Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWINDTRAIL PARK PUD FINAL - 66 93E - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSNOV— 5— 9 4 T U E 1 2: 3 9 P. 0 2 , COIARA. o2ATI UNNEWS111' RESEARCH FOUNDATION — t?A31 OAS 791fi CsUrf .....__ N... .. ..... .�...�.--._.—.... ._...—_.._.__�— 10FOUNDATIONPp, BOX�1N5 FMT COLLIN5, COI.ORAIIO 80511 November 4, 1994 VIA Facsimile No. 221-6378 'Mr. Stove Olt City of Fort Collins Planning Department Dear Steve: 'Phis letter is to confirm that CSURF has agreed to provide an off site stoirn drainage easement to Mr. John McCoy on his Windirail Apartments complex. Although the necessary legal documents have not been signed as of this date. CSURF and Mr. McCoy have agreed in principle an the transaction and the legal documents are presently being drafted. Please feel free to call me if you have any questions or need further inforination. K13:tdb cc: John McCoy Adlikk►tir cra i `PiLk AU D - 'I Q Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY CRITERION Is the criterion applicable? Will the criterion be satisfied? If no, please explain E LL z 1 a 2 Yes No Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA 1.1 Solar Orientation 1.2 Comprehensive Plan 1.3 Wildlife Habitat 1.4 Mineral Deposit 1.5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas reserved reserved 1.6 Lands of Agricultural Importance 1.7 Energy Conservation t/ ✓ 1.8 Air Quality i/ 1.9 Water Quality 1.10 Sewa e and Wastes ✓ ✓ A 2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA 2.1 Vehicular Pedestrian Bike Transportation ✓ 4 2.2 Building Placement and Orientation ✓ �/ 2.3 Natural Features ✓ ✓ 2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parking / V 2.5 Emergency Access 2.6 Pedestrian Circulation ✓ 2.7 Architecture ✓ 2.8 Building Height and Views 2.9 Shading I/ 2.10 Solar Access 2.11 Historic Resources 2.12 Setbacks ✓ ✓ 2.13 Landscape 2.14 Signs 2.15 Site Lighting t/ t/ 2.16 Noise and Vibration 2.17 Glare or Heat V 2.18 Hazardous Materials A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity 3.2 Design Standards ✓ 3.3 Water Hazards 3.4 Geologic Hazards Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 -61- N SCHOOL PROJECTIONS PROPOSAL: WINDTRAIL PARK PUD - Final DESCRIPTION: 56 apartment units, 21 single family units on 12.05 acres DENSITY: 6.39 du/acre General Population 21 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 73.5 56 2.8 156.8 SchoolA2e Population Elementary - 21 (units) x 56 Junior High - 21 (units) x 56 Senior High - 21 (units) x 56 .450 (pupils/unit) = 9.45 .120 6.72 .210 (pupils/unit) = 4.41 .055 3.08 .185 (pupils/unit) = 3.89 .050 2.8 %ZPr WAI I nc Afl 'i PLANT LIST DECIDUOUS TREES UAW w7mic NOWE It I_, Z EVERGREEN TREES Pi EVERGREEN SHRUBS DECIDUOUS SHRUBS PERENNIALS M GRASSES LANDSCAPE DETAIL SECTION A —A WMTPAL PAW P.U.D. DETAM e w.•`•ir�ar.r IArr� � s 1 5L PEI `Y�.�. WeLvm Y Y.l.rr. YM r PLANNING & ZONING APPROVAL PLANT NOTES DITCH COMPANY APPROVAL �a�'..ar:`•.� �� a.m..rw wro.n.®wweras,wcro-ro mJ OWNER'S CERTIFICATION ...s,»..E.,,.,..�s z 0 way .eE PROJECT STATISTICS rAVJCVI I.V ICJ / �'� •,• SOLAR OFdMATM nuv 1 MALL rFjq% r FMU BETE ✓1 LANMCItM PLM VICNTY MAP I © Ln 0 I wcn a IjjrT: .i9-1111111J'1-j:.J1,. I PROSPECT ROAD n 40 ::J Windtrail Park PUD - Final, #66-93E November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 5 the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made.) If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 3, of the City Code, the 11final decision" of the Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of this conditional approval; however, in the event that a dispute is presented to the Board for resolution, regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final decision't shall be counted from the date of the Boards decision resolving such dispute. 2. That the City has the right to require changes to the layout and density of this development in the event that an off -site drainage easement on the CSURF property to the east is not dedicated to the developer of the Windtrail Park P.U.D. 40 Windtrail Park PUD - Final, #66-93E November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 4 principle on the transaction and the legal documents are presently being drafted. A copy of the letter of "agreement" is attached to this staff report. Staff is recommending a condition concerning the vested right for the layout and density of the development should an agreement between the two parties in interest not be completed. FINDINGS of FACT/CONCLUSIONS: In evaluating the request for the Windtrail Park P.U.D., Final, staff makes the following findings of fact: * It is in conformance with the approved Windtrail Apartments P.U.D., Preliminary. *. It meets the applicable All Development Criteria in the Land Development Guidance System. * It has been reviewed by the Transportation Department. The project is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint and complies with transportation policies. * This development is dependent on an off -site drainage easement on Colorado State University Research Foundation (CSURF) property to the east to enable the developer to maintain the proposed layout and density of the project and size the on -site detention pond to accommodate the stormwater basin detention requirements. CSURF and the developer have agreed in principle on the transaction and the legal documents are presently being drafted. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Windtrail Park P.U.D., Final - #66-93E, with the following condition: 1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D. plans for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (January 23, 1995) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan certain specific unique and extraordinary, circumstances which require the granting of a a Windtrail Park PUD - Final, #66-93E November 14, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 3 Parking: There will be 2 unobstructed parking spaces per unit for the single family portion of the development and a total of 110 parking spaces for the multi -family portion of the development. The amount of parking being provided for the multi -family units meets or exceeds the minimum number of spaces required for a mix of 1- and 2- bedrooms in the 56 dwelling units. 4. Transportation: This development will be accessed from South Shields Street via an extension of the existing access drive that serves Rolland Moore Park. With this extension, the access drive becomes a public street on the.east side of South Shields now referred to as Rolland Moore Drive. This intersection will be eligible for a traffic signal in the future as conditions warrant. Rolland Moore Drive will be a collector street to the easterly property line of the development. From this point, the street will swing northeast to serve other Windtrail P.U.D.'s and Tract H of the Centre for Advanced Technology, overall Development Plan. As it makes this turn, the street may be downsized to a local street. Bridgefield Lane is designed to intersect with Shire Court to the north. This will provide access to the Shields Street/Rolland Moore intersection and allow the Shields Street/Shire Court intersection to be closed. The closure of this intersection is part of the original approval of the Sundering townhomes P.U.D. Existing asphalt, curb, and gutter will be removed and a new sidewalk will be built across the throat of the present intersection. The exact scope of the project will be determined with the development agreement between the developer and the City. The Windtrail P.U.D. has been reviewed by the Transportation Department. The project is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint and complies with transportation policies. 5. Storm Drainage: This development is dependent on an off -site drainage easement on Colorado State University Research Foundation (CSURF) property to the east to enable the developer to maintain the proposed layout and density of the project and size the on -site detention pond to accommodate the stormwater basin detention requirements. CSURF has agreed to provide the necessary storm drainage easement to the developer for the Windtrail Park P.U.D. project. The necessary legal documents for the off' -site easement have not been signed as of this date; however, CSURF and the developer have agreed in a a Windtrail Park PUD November 14, 1994 P Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background• - Final, #66-93E & Z Meeting The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: RP; existing multi -family residential (Hill Pond Condominiums, Sundering Townhomes) S: ip; existing elder care facilities, offices (Centre for Advanced Technology) E: rp; vacant (Centre for Advanced Technology) W: RL; existing City community park (Rolland Moore) The Windtrail Apartments P.U.D., Preliminary was approved by the Planning and Zoning Board on June 27, 1994 for 56 multi -family dwelling units and 21 patio home (single family) lots on 12.05 acres. 2. Land Use• This is a request for final P.U.D. approval for 21 single family lots and 56 multi -family dwelling units on 12.05 acres. The entire project will contain a total of 77 dwelling units. The overall gross residential density is 6.4 dwelling units per acre. It is in conformance with the approved Windtrail Apartments P.U.D., Preliminary and meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. 3. Desian• Architecture: The multi -family residential buildings will all be two -stories, 29' in height, and they will contain 8 living units. The exterior materials will consist of prefinished hardboard lap siding with 4" concrete block masonry veneer on the lower 3' of portions of all four sides of the buildings. The roofing material will be laminated, textured fiberglass shingles. Landscaping: There will be deciduous and evergreen trees incorporated in the Rolland Moore Drive streetscape. The existing street trees along the South Shields Street frontage are to remain, with the exception of one Honeylocust and one American Linden to be relocated on the project site. The common areas will contain combinations of deciduous and evergreen trees. Foundation plantings for the multi- family dwelling units will consist of a combination of deciduous and evergreen shrubs, perennial flowers, and ornamental grasses. ITEM NO. — 9 MEETING DATE 11 /14/94 STAFF Steve Olt City of Fort Collins PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD STAFF REPORT PROJECT: Windtrail Park P.U.D., Final - #66-93E APPLICANT: Jim Sell Design 117 East Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO. 80524 OWNER: Windtrail Limited Liability Company c/o John McCoy 3665 J.F.K. Parkway, Building 1 Fort Collins, CO. 80525 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for final planned unit development (P.U.D.) approval for 21 single family lots and 56 multi -family dwelling units (a total of 77 dwelling units) on 12.05 acres located on the east side of South Shields Street across from the entry to Rolland Moore Community Park. The site is directly south of the Hill Pond Condominiums and Sundering Townhomes. The property is zoned rp, Planned Residential. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with a conditions EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This request for final P.U.D. approval: * Is in conformance with the approved Windtrail Apartments P.U.D., Preliminary; * meets the applicable All Development Criteria in the Land Development Guidance System (L.D.G.S.); * is feasible from a traffic engineering standpoint and complies with transportation policies. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT