The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSW PROSPECT AND I 25 ROADWAY PROJECT - RP180001 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 3 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS11/08/2018: FOR APPROVAL: The Right Of Way dedication has some corrections to be made. This will be coordinated through Marc Virata. Response: Benchmark statement has been updated. 11/06/2018: FOR APPROVAL: The City has moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum, and as of January 1, 2015, all projects are required to be on NAVD88 datum. Please provide the following information for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below. PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 - X.XX'. Comment Number: 3 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are references to separate documents to be filed that have empty blanks. Please make sure these are filled in prior to submitting mylars. Response: Acknowledged. 11/08/2018: FOR APPROVAL: There are references to separate documents to be filed that have empty blanks. Please make sure these are filled in prior to submitting mylars. Comment Number: 5 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are line over text issues. See redlines. Response: Redlines have been addressed. Comment Number: 6 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: There are text over text issues. See redlines. Response: Redlines have been addressed. Topic: General Comment Number: 4 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: The Right Of Way dedication has not been corrected. This will be coordinated through Marc Virata. Response: Acknowledged. 5 been included. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 6 1/08/2019: INFORMATION ONLY. FOR DCP: Environmental Planning will ensure limits of the road project impacts are clear and that natural resources are protected during construction of this temporary road project. Environmental Planning and Forestry will attend the DCP meeting. Response: Acknowledged Comment Number: 7 01/16/2019: INFORMATION ONLY / FOR DA: Brief standard City Natural Resources language to be included documenting protections required during development and need for Ecological Characterization Study (ECS) prior to any Project Development Plan submittal for future development. Response: Acknowledged Department: PFA Contact: Andrew Rosen, 970-416-2599, arosen@poudre-fire.org Topic: General Comment Number: 1 01/09/2019: INFORMATION ONLY: The hydrants are shown along the new road at approximately 500ft. Should the project team wish, this spacing can be a hydrant located 300ft from any commercial structure and on 600ft centers thereafter. The project team has agreed that access to the weigh station will be maintained from the existing road or the new road. 10/29/2018: FOR APPROVAL: ACCESS : Access shall be maintained to the southbound weigh station and any other businesses at all times. >The Temporary Roadway before top -lift shall be constructed to support 40T Response: While we appreciate the opportunity to decrease our hydrant spacing, we believe that the increased hydrant capacity will assist with fire coverage during future development and have elecated to leave the hydrant spacing unchanged. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, jcounty@fcgov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Number: 1 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please revise the Benchmark Statement as marked. See redlines. 4 into the utility easements, we will require that the utility easements be dedicated now, OR, drainage easements specifically around the storm piping could be dedicated as an alternative. This second option would need to be vetted through Engineering. In addition, drainage easements will need to be dedicated for the proposed drainage swales with these plans. Response: Easements are now being dedicated at the same time at the plans though separate documents. The utility easements dedicated at this time will be 9' wide. Wider easements have been provided where storm pipes extend beyond the ROW. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, Ischlam@fcgov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 3 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please resubmit Erosion Control Plans based upon redlines, comments from the prior review were never updated to meet City Criteria. I will have the prior round comments included in the redlines folder to ensure they are updated. Response: Both rounds of erosion control redlines have been addressed. PDFs of the responses have been included with these written responses. 10/24/2018: FOR APPROVAL: Please resubmit Erosion Control Plans based upon redlines to meet City Criteria. Comment Number: 4 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Please resubmit an Erosion Control Report based upon the comments being returned in order to meet City Criteria. The sections seem to have not been reviewed as there are references to other projects that have nothing to do with this project. Response: Report has been updated to reference the correct project. 10/24/2018: FOR APPROVAL: Please submit an Erosion Control Report to meet City Criteria. Comment Number: 5 01/14/2019: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation based upon the changes in the erosion control plan to ensure the Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria. Response: Erosion Control Escrow Calculations have been included with this submittal. 10/24/2018: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT: Please submit an Erosion Control Escrow / Security Calculation to ensure the Erosion Control Plans to meet City Criteria. Department: Traffic Operation Contact: Martina Wilkinson, 970-221-6887, mwilkinson@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 01/02/2019: FOR APPROVAL: I understand this is interim, and the top lift will not be done, but we may still need to provide interim striping (centerline and edge line). Also - chevron signs at the turns may be needed per MUTCD requirements, and should be shown on the plans. Response: Interim striping and signage are now shown on the roadway sheets of these plans. Chevron signage has 3 of property that would be bound to the agreement and recorded against the property. I'm of the thought that the legal description would the metes and bounds description for the boundary of the upcoming plat. https://www.fcgov.com/engineering/pdf/InfoDevAgreements2018.doc? 1538760194 Response: Acknowledged. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Wes Lamarque, 970-416-2418, WLamargue@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 7 01/08/2019: FOR APPROVAL: Thank you for submitting a drainage analysis for this roadway project. Please note that the submitted report did not address standard water quality and will need to do so prior to approval of this project. Providing standard stormwater quality provisions is a requirement of Fort Collins criteria as well as the MS4 permit. If water quality is being provided in the existing pond, then this needs to be shown. If not, water quality in the form of a water quality basin or some other allowable facility must be provided. Response: Per discussion with City staff, water quality provided by the long, flat swales will satisfy the requirement for this project. Future improvements will be subject to standard water quality measures and LID requirements that will be provided at that time. Comment Number: 8 01/08/2019: FOR APPROVAL: The proposed frontage road is going to be classified as a commercial local roadway. With that, overtopping of the roadway is allowed during the 100-yr storm, up to 18-inches above the road flowline. Therefore, you will need to provide the 100-yr overtopping analysis to show that you meet the requirements. Response: Culvert overtopping analysis is now provided. The analysis shows that the proposed culverts are able to convey the full 100-yr flows generated in the interim condition with the understanding that Culvert 2 will only convey 5.19 cfs before flow is diverted south by swale to Culvert 3. The future development north of the roadway has also been considered. While it is very difficult to anticipate what the actual development will look like, we have tried to develop potential basins. Using those basins, a flow of 56.14 cfs would occur in a 100-yr event at Culvert 2, resulting in no overtopping. Culvert 3 would experience 100-yr flows of 81.02 cfs, resulting in no overtopping. Please see our updated drainage memo/report for additional information. Comment Number: 9 01/08/2019: FOR APPROVAL: The proposed swales appear to convey up to the 10-yr event, but nothing more. You will need to provide swales that contain the 100-yr event with either 1' of freeboard or sized to convey 133% of the 100-yr 0. Response: The Manning's Number was incorrect in the previous submittal. Swale analysis with the corrected Manning's Number are now provided showing that the swales can convey at least 133% of the 100-yr 0 for the developed future site north of the road. Comment Number: 10 01/11/2019: FOR APPROVAL: The plans show that the right-of-way for the road is intended to be dedicated with these plans, but its unclear if the roadside 15-foot utility easements are shown as being dedicated now or in the future. Because the storm pipes extend N City of Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6689 970.224.6134 - fax fcgov. com/developmentreview January 18, 2019 Bo Brown CSURF PO Box0483 Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: SW Prospect & 1-25, RP180001, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have any questions regarding these comments or the next steps in the review process, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through your Development Review Coordinator, Brandy Bethurem Harras, at 970.416.2744 or bbeth uremharras @fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: The response indicated that dedications would occur with the forthcoming replat. I would defer to the utility and drainage reviewers/providers on whether this would be acceptable, but would otherwise believe easement should be dedicated for the interim period between the construction of the improvements and the replat. Response: All utility work for this phase of the project is now contained within easements to be dedicated by separate documents. 11/06/2018: FOR APPROVAL: With only the right-of-way being dedicated at this time, would there be an issue of the utility crossings being installed at this time with portions of utility being outside of a prescribed easement or right-of-way? Comment Number: 11 01/14/2019: FOR APPROVAL: The drafting of the development agreement that was previously contemplated at the conclusion of round 1 can commence. I would need the information sheet filled out that is linked below. With that in mind, I would need a legal description