HomeMy WebLinkAbout2620 W ELIZABETH ST SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED - PDP160037 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORTStaff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. —Single-family Detached, PDP16003i
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 18
public good and the proposal submitted is equal to or better than a proposal that
would meet the code.
F. The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards located in
Division 4.4, Low Density Residential District (RL) of Article 4 — Districts,
provided the modifications to 4.4(D)(1) and 4.4(D)(2)(a) are approved.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the modification requests and 2620 W Elizabeth St. —
Single-family Detached, PDP160037.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Zoning & Site Vicinity Map
2. Statement of Planning Objectives
3. Elizabeth Street Farms Subdivision Plat
4. Planning Document Set (includes site plan, landscape plan, and photometric
plan)
5. Modification Requests and Alternative Compliance Request
6. Ecological Characterization Study
7. Utility Plan Set
8. Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards Fort Collins Figures
9. Neighborhood Meeting Summary
Staff Report - 2620 W Elizabeth St. - Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 17
As part of this project, the applicant conducted one neighborhood meeting. This
meeting occurred on February 15, 2017. At that point in time, the applicant was
considering a re -zone to allow a higher density of housing. The applicant
presented their two development ideas and those in attendance weighed in on
both proposals. 41 neighbors participated in the neighborhood meeting.
Comments primarily dealt with:
• Desire for single-family detached homes in accordance with the underlying
zoning
• Concern about increase in traffic in the neighborhood
• No support for a re -zone
• Ensure irrigation lateral on -site is not impacted by development
6. Findings of Fact/Conclusion:
In evaluating the request for the Harmony Cottages Project Development Plan,
Staff makes the following findings of fact:
A. The Project Development Plan complies with the process located in Division 2.2
— Common Development Review Procedures for Development Applications of
Article 2 — Administration.
B. The Modification of Standard to Section 3.8.11(A) that is proposed with this
Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section
2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the
public good and the proposal submitted is equal to or better than a proposal that
would meet the code.
C. The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards of Article 3 —
General Development Standards, provided the modification to 3.8.11(A) is
approved.
D. The Modification of Standard to Section 4.4(D)(1) that is proposed with this
Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section
2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the
public good and the proposal submitted is equal to or better than a proposal that
would meet the code.
E. The Modification of Standard to Section 4.4(D)(2)(a) that is proposed with this
Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section
2.8.2(H), in that the granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP16003�7
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 16
the requisite Level of Service as part of this development by supplying a
private drive and connections for bikes and pedestrians.
X. Section 3.6.5 — Bus Stop Design Standards
The proposes bus stop and pull out supplied by the development is
consistent with the City of Fort Collins Bus Stop Design Standards and
Guidelines, which satisfies this code standard.
Y. Section 3.6.6 — Emergency Access
All proposed developments shall provide adequate access for emergency
vehicles and for those persons rendering fire protection and emergency
services. The proposed development's emergency access plan has
gained preliminary approval from Poudre Fire Authority for meeting all
applicable code requirements.
Z. Section 3.8.11(B) — Materials
Fences required for screening may not be constructed out of chain link.
The proposed fences would be constructed using wood and stone.
AA. Section 3.8.11(C)
Fences must be less than four feet in height in a side yard, less than six
feet in a rear yard, and no closer than two feet to a public sidewalk. All of
the fences proposed meet these requirements. Note that the sidewalk
along Bartlett Drive is not a public sidewalk. This means the two -foot
separation requirement does not apply for that section of fence.
4. Compliance with Article 4 of the Land Use Code — Division 4.4, Low Density
Residential (RL):
The project complies with all applicable Article 4 standards as follows:
A. Section 4.4(B)(2)(a) — Permitted Uses
This section permits single-family detached dwellings subject to
Administrative Review.
5. Public Outreach Summary
Staff Report - 2620 W Elizabeth St. - Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 15
Lots must have 150 feet of depth if abutting an arterial street. Applicants
may request alternative compliance as part of this standard. The applicant
must demonstrate that their proposal minimizes the noise, light, and other
potential negative impacts of the arterial street on the residential lots. The
applicant submitted an alternative compliance request in accordance with
this standard.
U. Section 3.6.2(N) — Private Drives
Developments may supply private drives in lieu of public streets as long as
the private drive does not result in additional cut -through traffic, functions
similarly to a public street, satisfies emergency access requirements, will
be maintained in a satisfactory way, and can meet naming and addressing
requirements. The proposed development will be served by Bartlett Drive,
which is a street -like private drive. Bartlett Drive would have a five-foot-
widesidewalk, 6'-4" landscape parkway, and 30-foot wide drive. This
proposed cross section meets the standards of a Residential Local Street
in the Larimer County Urban Area Street Standards (Attachment 9, Figure
7-9F), in accordance with this code section. The plan will not promote
significant cut through traffic, will function similarly to a public street,
satisfies emergency access per 3.6.6 of the Land Use Code, ensures
maintenance by the HOA, and is named properly for addressing purposes,
satisfying this standard.
V. Section 3.6.3 — Street Pattern and Connectivity Standards
This standard requires streets to provide connections to existing streets
and provide safe, convenient, and attractive streets for all modes of
transportation. Pear Street stubs into the north property line of the
development site. West Plum Street PUD indicates Pear Street will
continue once the site develops. In accordance with this standard, the
applicant proposes Bartlett Drive to continue Pear Street with an
emergency access point along Elizabeth Street. A connection to Elizabeth
Street from Pear Street for all modes would not meet the spacing
requirements of intersections in this code section.
W. Section 3.6.4 — Transportation Level of Service Requirements
Developments must demonstrate that all adopted Level of Service will be
achieved for all modes of transportation. All modes of transportation meet
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 14
The proposed lighting plan is consistent with the requirements of the Land
Use Code in regards to the general standard, lighting levels and design
standards.
P. Section 3.3.1(B) — Lots
No lot in a subdivision shall have less area than required under the
applicable zoning requirements. Each lot must also have vehicular access
to a public street. Should Modifications 2 and 3 be approved, all lots meet
the minimum dimensional standards outlined in Section 4.4 of the Land
Use Code.
0. Section 3.4.1 —Natural Habitats and Features
Since this site contains an irrigation ditch, an Ecological Characterization
Study (ECS) was required. An ECS establishes what natural habitat
features and other environmental sensitive resources should be protected
as part of a development plan. The applicant submitted an ECS in
accordance with this standard. Based on the ECS, the only valuable
habitat feature on the site are the trees. The ECS recommends preserving
the existing trees or mitigating for lost trees per the City Forester's
requirements. As discussed earlier, the proposed landscape plan shows
the removal of many trees on the site with appropriate mitigation. As such,
the proposal satisfies this code standard.
R. Section 3.6.2(C)
Streets on a project development plan shall conform to the Master Street
Plan where applicable. The applicant proposes to improve Elizabeth
Street in conformance with the Master Street Plan.
S. Section 3.6.2(F)
Individual lots abutting an arterial street may not access directly onto the
arterial street. None of the proposed lots will access Elizabeth Street.
Each lot will access the street -like private drive proposed that would
connect with Pear Street.
T. Section 3.6.2(G)
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 13
Developments may need to provide off -site improvements to provide for
safety, efficiency and convenience for bicycles and pedestrians both within
the development and to and from surrounding areas. This development
will add a detached sidewalk, bike lane, and buss pull out on the north
side of Elizabeth Street in accordance with this standard.
K. Section 3.2.2(C)(8) — Transportation Impact Study
A Transportation Impact Study is required for developments that could
have an impact on the traffic conditions surrounding the development.
Traffic Operations staff waived the requirement for a Traffic Impact Study
due to the low amount of traffic generation anticipated from this
development.
L. Section 3.2.2(D) — Access and Parking Lot Requirements
The proposal meets the requirements outlined in Land Use Code section
3.2.2(D) including the separation of vehicles and pedestrians,
unobstructed vehicle access, location of off-street parking areas,
pavement material, and lighting.
M. Section 3.2.2(K)(1)(c) — Residential and Institutional Parking
Requirements - Single-family Detached
Single-family detached homes with more than 40 feet of street frontage
must provide at least one off-street parking space. Each lot has more than
40 feet of frontage and will provide a two -car garage in accordance with
this standard.
N. Section 3.2.3 —Solar Access, Orientation, Shading
All development shall be designed throughout to accommodate active
and/or passive solar installations to the extent reasonably feasible while
minimizing the casting of shadows onto adjacent developments. The
architectural elevations show solar panels on the roofs of each duplex and
are located to minimize casting shadows on the neighborhood to the
south.
O. Section 3.2.4 — Site Lighting
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. —Single-family Detached. PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 12
Significant trees slated for removal require mitigation based on their size,
species, and condition. The City Forester conducts a site visit, inventories
all existing trees, and establishes a mitigation value for all significant trees
on the development site. Sheet LS3 of the landscape plan indicates the
locations, species, size, and condition of all existing trees on the
development site. The City Forester determined the mitigation value of all
trees on the site. The applicant proposes removing all but two of the
existing trees on the site, resulting in a mitigation value of 38 trees. The
project will provide mitigation for 36.5 of these trees by upsizing all trees
on the site per the standards in this code section. The applicant will pay
the Forestry department for providing mitigation trees off -site for the
remaining trees in accordance with this standard.
G. Section 3.2.2(C)(1) — Safety Considerations
To the maximum extent feasible, pedestrians shall be separated from
vehicles and bicycles. The proposed development shows sidewalks
separated from the roadway by a curb and a landscape parkway. These
walkways allow pedestrians to move within the site without encountering
vehicles or bicycles.
H. Section 3.2.2(C)(5) — Walkways
Walkways must be located and aligned to directly and continuously
connect areas or point of pedestrian origin and destination. Sidewalks line
the street -like private drive and connect to each lot. The proposal shows
each sidewalk connecting to the existing sidewalks on Pear Street and
Elizabeth Street.
I. Section 3.2.2(C)(6) — Direct On -Site Access to Pedestrian and Bicycle
Destinations
Pedestrian and bicycle facilities provided on site must connect to or allow
for direct connections to major pedestrian and bicycle destinations. The
sidewalk network connects to the sidewalks on Pear Street and Elizabeth
Street, which provide direct connections to major destinations.
J. Section 3.2.2(C)(7) — Off -Site Access to Pedestrian and Bicycle
Destinations
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 11
standard. Due to these factors, staff finds the proposal to meet this code
standard.
C. Section 3.2.1(D)(3) — Minimum Species Diversity
To prevent uniform insect or disease susceptibility and eventual uniform
senescence on a development site or in the adjacent area or the district,
species diversity is required and extensive monocultures are prohibited.
The maximum percentage of any one species when there are 20-39 trees
is 33%. No species consists of more than 20% of the overall amount of
trees provided.
D. Section 3.2. i(D)(4) — Tree Species and Minimum Sizes
All trees provided must meet the minimum sizes as follows:
Type
Minimum Size
Canopy Shade Tree
2.0" caliper balled and burlapped or
equivalent
Evergreen Tree
6.0' height balled and burlapped or
equivalent
Ornamental Tree
1.5" caliper balled and burlapped or
equivalent
Shrubs
5 gallon or adequate size consistent
with design intent
Canopy Shad Tree as a street tree
1.25" caliper container or equivalent
on a Residential Local Street Only
The trees shown on the landscape all meet these minimum requirements.
E. Section 3.2.1(E)(3) — Water Conservation
All landscape plans must be designed to incorporate water conservation
materials and techniques in order to meet the Xeriscape principals
established in the Land Use Code. Total annual water use shall not
exceed 15 gallons/square foot over the site. The landscape plan meets
the Xeriscape principals in the Land Use Code and has an annual water
use of 9.6 gallons/square foot over the site.
F. Section 3.2.1(F) — Tree Protection and Replacement
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 10
modification for Lots 6-9. From the perspective of the overall development, staff
finds the modification requested is nominal and inconsequential by having a
similar lot pattern to the adjacent development and by only requesting the
modification for four lots.
3. Compliance with Article 3 of the Land Use Code — General Development
Standards:
The project complies with all applicable General Development Standards as
follows:
A. Section 3.1.1 — Applicability
Single-family homes subject to Basic Development Review (BDR) in
Article 4 must only comply with the standards in Article 4 and any
supplemental regulations contained in division 3.8. Single-family detached
dwellings part of an approved site specific development plan are subject to
BDR per Section 4.4(B)(1)(a)(1). Owners of the lots created by this
subdivision will submit a BDR for the design of their individual homes. This
PDP only deals with creating buildable lots for the single-family detached
homes. As such, this staff report does not cover setbacks or building
height per the standards in Section 4.4 of the Land Use Code since each
individual lot owner will submit a BDR with their specific home designs
later.
B. Section 3.2.1(D)(2) — Street Trees
Developments that front on streets with a landscape parkway must
provide canopy shade trees at 30-40 foot spacing in the center of such
parkway areas. The proposed landscape plan shows street trees planted
behind the sidewalk rather than in the landscape parkway. The applicant
proposes these locations since the landscape parkway is acting as a
swale for stormwater purposes. This precludes planting trees in the
parkway. The proposed alternative with a street tree planted in the front
yard of each lot and two additional trees on the side of Lot 6 meets the
intent of this code standard. All of the trees must remain per the landscape
plan so homeowners will not be able to remove these trees. All of the
trees will contribute to the urban tree canopy, which is the purpose of this
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 9
neighborhoods in the City. It did not contemplate infill, redevelopment, or
small underutilized parcels of land. Meeting all of the dimensional and
density standards is infeasible.
• The modification is minor and only affects three lots, which are 52.3 , 52.7'
and 53.3' respectively. The lots will meet all of the required setbacks in the
R-L zone. The project is designed and intended for small, narrow homes
in order to provide more housing choices and is not a standard single
family greenfield development.
• The proposed alternative plan continues to improve the design, quality
and character of new development by exceeding the building standards
set forth in Section 3.5. The use of high quality residential building
materials, building articulation, projections and recesses, along with
pitched roof elements ensures sensitivity to and compatibility with the
surrounding neighborhood.
• We feel that the proposed alternative plan ensures sensitivity to the
surrounding neighborhood by building an attractive, desirable product in
an infill site with a price point that the market desires and that the
community can be proud of.
Staff Finding:
Staff finds that the request for a Modification of Standard to Section 4.4(D)(2)(a)
is justified by the applicable standards in 2.8.2(H)(4).
A. The granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good;
B. The project design satisfies 2.8.2(H)(4): the plan as submitted will promote
the general purpose of the standard for which the modification is requested
equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standard for
which a modification is requested the plan as submitted will not diverge from
the standards of the Land Use Code that are authorized by this Division to be
modified except in a nominal, inconsequential way when considered from the
perspective of the entire development plan, and will continue to advance the
purposes of the Land Use Code as contained in Section 1.2.2.
The purpose of this standard is similar to the minimum lot size requirement in
that it promotes a certain character of development typical of subdivisions from
the 1950s to 1980s. Most RL lots in the City have at least 60 feet of width. West
Plum Street PUD, immediately adjacent to the north, features lots less than 60
feet wide. Nine of the 12 lots have less than 60 feet of lot width. The lots range in
width from 56 feet up to 79 feet. Similarly, the applicant proposes lots ranging in
width from 52 feet up to 77 feet. This range of lot widths is similar to the lot
pattern of West Plum Street PUD. The applicant is also only seeking this
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. —Sing le-f am ily Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 8
below 6,000 square feet in the RL zone is the West Plum Street PUD
immediately north of the proposed development. Four of the twelve lots in the
West Plum Street PUD have less than 6,000 square feet of lot area. Lots 1, 6,
11, 12, and 13 all have less than 6,700 square feet of lot area each. The
remaining lots have over 9,000 square feet of lot area.
The lot pattern the applicant proposes is similar to the West Plum Street PUD.
Lots 6-9 would contain less than 6,000 square feet with the smallest lot having
5,515 square feet of area. Lots 1, 4, and 5 would contain more than 6,000 square
feet but less than 6,500 square feet of area. Lots 2 and 3 would contain more
than 8,000 square feet of area. One other feature that limits the lots sizes for this
subdivision is the proposed detached sidewalk. West Plum Street PUD has
attached sidewalks. Detached sidewalks provide more safety for pedestrians,
allow for the planting of street trees, and provide an area for plows to push snow
in the wintertime. Lots 6-9 would comply with the minimum lot size if the
sidewalks were attached and the property lines went to the back of the sidewalk.
By virtue of providing detached sidewalks and having a lot pattern consistent with
the adjacent neighborhood, staff finds the proposed plan to be equal to or better
than a compliant plan.
Modification #3 Description:
The applicant requests a Modification to Section 4.4(D)(2)(a) to have Lots 6-9
less than 60 feet wide.
Land Use Code Standard Proposed to be Modified (areas underlined and
bolded for emphasis):
Land Use Code 4.4(D)(2)(a):
Minimum lot width shall be sixty (60) feet for a single-family dwelling or
child-care center and one hundred (100) feet for all other uses.
Summary of Applicant's Justification:
The applicant requests that the Modification be approved and provides the
following justification based upon Criterion 1 (proposal is equal or better than
provisions in the Land Use Code):
Applicant's Justification for Criterion 1:
• As stated in the purpose statement, the R-L zone district was intended to
be a broad brush zoning district for the many of the established
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 7
The applicant requests that the Modification be approved and provides the
following justification based upon Criterion 1 (proposal is equal or better than
provisions in the Land Use Code):
Applicant's Justification for Criterion 1:
• As stated in the purpose statement, the R-L zone district was intended to
be a broad brush zoning district for the many of the established
neighborhoods in the City. It did not comtemplate infill, redevelopment, or
small underutilized parcels of land. Meeting all of the dimensional and
density standards is infeasible.
• The modification is minor and only affects four lots. If the lot areas were
measured to the flowline instead of the back of the detached sidewalk,
then they would meet the minimum size.
• The proposed alternative plan continues to improve the design, quality
and character of new development by exceeding the building standards
set forth in Section 3.5. The use of high quality residential building
materials, building articulation, projections and recesses, along with
pitched roof elements ensures sensitivity to and compatibility with the
surrounding neighborhood.
• We feel that the proposed alternative plan ensures sensitivity to the
surrounding neighborhood by building an attractive, desirable product in
an infill site with a price point that the market desires and that the
community can be proud of.
Staff Finding:
Staff finds that the request for a Modification of Standard to Section 4.4(D)(1) is
justified by the applicable standards in 2.8.2(H)(1).
A. The granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good;
B. The project design satisfies 2.8.2(H)(1): the plan as submitted will promote
the general purpose of the standard for which the modification is requested
equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standard for
which a modification is requested.
The purpose of this standard is to maintain the character of subdivisions with a
predominance of single-family detached homes developed from the 1950s until
the 1980s. Neighborhoods with few opportunities for redevelopment received the
RL zoning designation as part of City Plan in 1997. Few lots in the RL zone
district have less than 6,000 square feet of area. One of the subdivisions with lots
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 6
Staff Finding:
Staff finds that the request for a Modification of Standard to Section 3.8.11(A) is
justified by the applicable standards in 2.8.2(H)(1).
A. The granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good;
B. The project design satisfies 2.8.2(H)(1): the plan as submitted will promote
the general purpose of the standard for which the modification is requested
equally well or better than would a plan which complies with the standard for
which a modification is requested.
As stated in the code language, the purpose of this standard is to avoid the
tunnel effect, where a long, uninterrupted fence creates a monotonous
streetscape. This standard requires the fence to be visually varied, with both
columns or openings, as well as a change in plane, when it exceeds 100 feet in
length. The proposed fence is approximately 288 feet in length. The proposed
fence shows a change in plane only along Lot 3 where the fence is 113 feet long.
Lots 4 and 5 contain a fence 175 feet in length without a change in plane. One of
the issues with providing a second change in plane is how it affects the lot size
for Lots 4 and 5. Lots 4 and 5 would not meet the minimum lot size requirement
by pushing the fence five feet further into either lot. To break up the tunnel effect
of the fence, the applicant proposes stone columns at the corners of each lot.
The applicant also proposes 4 x 6 cedar posts every 7'-6" to add further visual
relief to the fence. This proposal effectively breaks up the fence visually while still
providing a change in plane without pushing the lots into non-compliance. For
these reasons, staff finds the proposal is equal to or better than a compliant plan.
Modification #2 Description:
The applicant requests a Modification to Section 4.4(D)(1) — Density to have four
lots with less than 6,000 square feet of lot area.
Land Use Code Standard Proposed to be Modified (areas underlined and
bolded for emphasis):
Land Use Code 4.4(D)(1):
Density. All development in the Low Density Residential District shall
have a minimum lot area the equivalent of three (3) times the total
floor area of the building but not less than six thousand (6,000
square feet.
Summary of Applicant's Justification:
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 5
(3) by reason of exceptional physical conditions or other extraordinary and
exceptional situations, unique to such property, including, but not limited to,
physical conditions such as exceptional narrowness, shallowness or topography,
or physical conditions which hinder the owner's ability to install a solar energy
system, the strict application of the standard sought to be modified would result
in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties, or exceptional or undue hardship
upon the owner of such property, provided that such difficulties or hardship are
not caused by the act or omission of the applicant, or
(4) the plan as submitted will not diverge from the standards of the Land Use
Code that are authorized by this Division to be modified except in a nominal,
inconsequential way when considered from the perspective of the entire
development plan, and will continue to advance the purposes of the Land Use
Code as contained in Section 1.2.2.
Any finding made under subparagraph (1), (2), (3) or (4) above shall be
supported by specific findings showing how the plan, as submitted, meets the
requirements and criteria of said subparagraph (1), (2), (3) or (4).
Summary of Applicant's Justification:
The applicant requests that the Modification be approved and provides the
following justification based upon Criterion 1 (proposal is equal or better than
provisions in the Land Use Code):
Applicant's Justification for Criterion 1:
• The modification is minor as the fence line is only 288'.
• Variation in the fence line will reduce the length of the side yard lot lines
and reduce the overall size of the lot creating additional conflicts with the
land use codes and in the design of the subdivision.
• The proposed alternative fence plan continues to improve the design,
quality and character of new development. This is achieved by using high
quality fence and column materials and landscape. This will still create the
desired streetscape along this portion of Elizabeth and far improved
compared to the existing fencing in the adjacent neighborhoods.
• We feel that the proposed alternative plan ensures sensitivity to the
surrounding neighborhood by still building an attractive, desirable product
in an infill site with a price point that the market desires and that the
community can be proud of.
• Finally, the proposed alternative plan is not a detriment to the public good,
as it results in the development of a vacant property within an established
area in accordance with the overall City goals outlined in City Plan.
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. —Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 4
2. Compliance with Section 2.8.2(H) of the Land Use Code - Modification of
Standards
Modification #1 Description:
The applicant requests a Modification to Section 3.8.1 l (A) to have a fence that
exceeds 100 feet in length without a change in setback.
Land Use Code Standard Proposed to be Modified (areas underlined and
bolded for emphasis):
Land Use Code 3.8.11
If used along collector or arterial streets, such features shall be
made visually interesting and shall avoid creating a "tunnel" effect.
Compliance with this standard may be accomplished by integrating
architectural elements such as brick or stone columns, incorporating
articulation or openings into the design, varying the alignment or setback
of the fence, softening the appearance of fence lines with plantings, or
similar techniques. In addition to the foregoinq, and to the extent
reasonably feasible, fences and sections of fences that exceed one
hundred (100) feet in length shall vary the alignment or setback of at
least one-third ( 113 )of the length of the fence or fence section (as
applicable) by a minimum of five (5) feet.
Land Use Code Modification Criteria:
"The decision maker may grant a modification of standards only if it finds that the
granting of the modification would not be detrimental to the public good, and that:
(1) the plan as submitted will promote the general purpose of the standard for
which the modification is requested equally well or better than would a plan which
complies with the standard for which a modification is requested; or
(2) the granting of a modification from the strict application of any standard
would, without impairing the intent and purpose of this Land Use Code,
substantially alleviate an existing, defined and described problem of city-wide
concern or would result in a substantial benefit to the city by reason of the fact
that the proposed project would substantially address an important community
need specifically and expressly defined and described in the city's
Comprehensive Plan or in an adopted policy, ordinance or resolution of the City
Council, and the strict application of such a standard would render the project
practically infeasible; or
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. —Sing le-f am ily Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 3
Figure 1: 2620 W Elizabeth St. - Single-family Detached Zoning & Site Vicinity
Map
1 inch = 667 feet
2620 W Elizabeth St. - Single-family Detached
Zoning & Vicinity Map -1
Staff Report — 2620 W Elizabeth St. —Single-family Detached, PDP160037
Administrative Hearing 10-23-2017
Page 2
• The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards of Article 3 —
General Development Standards, provided the modification to 3.8.11(A) is
approved.
• The Modification of Standard to Section 4.4(D)(1) that is proposed with this
Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section
2.8.2(H)(1).
• The Modification of Standard to Section 4.4(D)(2)(a) that is proposed with this
Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section
2.8.2(H)(1).
• The Project Development Plan complies with relevant standards located in
Division 4.4, Low Density Residential District (RL) of Article 4 — Districts,
provided the modifications to 4.4(D)(1) and 4.4(D)(2)(a) are approved.
COMMENTS:
1. Background
The property annexed into the City of Fort Collins in two phases. The eastern 45.97 feet
was included in the Valley Hi Second Annexation on March 24, 1966. The remainder of
the property was included in the Overland Trail Annexation on November 25, 1970. The
property was platted as Tract A of the West Plum Street PUD on July 22, 1996. West
Plum Street PUD indicates, however, Tract A was not a part of the development.
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
Direction
Zone District
Existing Land Uses
North
Low Density Residential RL
Single-family detached residential
South
Low Density Residential (RL)
Single-family detached residential
East
Low Density Residential (RL)
Single-family detached residential
West
Low Density Residential (RL)
I Single-family detached residential
Below is a zoning and site vicinity map.
City of
F6rt Collins
ITEM NO 1
MEETING DATE
STAFF
Oct. 23, 2017
Clay Frickey
ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING OFFICER
PROJECT: 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037
APPLICANT: Mike Walker
TB Group
444 Mountain Ave.
Berthoud, CO 80524
OWNERS: Flagstone Investments LLC
PO Box 2796
Gillette, WY 82717
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for a Project Development Plan to plat 9 lots for single-family detached
homes. The lots will range in size from 5,515 to 9,462 square feet. The existing home
on the lot will be preserved and will be on its own lot. The applicant is requesting 4
modifications of standard as part of this application. The site is located in the Low
Density Residential (RL) zone district.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the modification requests and
the 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached, PDP160037.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Staff finds the proposed 2620 W Elizabeth St. — Single-family Detached Project
Development Plan complies with the applicable requirements of the City of Fort Collins
Land Use Code (LUC), more specifically:
• The Project Development Plan complies with the process located in Division 2.2
— Common Development Review Procedures for Development Applications of
Article 2 — Administration.
• The Modification of Standard to Section 3.8.11(A) that is proposed with this
Project Development Plan meets the applicable requirements of Section
2.8.2(H)(1).
Planning Services 281 N College Ave — PO Box 580 — Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580
fcgov.com/developmentreview/ 970.221.6750