plant list. Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: INFORMATION ONLY Due to a family emergency, I am out of the office this week so the Forestry redlines will be provided next week. I apologize for the inconvenience. The redlines will include required changes such as: Additional landscaping along Suniga median (follow Larimer County Urban Streetscape Standards) Specific site changes from ornamental to canopy shade trees Species list changes Language regarding private property Cottonwood maintenance responsibilities along arterials Contact: Nils Saha, nsaha@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: FOR FINAL APPROVAL There is a line that runs through the center of the Suniga median. If this a utility line, please label it. Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 Page 8 of 12 Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Basil Hamdan, 970-224-6035, bhamdan@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please address all EC redlines supplied on the reclined Utility plans. Please contact Basil Hamdan bhamdan@fcgov.com, (970) 222-19801 if you have any questions regarding the comments. 05/01 /2019: For Final: Please submit an Erosion Control Plans based upon the returned redlines to meet City Criteria. Comment Number: 2 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 Thanks for addressing SWMP comments. Please add a section in the SWMP report addressing how the phased construction will be handled for Erosion Control as the EC plans are not phased at this point. 05/01/2019: For Final: Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report based upon the returned redlines to meet City Criteria. Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, wlamargue@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Repeat Comment. 05/07/2019: Please provide HGLs for all storm sewer profiles. Comment Number: 9 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please contact the City on edits to the drainage report. Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 05/10/2019: Please revise the text in the drainage report to state that 100% of the southern 32 acres is being treated with extended detention water quality which is _% of the entire site. Also, please clarify what percentage of the entire site is being treated by the forebays and wetland. Comment Number: 10 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 Please provide a detail for the concrete forebays at the upstream end of the pre-treatment areas. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: In the Drainage Report, the text states Basin 7 is being treated by a rain garden in one section, and by a forebay in another. Please clarify and revise text. Department: Forestry Contact: Molly Roche, 224-616-1992, mroche@fcgov.com Topic: Landscape Plans Page 7 of 12 The landscape plans show vehicle sight lines throughout the site. These are incorrectly being labeled as "sight distance easements". There only actual sight distance easements are as dedicated on the plat. The sight lines that fall within public ROW are not actually easements. Comment Number: 39 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL There may be some sight distance easements being dedicated on the plat that do not need to be. Coordinate with Engineering to determine which ones may be removed from the plat and plans. Comment Number: 40 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please refer to the entire set of redlines for additional comments on this submittal. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Regarding the Timberline striping: Can you please delete misc. non -traffic related callouts in the plans, add a legend and striping labels? See additional signing and striping redlines 05/07/2019: We'll have signing and striping redlines for T-Line and Suniga. Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Regarding the internal signing and striping: Please delete stop signs from alleys onto roadways. See additional redlines. 05/0712019: Can you please add a signing and striping sheet (or 2) for the internal areas? The signing is shown in the plan/profiles, but these are such short sections of road, it is very difficult to get an overall understanding when there are 30+ sheets to review. Once we get those sheets, we can review internal striping. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Regarding Suniga signing and striping: Please see redlines. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL: The typical sections for the private boulevards need to show 11 ft travel lanes (since there is no gutter pan). The median can be narrowed so the total ROW width remains the same. Comment Number: 5 05/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 Can you please call out the signs on the landscape plans? We need to ensure that street trees are at least 50 ft from stop signs to ensure visibility. Page 6 of 12 easement for it on the plat. Comment Number: 30 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Why does Tract'Y' encroach into the 15-foot utility easement on the south side of Suniga? Comment Number: 31 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL There is a proposed pocket park and pedestrian walkways within Tract 'G', which is currently only designated for utility and drainage easement. These other uses need to be included or separated from the Tract. Comment Number: 32 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Not all ROW/tract linework is the same between what is shown on the plat and on the plans (see redline on Grading Plan Sheet C3.10 for example). Comment Number: 33 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL There are numerous instances of previous comments that were not addressed with this second submittal. My redlines have identified all of those with a "Repeat Comment" prefix. Comment Number: 34 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL There are a few vertical cures on the Suniga profile that appear significantly short per LCUASS. Comment Number: 35 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Many sheets throughout the plans do not label Tract'S of Waterfield 3rd Filing. The ROW along that portion of Suniga is also mis-labeled as 130 feet, rather than 115 feet? Comment Number: 36 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please make sure that the new irrigation line has been shown on all pertinent profile views for streets, water, sewer, storm sewer, etc. The proposed irrigation line needs to be within an easement that should be dedicated on the plat. Please see if you can get more separation from the proposed walk along Timberline Road (north of Suniga). Since this will be serving as the public pedestrian route until the ultimate Timberline section is built, we don't want it to be closed if the line needs to be excavated for repairs or maintenance. Comment Number: 37 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL The underdrain details provided don't really look like they match how the system is being laid out and designed. There are a couple of missing storm drainage details (see redlines). Comment Number: 38 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Page 5 of 12 documentation for the on -site ROW vacations as soon as possible. I would like to get all of the documents ready and take it to City Council soon enough to avoid having it delay the project. Comment Number: 17 Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 07/09/2019: INFORMATION ONLY Please be aware that the Metro District for Waterfield 4th will be responsible for maintenance of the Tract U on the south side of Suniga and not the adjacent Bull Run owner/manager. 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL What uses are allowed in Tract'S of Waterfield 3rd Filing? It sits right where the standard 15' utility easement would for the south side of Suniga. We need to make sure that the 15' utility corridor is able to function as intended. We may need to include this tract in this replat to make sure it is designated for utilities. Comment Number: 18 Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL Remove the erroneous grade labels on all profile sheets. Comment Number: 21 Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 07/09/2019: INFORMATION ONLY The variance for the angle of intersection was approved by Engineering staff. 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL The angle of intersection between the ultimate Timberline Road and Suniga Road exceeds the allowable tolerance. This needs to be adjusted to be within 10 degrees of perpendicular. Comment Number: 22 Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL Some of the dimensions for Timberline Road don't match standards or your typical sections (see street redlines). Comment Number: 25 Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL There are some areas that look like drainage may be an issue on some of the alleys and in street intersections (see redlines). Comment Number: 26 Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL Please add speed limit signs on your on -site signing and striping plans that reduce the speed on the elbows that do not meet connector local centerline geometry standards (per previous discussion with Engineering). Comment Number: 27 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL The owner information that is shown on plans is not the same as what was provided with the DA information form. Comment Number: 28 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL There are some easement acronyms used in the plat that are not defined in the legend. Comment Number: 29 Comment Originated: 07/09/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL An irrigation line was added to the plans with this submittal. I don't see an Page 4 of 12 Pedestrian crossings at Suniga and Merganser may be allowed if warranted and if they are protected and designed to City standards. Typical striped crosswalks will not be approved. 05/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL Pedestrian crosswalks should not be shown across Suniga. Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated: 05/08/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL The interim Vine Drive design needs to be revised to meet current City Major Collector standards. Also, as discussed, the ultimate design and improvements will be required with Waterfield 4th with a transition to existing west of Emmerson Lane. The remaining frontage improvements will be completed with the City's bridge widening project with the development providing payment -in -lieu for the local street frontage. You will need to verify that your design of the Waterfield 4th site will work with the bridge widening design. We will continue to coordinate with the City CIP engineers and Waterfield 4th engineering consultants on this aspect. 05/08/2019: FOR APPROVAL Ultimate Vine Dr. improvements for the north half of the roadway, adjacent to the site will need to be designed and constructed with this project. Please include plans in Utility Plan set with next submittal. We will want sidewalk, curb and gutter, etc. with this project. Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL The variance for storm cover was not submitted properly. As this is an Engineering issue, the variance needs to be submitted to Engineering per our standards. Also, the variance request was inadequate. You simply stated that you couldn't meet the criteria and that you were designing your pipes with half of the required cover in certain locations. As discussed in the meeting with City Engineering staff previously, we are okay with allowing less than required cover in certain instances, as long as you mitigate for the deficiency. You need to show how you wil maintain the integrity of the roadway section and protect the pipe in the areas of shallow cover. We need to see a proposal to be able to approve the variance. 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL There are several storm pipes that have less than minimum cover (see redlines). Comment Number: 13 05/10/2019: FORAPPROVAL 05/10/2019 Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 Please make sure that you are showing and calling out all proposed and existing easements on all plans. Also, use the correct description when labeling/calling out an easement (refer to the plat as the standard). Comment Number: 14 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 Please use the correct name for Suniga Road (Suniga Drive is used on some plans). Also, Old Vine Drive should not be used in place of E. Vine Drive. Comment Number: 15 05/10/2019: FOR APPROVAL Comment Originated: 05/10/2019 Please submit the required ROW vacation request and supporting Page 3 of 12 07/08/2019: FOR APPROVAL -- Landscape Plan: Overall the plans look good — see redlines for minor comments. Comments include recommending adding plant coverage in some bed areas along Suniga; clarifying irrigated turf water use; clarify installation of sod for the irrigated turf areas; minor comments — please see redlines. Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: Building elevations — ready for mylar. Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Kyle Lambrecht, 970-221-6566, kaambrecht@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 05/07/2019: INFORMATION ONLY A portion of the Suniga Road right-of-way (ROW) which will be dedicated to the City as part of this project is eligible for reimbursement through the Transportation Capital Expansion Fee (TCEF) Program. The City is interested in finalizing this value to expedite the ROW reimbursement. Please contact Kyle Lambrecht, the City's Transportation Capital Expansion Fee Manager, at 970-221-6566 to discuss. Contact: Spencer Smith, 970-221-6603, smsmith@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 05/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL The full half ROW for future Turnberry will need to be dedicated along Tract 0, along with the standard utility easement (15-foot). Where the ROW ties into the existing Conifer Street ROW, it should be dedicated to match what is on the south side of existing Conifer (see redlines). Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Variance requests were received. All were approved except for one minor change. The custom street sections with the widened center medians need to have the 10-foot travel lanes measured from edge of concrete pan section and not curb face as shown. This means that the medians in those instances will need to be narrowed by 1 foot on each side. 05/07/2019: PRIOR TO NEXT SUBMITTAL Please submit a variance request as soon as possible for the street sections that vary from City standards. These have not yet been provided. These sections need to be vetted and approved before moving forward with final design. Please see redlines for typical section comments. Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Some references to asphalt were corrected, many were not. 05/07/2019: FOR APPROVAL The Suniga elevated bike lane needs to be concrete, rather than asphalt. Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 05/07/2019 07/09/2019: FOR APPROVAL Page 2 of 12 Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview July 09, 2019 Katy Thompson Ripley Design, Inc. 419 Canyon Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Collins, CO 80521 RE: Waterfield Fourth Filing, FDP190009, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, please contact your Development Review Coordinator, Todd Sullivan, at 970.221.6695 ortsuilivan@fcqov.com . Comment Summary: Department: Planning Services Contact: Jason Holland, 970-224-6126, iholland@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: FOR APPROVAL -- Plat: All tracts where sidewalks or pocket parks are provided — add a Public Access in the easement dedication description table for all of these tracts. The plat indicates that lots shall be maintained by the property owner, however, portions of these lots are to be maintained by the Metro -District. Please resolve this so that the intent is consistent between the site plan and plat. Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: FOR APPROVAL -- Site Plan: There are a few lots where the site distance triangle doesn't match the building setback line. Please pull the BSL back to match the SDT's. Please review the SDT's with engineering staff to confirm whether all of them are required. Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 07/08/2019: FOR APPROVAL -- Site Plan: see redlines for minor comments. Fencing notes and general note for Suniga medians. Comment Number: 15 Comment Originated: 07/08/2019 Page 1 of 12