Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOVENTRY SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY - 80 93 - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSA 26. Under Project Notes, please delete references to setbacks and note number seven as these areas are governed by Zoning Code. 27. As sheet two of two, the Landscape Plan should contain details and notes on fencing on Harmony and the screen wall on Hinsdale. 28. It would continue to be helpful, however, to keep information on gross size of site, number of lots, average lot size, gross density, and existing zoning on the Landscape Plan. 29. The size of the tracts would also be helpful to include on the Landscape Plan, and will be a requirement on the Final Plat. This concludes Staff comments at this time. Please note the following schedule for the January 24, 1994 Planning and Zoning Board meeting: Plan revisions are due January 5, 1994 P.M.T.'s, 10 prints, renderings are due January 18, 1994 It appears from the comments that thorough discussions need to occur with various City departments regarding a variety of issues. These meeting should not be delayed as the seven week review process does not allow much time to resolve issues. Please feel free to call if there are questions or concerns regarding these comments. Sincerely: Ted Shepard Senior Planner xc: Joe Frank, Chief Planner Kerrie Ashbeck, Civil Engineer width to meet A.D.A. After the bus stop and sidewalk connection, are located, it may be necessary adjust the location of the street trees to avoid conflicts. 21. According to the Zoning Code, pie -shaped lots like 50, 51, 60, and 61 require a minimum of 60 feet of lot width at the narrowest point on the lot where the structure is built. The narrowness of these lots may dictate that homes be setback from the front lot line a greater distance than is considered customary. Since this project is a subdivision and not a P.U.D., this requirement cannot be modified without obtaining a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals. 22. The Department of Natural Resources would like to work with the developer and the Stormwater Utility and Parks and Rec on the treatment of the 3.2 acre area. The following are concerns that need to be discussed: A. The landscape plan should show trees to be removed and existing trees to remain. B. It would be desirable to remove Russian Olives from the site as this species is considered a pest shrub with negative impacts on wetland areas and downstream areas.. C. It is preferred that smooth-brome grass or crested wheatgrass not be used to re -seed disturbed areas. D. It is recommended that native grasses and shrubs be used in this area. Shrubs can be low to help guide human activity and minimize disturbance to the wetland. Grass areas should be kept unmowed and natural to help water quality. Bare -root shrubs are appropriate. E. Plantings should be placed to buffer the developed lots from the wetland area. Lot 89 looks very close and may require special buffer treatment. 23. The landscape plan should include a preliminary fence design for the treatment along Harmony Road. 24. It is not clear where the path on Tract A connects to the community college. Is there a sidewalk system on the campus or a parking lot at this location? Please clarify. 25. The sheet titled "Preliminary Site and Landscape Plan" should be considered sheet two of the plat. Since the project is not a P.U.D., there is no site plan, only a landscape plan that accompanies the plat. As such, this sheet should not contain owner's certification, Planning and Zoning Approval, Project Statistics, or vicinity map. Solar Orientation information is required to be placed on the plat document, sheet one. P to dedicate 3.2 acres to the neighborhood park. The Parks and Rec Dept. has the following concerns: A. Parks and Rec would be willing to explore the option of receiving an area that lies south of the limits of the 100-year floodplain. This area could be used for a raw water irrigation pond. Parks and Rec is not interested in land that is within the 100-year floodplain. This area should be discussed with Stormwater. B. Parks and Rec would be willing to receive the area south of the 100-year floodplain under the condition that the developer retain the obligation to construct public improvements along Harmony Road and Crest Road. C. Parks and Rec is concerned that the folks who buy homes on East Bentley Place will demand a sidewalk be constructed on the east side of Hinsdale, along park frontage, prior to development funds being budgeted by City Council for park construction. This sidewalk gap must be addressed, especially since it leads to an elementary school. It is suggested that the developer consider building the sidewalk as part of the Coventry development with Parks and Rec reimbursing the developer for the cost at the time park development funds are budgeted. D. There should be a pedestrian/bicycle path connection between the park and Crest Road. This should be between Lots 99 and 100, or on the south side of Lot 100. 18. The Stormwater Utility has the same concerns as expressed at Conceptual Review. The size of the culvert under Harmony Road that feeds the 3.2 acre open space remains a critical issue. If this culvert is not sized properly, then stormflows from the northwest could overtop Harmony Road and flood the homes on the north side of East Bentley Place. It may be that this culvert needs to upgraded to a 6' x 8' box culvert in order to handle the storm flows and protect the single family lots. This issue should be resolved prior to consideration of the Preliminary by P & Z. Design of the drainage facilities can be done at the time of Final. Please contact Glen Schlueter, 221-6589, regarding this issue. 19. The Stormwater Utility is not clear as to whether the developer is proposing "onstream detention" or "offstream detention". Please verify as this will determine the size of the stormwater detention area. 20. Transfort needs a bus stop at the southeast corner of Harmony and Hinsdale. This bus stop must meet the requirements of the A.D.A. The exact location is to be determined by the City's Traffic Operations Department. The bus stop must be connected to the sidewalk on Harmony Road by a sidewalk of sufficient • 20 foot wide landscape and utility easement cannot be platted on the existing private easements. Please contact Susan Peterson to coordinate the location of landscaping vis a vis private easements. 7. The City Light and Power Department has a concern about providing electrical power to the lots fronting on Crest Road. Since there are no close facilities, sufficient advance notice should be given so that power can be brought to these lots. 8. Columbine Cablevision requests that Tracts A and B also be dedicated as utility easements in addition to open space tracts. 9. Also, Columbine Cablevision would like to coordinate with the developer and U.S. West about using a joint trench system for providing service to this subdivision. 10. The Engineering Departments of the City and Larimer County need to decide upon what level of improvements will be required to upgrade Crest Road. 11. Notes four and five on landscape plan should also appear as notes on the plat sheet. 12. The plat should also contain street names. 13. The utility plans should contain the following items: A. Typical street cross -sections should be provided. B. Six foot wide utility easement on Crest Road is not adequate. Front lot utility easements must be a minimum of nine feet. C. Utility easements are needed between Lots 92 and 93 for the 24 inch diameter R.C.P., and between Lots 74 and 85 for the water line. 14. The plan should indicate that the Traffic Study recommends a west bound left turn lane on Harmony Road for access to Crest Road. 15. The Poudre Fire Authority will not allow any home on Crest Road, beyond 900 feet of the Harmony/Crest intersection, to be constructed without an approved, residential, automatic fire extinguishing system. 16. Fire hydrants must be shown on the utility plans. All lots must be within 400 feet of a fire hydrant. 17. The Parks and Recreation Department would like to coordinate with the Stormwater Utility regarding the developer's proposal Commi y Planning and Enviror menta*rvices Planning Department City of Fort Collins December 22, 1993 Ms. Kay Force Jim Sell Design 117 East Mountain Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Kay: Staff has conducted its interdepartmental review of Coventry Subdivision. The following comments are offered: 1. The Public Service Company requests that utility easements be dedicated continuously around all streets. In particular, these easements should be continuous around Lots 78 and 79, within Tract A between Lots 41 and 56, and between Lots 35 and 36. Easement widths need to be sufficient to leave 13 feet from back of sidewalk to rear of utility easement. Normally, this means nine foot wide utility easements, not eight feet. The developer's consulting engineer should coordinate the location of the three foot high masonry screen wall with Public Service, U.S. West, Columbine Cable, and Light and Power so there are no utility conflicts. 2. The plat does not match the landscape plan. The plat shows nine lots on the south side of Park Lane while the landscape plan show eight lots. Please clarify. 3. Please select another name besides "Park Lane" as this duplicates existing Park Street. (Perhaps there is an important individual associated with the founding of Front Range Community College who could be honored with a street name at this location.) 4. U.S. West requests that a 15' x 30' easement be dedicated in the general vicinity of Tract A. This easement would be for three large telephone equipment cabinets. In general, it would be helpful to dedicate open space tracts as utility easements. 5. U.S. West also requests a utility easement be dedicated across the west side of Lot 56 for access to Lot 57. In addition, a utility easement should be dedicated across the south side of the park site for access to the lots fronting on Crest Road. 6. U.S. West has an existing easement along the south side of Harmony Road. This easement should be shown on the plat. The 281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750