HomeMy WebLinkAboutSOUTH TAFT HILL ANNEXATION AND ZONING - 63 93 A - CORRESPONDENCE - ANNEXATION DOCUMENTS2. If elements of the adopted Comprehensive Plans lack
specific guidance for the boundary amendment request, the
request must be justified through the following
considerations:
a. Has there been substantial change of conditions in
the vicinity of the property in question? Have
time and experience demonstrated that the existing
UGA boundary is unwise or in need of change?
b. Are there existing transportation, recreation,
education, utility, and other facilities to
accommodate the potential uses permitted in the
requested UGA boundary amendment area or are there
adopted plans to extend necessary services and
facilities in the requested UGA boundary amendment
area?
C. Will the impact of this boundary amendment request
upon the immediate neighborhood, vicinity and the
community as a whole be positive?
The City is allowed to unilaterally amend the UGA boundary through
the annexation process. However, the City is required, under State
law, to provide an Annexation, Impact Report to the County on all
proposed annexations. Given the current City Council and County
Commissioner meetings to discuss UGA issues, and the on -going
"Corridor Study," I believe it will be necessary for this
annexation proposal to provide as much information and
justification as possible to the County Commissioners, the Planning
and Zoning Board, and the City Council.
Please feel free to contact me if you have any comments or
questions.
Sincerely,
Kenneth G. Waido
Chief Planner
CC. Tom Peterson, Director of Planning
e
October 6, 1993
Mr. Eldon Ward
Cityscape Urban Design, Inc.
3555 Stanford .Road
Suite 105
Fort Collins, CO 80525
RE: South Taft Hill Annexation
Dear Eldon,
In reviewing the application and file for the proposed South Taft
Hill Annexation, I cannot find any materials which present
justifications for this annexation. As you know, the proposed
annexation is for a property outside of the current Fort Collins
Urban Growth Area boundary and as such is not in the "slam dunk"
category it would be if it were inside the UGA. There are several
statements within the Petition for Annexation, and several issues
and criteria within the UGA Agreement which I would like to have
additional discussion on from the applicant.
From the Petition for Annexation, the following allegations are
made and need to be further discussed:
1. That it is desirable and necessary that such area be
annexed to the City of Fort Collins.
4. That a community of interest exists between the area
proposed to be annexed and the City of Fort Collins.
5. The area to be annexed is urban or will be urbanized in
the near future.
6. The area proposed to be annexed is integrated with or
capable of being integrated with the City of Fort
Collins.
From the UGA Agreement the following issues and criteria are among
those to be considered in an analysis and evaluation of UGA
amendment requests:
1. The primary criteria for evaluating an UGA boundary
amendment request is compliance with elements of the
Larimer County and City of Fort Collins Comprehensive
Plans, specifically, but not limited to adopted land use
plans and policies.