Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCOVENTRY SUBDIVISION FILING ONE FINAL - 80 93A - DECISION - MINUTES/NOTES• • • Planning and Zoning Board Minutes April 25, 1994 Page 15 Member Winfree cited that half the curbcuts were Crest Road and the shared looping driveway access to the development and neighbors to the east. Motion carried 7-0. 'l - eliminated on were positive Member Klataske stated his conflict of interest in regard to this plan. Ms. Whetstone, Project Planner, read the staff report including a slide presentation. Linda Ripley - Ripley Associates, representing Charlotte Jorgensen and Bill Neal. She said there are storm water concerns which need further study for location of an easement through the site. The applicant is working with the City on this. She explained the plans for the project with 4 d.u. per acre and that the site was appropriate for single-family. Bart Nelson - Vice President of the Pleasant Valley Lake Canal Company an irrigation ditch that crosses this property, showed the Board his concerns for drainage and the change of the original right-of-way and easement across the property. He was concerned about drainage problems in other developments of the area. He stated that his ditch company would not be liable for any damages caused by the development because the developer does not notify the prospective buyer of potential problems. The canal bridge at Prospect has a tremendous amount of runoff (he understood that the Choices 195 will widen this) and needs to be addressed.. He mentioned chemicals that could be washed to the ditch and contaminate it as a concern. What are the subdivision requirements above the canal with regard to storm drainage? He read from a detailed report. He said the Federal Government's Cold Water Act must be considered. Ms. Ripley stated that the developer will be working with all parties concerned with regard to this issue. xember Fontana commended the plan especially the density and recommended approval of the amended Pairbrooke - overall Development plan, #65-828. Member Strom seconded the motion. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes April 25, 1994 Page 14 (1) the disparity of the size of the lots along Crest Road in relation to the county size on adjacent tracts. Some landscape medians and private driveways would serve the residents for landscape buffering along Crest Road. The Brookwood Homeowner's Association endorses that idea. (2) The Clarendon Hills Homeowners Association supports an effort to bring about a park sooner than projected year 2000 for development. There have been meetings with citizens, and the developer with Parks to create a park with funds from the homeowners and developer. He described the detail of the park with fields, courts, tot lots, etc. and a detention facility which would eliminate some function in the park. The Parks and Natural Resources Departments agree this is not a feasible condition. The developer opposes this condition. CITIZEN INP_UT_, Bruce Heath - 4920 Crest Road - President of the Brookwood Homeowners Association - He referred to the PUD plan, he was concerned with access streets. His concern was with the amount of traffic to Crest Road and that the centerline be kept and brought up to City standards. The design is very nice. He was concerned with phasing of the development because of the detention pond problems and flood line. CITIZEN INPUT CLOSED, Member Cottier asked if this was to be brought to City standards or remain a County road? Mr. Shepard said the compromise was that Crest Road would be a 28-foot street (not 36 feet), sidewalk on the west side only, still determining the exact curb edge of the east side and remain a County street with improvements. Member Strom moved to approval of Coventry Subdivision, Filing one, Final #80-93A With the preliminary agreement conditions. Member Fontana seconded the motion. Member Strom commented for the record that the intent of the Board is for the road to align on the existing easement centerline. Member Fontane commented and applauded the effort to get the park before the year 2000 and the cooperation of the developer and neighborhoods working together. A very good example in the community. Planning and Zoning Board Minutes April 25, 1994 Page 13 Mr. Phillips said that "landscaped" rather than "grass" be used in the motion. Member Cottier felt that the owners of surrounding property bear the burden of not creating future problems. Member Strom amended the notion to include the Solar Variance, and that it be granted; that it was equal to or better than the plan rather than the letter of the ordinance. Members Fontane and Cottier indicated that was acceptable. Notion carried 7-0. Item 25. Coventry Subdivision, Filing One - Final 100-93A, Mr. Ted Shepard read the staff report with conditions, there is an anticipation for Filing 2 and staff recommends appLoval. The staff report does not include the standard condition of the timely filing of the utility plans and development agreements, that condition if the recommendation is approved. Chair Clements asked about the "centerline not be moved" issue of Crest Road agreement as requested by the Brookwood Neighborhood Association. Mr. Shepard said the Planning staff is working with the County Engineering Department. Mr. Mike Herzig, Planning Engineer, gave a brief summary with the developer trying to shift the centerline towards the east away from their property for room for driveways. Mr. Rex Burns of the County has been involved and stated it was okay to shift it. However, the neighbors on Crest Road would like it to remain. The most recent report is that it is shifted three feet off the centerline right-of-way. The Board can direct the developer through a condition. His professional opinion is that the street should be designed center on the current right-of-way, concurring with the Brookwood Homeowner's Association recommendation. Mr. Dick Kellogg - J. R. Engineering - reviewed the issue of Crest Road. Mr. Rex Burns was approached and stated that " the east property line was fixed, so that in the future, if the road was widened from 28 feet to the full width that the east full lane would stay constant and it would not move in the future." If the road is widened in the future for development, the west side would move correspondingly. That was their reasoning. Jim Sell of Colorado Land Source Limited, applicant, gave the presentation. He pointed out some concerns: v PLANNING & ZONING BOARD MEETING MINUTES April 25, 2994 Gerry Horak, Council Liaison Ron Phillips, Staff Support Liaison The April 25, 1994, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Board was called to order at 6:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers of City Hall West, 300 Laporte Avenue, Fort Collins, Colorado. Board members present included Chair Clements, Vice -Chair Jan Cottier, Member Fontane, James Klataske, Bernie Strom, and Lloyd Walker. Member Winfree was absent. Staff members present included Interim Planning Director Ron Phillips, Greg Byrne, Deputy City Attorney Paul Eckman, Jim Clark, Tom Shoemaker, Steve Olt, Kirsten Whetstone, and Carolyn Worden. IEA Mr. Ron Phillips, Interim Planning Director read the agenda review items. Consent Agenda: Item 1. Minutes of the February 28 and March 7, 1994 Planning and Zoning Board meetings, Item 2. Silver Oaks PUD, 3rd Filing - Final, #14-88L, Item 3. Columbine Care Center East PUD - Preliminary & Final, #12-94, Item 4. Country Club Corners PUD, 3rd Filing - Preliminary, #72-84D, Item 5. Windtrail on Spring Creek PUD, Phase 2 - Final, #66-93C, Item 6. Greenbriar Village PUD, 4th Filing - Final, #19-93G, Item 7. Prospect II PUD Amended Final, #82-79D, Item S. Stoneridge PUD, 3rd Filing - Final, 421-92G, Item 9. Best Western Transmission PUD, Lot 1 - Final, #15-93A, Item 10. Bennett Elementary School Site Plan Advisory Review, #13-94. Item 11. O'Dea Elementary School - Site Plan Advisory Review, #14-94, Item 12. Moore Elementary School - Site Plan Advisory Review, #15-94, Item 13. Resolution PZ94-3 Easement Vacation, Item 14. Resolution PZ94-4 Easement Vacation, Item 15. Modifications of Conditions of Final Approval, Item 16. Amendment to the Oak -Cottonwood Farm overall Development Plan, #54-87N. Recommendation to Council: Item 18. Robert Shields Annexation and Zoning,. #19-94A and Item 19. Strachan Farm Annexation and Zoning, #18-94. Discussion Agenda: Item 20. Recommendation to City Council for Certain Amendments to the Land Development Guidance System and Chapter 29 (Zoning, Annexation and Development of Land) in regard to the Addition of Water Conservation Standards and Guidelines for Outdoor Landscaping and Irrigation Systems, #17-94, Item 21. K & M Rezoning, #17-94, Item 22. Hillcrest PUD - Preliminary, #6- 93A, Item 23_ Westbury PUD - Preliminary, #11-94, Item 25. Coventry Subdivision, Filing One - Final, #80-93A, Item 26. Fairbrook PUD - Amended Overall Development Plan, #65-82Z, Item 27. Waterglen PUD - Preliminary, #71-93A, Item 28. Referral of an Administrative Change, Lot 25, Paragon Point, #48-91J.