The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOVENTRY SUBDIVISION PRELIMINARY - 80 93 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY_ MATTHEW J DELICH ARTERIAL PROGRESSION DESIGN - - RLN2 ROUTE HARMONY - INTERSECTIONS: 4 CYCLE LENGTH: 100 SYSTEM OFFSET: 0 1 BANDWIDTH LEFTt 37 56L RIGHT$ 37 5ec PERFORMANCE INDEX: 51 _ EFFICIENCY$ 3776 ATTAINABILITY$ 98 INTERFERENCE: 17 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO. .........TIME-LOCATIONDIAGRAM.......... DISTANCE SPEED RIGHTBOUND ... READ DOWN LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT 1 XXX)000000( _)00O0O000000OC( 2300 0 35 35 2 XXXXXXXX I ).000(XXX 2500 2300 35 ° 35 XX 3 X)OCXX(X 'Xxxxxxx 500 2500 35 35 4 X)00(X)OOK XXXXX)OOOOOOOCXX 0 500 35 35 - NO. OFFSET .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM........... PHASE LENGTHS LEFTBOUJD ... READ UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 25 XXx000000(XX 40 60 2 65 XXx >OOO(X)OOO(X)O(X 60 40 3 15 xx j )00OOCX)OOO$X)00( 60 40 4 25 X))00000(XX " X)0000000(XX)00( 40 60 _ -------------------------------------------- ^------------------------------ _ TIME SPACE DIAGRAM - -- ROUTE: HARMONY - . COMMENT: RUN2 - CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS:.SCALE IINCH-40X OF CYCLE: 1 LINE- 132 FT . ..rrrwwwwawwaarrrrwwrrwwrwwarrrarawrwrrawwrrrrrwrawwasrrrwwwwwrwrrarrarawwwv raaaw - T - 15M 2 A,ZsDAt-arxx)0000O( XXXxXxXXXx xxxxxxxxxx 3 MA;ii]O.A! X)Om, xxxxxxxxxx XXXXXX 4[Ipp)(ffi6� xx)o(x)ocxxo( x xxx)xxxxxx xxxxxxxx . rwraarasaawrrwrwwwawwwrwrwrarrrrrarraawrrrrr rwwwwrrr�rawwwraaaw►wwrrw wawarawawr - I _ MATTHEW J DELICH`. ARTERIAL PROGRESSION DEGIGN RUNT ROUTE: HARMONY INTERSECTIONS: 4 CYCLE LENGTHt 100- SYSTEM OFFSET: 0 BANDWIDTH LEFTI 30 56G RIGHT: 30 56C PERFORMANCE INDEX: 46 EFFICIENCY: 307 ATTAINABILITY: 80 INTERFERENCEt 20- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO. - .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... DISTANCE SPEED RIGHTBOUND ... READ DOWN - LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT 1 XJIXXX)OOOCX 2300 0 40 40 - 2 XXXXXXXXXX _ XXXXXX 2500 2300 40 40 3 - XX 500 2500 40 40' 4 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX 0 500 40 40 - NO. OFFSET .........TIME -LOCATION DIAGRAM.......... PHASE LENGTHS LEFTBOUND ... READ UP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 _ - 1 25 XXXXXXXX)OOOOX XXXXXXXXXX 40 60 2 65 XXXXXX XXXXXXXXXX 60 40 3 15 xX XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 60 40 4 25 xxxxxxxxxx XXXXXXXXXXXXXX 40 60 . -------------------------------------------------------------------------- . -- TIME SPACE DIAGRAM ROUTE: HARMONY COMMENT: RUN1 CYCLE LENGTH 100 SECONDS: SCALE IINCH-40X OF CYCLE: i LINE- 132 FT ' I SFlt X)OOO(o000000( XXX)OooaX 2 Nw3oALaXXXxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx 3 M45carV : xxxxxxx -- - - xxxxxxxxx, xxxxxx 4 eo - XXXXXXX�=xxx xxxxuxxxxxxx i xxxxxxxx }w!!lssw}!!}}jr}}!al+M}.}w}}+r}}}}}}}}}!}}!}}}}!}}!}►}!!!}}}}}*}}}}}}}s}.ss}}}}.} . i I No Text 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEO I{1TERSECYIONS Page -I Y YZZZYYYZYZYY%%YY%YYY%YFYYZYZYYYYZ%YZY%ZY%YYYYYY%%%YIZYYY%%YYYYYYYZZZ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ' AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR'STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...............:. .":t:.< 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... d NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST... ......:........ mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... '11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. an. ® 1995 l�n OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------- __________________________________________________________ INTERSECTIOtt-TYPE: -T-INTERSECTION ,. MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASIBU(IND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------- ------------------------------- --------------------- EB WB NB SB -'- LEFT 10 1 0 . THRU 0 -- 85 130 RIGHT 1-- 0 15r NUMBER OF LANES i EB WU' NB SB _______ ------- LANES 1 -- 1. 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE .. RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c.(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - V' LOS p M SH R SH _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ --- MINOR STREET, EB LEFT 11 700 700 > 700 > 689 > A > 717 > 705 >A RIGHT 1 956 956 > 956 > 955 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1 993 993 993 '992' A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... d NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS...... 11/10 am® 1995 on OTHER INFORMATION.... n 1985 HCM: 'UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 i;i;;;;};;;;K;;;;;i;;Y;;i;;;i;;;;;;;Y;E;;#;;;4;;i;;;;;Y;;i IDENTIFYING INFORMAIIUN .. AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET;. -30, PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION .........:..:......... *100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... d NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET- hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m-Id DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).:. ... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.................. am pm 1995 lonq OTHER INFORMATION.... - INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE:..T-INJERSECTION MAJOR STREET OIRECTION� NORTH/SOUTH . CONTROL TYPE--F.ASTBUUND: STOP SIGN 'i TRAFFIC VOLUMES - ------------------------------------ -------------------------------- E6 W6 NB 56 LEFT 10 -- 1 0 THRU 0 -- 140 95 RIGHT 1 -- 0 5 NUMBER OF LANES--- - -------------------------------- EB.... WB N6 SB ______________ _______ ------- LANES i --- •I 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY. CAPgC]TY. CAPACITY ' MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c: (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH --------------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR"STREET - EB LEFT 11 687 687 > 687 > 676 > A > 707 > 695 >A RIGHT .1 9951 .995 i > 995 > ' 994 >, ,A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1 1000 1000 1000 999 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... d NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 ;G�pni 1995 ong OTHER INFORMATION.... u 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Z #iXZiXiXZZXXX3•:X XXXXYXX#iX#ZXXiiiZZiYtYt................ ZtXXZZXi IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET'.. 30: PEAK HOUR FACTOR.... ................. .1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......... c NAME OF THE 'NORTH/SOUTH STREET ... ...i�hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST......':........... mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy):'..':.'. 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1995 ong OTHER INFORMATION.... - INTERSECTiON'TYPE AND CONTROL --- --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE:_T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES - --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB LEFT .- 5. . --- 1 0 THRU 0 - 95* -145 RIGHT 1 -- 0 10 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES •r \1 n� ' CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY 'MOVEMENT V(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 681 680 > 680 > 675 > A `v > 714 > 707 >A •,RIGHT 1. 943 943 > •943 > 941 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1 992 992 992 991 A ' IDENTIFYING •INFORMATION • i NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... c NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 ; em p® 1995 ong OTHER INFORMAT-ION.... v 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALI.ZED. INTERSECTIONS Page-1 X YYZXZZiX1Y iYi YYYZXz;ZiYYYizi{1iYXZZiZ#4 z{iXiZYY;YX;ii##z#XXY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------=-----=--------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STkEEI.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .................... 1 AREA POPULATION ........ ............:. 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... c . NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hinsdale NAME OF T,HE.ANALYST.................... mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/Qd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................... pm 1995 on OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL_ .. INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTIONS- MAJOR STREET OIkECTION:.NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN' TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- -E8. WB NO SB ---- _ ---- ---- LEFT 5 - 1 0 THRU-0• -- 150 100 RIGHT 1 --. 0- 5 NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SO ------- ------- -------- LANES CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET ' Ell LEFT 6 675 674 > 674 > 669 > A > 712 > 706 >A RIGHT 1 992 992> 992 > 991 > A MAJOR STREET NO LEFT 1 999 999 999 998 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... c NAME OF'THE NORTH/SOUTH'STREET.'... hlnsdale ' DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 am pm 1995 ong OTHER INFORMATION.... u 1985 HCM. UNSICNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 • X#X##XY#>Y1}#}}iY#X}}>YZX}ZY##Y#�Z»}iY#YY}}>}}}YY.}}YYXY#XY##YXZ#}#Y. ______________________________ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION POTEN- ACTUAL ' ------- ----------- --------------------------------------------------- FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED. RESERVE .,� RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH PEAK HOUR FACTOR.:.:.-.................. 1 ------- AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 MINOR STREET NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... b EB LEFT 6 668 �668 > 668 > 662 > A > 701 > 694 >A NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hinsdale RIGHT 1 932 932 > 932 > 931 > A NAME OF THE ANALYST-, :. ..... ........:.. mjd .MAJOR STREET DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 NB LEFT 1 990 990 990 989 A TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am 01995 OTHER INFORMATION-.... .. - •• IDENTIFYING INFORMATION INTERSECTION -.TYPE AND CONTROL .. '____________________________________________________________________ ..: ------------------------------------------ ------------------------- ` NAMES OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... b ' NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale ' INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 am(& 1995 ong " •. OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN - • TRAFFIC VOLUMES .. ,. .._ -------------------------------------=------------------------------- _ EB.--.• W6 ,- NB S6 ____ ___- LEFT 5 -- 1. 0 - THRU D -- 100 155 .. RIGHT 1 -- 0 10 NUMBER OF LANE$ ---------------------------- -------------------- --------------------- 7"• EB WB NB SB " -------- ------- ------ LANES ----- -- 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 _CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 i ;;iiiit;i;;i;t;ttii;;ii;i;iiiiii;;;ti;ii;;;ii;ii;iiitY;it;; IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ' POTEN- ACTUAL ---------=-----=-==---------------------------------------------- ---- FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE - - .... RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNWING SPEED. MAJOR STREET... 30 .. MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH PEAK HOUR FACTOR ......:............... I ------- -------- --------------------- ------------ --- AREA POPULATION .......... :........... 100000 MINOR STREET NAME OF THE-EAST/WEST.STREET.......... b EB LEFT 6 666. 666 > 666 > 660 > A > 704 > 697 >A NAME OF THE NOR1H/SOOTH STREET....... hi,sda lu RIGHT 1 987 987 > 987 > 986 > A NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. n.jd .. - .. MAJOR STREET DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 NB LEFT 1 999 999 999 997 A • TIME PERIOD ANALYZED........'.:......... Q pm 1995. long OTHER INFORMAT.ION.... • .IDENTIFYING INFORMATION INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------- ------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... b NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hins dale INTERSECTION TYPE: TTINTE$SECTIOt.4_ . - DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 ; a9 pm 1995 Qon OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR.STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH.; CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN - - TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- - EB WB NB SB.. LEFT 5 THRU 0 -' --. - 155 105 RIGHT 1. -.- .. 0 _. .5. NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------- ________________ _ -_--EB WB NB SB _______ _______ _______ LANES I -- 1 ------- i 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1• ;ZZ;;;;};>}}}}}aZ};Z.t4Z}};;Z};iZ}ZZ};i}Z}};;>}}i}>Z;;};}>}}i;;i} IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------- ------- --------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOk...................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 - NAME OF THE EASTjWEST STREET......... a NAME OF THE-NORTH/SOUTH STREET:...... hinsdale NAME OF 1HC:AMALYST...............:... mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............:.... am pm 1995 ong OTHER INFORMATION_:.— INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND:- ATOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES' - - -------------------- EB WB NB 58 ' ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 10 1 1 15 THRU .1 1 105' 165 RIGHT 1 5 1 20 NUMBER OF,LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------- - ---------- EB WB NB SB ------- .------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 1 1 LANE IISAGF. ( 10.• 1 TR - 0 A 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL •FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT,. SHARED - RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS . p M ... SH R SH ------- -------- -------- ------------ --- -MINOR STREET EB LEFT 1,1 633 623 > 623 5 6,11 2 > A'.• i THROUGH 1 713 705 > 647 705 > 634. 704 >A A RIGHT 1 916 916 > 916 > 915 > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 1 629 621 > 621 > 620 > A 'THROUGH 1 704 697 > 864 697 > 856 696 >A A RIGHT 6 989 989 > 989 > 984 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 17 999 999 999 983 A NB LEFT 1 987 987 987 986 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... a NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 au,a 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCMr WNSIGNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS .. Page -I aa.a>awaaw:a».».asaaxaa.a. wxaazar+aa>xs.aaaasz aaaaaaaaa as a>aaaaxaxawaasaaa' IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------- ---------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ................:.. 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET. a - ...• „ . NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST.....;......... mJd DATE.OF.THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. <ppm 1995 Tong OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE -AND CONTROL --------------------------------- —-------- ----------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EBWB NB 58 LEFT 20 1 1 5 THRU 1 1 160 •'1.1'0 RIGHT 1 10 1 5 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE" . ... E'B . W8 N8 SB ------- ---- - ------- ------- LANES 1 1 - 1 1 I ANF Ilc,n RF ... I TP I TO . CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE •RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY.. •GAPACITY - CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR -STREET EB LEFT 22 643 635 > 63 > 613 >�.A THROUGH , 11 727 725 > 649 72 S 625; 7,23 >A ,A„ . . RIGHT 1 982 982 > 982 > 981 > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 1 649 645 > 645 > 644 > A THROUGH 1 726 723 > 678 723 > 865 722 >A A RIGHT 11 _ 931 931 > 931 > 920 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 991 991 991 985 A NB LEFT 1 998 998 998 997 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... a NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 •AS pm 1995 ong OTHER INFORMATION.... ly 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS Paoe-1 1;;;##;;#;;}##a31;1#aa;i.♦#.as{a;#ii♦;.;1;.K;a;{;Z;;;#'a#t; a:i;;Y;;;;;;... ,r IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------`----------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ........................ 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony ,.r NAME OF THE N6R111/SOIITry STREET....... crest NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mnr/dd/yy):...•.. 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED., am® 1993 1995 ong OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTIOW TYPE.ANO CONTROL .. INTERSECTION TYPE:T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST" CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND.: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- LEFT 0 '15 5 THRU 544 764 0 -- - RIGHT 5 0 10 -- NUMBER OF LANES .. EB MB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 2 ,. 2 -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 1 I POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c - c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 6 88 87 87 82 E RIGHT 11 529 529 529 518 A MAJOR STREET ^ WB LEFT 17 636 636 636 620 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME,OF -THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony. NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... crest DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 am pm 1993 1995 tong OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALTZEO INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------- -----------i- --- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST-STREET........; harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... crest " NAME OF THE ANALYST:............ DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZE D...................pm 1993 1995 bong OTHER. INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPF AND CONTIt OL --------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE:T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION; EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN --� TRAFFIC VOLUMES '•' -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SE ---- — — ---- LEFT 0 5 5 -- THRU 816 391 0 -- RIGHT 5. 0 - 10 -- NUMBER OF LANES EB NB NB' SB - - ---- LANES 1 2 c2 -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW,, TIAL• MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph)' c (pcph) c (ptph) c = c - v, LOS p M SH R SH ------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT - 6 108 107 107 101 D RIGHT 11 368 368 368 357 B MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 6 459 459 459 454 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------- NAME OF THE EA61/14EST STREET...... harmony r'r� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... crest DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 ;(N)pm 1993 1995 ong 'OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSICNALI ZEE) INTEkSECT10NS Page-1 1i..*.......................... FZ112itS1211...............t;{YY3......... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... -harmony 'r NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... h.insdale NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m.id DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................. am 199's 199 long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION - MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN- ... ,TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 0 160 30 ", n THRU 504 683 0 -- - RIGHT 40 - 0 90 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------- ----------=------------------- EB WB NB SB _____ _______ LANES 1 '2 2 -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(Pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M I SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB LEFT 33 8266" 66 33 E 1 RIGHT 99 549 549 549 450 A MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 176 644 644 644 468 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 am® 1993 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION....-. -- 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paoe-1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE -------------------------------------------------------- Page-3 YXZiZ##ZiX#ZXXXZiXXZYiiX#J[ZZY##YZZZ#YYZX#iZZXYZZ#YZYYX#ZX#YZYZ#.ZYZZ# --'-------- .. .. .. . POTEN- ACTUAL IDENTIFYING INFORMATION FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT C. RESERVE --------------------------------------------------------------------- I<ATE CAF'AC LTY .CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 MOVEMENT vlpcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c.SH ..(Pcph) c = c - v R SH LOS p M --- PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 --------------- --------------------- ------------ AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 MINOR STREET " NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... I harmony NB LEFT 1. RIGHT 33 113 tIti 404 99 404 99 404 66 228 E �C NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET........ hinsdale - MAJOR STREET .. - -- NAME OF THE ANALYST.................. mJd WB LEFT 88 486 486 486 398 B DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/Yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ am pm 1993 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... IDENTIFYINI, INFDRMAIIUN - --- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL NAME OF THE NORTH/SUI)TH STREET.... hinsdal --------------------------------------------------------------------- DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS...... 11/10 : a}u pm 1993 1995 ong INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION OTHER INF0RMAl1ON.... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST.. ' CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -----"-----'-------------------------------------------------------- ' - EB WB NB SB ---' ---- ---- ---- LEFT 0 80 30 -- ... . THRU 735 352 0 -- RIGHT 40 0 160 -- - NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 - EB WB NB SB ------- -------------- LANES 1 2 ------- 2 -- . • 985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS UMMARY REPORT -- : sisiaaxiiai i<x..<a<alaaiax...Yai.K<x NTERSECTION..harmony/shields REA TYPE..... OTHER• NALYST........ mJd ATE: ......... IME.........an, m 1995 1onq -n OMMENT....... VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB 511- EB WB NB SB T 100 100 90 350 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 H 740 200 660 490 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 110 160 210 60 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 - TR 12.0 R 10 10 10 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -----------------7--------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M (i) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T 5 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 -0.90 10 N 25.8 3 B 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 B 0.00 1.00 N 0.:0_ 0.90 .: 10 N '22.6 3 B 0.00 1.40 N 0 0 0.4010 N 22.8 3 ---------------------------- ISIGNAL SETTINGS " - � CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-) PH-2 PH-3' PH-4 3 LT x x NB LT x x TH X• TH x RT X RT x PD x PO x 3 LT X x Sb LT x x TH x _ 1H X RT x RT X 2EEN 7.0 29.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 12.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 ALLOW 4.0 5.0- "'O.0 .0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SEkVICL LANE GRP. V/C 0C DELAY L0� APP. DELAY APP. LOS 3 L 0.053- 0.420 13.-11 •.26.0 D TR 0.899 0.310 27.5 0 3 L 0.053 0.426 13.1 6 16.7 C TR 0.394 0.310 17.6 C 3 L 0:037'=- -0.520 8.9 B 20.0 C TR 0.807 0.360 21.1 C 3 L 0.641 ' 0. 520 29.5 0 21.4 C TR 0.496 0.360 16.3 C ------------------------------------------------------------------------- NTERSECTION: Delay 21.7 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.755 L05 = C 1985 MGM: SIGNALIZED. -INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT a •" YiYYiKKKKYiiYYYYKKiiYiYiiiYYYiiY........... INTERSECTION':.harmony/shields AREA TYPE. -....OTHER ANALYST....... mJd DATE .......... 11/10 TIME ........ j:.am ®199 lon - COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY ES WB NO SB : EB WB N8 SB LT 80 190 105 300 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 400 540 650 740 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 80 460 170 100 : TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 10 10 10 10 : 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (Y) M Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 NB 0.00 1.00 - N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.8 3 SB 0:00 1-.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.8 3 ------------- -------------------------------- '--------- ------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS 1000 CYCLE LENGTH - PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x x NB LT X x TH ., X TH x RT x RT x PO x PD x WB LT x x SB LT x x TH x TH x ` RT " x: i RT i x PO x PD x GREEN 7.0 33.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 10.0 32.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0, ---------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS E8 L 0.053 0.460 11.,4 B 15.6 ..,C TR 0.448 0.350 16.3 C WB L 0.053 0.460 11.4 B 32.6 D TR 0.991 0.350 36.5 D . NB L 0.042 0.480 10.5 B 20.5 C TR 0.801 0.340 21.7 C SB L 0.686 0.480 20.7 C 21.6 C TR 0.809 0,340 21.9 C -------------------------------------------------------------------- iINTERSECTION: Delay = 23.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.770 LOS = C No Text 1965 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS- Page-1 xx....x.x...........aww..rxw.+..+r.xxass...............w...............xwx. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR._.: ................. 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... d ,NAME OF THE-NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hinsdale ,. NAME OF THEANALYST.................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS Uom/dd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am ri 1. 95 long 1 OTHER INFORMATION...: INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ' _____________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: -STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB. LEFT THRU 0 -- 75 110 RIGHT - 1 - 0 „15 NUMBER OF LANES ,. - - - - - - - - - - i EB WB NB sP __ I LANES i CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------- --------------------------- =------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT-. SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH - ..------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 1 111 727- 726 > 726 >1 715 > A.'AI > 743 > 731 >A RIGHT 1 977 977 > 977 > 976 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1 996 996 996 995 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... d NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale - DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 : am m 199 long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 .................. a.} ♦;..Yl;;;}##1;4t;.RM 1<F;4AR};l#;. A. 1. ).;Xi#;i;:#;;It! it IDENTIFYING.INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ............. :------- 1 AREA POPULATION...--... 100000 " NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... d NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH,STREET........ hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.................. pm 1y9 - OTHER INFORMATION.-..,.,- •" INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUNU: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES - ------------------------------------- ------------------------ EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 10 -- 1 0 THRU - 0 -- 120 BS - RIGHT 1 - -- 0 5 NUMBER OF LANES —'EB - WB 'NB56 _______ _______ ____-_- LANES CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL 1 I FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE, CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ -- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 11 713 712 > 712 > 701 > A > 731 > 719 >A RIGHT 1 996 996 > ,•• 996 > 995 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1.' 1000 1000 -' 1000 999 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION �• ••� _____________________________________________________________________ NAME"QF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... d NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 pm 995 long - OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: IINSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 1I.}}}}}it}}};4ili!<}A#4i4}}}}}};i}}}}}iiti;i ti}}}}}}i}i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------- — — -------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET 30 ,I PEAK HOUR FACTOR....'..........'....... 1 AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... c NAME OF THE NORHUSU01H STREET....... hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST... ............... mjd � DATE OF THE ANALYSIS_(mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................. am pm 995 ong OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T_-INTERSECTION 'MAJOR STREET -DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH... CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES � -------------------------- --------------------------------------- EB WB NB SE ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 1 0 THRU 0 -- 05 125 RIGHT 1 -- 0 10 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------- --------------------------------- EB WB Nb Sb ---------------------------- LANES ...... 1 -.. 1.- 1 . I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY. CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(Pcph) c (pcph)l c, (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p 'M ' SH R SH .t I ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 706 706 > 706 > 700 > A > 739 > 732 >A RIGHT 1 964 964 > 964 > 962 > A MAJOR STREET NB. LEFT 1 995 995 995 994 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ... , ----------------------------------------------------------- ---------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... c NAME OF 111E NORTII/5O11TH STREET.... h.lnsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... II/10 ; am long •'1� OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: 'UNSCGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 }Z}ZZTZZZi}#}Z}#Y}#Y}}#i}i}#i}ZZZZZ}}i}i}}Y}1<}.F}}}}.t1}##YY#Z.}t}YZZ} IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR.-_— ................. 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... c NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.. .... hin>dale NAME Of THE ANALYST.... ni,ld DATE OF THE ANALYSIS. (mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 ' TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................... an pm 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECT WN-TYPE-ANR..CONTROL INTERSECTION lYC•E: T-INIEk4;EC11ON MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SO(ITH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------- EB -146: NS Sft . LEFT . _.51- -- 1 0 . THRU - •� 0 -- 130 90' RIGHT 1 -- 0 5 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------------------------------- Eb Wb IJb SE; ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SEkVICE Page-3 ---------------------- -------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH k SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 6 700 700 > 700 > 694 > A > 736 > 729 >A RIGHT 1 995 995 > 995 > 994 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1 1000 1000 1000 999 A 1 1 IDENTIFYING.INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EASI/WE SI STREET...... c NAMF Of IIIE NOklll/S0tllll SCkCEI.... hlnsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... I1/10 an pm 995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1, 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ;tLLL1}LIaLL}t};Y#Ll);;LL{.RIL;>}l.;;L#I...... Lll;#L;w#;;;L;LLL♦ IDENTIFYING. INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOk........... ............:. 1. AREAPOPULATION ......... :....... : .: 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... b NAME OF THE NOR TH/bOU TH STREET..', hinsda le NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)'.':.... 11/111 TIME PERIOD 'ANALYZED............,.- am m 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE ANO CONTROL - ------------- ________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION"TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIkECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUME`_. . EB. Wb N8 ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 -- 1 0 THRU 0 -- 90 135 RIGHT 1 --- 0 10 NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------------------- ______________ Eb WU, Nb ' Sh ------- ------- _______ ------- LANES CAPACITY.AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------------ -------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINQR STREET EB LEFT 6 694 693 > 693 > 688 > A > 726 > 720 >A RIGHT 1 953 953 > 953 > 952 > A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 1 993 993 993 992 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------- _----- ________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... b NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 ; am m 1995 long " OTHER INFORMATION.'... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTEkSECT1ONS Paq, I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -- -- -- -- - - -- - - - - — - - - - - - — — - - — - - - - - - AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE'EAST/WEST STREET......... b NAME OF THE NORTh/SOUTH STREET....... hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST....... :....... ... .."m,jd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).,,, TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pug 19U5 long OTHER.INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECT LON. TYPE: 1-INTERSECTION. MAJOR STREET DIRECTION:.NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOLINU: STOP SIGN . TRAFFIC VOLUMES--------------------------------------------------------------------- - EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- LEFT 5 _ _ 1 0 THRU 0 -- - 135 95 RI6HT --1 0 5 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------- __________________________________________ Eh WB Nis �G ------- . ------- _____.__-______ I. LANES i 1' I CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET Ell LEFT 6 692 691 > 691 > 686 > A > 728 > 722 >A RIGHT 1 995 995 > 995 > 994 > A MAJOR STREET NB�'LEFT 1 1000 1000 1000 999 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... b NAME OF THE'NORTH/SOLITH STREET.... hinsdele DATE AND •'T1ME OF THE ANALYSIS'..:.. 1I/10 a , pm 99 long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UN SIGNAL I2ED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING 1NFokMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... a NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... . hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m"jd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS '(mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED.'... :': .....:': an, 995 OTHER INFORMATION.'... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET UIRECTION: NORTH/SUOTH CONTROL PYPE•EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND! STOP SIGN — ' TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB 140 N8 SI. ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT AD 1 1 15 THRU I " 95 145 RIGHT 1, 5 1 20 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ' ---------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SF ------ -------------- LANES 1 LANE USAGELTk LTk 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT" v(pcph) c (pcph) C (PCph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------ ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET E0 LEFT 11 658 648 > 648 > 637 > A THROUGH 1 738 730 > 672 730 > 659 729 >A A RIGHT 1 937 937 > 937 '> 936 > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 1 653 645 > 645 > 644 > A THROUGH 1 730 722 > 880 722 > 872 721 >A A .,� RIGHT 6 995 995 > 995 > 990 > A MAJOR STREET . SB LEFT 17 1000 1000 1000 984 A NB LEFT 1 990 990 990 969 A IDENTIFYING .INFORMATION 1 ------------------------------- -- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... a NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 : am �1995 long OTHER INFORMAT-ION.... 1985 HCM: ONSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-I • i#Z#}#}#}#Y}}Y}}}}A.}}IY#1}X}}}YYX}}}}{}Y}}}}1}.X}}}.}}X }4}}}Y}YYYY}l#} IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR .......... I.......... AREA,POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.:.:.:... a� NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hinSdale NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/YY).... _ 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. G Pm 1995 long' OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION . TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE -EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------ ------------------------------------------ EB WB ' NB "S8 LEFT ' . 20 1 1 - -5 THRU .1- - 1 140 100 RIGHT 1 10 1 5 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- .. ._.. E8, WB 'NB :.B ------ ------ ------ ------ - LANES . . 1 1 1 1 n nir I c;^rF i ?h Tr. CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 -------------------------------------------------------------- ----- - POTEN- ACTUAL . - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY • CAPACITY MOVEMENT V(Pcph) c (pcph) c (PcPh) c (Pcph) c = c'' -'v LOS'' p M SH R SH MINOR STREET DEB LEFT 22 669 661 > 661 > 639 > A THROUGH 1 753 750 > 675 750 > 650 749 >A A RIGHT 1 992 992 > 992 > 991 > A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 1 675 671 > 671 > .670 > A THROUGH 1 751 748 > 900 748 > 887 747 >A A RIGHT 11 952 952 > 952 > 941 > A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 6 994 994 994 988 A NB LEFT 1 999 999 999 998 A IOENTIFYING INFORMATION --�'---------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... a NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 ; au pm 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNAL. IZEU INTERSECTIONS i##YF}}Yi}#i!#wi�a.wwwiitYii}}YYiYi}}iFFtiiltiYYawwwii Faae-1 ti i.li#iFF#w#i CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE _Page_3 - ---- - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION POTEN- ACTUAL ___-__________________________________________________________ - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE --• -.. .. .. .. RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNN1116-SPEED, MAJOR -STREET.. 40 MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - S LOS• -- p M SH R SH PEAKHOUk FAGTOf(. .................... 1 _______ ________ _________ ____________ ____________ AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 MINOR STREET NAME OF THE EAST/WESI STREET......... harmony NB LEFT 6 83 81 > 81 > 76 > E . . . "11 . I > 172 > 156 >D NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREEI....... crest RIGHT 11 393 393 > 393 > 382 > B' NAME OF THE A14ALYST.................. mjd MAJOR STREET DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mni/dd/yy)...... 11/10 WB LEFT 17 460 460 460 443 A TIME PERIOD ANAL IZEU................. en. ( C,,,).1993 9v• l ong OTHER INFORMATION.... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION INTERSECTION TYPE ANDCONTROL ._____________________________________________________________________ ------------==------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... crest INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 an.(q 1993 199 long OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: 'STOP SIGN „y TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------- --- 7---'--------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ____ ____ ____ ---- LEFT 0 15 5 -- , THRU 815 1186 0 - -- RIGHT 5 0 10 - NUMBER OF LANES - - - EB WB 'NB, 56 _______ _______ _______ LANES 1 1 1 ------- -- 1965 HCM: IINSI(,NALIZED IIJTERSECTIUNS Page-1 axxx x..www+++w x.+..+s..x.+x. x.xx... ........xxx....x+w. +++x......... I DENT I F YI NG. I NFCiRMA i I UN ------------------------------------------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET..- 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ........... :.:........ 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......,.. harmonv NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... crest NAME OF THE ANALYST..: ................... mid r DATE OF THE ANALYSIS {.mm/dd/yy)...... 11/10 . TIME PERIOD ANALYZED....:........:. 1 pm 1993 995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-TNTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ' EB WB NB SE, ---- ---- ---- ---- .LEFT 0 5 5 -- THRU 1215 -" 570 0 -- RIGHT .....5 0 10 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------- _'__:_---___-_---________--_____-_--__ EB WB NB SB ------ ------- -------------- LANES 11 1 -- I, CAP AC 11TY AND LEVEL-CIF-SFkVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------- ______________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------ -------- --- ----- ------------ ----------- --- MIWk STREET ` ••• NB LEFT 6 83 82 > 82 > 77 > E > 144 > 127 . >D RIGHT 11 Z30 Z30 > 230, > 219 > C .. MAJOR _STREET WB LEFT G 281 281 281 t 276 C"I IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmonv NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... crest DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 ;C9)pn, 1993 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALI-ZED INTERSECTIONS Faae-1 i..*..*1Ziitilla liiiiiiatii.iiiitii.il.;iiii.tii).i.iiiliiiiiii♦ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION - ------------- -------------------------------------------- ---------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED- MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ........................ I AREA POPULATION ....................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH;SOLITH STREET....... hinsdale NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m-id DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mu,/dd/yy)...... 11/16 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. au, pm 1v9.i 199b long OTHER INFORMATION.... ,I INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------------------------"----_----------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INIERSECTION MAJOR STREET QIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP' SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES. ------------------------ ------------------------------------------- Eb Wb NB Sb LEFT 0 1.50 25 -- ' THRU 735 1040 0 - RIGHT 0 .,0 ._ 85 -- NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------------------------------------------- Eb Wb NE; SI: ..,i ---------------------------- LANES 1 -'1 2 -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R. SH ------------------------ ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET Nb LEFT 28 83 62 62 35 E RIGHT 94 441 441 - 441 348 B ( MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 165 512 512 - , 512 347 8 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION %, .,., NAME .,OF 1THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... II/10 bu.0 1993 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEU INTERSECTIONS Pace -I Y##{YYYY IY Flt#if#.}f#t!t##4#�#f-l#}.A.4♦}>lf.f}.!llll tf##tw#tf Y####..R#}}!}Y# IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 PEAK HUUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 1000OU NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmonv NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hinsdale NAME OF THE_ANALYST.. i............... m.jd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (nm/dd/yy)..— - 11/10 .TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ....... ::........ am ph. 1993 995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ----------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND. STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------- --------------------------------------- EB WF NB SB LEFT — O .. 75,_.. 20 THRU 1070 506 0 -- RIGHT 0 0 .150 ;t -- NUMBER OF LANES ---`----- ------=------------------------------------------------- Eb Wb Nb `.iP• _______ _______ _______ _______ LANES 1 1 " I CAPAC I TY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page="3' _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SM " M114OR STREET NB LEFT 22 83 69 69 47 E RIGHT 165 281 281 281 116 U MAJOR STREET Wb LEFT' 63 341 341 341 258 C IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/10 am pm 1993 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... t I 985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS - 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS UMMARY REPORTSUMMARY REPORT 111fY;1;1;Y1111\{1}1I:iA...... ...................... t}}i!1! 111{{11}#;i#;11#111111111}}}#11#}1Y1#}#ilti}}i1111}11;ii1}#11i1111111iii1. NTEkSECTION.. harmony/shields INTERSECTION.. harmony/shields REA TYPE ..... OTHER '''- AREA TYPE ..... OTHER NALYST....... mJ d """ I ANALYIST....... m.ld ATE ........... J.;l10 ...._. DATE.....-.... I ME........ �. en. -I pn1 1995 long TIME..........am q/ 1995 long OMMENT...'.... ..... .. .. ... ., COMMENT.'...... ----------------------------------------------------------- --------------- --------------------------------------- VOLUMES --------------------------------- ---' GEOMETRY VOLUMES _ GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB' EB WD NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB T 70 65 35... 295 L 12.0.,. L -,J1 .0 L. 12.0 L 12.0 LT 55 140 45 240 L 12.0 L 12.0 ,L 12.0 L,, . 112.0 H 530 100 445 330 iR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 TH 296 400 445 490 Tk 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 80 115 145 20 12.0 R 1:1.0 k 12.0 k 12.0 RT 55 320 120 55 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 .R 5 72 72 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 RR 5 72 72 10 12.0 12.0 _ 12.0 12.0 -- 1Z.0 12.0 I?.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENI FAC1Ok:, -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV, _.,ADJ_PKG BUSES PH PEDS PED. BUT. Akk. TYPE GRADE HV AOJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE M (X) •- Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T M (%) Y/N Nm- Nb Y/N min T B 0.00 1.00""'N "0 0 0.90 10 N 25.6 3 EB 0.00. 1..00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 IB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0-.90 - 10 N 25.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 IB - .0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.8 NB0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.6 3 iB 0.00 1.00 N 0 - 0 - 6.90 10 N 22.8 3 58 0.00 1.00 N :0 0 0.90 10 N 22.8 3 .------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 100.0 PH-) PH-2 -PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 :8 LT x Nb I.T x _ EB LT X NB LT x TH x TH x TH X TH x RT x RT x RT x RT x PD x Pb x PO x PO x 18 LT x SB LT x WB LT x SB Li x TH x TH x TH x' TH x RT x RT x RT x RT x PO x __ .: .. PD. x PO x PD x ,REEK 37.0 0.0 "0.6 0.0 GREEN .5i.0 0.0 0.0 .10.0 ,GREEN 37.0 0.0. „O.0 0.0: GREEN 53.0- 0:0 0.0 0.0 'ELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0.YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 =------------------------- ---- --------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE - LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C (t/C DELAY L(I API' Ort AY APP. LOS LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS :B L 0.162 0.390 15.1 C 35.9 D EB L 0.853 0.390 60.7 F 22.2 C Tk 0.980 0.390 38.21 1) TR 0.553 0.390 16.0 C IB L b. T93 0..390 444 E 22.6 C WB L 0.512 0.390 16.9 C 16.8 C - T 0. 159 0.390 12.8 6 T 0.636 0.390 17.1 C R 0.081 0.390 12.4 B R 0.467 0.390 15.1 C IB L 0.076 -0.550 8.0 E. 8.9 8 N8 L 0.149 0.550 8.4 B 9.0. 8 T D. 502 0.550 9.3 B 7 0.502 0.550 9.3 B • R 0.097 0.550 6.9 B I R,, 0.054 0.550 6.8 8. lB L 0.938 0.550 39.5 D 22.6 C SB L 0.719 0.550 17.2 C _ 12.0 B T 0.372 0.550 8.3 B I T 0.553 0.550 9.8 B k 0.013 . 0. S50 6.6 6 I .R 0.060 0.550 6.8 B .--------------------------------------------------_ NTERSECTION; Delav= 23.3 Ise./veh)' V/C = ---------------------- 0.956 LUS = C I ------------------------- INTERSECTION:' ------------------------------------------------ Delay = 14.5 (sec/veh.) V/C = 0.77.4 LOS B I APPENDIX D 1985 HCM: UNSIGNAI.I7EU INTERSECT I ON Page-1 :.......................♦ .. .............. z u.0 ..... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION .. .. . AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 .PEAK HOUR FACTUk...................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 1110006 NAME OF THE EAST/WES1 3TkEET....; ., HAkMiINY NAME OF IHE'NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... crest NAME OF THE ANALYST ................:.. m.Id DATE OF IHE ANALY'Ib ((.uu/UJ/YY)...... I1/1:/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ............. :..%,am pm 1993•. OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION -TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECT -ION: EAST/WEST - CONTROL TYPE NOk1HBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------- EB WB .. NP• - SE. LEFT -0 10 5 THRU 736 1052 0 -- RIGHT 5 0 -- NUMBER OF LANES •) EF WI. NB 51. _______ ______________ ------- LANES 1 1 -- CAPACITY ANDLEVEL_OF_SEkvIf.E----------------------------------Pe--- -- - POTEN- ACTUAL - FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENTSHARED' RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcph) c (Pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET NB LEFT 6 83 82 B2 76 E RIGHT' 6 413 413 413 468 A ' MAJOR STREET WR LEFT 11 508 508 SOB 497 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... HARMONY NAME OF THE NORTH/SOLITH STREET.... crest DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/12/93 ; am pn 1993 OTHER INFORMATION.... u 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALI<Ef- INTFT:P.ECTION. ♦;>A;tl;;;All;l;aY.wl;4llttt-t;t!{!♦t-;;.t\lt;t,t.. 4.l;ttlttl;l+!!•t;, Al; IDENTIFYING INFORMATION _____________________________________________________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPCED- MAJOj_STREET 40 PEAK HOUR FACTOR...."" ............... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREFJ...... .., HARMON'i NAME OF THE N&OH/SOOTH STREET.. rre t. NAME OF THE ANALYST......... "....... nl.i cl DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).".... TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ .(an��pm 1993 OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL - ---------------------------------- ____________________________________ INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION "-- MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES:. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Eh W0 N6 SE LEFT _-_0.,, -=-5_ 5 . THRU 1094 574 0 -- " RIGHT 5 0 10 -- NUMBER OF LANES - --------------------- ________________________________________________ EB WB NF >R _______ _______ -------- -.._"._-- LANES t t 2 -- CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF-SERVICE _________________________________ Pb9�-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAP'AC I TY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph)'O (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p ------- -------- --------- M , ------------ SH R SH ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB„j_EFT, 6 83 82 82 77 E R.�CiH7 11 246 248 248 237 C MAJOR STREET WB LEFT 6 327 327 327 321 B 'IDENTIFYING ,INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... HARMONY NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... r-rest DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 11/12/93 G.pit. 1993 OTHER INFORMATION.... 9 1985 MCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-] CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page,' ;i>il......a..♦#•#1.1R}#tl.All..... A.#l.•#}ll#A1111###t#ll♦#Fl1 ______ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION POTEN- ACTUAL --------------------------------------------------------------------- FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY AVERAGE RUNNING SPEEO..MAJQk STREET,. 40 MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c ,(pcph) c - c - v LOS .. p M SH k SH PEAKHOUR FACIA .................... . 1 ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- AREA POPULATION ............... *....... 1000U0 MINOR STREET NAME OF THE EAST/WEST °.TREET......... harmony NB LEFT 21 83 72 72 51 E '•^- - ,s RIGHT 63 473 473 - 473 410 A NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET........ hinsdale MAJOR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. .. mJd - ' WB LEFT 106 545 545 545 440 A DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..': .-t•. 11/10 ' TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ........:........ am pm 1993 1995 long OTHER INFORMATION.... - ..... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------- INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL-- --------��--r--- NAME OF THE r----------i---------;--------------------- EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony. -------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... hinsdale DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... ll/10 an.1993 1995 long INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION ... - OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST - CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------- - EB WB NB 58 -- - LEFT .0':. 96 19 -- THRU 684 961 0 -- RIGHT 0 0 57 - NUMBER OF LANES .. ------------ ------------------------------------------------------ .. .. EB WB NE. 5B . ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 ------- 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEO INTERSECTI(N$ Paue-I .....#Z2#Zi1t!#Rlillikil.i.{l#}i;id1F}#♦.#Y}4#\{llltlal{{!{{1#tlR1{.{... _CAPACITY, AND LEVEL-OF-SEkVICE Paue-3 - IDENTIFYING INFORMATION POTEN- ACTUAL ---------------- --------------- ---- ------- ---------------------- ----- FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE " kATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY c, AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 40 MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcoh) c = c - v LOS .. p M SH R SH PEAKHOUR FACTOR ..................... I � � -----'- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- AREA POPULATION ............... I....... 100006 MINOR STREET NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STkEET......... harnior,v NB LEFT. 8 94 83 83 75 E RIGHT 114 306 306 306 192 D NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... hinsdale MAJOR STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST ...:.............. m.id - WB LEFT 63 369 369 369 306 8 DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mn,/dd/yy)------ 11/10 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. an pm 993 1995 long - .. OTHER INFORMATION...... .•,._. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL: ------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony --' NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... hinsdele 11/10 an, ni 993 1995 long INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION OTHER INFORMATION.... MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOC'UMES --------------------------------- ------------------------------------ - - - EB W8 NO S6 - 1 . --- ---- ---- - LEFT 0 57 7. - -- THRU 1000 472 0 -- RIGHT 0 0 104 -- - NUMBER OF LANES ------------------------------------------------- 7------------------ '-' EB - WB NE. SF . ------- ------- ------- LANES 1 1 -------- 2 -- - 1985 HCM; SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS " SUMMARY REPORT - ' - ' . ' • • I : siaYiYYt}iYa}a}xasxsxx}s.....YYaxxs}aYr}xxx.x}}xaxx s xsaaasassata}xaiYf siaa INTERSECTION.. harmony/shields- " 4REA TYPE ..... OTHER•- 4NALYST....... m_Id,-. - - )ATE .......... 10/9/93 TIME......... em pm 1992 1995 1997 ;OMMENT...... 70 --10 ---_----------____________________________________________________ VOLUMES _ GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB -T 50 51 29 264 l 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 453 79 387 293 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 3T 68 93 127 12 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 2R 5 72 72 10 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG" BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARk. TYPE (Y) (Y) .,Y/N Nm 'Nb YIN min T 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 4B 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 VB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.8 3 38 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.8 3 ------------------------------------------- ---------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 , '_B LT X N8 ':LT x TH x TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X 48 LT. X SB LT X TH x TH x RT x RT X PO X PD x 3REEN 37.0 0.0 -0.0 0.0 GREEN 53.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 FELLOW 5.0 'D.'0 0.0 0.0 'YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- L'EVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. VIC G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS `_B L 0.107 0.390 14.8 B 22.4 C TR 0'836 0:390" 23.1 C 48 L 0.358.0.390 17.0 -.0 14.1 B T 0.126 0.390 12.6 B R 0.040 0.390 12.2 B VB L 0.058 0.550 8.0 6 8.5 B T 0- 43-7 0,550 8.8 B R 0.073 0.550 6.8 8 5B L 0.705 ' -0.550 16.2 C 11.9 B T 0.330 0.550 8.1 B R 0.O(13. -0.550 6.6 B -------------------------- ---------------------_---------------_-------- INTERSECTION: I -Delay -14.6 (sec/veh) V/C 0.759 LO5 B 1965 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT }}iYY}iiiiYYYYYi}iYYYYY}}}iY}}YYY}}}Y}iY}}}iYiis}i}}i YsiYY}Yi i1[}}sxY} "11 INTERSECTION..harmony/shields AREA TYPE.'.:..OTHER ANALYST ..... ..mJd - DATE ..........10/9/9' TIME.......... am m 1992 1995 1997 COMMENT....::..201 __________________________________________________________________________ nl VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB S8 LT 33 115 34 209 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 239 327 392 424 : TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 44 284 99 27 : 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 5 - 72 72 10 : 12.0 ,12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------- ----------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV AOJ PKG BUSES PHF PEGS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (X) (X) YIN Nm Nb YIN min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00. N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 22.8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH 100.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD PO x WB LT X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X 1 PO x 1 PD x GREEN 37.0 0.0 0.0 -0.0 GREEN 53.0 0.0 0..0 0.6 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------ LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP.. V/C- G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.262 0.390 16.0 C 15.0 B TR 0.451 0.390 14.9 B WB L 0.357 - 0.390 16.7 C 15.4 C ' T 0.520 0.390 15.6 C R 0.399 0.390 14.4 B NB L 0.091 0.550 8.1 B 8.6 8 T 0.442 0.550 8.8 B j R 0.036 0.550 6.7 B SB L 0.531 0.550 11.9 B 9.9 8 T 0.478 0.550 9.1 B R 0.023 0.550 6.6 B INTERSECTION: Delay = 12.1 (sec/veh) VIC = 0.527 LOS = B i _. �_ a i i LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level-of-serv-ice for signalized intersections is defined -in terms of delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. `Specifically, level -of -service criteria are stated In terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for a 15-minul:e analysis period. Level -of -service A describes operations with very low delay, i.e., lees than 5.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service B describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service C describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to.25.0 seconds per vehicle. -Level-of -service D describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service E describes operations with delay in the range of 49.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. Level -of -service F describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptable to most drivers. UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF EXPECTED DELAY TO RESERVE CAPACITY SERVICE MINOR STREET TRAFFIC 40U A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 2UO-299 C Average truffic delays 10U-199 U Long Irnffto delays. U- 99 E ;Very luny traffic delays * . F *When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lone, extreme duI aye will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion,effoul:lny other traffic movements in the intersection. This oondition usually warrants. improvement to the intersection. No Text CiTiY OF :CRT COU IiAS site Ccca : C000102 Street: N s-; E -'W Street: RAR.KXY RD-. feather SU9;jYP9AR4- Ncvenens hv: ?riury ---- W E -2 2 ---- — --------------- ---- — -- — ------------- — — — ------- — — — - PE."K Pcil-CO, VIALYSB, FCq IBE ?PiC-D: 01:30 F'm - N SI AR71 ........... FRO 'IOUR :AC7.,j "-)S Ii.t T,rj Le;: -cza': r -i f — — - — ----------- — — --------------- — ----- — ------------------ — A ------------- 'JI.-S 5 27 12-1 2143 :40 12 :13: 4 0 op .1 31 2 2.4 ,7 2 39. :.I r :.n 3., SHIELDS ST. N W—+" . . . . . . . . . . . . S- . . . . . . . . . . . . . 709 . . . 6 27 [PEDS, 424 209 . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 P E DIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . 660 284 . . . . . . . . . 388 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . HARMONY RD. 726 327 1 33 115 239 316 HARMONY RD. . . . . . ... . . . . . . . ... . . . . . 547 . . . . . . 44 525 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . [PEDS . . . . . . . . . . . 34 392 99 4 P E DS 583 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . SHIELDS ST. 9F F0,R CU MS 'RAF..0 3ir.8:cii.`iC Si'e Cc:e . 000901C2 PA.:, ! II-S,reef: SH'H'r5 Si, FI:E: 1.12 i6?2 E-W Straet: IIA;iMCB•i 80. Weather S0'IPPA49 Navuecs by: Priaar DAi=: 10/20;12 PEA.( ^ iCO AIi;,iY,. S KR 'HE r RiC?: i:30 AN - 08::: AN Ci;iEC'i011 S-Ali EAn i'R V11LUXES ,I.II.....I .I.... %:-.:YiS ....... FRC9 EAR riCUR F.AC;CR PEOS yi? ihr� le.[ io,31 EsS 31; v, le?: -------------------------------------------------------------- +crt` i:.0 AN C.%i 2 ` 12 293 2c ? 7:30,V %I 0 ?3 .'i: 22. - 2 35 2: :,:ire '.a:er:::; 0 =2= :l , I , SHIELDS ST. ..... N I- , I I .. 530 [PEDS ] 2 12 ; 293.; 264 ;.........°....; 0 [PEDS ] .................. , -- 569 ---- -- 93 120 ... HARMONY RD. 223 79 50 — — 51 ------- ----- ' ---------------=— 453 571 HARMONY RD. ... --- ------ ; .................. i 844 ........... 68 — -- 543 ---. .................. [PEDS ] 3 ............. 29 387 .; 12.7 ; 1 [PEDS ]. 412 � , I ;...; SHIELDS ST. ; -14ATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS Observer Date ?1-5 0�-3 Day �l/ sDAY city , _OC'T edLL /4-J-3 R = Right turn ,p INTERSECTION OF - m ('U S /q< V AND ��Ai2R�f O N S� S = StraightL = Lett turn B GINTIME BE -GIN I 14i.v s 1J A e- from SOUTH None South 010 y l7�oQi2 a-c o.UY TOTAL West TOTAL ALL tram NORTH tram EAST I trom WEST R I S I L I Total II R I S I L I Total R I S I L I Total II R S L I Total 73o II I I' 11131 I Z- 1 Z-o II Za 1114.1 3 1 11 1 II z 2i�;- I Z17 334 13s4.. 74t p I II3Z 1 2- 1 3 4 II 34 11 I zs1131 ! 38 118 L¢( 1 1 z49 1 38-7 14-2-I II I I Ilz� I Z 1 30 II 3C> II IIz-T1Z31'/5-o11$ IZ-771 z2rsp•.43s114-6as s.11 I I 112� I IZ-1 II Z 10& 11$11z4-II Co z67 Z7313q 7 II4z4 �30-�3011 I I.. IIle)4 1-7 1 111 11 1A.1 1 .. 1472-1s71 sz i IIZ4 11000 11oz¢ 1166311 r&(,> II I_ I II I I f II I I I I I I I I II r.. I I II I I I II I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I I I I I I I I I I 4-3011 I I I li4 IS► 19 11 1q I 114Z11-71 Zoe 11 1 11G( I I t&z1 37/ 11 390 5 II I I I l i4 I I 1 5 1/> I Izs-1 1/6l Z&7 14 1i54 1 11 s? 14 zs 1144-0 Soo II I 1_ lilt I 15 I t& 11 l (a z&S133 1Z 9 16- 1r5iI 1 1 / 3'l0 14?4- 11ag00 5 1 14-'74- 15-00 II I I I II I I F 11 I11I 7<o 17% 9bl h� ►os71I►3 �4 lb)w7 ►�s4-111�30 . I i , f .. - � i indicated by the level. of service for minor street left turns, the delays can be significant during the peak hours. If the City of Fort Collins desires to have a traffic signal along this segment of Harmony Road in order to maintain vehicle queues, this location would fit into a progression pattern. The time -space diagrams shown in Appendix F indicate that a signal at Hinsdale Drive would have no negative= impact to Harmony Road progression. The time - space diagrams indicate a number of travel speeds on Harmony Road. The progression bandwidths are primarily controlled by. the amount of Shields Street and College Avenue green time.for Harmony Road. III. Conclusions The following summarizes the significant findings as a result of this study: Traffic from the McGraw Site and other existing uses in the area can be handled on the area streets with various improvements. Traffic operation at ,the area intersections is acceptable, except for minor street left turns at stop sign' controlled intersections along Harmony Road. The delays experienced by these drivers are normal at stop sign controlled intersections along arterial streets during peak hours. At the short range future (1995),. the key intersections operate acceptably,.'except for minor street left turns to Harmony Road. At the Harmony/Hinsdale and Harmony/Crest intersections, the northbound left turns will experience delays which are common at arterial/local street intersections with stop sign control. The following auxiliary lanes.. exist at the Harmony/Hinsdale intersection: 1) eastbound right -turn lane, 2) westbound left -turn lane, 3) northbound right -turn lane, and 4) northbound left -turn lane. At the Harmony/Crest inter_s_ect__i__on_, a westbound left -turn lane on Harmony Road is recommended.. At the long range -future (2010), the key intersections will operate acceptably, except for the same northbound left turns at the Harmony/Hinsdale and Harmony/Crest intersections, which will experi-ence some delays. It is expected that Harmony Road will be built to four lane cross sections. The same auxiliary lanes shown in. the short-range recommendation should be provided in the long range future.. - While a signal is :not likely to be warranted at the Harmony/Hinsdale intersection, if the City desires to introduce a signal alone Harmony Road .in order toymaintain traffic queues, this location would not negatively impact progression. 11 Table 4 Long Range (2015) Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM • PM Shields/Harmony (signal); C C - Harmony/Hinsdale (stop sign) NB LT E E NB.. -RT C A WB _ LT B A Harmony/Crest (stop sign). NB :LT - D E NB RT B - A WB. LT A A Hinsdale/Intersection A (stop sign) _ EB LT/T/RT A A WB LT'/T/RT _ A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Hinsdale/Intersection B (stop sign) EB LT/RT A A NB LT A A Hinsdale/Intersection C (stop sign) EB LT/RT - A A NB -LT A A Hinsdale/Intersection D (stop sign) EB LT/RT A A NB LT A A o �o „ c -160/460 (n „o, to -+ " 200/540 100/190 f 670 1300 130/161 f- 745/1455 HARMONY ROAD r— 5/15 100 80 -- 1400//60 - ! 40/40 1555/15/5 y 740/400 110/80�� in CD 0 o no 000 c rn "N � °< W A o �-10/5 O NOM. NOM. Q %— �2 C 20/10 } W NOM. - i n V id NOM. 000 - _ N Ln Ln CD in Ln _ f 1 } NOM.5 —4� zn to ^ Jol ` 5/5 NOM. Ln zLn W qC =u co o �Qn � � PM IrnAht Rounded to nearest ' 10/10 5 Vehicles. NOM. o Ln . z� 0 v. LONG . RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 to its full width. However, both east and west of the McGraw Site, the south side of Harmony Road is not improved. West of the McGraw Site is the Front Range Community College Campus, and east of the McGraw Site are some smaller land parcels. It is uncertain whether these property owners will improve the .south side of Harmony Road to a full arterial cross section. This may need to be accomplished as a capital improvement project by the City of Fort Collins. If the frontage along Harmony Road were improved, it would be striped to function just as the current cross section functions. There is merit in improving the south side of Harmony Road from Shields Street to the railroad tracks at one time rather than with piecemeal construction projects. Therefore, it is'recommended that this development participate in the overall improvement of Harmony Road when funds become available for the entire segment to be improved from Shields Street to the railroad tracks. Figure 6 shows the long range (2010) peak hour traffic assignment.. which includes the background traffic on the area streets. Table 4 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix E. By this future time, it is expected that Harmony Road and Shields Street will have four lane cross sections as per Fort Collins arterial street standards. The intersection approach geometry on both Hinsdale Drive and Crest Road should be one left -turn lane and one right -turn lane. The Harmony/Shields signalized intersection will operate at level of service C. With the 2010 volumes and the wider cross section, an eight phase signal will be required at this location. The Harmony/Hinsdale and Harmony/Crest stop 'sign: controlled intersection will operate acceptably, except for left -turn exits from the minor streets. The 1985 Highway Capacity Manual analysis technique shows this operation to be at level of service ::-E. However, the range of delay per approach vehicle will be 16-26 seconds in the morning peak hour and 21-31 seconds in the afternoon peak hour at the Harmony/Hinsdale intersection, and 11-21 seconds in the morning peak hour and 14-24 seconds An the afternoon peak hour at the Harmony/Crest intersection. These delays are considered to be at level of service C/D. This level of service occurs at many arterial/local street intersections throughout Fort Collins. This :type of operation is generally accepted. With the four lane cross section on Harmony Road, a right -turn deceleration lane, and a left -turn deceleration and storage lane are required on Harmony. Road at Hinsdale. At the Harmony/Crest intersection, a. westbound deceleration and storage lane is required on Harmony Road. E. Harmony/Hinsdale Signal Hinsdale Drive is approximately- 2300 feet east of Shields Street. Based upon the traffic projections shown in this study, a traffic signal would not be warranted at the Harmony /Hinsdale_ intersection: .However, as observed during traffic" counting and asi. 6 Table 3 Short Range (1995) Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Shields/Harmony (signal) C _ B Harmony/Hinsdale (stop sign) - NB LT E E NB RT D _ B WB LT C B Harmony/Crest (stop sign) NB LT E E _ NB RT C B WB LT C A Hinsdale/Intersection A (stop sign) ' EB LT/T/RT. A A WB LT/T/RT A A SB LT A A .. NB LT A A Hinsdale/Inters.ection B (stop sign) EB LT/RT A A NB LT A A Hinsdale/Intersection C (stop sign) EB LT/RT A A = NB LT A A Hinsdale/Intersection D (stop sign) EB LT/RT A A NB LT A A N CD 115/320 cM C N M N — 100/400 500 1040 — 570/1185 85/140 HA ONY ROAD /— 75/150 5/15 755 -1 1070 35 r 1215 815 5/5 r I I 355/30 I 530 290 -� 80/55 a to CDN m �a � LO o 10/5 W I f NOM. Q I� 1� � /� NOM. � N 20/10 EliW G - NOM. ;j'n :j U W NOM.� zoz N n - �Ln in rn n 5/5 } NOM. - s o\ z ,n - n - - Ln N CD 5�5 } NOM.� o LO c zo - n W �W co 0 n� _ LO ,AM / PM Rounded to nearest 6 Vehicles. ` 10/10 . NOM. -� 0 zo. _ SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 5 Hinsdale Drive, and Crest Road as they are today. The analyzed intersections were Harmony/Shields with the existing signalization, Harmony/Hinsdale with stop sign control, Harmony/Crest with stop sign control, and four intersections-arong Hinsdale Drive with stop sign control. The intersections along Hinsdale Drive are labelled A, B, C, and D in Figure 3. The current traffic counts (Figure 2) reflect the use of Hinsdale'Road by Clarendon Hills residents. A cursory analysis indicates that the Harmony/Hinsdale intersection is primarily used by northbound to eastbound and westbound to southbound vehicle trips. It appears that trips to/from the west and from the north (via Shields) are utilizing the Shields/ Clarendon Hills Boulevard intersection. This is not surprising since that route is much easier than using the Harmony/Hinsdale intersection.. As reported in the neighborhood meeting, left turns from Hinsdale to Harmony are difficult. This is reflected in the current level of service of .this movement. The background traffic on Hinsdale Drive does not reflect any change in this travel behavior. Figure 5 shows the short range (1995) peak hour traffic assignment. This assignment also includes a 2 percent per year increase in background traffic as described earlier in this report.= Table 3 shows the peak.hour operation at the key intersections'. Calculation forms are provided 'in Appendix D. All of the key intersections will operate acceptably with the existing geometrics, except for the northbound left turns from Hinsdale Drive and from Crest Road to westbound Harmony: Road. These turns will operate at level of service E. Based upon recent research, the delay per_ approach vehicle will be 19-29 seconds during the morning peak hour and 21-31 seconds during the afternoon peak hour at the Harmony/Hinsdale intersection, and the delay per approach vehicle will be 15-25 seconds during both peak .hours- at the Harmony/Crest intersection. ' Using delay criteria; the operation of these left turns would be in the level of servile C/D category.even though the operations technique shows the level of service in category E. 'It is recommended that this operation be accepted. At the Harmony/Hinsdale intersection, the following geometry is required: 1) eastbound - one through lane and one right -turn deceleration lane;. 2) westbound - one through lane and one left -turn deceleration/storage lane; 3)'northbound - one left -turn lane (100. feet) and one right -turn lane; and 4) southbound -one lane. This geometry was: constructed with the development of the McGraw. Elementary School. At the Harmony/Crest intersection, a.westbound left -turn lane on Harmony Road is' required. This lane can be: accommodated on the currently paved area of .Harmony Road. As part of the development of thi.s.property, the City, of Fort Collins will..require that one half of the Harmony Road larterial cross section be built along the frontage of this property. The full arterial width is 70 feet. The north side of Harmony Road has, been completed as a requirement of development on the north. Therefore, approximately 1700 feet of Harmony Road will be built 4 N Figure 4 B. Background Traffic Background traffic is defined as the traffic that is and/or will be on the area streets that is not related to the proposed development. The intersections considered -for the operations analysis are Harmony/Shields, Harmony/Hinsdale, and Harmony/Crest. Background traffic for impacted streets was projected for each of the future years.analyzed (1995 and 2010`). Background traffic was projected to increase at 2 percent per year for all future years. This rate of increase is normal for streets and roads in the City of Fort Collins. It accounts for general traffic growth and some level of continued development in the vicinity that would also contribute to traffic growth. Traffic from two developments were specifically added to the background traffic. These were Arapahoe Farm and Fossil Creek Estates, which is currently going through the planning approval process in Fort Collins. The Fossil- Creek Estates Site Access Study was submitted in October 1993. The Arapahoe Farm Site Access Study was submitted to the City on April 1, 1991. An amendment for Arapahoe Farm Townhouses was submitted October`23, 1993. There are no other major developments proposed which would cause_a dramatic increase in traffic, in this area in the short range. future. Should a major -development occur which nullifies this methodology, then the traffic study for that development should reflect both the proposed development and the projections as reflected in this site access study. In the case of traffic studies for future developments, the traffic projections in this site access study become part of the background traffic for that development. C. Trip Distribution Trip distribution was determined based upon an evaluation of attractions for home -based productions and the most likely routes available to travel .to those attractions. The directional distribution of the approaching and departing traffic generated at the proposed uses is a .function of: - Geographic location within the City of Fort Collins - Location of employment and business centers which are likely to attract trips. from this area Access to the site. Figure 4 illustrates the trip distribution percentages used in the subsequent'traffic assignments. D. ` Traffic Assignment.and Intersection Operation Using the vehicular trip generation estimates presented in Table 2, the site generated traffic"was assigned .to the area street network:. The network consisted,of Harmony Road;, Shields Street, 3 CREST ROAD Parcel. 2 • East Lee11 D.U. ._._..._._ ...�.. PARK -SITE Dar el 2 WSCHOOL- S 1 D. B C D NSDALE �Rl vE - 7,\7 Parcel 1 North Parcel 1 41' D.U. ; South 34 D.U: SITE PLAN J «Z NO SCALE Figure 3 Table 1 Existing Peak Hour Operation , Level'of Service. Intersection AM PM Shields/Harmony (signal) B B Harmony/Hinsdale (stop sign) NB LT E E NB RT D A WB LT B A Harmony/Crest (stop sign) NB, LT E - E NB RT C A WB LT B A Table 2 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M.,Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Parcel 1 North of Ditch - 41 DU 390 8 23 27 15 South of Ditch - 34 DU 325 6 19 22 12 Parcel.2 Access to Hinsdale - 180 .4 10 12 7 19 DU Access to Crest.'-. 11 DU 105 2 6 7 4 Total j 1000 20 5$ 68 _ _ 38 .� c, N O 93/284 N W) CO�- c'' C4 79/327 _ �, 51/115 HARMONY ROAD 5OX33 } 453 239 v cv c" 68/44� CIOrn 1992 W Q H co ' O J W 2 N f 472 961 _ �-- 57 96 1000/684 — 24/13 —� rn� 1993 C W - Z II. .Existing Conditions Peak hour intersection counts were obtained in 1992 and in October 1993. These counts are shown in Figure 2. - Raw data is shown in Appendix A. Since the peak hour of a residential development occurs at the same time as the peak hour of the streets, counts were obtained at 7:30-8:30 AM and 4:30-5:30 PM. These times do not correspond with peak times for elementary schools. However, -analysis of the morning counts and conversations with the count technician indicate that some. traffic ;between 8:00 and 8:30 AM was school related traffic. Traffic was -not counted at the Harmony/Crest intersection. The traffic shown at this intersection was- estimated using trip generation and trip distribution for the existing dwelling units along Crest Road. With the existing control at the key intersections, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. This operation is deemed acceptable, except for minor street left -turns from Hinsdale and Crest. Acceptable operation is defined as level of.service D or better. Descriptions of level of service from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual for signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Appendix B. Calculation forms for the opera-tion shown in Table 1 are provided.in Appendix C. III. Proposed Development Colorado Land Source,, Ltd. is proposing to develop 105 dwelling unit lots on a parcel of land south of Harmony Road and on both sides of Hinsdale Drive. A schematic site plan is shown in Figure 3. Eleven lots of the McGraw Site will access Crest Road to the east. In addition, the City of Fort Collins may build a park bordering the.McGraw Elementary School on three sides. It is expected that the park and school uses will be complementary, sharing parking facilities on the school site and the park providing recreational uses for school functions. Typically, during the school hours and peak hours of the street, the activity at the park will be minimal. Two future years were selected for analysis. The short range future was 1995 and the long range future was 2010. It is assumed that this development will be built out by 1995. A. Tr-.p:Geaeration Trip. generation estimates for, the McGraw Site uses were obtained from Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE. Table 2 shows trip generation on a.dai,ly and peak hour basis. 2 '. r isa /,. ! --�. �y'-��'7x( xx // F�� •�qp� .. a I_. 'A �3•� .• �LJI11Fy1.. .A. '� I/-'I(`�I�a ,Par 1 Golf I „ ,I •Ti• /,- -t� S w e I- "'< h; Course. nl _ fo Di sal=.1•—tC. u htt -•� - ' J o L�n�. .�-�a y - i (ry��p� =UAL_' _ �� 15/^ O lBM 4954 50 AD gg p y l8 ,n 17 I 1 UNIVER YTW I4�- Li ,I` II - t=2f ;., I • 5065 l r �•. I. �t 1`' 1544 1 StadH es ium l `� N>�=a h 3; Ieatf ; 1 (-`- ?D -�� 9�11 2�9 LAHINIEP 2_31 -- I - 19 - ravel:. — > Dnve�l�l'• -.1' ,yr'�';. aPd o, I• Pit. �.�• IThealrl. rakes \ 1 - • " i p 56 irnS 95,1 j 2taf.�a ��_ -27----- 25 llrB 09 'i ea F_ _[ Pits Ome�.j � r549 t [i I � D,,Y `In IIIIl. � 7l 'I�„ �a .,i � - �--_a'.•\`+rLl � .• / � �i-pII 1 Lake 3;i( I� • �I �4 3d - 35 ¢ �:_;� 36 _— -- .anyon II � ,.. � I, � � "-�--•—,Gravel .l t7 DamA:•-;.I I Pit J �... Mc Clellanc�s Q • 11"9` Harmony I I 1 HARMONY ROAD mmfa I I � I, rl / I��; II U I I'W 1 •ill / 5` i j/ IM W L �a 5f III 3 ' MCGRAW SITE - I 4918 12 / 7 TI'ilby ja NO SCAT F SITE LOCATION Figure 1 I. Introduction Colorado Land Source, Ltd. i-s proposing a residential development located -on both sides of. Hinsdale Drive and south of . Harmony Road in.For-t Collins, Colorado. The site location is shown in Figure 1. This is known as the McGraw Site, named for its proximity to the recently completed McGraw Elementary School. Most of the 105 dwelling units will access Hinsdale Drive. However, there are eleven dwelling units along Crest Road to the east. The roads which will' be impacted by this development are Harmony Road, Hinsdale Drive,_and Crest Road. The key intersections that will be impacted are: Harmony/Shields, Harmony/Hinsdale, and Harmony/ Crest Road. Harmony Road is classified as a major arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plana The segment between Shields Street and College Avenue is three lanes with a rural cross section on the south side and curb and gutter on the north side. Harmony Road widens to four lanes with an urban cross section from the railroad tracks to College Avenue. The segment just north of Front Range Community College_ is striped as one eastbound lane and one westbound lane. There is signal control at the Harmony/Shields, Harmony/Mason, and Harmony/College intersections. All other' intersections are stop sign controlled with Harmony Road receiving the right-of-way. In the future, Harmony Road is expected to have a four lane cross section with turn lanes at appropriate locations. Harmony Road is posted at 40 mph in this area. Shields Street is classified as an arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. It is a street of varying width south of Drake Road. It is proposed to have a four .lane urban cross section with turn lanes at appropriate locations in the future. It is posted at 35 mph near Harmony toad. Hinsdale Drive is not classified and is considered to be a local street: It has recently been:.completed from the Clarendon Hills development to Harmony -Road. -It is two lanes wide, except at Harmony Road where there .are northbound right- and left -turn lanes. Crest Road is a local street serving 8 dwelling units. It has a rural cross section with one lane. in each direction. It is a cul-de-sac street. area are residential, school, and open are east, north, and south of the McGraw Community College is west of the •site.` - and. a future !park is surrounded. by this Poudre School District stores some school Land uses in this space. Residential uses Site. The Front Range McGraw,ElementarySchool residential development.' busesA n this area. 1. RECEIVED NOV 17 1993 AtNGR�G,t= HCGRAW SITE SITE ACCESS STUDY FORT COLLINS,.COLPRADO NOVEMBER 1993' Prepared for: Colorado Land Source 9085 East Mineral Circle, Suite 200 Englewood, CO 80112- Prepared by: MATTHEW J.. DELICH, P.E.- 3413 Banyan Avenue, - Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 303-669-2061