Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWINDTRAIL TOWNHOMES PUD FINAL - 66 93A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS JMMARY REPORT - i#YZYY#i;.YYYZY ZY NTERSECTION..rolland moore /shields REA TYPE ..... OTHER NALYST....... mid ATE......... pm /93 IME........ em pm long ' OMMENT....... --------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NO SB f 5 55 5 15 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 1 1 1 1700 1050 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 i 5 65 15 5 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 2 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 - 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE . HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T 1 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 1 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 I 0.00- 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 19.8 4 1 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 19.8 4 --------------------------------I---------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 .PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 I LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X. RT X PO X PD X LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PO X tEEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 65.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'LLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 --------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C - G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS I L 0.020 0.189 22.6 C 20.7 C TR 0.023 0.189 19.2 C I L 0.181 0.189 23.3 C 21.6 C TR 0.262 0.189 20.2 C I L 0.025 0.744 2.3 A 4.2 A TR 0.750 0.744 4.2 A I L 0.208 0.744 2.8 A 2.2 A TR 0.462 0.744 2.2 A ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ITERSECTION: Delay = 4.2 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.651 LOS = A 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT 2YY22222Y22YYYIZ2Y###2R2222#R##Y#2RZZZZZZY;Z##22YYYYYZ###;222YY2Z222#I.YY# INTERSECTION..rolland moore ishields AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... m,ld DATE.......... 12/2A3 TIME .......... am pm long COMMENT....... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NO SB : EB WB NB SB LT 35 35 25 65 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1 1 1520 1690 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 65 35 60 25 : 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 _ 0 0 0 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb - Y/N min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 NO 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 19.8 4 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 19.8 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PO X WB LT X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 7.0 79.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.138 0.183 31.2 D 28.7 O TR 0.269 0.183 27.3 D WB L 0.152 0.183 31.3 D 28.9 0 TR 0.147 0.183 26.6 0 NB L 0.064 0.767 2.6 A 7.8 B TR 0.767 0.675 7.9 6 SB L 0.078 0.767 2.6 A 9.7 B TR 0.830 0.675 10.0 B ----------------------------------- ------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 9.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.649 LOS = B 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-1 X XYZXXXZZYiZiXXYiZXYZXi}iiYiZZXiiY1 ZZZZZZZXZZYi}i}XX#iYYY#XZXYYYii i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------- ------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 30 15 20 40 THRU 1 1 808 885 RIGHT 20 30 30 20 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ----------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------ ------ LANES 2- LANE USAGE LT + k LT 4 R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SM ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET "EB LEFT 33 66 57 > 57 57 > 23 24 >E E THROUGH 1 83 74 > 74 > 73 > E RIGHT 22 630 630 630 608 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 17 66 58 > 58 58 > 41 41 >E E THROUGH 1 83 74 > 74 > 73 > E RIGHT 33 654 654 654 621 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 44 395 395 395 351 B NB LEFT 22 363 363 363 341 6 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE AtIALYSIS 12/3/93 ; am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... ong 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).....'. 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ am pm 1993 short OTHER .INFORMATION... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT 10 20 60 10 THRU 1 1 892 535 RIGHT 20 50 10 40 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB -------------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE USAGE LT + R Ll + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW= TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT V(Pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 11 69 59 > 60 59 > 48 48 >E E THROUGH 1 94 65 > 85 > 84 > E RIGHT 22 770 770 770 748 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 22 70 62 > 63 62 > 40 40 >E E THROUGH 1 92 83 > 83 > 82 > E RIGHT 55 632 632 632 577 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 11 365 365 365 354 B NB LEFT 66 558 558 558 492 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... hill Pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE A IS..... 12/3193 pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION... long APPENDIX E 1.4 i f RESTRICT/L'LOSE St{I(ZE is 1 E G v PROVIDE Co/UAJECTtaAj FROM i t4 SHIRE TO�VArtC�QrL._.. WINpT2A IL OiV SPRIMG GR�GK PUD I F j IJ U_� 1DlDEI LL INj3 TOWNI O Tr_TTTr-r G : J low ^•�. ��'� I RIVATE NATURE TRA 0000 T�- • • K POSSIBLE PEDESTRIAN DITCH CTION: SEW. �r •I ui 1' m `.1 w l \ N M i P • �� ., (ON STREET BIKEWAY) .r U �. og to No r-- R KE ROAD CIIIJA RON CIM�HRi7y ©ApE l WOODWEST_ � ( I- FiLAZA [_.� L..' i I f 1 1`- 1 F� APPENDIX D 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS .Pace-1 Z##########Z#Z##############ZZZZYZZYZYYZ#Z#Z######ZZZZZZZ#Z#YZZZ##Z#Z IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... shire NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am e 199 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT --• 10 0 15 THRU -- 0 777 808 RIGHT -- 10 10 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES -- 1 2 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE k ATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ----------------------- --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 11 66 64 > 64 > 53 > E ' > 118 i 96 >E RIGHT 11 674 674 > 674 > 663 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 421 421 421 405 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... shire NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 ; am pm 199 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... shire NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 199 shor OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------"'------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------- =--------------------------------------"' EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 10 0 5 THRU -- 0 848 499 RIGHT -- 15 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES "'------=---"""---------------------'___------------- EB WB NB ------- SB ------- ------- ------- LANES -- 1 2 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET - WB LEFT 11 98 97 > 97 > 86 > E > 198 > 171 >D RIGHT 17 649 649 > 649 > 633 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 388 388 388 382 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----'_ "'_'_'---------- ---- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... shire NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 #YYYYYYYYYYYYY YYY Y#Y##Y YYYYYYYYYYYY#YYYY#YYYY#YYYYY###YYYY Y YYYY##YY#Y IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET... 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long - INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------ -------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 15 15 10 30 THRU 1 1 764 803 RIGHT 10 25- 25 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB ------- SB -------------- LANES 2 2 ------- 2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + P CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paqe-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT V(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ----------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 17 66 60 > 61 60 > 43 43 >E E THROUGH 1 83 78 > 78 > 77 > E RIGHT 11 663 663 663 652 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 17 66 61 > 62 61 > 44 44 >E E THROUGH 1 83 78 > c 78 > 77 > E RIGHT 28 673 673 673 645 A MAJOR STREET - SB LEFT 33 420 420 420 367 B NB LEFT it 407 407 407 396 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/HEST STREET...... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 pni 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNAL12EO INTERSECTIONS Page-) IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 _ PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIMEPERIODANALYZED................. Om pm 1993 shor OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG ,MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 20 30 5 THRU 1 1 837 406 RIGHT 10 40 5 20 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NBSB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE USAGE LT 4 R LT + k CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH --------------- --------------------------------- --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 88 81 > 85 81 > 78 75 >E E THROUGH 1 118 113 > 113 > 112 -> D RIGHT 11 802 802 802 791 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 22 91 87 > 88 87 > 64 65 >E E THROUGH 1 117 112 > 112 > 111 > D RIGHT 44 653 653 653 609 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 393 393 393 388 B NB LEFT 33 608 608 608 575 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF -THE EAST/WEST STREET...... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 am Pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long APPENDIX C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNAL17ED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ii##iYY#ii##Yi##YiYY##itiYYYi#iiYYYYYY###iYYYY#Y##iiiYiiiiYYYYY###ii# IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......... rolland moore NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST. ................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 199 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 35 -- 25 7S THRU 0 -- 745 795 RIGHT 65 -- !L 25 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------ LANES 2 -- 2 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE ' - Page-3 ----- --------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------ ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 39 69 66 66 27 E RIGHT - 72 661 661 661 589 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 28 404 404 404 376 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rolland moore NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 ; am (3 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... rolland moore -NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ Om pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 -- 5 4� THRU 0 -- 832 490 RIGHT 5 -- 4251; 5 NUMBER OF LANES _____________________________________________________________________ Eb WB Nb Sb ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 -- 2 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ------- P M SH R SH ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 102 102 102 96 E RIGHT 6 807 807 807 802 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 6 616 616 616 610 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION . --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... rolland moore NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 ;(am pm 199 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 1Z1Z1ZZ###ZZ2IZXZ#ZIIZZZZZXI 2Z#1X1###1#1211ZZZZ#11ZZZ#XX11ZX2ZZZ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... shire NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 hort OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 5 0 10 THRU-- 0 759 790 RIGHT -- 5 10 0 NUMBER OF LANES . -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES. -- 1 2 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Pape-3 ---------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH k SH ------- ------- -------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 6 70 69 RIGHT 6 682 682 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 11 .433 433 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 69 > 64 > E > 126 > 115 >0 > 682 > 676 > A 433 422 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... shire NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 : am Kpmy 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paoe-1 xxxxxxxxxxxzxxxxxxxxxzxzzxxxxxzxxxzxzzxxxzxxzxxxxzxxxzxxxxxzzzxzxxxxz IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................:.... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... shire NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST...... ............. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Pm 199 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 10 0 5 THRU -- 0 832 486 RIGHT -- 10 5 0 NUMBER OF LANES --------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ----- LANES -- 1 2 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT V(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET - WB LEFT 11 103 102 > 102 > 91 > E > 177 > 155 >0 RIGHT 11 655 655 > 655 > 644 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 395 395 395 390 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... shire NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long. 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paqe-1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 15 10 10 20 THRU 1 1 745 785 _ RIGHT 10 20 20 10 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB 9 LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE OSAGE LT . R LT . P CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ----------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT .SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- ------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 17 66 61 > 62 61 > 45 45 >E E THROUGH 1 85 81 > 81 > 80 > E RIGHT 11 670 670 670 659 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 11 67 63 > 64 63 > 52 52 >E E THROUGH 1 86 82 > 82 > 81 > E RIGHT 22 684 684 684 662 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 22 435 435 435 413 A NB LEFT 11 416 416 416 405 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAS1/WEST STREET...... hill pond. NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields / \ DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/3/93 ; am / Pii, 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long op 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xxxaxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:xxxx:x xxxxx xxxx xxxxxxxxxxx:xx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... shields NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/3/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................. am pm. 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 15 30 5 THRU 1 1 819 475 RIGHT 10 30 5 20 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB W8 NB SB _______ _______ _______ ------- LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE USAGE LT + R Ll + k CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) 'c = c - v LOS P M SH R SH ------ -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 94 87 > 91 87 > 85 82 >E E THROUGH 1 124 119 > 119 > 118 > D RIGHT 11 807 807 867 796 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 17 97 91 > 93 91 > 75 75 >E E THROUGH 1 122 118 > 118 > 116 > U RIGHT 33 659 659 659 626 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 402 402 402 396 B NB LEFT 33 616 616 616 583 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... hill pond NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... shields DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS...... 12/3/93 am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long APPENDIX B S C6N7RE' Foot A DVAAJC&-V TECNgoi owe M4sTGK RAV 1989 APPENDIX A 1. OFFICE PARK ROLLAND MOORE PARK 50/30 C3 moo ,NOM. 20/15 �-- 10/30-T -1 t r NOM. -+ o o 20/20 -� o o 0 0 rl -� vv Si m Ln �u� �— 65/35 Ln - NOM. 55/35 5/35 � NOM. 5/65 u7 O � C� t2 0 0 n HILL POND AM / PM Rounded to nearest 6 vehicles. A* N LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7 Table 3 1995 Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Shields/Hill Pond (stop sign) EB LT/T E E EB RT A A WB LT/T E E WB RT A A SB LT B B NB LT A B Shields/Shire (stop sign) WB LT/RT U E SB LT B A Table 4 Long Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Shields/Hill Pond (stop sign) EB LT/T E E EB RT A A WB LT/T E E WB RT A A SB LT B B NB LT A B Shields/Rolland Moore/Access (signal) A B OFFICE PARK o o N 40/25 u� -�-- NOM. /-- 20/15 5/15 —f } I NOW Ln 10/10 —� n LO Ln rn Ln L POND n M / PM Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. AL N SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 Table 1 Existing Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection' AM PM Shields/Hill Pond (stop sign) EB LT/T E E EB RT A A WB LT/T E E WB RT A A SB LT B A NB LT A A Shields/Shire (stop sign) WB LT/RT D D SB LT B A Shields/Rolland Moore (stop sign) EB LT E E EB RT A A NB LT A B Table 2 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Windtrail at Spring Creek PUD Parcel A - 36 S.F. D.U. 340 Parcel B - 37 T.H. D.U. 240 Parcel C - 29 S.F. D.U. 260 TOTAL 860 7 20 23 13 3 15 15 7 6 16 19 10 16 51 57 30 OFFICE PARK ROLLAND MOORE PARK LO C, 0 0 _� 3Y20 /-- 5/10 5/15 -J 0 0— o00 10 10—\ C3 tn 0 un, 0 LO to tn to 10/5 r- 10/5 -�VV�I 1 Ln o Ln `n xi 0) ul CN \M Y'1 0jI1 1 HILL POND AM/PM Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. 4, N 1993 BALANCED PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5 i 9/92 rm OFFICE PARK CD In 5/13 --� 0/0 11/92 30/18 9/92 +— 0/1 59/52 /-13/e (71e) f8) HILL POND nco cn N N CI co O to N N \ Q7 O to t0 9/4 6/5 18/63 (631) 9/92 3/30 v� C3N 5/91 9C3 W ca 3/93 �Cl M to ROLLAND MOORE PARK 4/98 (850) N � o^ 3/93 �M m 3/93 LEGEND: AM / PM (DAILY) 4 N RECENT TRAFFIC COUNTS Figure 4 NOT TO SCALE A ' r------� I I SPR CREENG K I STUART VILLAGE I L------� Y j/ A° OFFICE HILL PO aoWINDTRAIL / PARK t iC.A.T. PARCEL J �' -•• ROLLAND Future Street MOORE PARK FUTURE STREET SYSTEM Figure 3 I . _notIM.004.._ / /'. / / < Parcel B 'ROAD _ Cj i Parcel A �. ..mob N No Scale ' GmEmm_ %=mmmm6 0%*,w CONNECT TO FUTURE CENTRE AVENUE — C dml� N awn V CAT Parcel J • i CONNECT TO FUTURE • ROLLAND MOORE DRIVE SITE PLAN Figure 2 i jk, N I'Laporte (BM5061/543) n �"'• ' ,I m • ••� • �"'• �J •'•- 5065 r541 :_"' u Golf Course O � ' '•I. - '�If. IIyhC'• ' n II .h( `•:: ;'•'::: .1: Gravel I. n� _—_ _ ..•.. cyS6 ______ �__ �+' ��ri:t O u Pits I Q o s .•:i\ °. '•—:� -1 s0 I c� _ �IlSubsta <. 1 ' it in a _ r gg 9 i ij�_--'i8a� +{ �T-- '�ad�o , North Yards COLO7AD( Refiner - �jtalp££' Ip, c� £L'F q4 ' ti -_ •Y'T4wer3.`^' � ❑�I �' ' 06 Downtown �\ ':- ��+ Fort Collins r .1� II.�i, par 1�. \Airpark £ l ; I • • It Caurse 'JCS©_j ...,-Sewage _.:-1 <••�:' Disposal.: \' L i J rsro ..:...:� 8M4954 _ UNIVER I t u Osp o JI• rPt�l I.30 F5065 ' n 4 Fri _I ' ---:Drive4. -__.Theate( _ cG c li 1. W LARIt1ER WINDTRAIL AT i /.. ..... •yo � o ' . a I !^ is =p96d i SPRING CREEK P.U.D. ll r; .I, 1 I ° DRAKt Drakes II _ I r —� .Gravel .a:.. ' Omera .'_• ` I' Pits 1 I 6 f•` 50e2 ,r5co C `Itf^�\ IL '��-- - . .. •t'. —. t \lam` \' NO SCALE SITE LOCATION Figure 1 Figure 7 shows the long range (2010) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. This project assumes full development of Windtrail, and development of the Centre for Advanced Technology, Parcel J as a townhome residential use. It is expected that there will be a connection to Centre Avenue to the east of Windtrail. The vehicles using this connection would likely be minimal (15- 30%). Based upon previous traffic studies for the Centre for Advanced Technology, there will be excess capacity on Centre Avenue to handle any vehicles that may use this route. At this level of development, it is likely that a signal would be warranted at the Shields/Rolland Moore/Parcel J Access intersection. This intersection will likely meet a combination of warrants. The City has been considering a signal at this location due to the high seasonal activity at Rolland Moore Park. When this connection to Shields occurs, it is recommended that the Shields/' Shire intersection either be closed or restricted to right -in/ right -out. If no median is placed on Shields Street, then closure is recommended. It is further recommended that when Parcel J is developed, a connection to Shire Court be made similar to that indicated in Appendix D. This will allow convenient access to the signal at Shields/Rolland Moore/Parcel J Access intersection from Windtrail, Hill Pond, and Sundering Townhomes. Table 4 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections using the Figure 7 traffic projections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix E. The Shields/Rolland Moore/Parcel J Access intersection will operate acceptably._ Minor street left turns at the Shields/Hill Pond intersection will continue to experience level of service E operation. However, the left turns from the east side of Shields will have alternative routes to the Shields"/ Rolland Moore/Parcel J Access signal or to Centre Avenue to the east. Conclusions This study analyzed the impacts of the development of land to the east of Hill Pond and Sundering Townhomes. The sight line constraints at the Shields/Hill Pond intersection should be corrected. With this additional development, operation at the key Intersections will be acceptable, except for minor street left turns in the short and long range futures. A signal will likely be warranted when the ParceL_,L�_ce_s.s__ta Shialds street_is__made.,. When this occurs Shire_ Street should either be closed or. access should be limited. It is recommended that Shire Court be connected_ to the Parcel J street system. 3 northbound vehicles on Shields Street, particularly those in the right lane. To the north, there is a street tree with multiple trunks. These multiple trunks cause a sight line constraint to see the sorthbound traffic on Shields Street from a stopped vehicle on Hill Pond Road. Since these are existing problems, they should be corrected. Minor adjustment of the median treatment and removal. of the multiple trunk street tree will improve these sight lines. Figure 4 shows the recent traffic counts along Shields Street and at key intersections. All of these intersections have full - movements and stop sign control. Since these counts were performed in different years, they were adjusted and balanced to depict a 1993 peak hour condition. This is shown in Figure 5. These key intersections operate as indicated in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. Minor street left turns experience significant delays during the peak hours. This level of service is primarily due to the high peak hour volumes on Shields Street. This type of operation. is common at stop sign controlled intersections along arterial streets. Table 2 shows the trip generation from�the Windtrail on Spring Creek PUD. The initial phase of development will be the Windtrail Townhomes in Parcel B. This parcel will be included in the short range analysis. Development of Parcels A, B, and C were included in the long range analysis. The trip generation was estimated using Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE as a reference. The short range trip distribution was assumed to be similar to that reflected in the latest traffic counts performed at the Shields/Hill Pond and Shields/Shire intersections. This is 60 percent to/from the north along Shields Street and 40 percent to/from the south along Shields Street. The long range trip distribution assumed that the travel patterns would modify somewhat, reflecting increased development in the southern portion of Fort Collins. The long range distribution used 55% to/from the north and 45% to/from the south. Figure 6 shows the short range (1995) peak hour traffic at the key intersections. This projection assumes that the background traffic on Shields Street will increase at the rate of 1 percent per year. This assignment assumes that access to Shields Street will continue at the Hill Pond and Shire intersections. The Shields/Rolland Moore intersection was not included in this analysis, since the east leg will not likely be completed in the short range future. Based upon these traffic projections, signals will not be warranted at either analyzed intersection. Table 3 shows the operation at the key intersections using the traffic shown in Figure 6. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The operation at the key intersections will not be significantly different than the current operation. Minor street left turns will continue to experience delays. 2 co MEMORANDUM 0 co To: John McCoy a c Kay Force, Jim Sell Design p a Fort Collins Staff o From: Matt Delich 0 z Date: December 6, 1993 w O Subject: Windtrail on Spring Creek PUD traffic study • (File: 9390MEM1) w D z w 'a This memorandum documents the findings of various traffic a analyses related to the development of the Windtrail on Spring > Creek PUD. The location of Windtrail is east of Shields a Street and south of Spring Creek. Figure 1 shows the location 0D of the site in the City of Fort Collins. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the site plan of Windtrail on Spring Creek PUD. Windtrail on Spring Creek PUD presently contains approximately 31.15 acres. The "College Park Student Apartments and Hill Pond Single Family Site Access Study," September 1991, evaluated the traffic impacts with development of this property as a single family detached development. That proposal contained 110 dwelling units. The current proposal Is for 65 single family detached dwelling units and 37 townhome dwelling units. This memorandum acts as an addendum to the site access study. This study addresses the impacts of Parcel B (the Windtrail Townhomes), shown in Figure 2, in the short range (1995) future, and full development of Parcels A, B, and C in the long range future. co ? The analyses contained in this memorandum assume that the °C Spring Creek Village, as approved b the Fort Collins P & Z P g 9 PP Y LU z Board,will be implemented by 1995. In the short range CD z future, the access to Parcel B will continue to be via Hill W UJ Pond Road and Shire Court. With development .of Parcels A and C, it is expected that street connections will be made to Shields Street at the Rolland Moore Park intersection and to c the street system within the Centre for Advanced Technology. a A schematic of the future street system is .shown in Figure 3.- W Parcel J of the Centre for Advanced Technology Amended Master a Plan (provided in Appendix A) is assumed to be developed as z medium density townhomes. The density used in this analysis was 6.0 dwelling units per acre (190 D.U.), which is rH. . compatible with the other townhome areas adjacent to it. _ 3 W a At the Shields/Hill Pond intersection (east leg), there = ~ are sight line constraints for vehicles entering Shields F~- Street The median separating the inbound and outbound lanes Q on Hill Pond Road creates A minor sight line constraint to the south. The minor street vehicle must "inch" out to see