HomeMy WebLinkAboutINDIAN HILLS VILLAGE PUD AMENDED FINAL - 81 93C - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSA �r
Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
ALL CRITERIA
APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
- Is the criterion
applicable?
CRITERION a a.Q
u LL Z
' a �
Will the criteria
be satisfied?
If no, please explain
Yes
a
No
Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA
1.1 Solar Orientation
I I
I
I ✓ZA
1.2 Comprehensive Plan
4� U
1.3 Wildlife Habitat
I I I✓
1.4 Mineral Deposit
II ICI
I
1.5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas
reserved
reserved
I
I I
1.c Lands of Aericultural Importance
I
1 I
1.7 Enerov Conservation
1.8 Air Quality(✓
I
I
1. ✓ Water Qualitv
I I
I
I I
1.10 Sewage and Wastes
I 1
I I
I
111 Water Conservation
I✓I
1.12 Residential Density
I 1 V
I V I
I
A 2- NEIGHBOP,HOOD COMPATIBILITY
CRITERIAI
2.1 Vehicular. Pedestrian. Bike Transoonation
I i
I I
I
2 2 vuiidinc Placement and. Orientation
I✓ I
! I
I
2.3 Natural Features
I I✓I
I
2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parking
I ✓I
I
I
2.,; Emergency Access -
IV/1 I
✓ I
I
2.8 Fedestnan Circulation
I IV/1 I
✓
2.7 Arc; Jtecture
i I VI
I
2 8 3uiidino Heicnt and Views
2.9 Shading
2.10 Solar Access
I I I
I
I
2.11 Historic Resources
I I I I
I
2.12 Setbacks
2.13 Landscaoe
11 I
I
I
2.14 Slcns
I I 1
I
I
2.15 Site Lighting
I I
2.1 o Noise and Vibration
I A I
I
2.17 Glare or Heat
IV/1 I,
2.18 Hazardous Materials
I I
I
A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA
3.1 Utility Capacity
3.2 Design Standards
3.3 Water Hazards
3.4 Geologic Hazards
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised h 1994
U5�
-61-
EAST STUART STREET
GRAPHIC SCALE
wssa a.sc-[r.s. ua�s �s'euo
THE REPLAT OF
LOTS 35 - 43 AND TRACT B OF INDIAN HILLS VILLAGE P.U.D.
SITUATE IN THE NW. 114 OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH,
RANGE 69 WEST OF THE 6TH. P.M.,
CITY OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO
_^au✓.s.ea.. u. are.rr.rsm_w___
PHniEZ H/LEL /K/¢�
(caJ7 �-6J
m.
pOY040 IrROUpn
Rli fEMLF [a' 1{i)
•dbMYO1l4 i1/JRrlfi
.}S17WiE
1EIrOtliMr SONfS Y �
II U WR
ro oMEa rwrx.
I19A14 prrnry�m
MIOUprt MCN GJE J
`HASEII
(UlR f14p-Iqh '
ELSIeC TrRFS -N.RL• —/
%a�r�sua� aR I®eTfn
acauiJlG�ilpa�(sFf
Pewnpnwr AMltnun>
LOC p - p M VIw1M1
c
INDIAN HILLS VILLAGE P.U.D.
PLANTM LEGEND
G 1Y COMMON K4ME BOTAN C?L NAME SYMBOL
4fee
arm
/
;OF, ��
• ,ice
{•.
��
0
- �
A
0• f• yr
Y
rf �
,t2 /
cgs .
■per 4q-...
f// /%/-
_
1
"�sjyi
w 9�f
-•^Tt.-�. ,//per/I•
[NOSING IHIOSCME alJFli yaalG 116rJ
MgPERIY IYIE n10-150 T.m - 5#viOn EIrR
f. Tr.�ew.mrMYOIeCrM1v IM.ewl prYrsbl[YON
�raers« w r r s...rs�.s r. Lyrlaabl eY rrNea
46.w 1Y:t YNMnswYA Ya TY.INpr yVM
Wr..Y: Nr tY.ln {'/:P:r. labw r r usr /N. r
wrllY. Y t. W wb tarry iwe�V d0 r 9 M.f:
tun t0.. Ytl M� ya.. OL . IowY sro °I ll' Yews:
a:�/tom N 0..1 WMr Y r.lrr.we.
L [wrsry er.M Yw.l.awsa.e.M.4s'r s.1. eO..>
.Yrm Yw r Nat r re wr r r. Ls.Ys.r Yr r w
rw r. rslta ros�.NT.
� Jr.nM..rmrwtr.r.rwrr.rrnaY.w_
wrwr�rmere wr.�w �.a: _war w.N e..°,
s ^r ways
--'rEN TNfFS
EXIST G
BG$L.y \ •c al/ IRI
\ CO6 sWu
RT
w L.rer°ersYl. Yrre
IM Ns-4N11 ivf tl.W V
r.a.s war:-MrYer woaa
�•rw YY I1.JipM
Tm orrrw.. Jaass
•....r. Yrme.rr �.r w,y. r��Yw•M. wr+.s
IME
,� NaMe FAsI �F ASSf emC Off)/SHADE TREES
IXISTNG CMOPY/9WDE TREES
M SrAQrs yyfy Ip(,US (To Ds preserved)
IWrCF MAE FVPENEN[F
02 STREET ('GMNfUNG--Y 4inimum Caliper
Lve6Tie[ CONIRCTOR slLLll CnLL (Large canopy/shade Treas) �y/
fort A InTw¢ aR EY6lMG LmIQ w r:eN: Ir+ n« - T�+w rNee
Ar rles Lnnol asps fOMSaOCrtpr .o z T,,rr,I aaeenuarer u:eee I r m city
e - E
(n CA, R.. Coli ,
6} •(Small/AY LANE PL,WIING Y Minimum Caliper
—:ar wMy (Yrrtox z na) (SmaNl Shade Trees)
L� JO xerNN.r I::em _ rn;e rse neaw..°'...
s.e.n u.n a0. a°..ee. xob
EXISTING T.H 11 EVERGREEN TREES -6' Mmlmum H6gh1
' ff Ou/.OI°OI antis OqO
6 B4e 5«..re p— pu.gen0
n pn &M. m a 62 ORNAMENTAL ACCENT TREES- 1 1/27 1a 1 3/4• Lhnimum Caliper /iPME O.Lf ;S Cenm 1IN Qe.M1 0.uu. •N.wtu 'S[AO.n!
FnO:. IbpW tee gnpl0
a Jo w,s . s°:oo se« - sw:ro sM. e.nn [ ea, Row «wl
ow�.MDJrY 1REET wNo slrtuBs 't 64 DECIDUOUS SHRUB PLANTING-5 Gal. Minim. N5 1
SrHEEI mEE a•LxUnw suLL att=M Isa•�_'SCJ
11.pF LOCK SIRFSR 'Nits LV09MF J Cd6a FOnn - 0.uw0 . tiflm
S ) eOvaal .nrim -
jjP( YO
front TNDS iT10Y �� i Cv:pal Ba^M BuN [ x� y°4.0 Ts°y0e0^�1'
apS 1E ; e ^®: Pl fl O BeNaru Nvipnq. 'pmaw: 4�yM.
J C. NO:.N Nme•s«ue L .Tple..m 'f:«.ra umnq'
rorlNlLLL rFLIVPIAT Ir[OFl �� • -O WO.a°O vnu
Ilolc LOG1roN R>oJ 11 •••O• �-ro oes-°°° ( c
wpw Iris ufsT lotTancc N.pA Ifs 6'S EVERGREEN SHRUB PLANTING 5 Gal. Minimum .eRDn Jo MiNa, .IT TNUN RIra 16 seeseOs +.,o.: - .LN:oo°..eo-„ s.eeeN:ee.Tw.N.oara°O
m N�iaR Ta is .�1 .. - E.vNONrs r ' Ee.sre tray:
OF 130111°Ro+Ens
Ifi sKags rm.Ll«
LMrnGROUND COVER -J:.OTao:rutt .MOlGmnmO umiY
iXiIOM1O
125 YdNypl yfiraly ubl0
EXISTING PRIVATE 1n n� ""°' - °°'°• °�°
OPEN SPACE
125 So.-a.-Smm.v - (i.001i.n Iw..e.x«um
SEEDED TURF AREA 3.y
ILY PM%LT fFN,[$ WT INYL .YrE: . �ru .o-Oa�OI°le amr vgae bin I.nerf w«e OM CNvvNe
JRiS NO aCMfi •'w9a aMee 1 •1. WwYEMJY .CpXi
/MMG2EN yWLg Nµrryf:5 LSRD .IW.E
`\ ••.yNe a,. µr Nei wmntlw.1�1. I .T JrtEES so arnuaus/EfcxAEn,
�Yw Tn¢s. GENERAL N )TES •••L:ayn .a O„b x w.a .°oe mar ai .ae«e rw w+ I°. a n°,,,. «• m,
1. 1M IWn«.nv'. /m°v,Eu. �p..aspr:yDy J. Y bola le to p°yp py po-lOppar,
I'p Ind m°inerase M a
. ludrq bp1 in ey ppEa RO.M � PO 8. Y Op.myy «n0 10 « mi/[rN0 .iN ° Y Cwm
emementr. IWyw«.f oe mposMe b rw a mukn. Y Wur oam Mr ee mlane0 M
'°°nOcapG rinugn Nine .i M MPi.ua:s No- m Y byn r :m:lan
igmiw. i.e i::a Yq.b I> OquMl e^•ale
«-o. sr IM sNM'+• eYwY r . w-�Ir.w s. fagNs .n°. «an. rl.«. IW em r,N,r. Y
awae« sea. eeties e°s:ro IW r:w « n,r:.im r:Rn ..A«a.
2. 1. tau-w rs M o.mee a raw a Ll Ip- Y e u.J inn. w x a e:.be r ]
I sri.e..
]. lne coal oN .ml bN Lo N:w M e`rM Y:/N°. r CO[ rw Geeu[.
sw .areruf rO.lwq tie K J.er w e.le:re0 ..s 11. n J.« as"•n °vm a maw r,se uw der T>Yls
len reo woe. TM "TT ivaa6y NNe°rtnial raMe ear ueN. a .s:cs m aelm a. Oft pa we
1a. Ca crosll.e °CpA Ye vL IM moggo-:wr er°�.e. M.:w o- .v.wwe m Me P-04 F.O.W.
hwN:e:O. Y w«o. IJ. naslaa alrl m ww e.m.
rsoe.�°° s�.:w r Ns, a:::n.,, wN sa rns ro-n.y i°alwwoe x� +°�wle°I`e. •.
O. $1.Y1 bW v. PO•iea° M tie LOM.[W. Mrel«I Ww b tOmhuaeen.
rant 5se.n:r .ew (rye.). 15 saa..ir 'V*:n w « o-«dss m set «wYb.
s Y :.:.Isola rr a :, eccamN..AN ♦.x e.•r.e.e-
'O°rrm4°•n b r.•4'•(..' p°ea. Iw Cs4ac1« l0 .e.[, uliy I«eyp pv l0
'." aq
b°Alin ar.Igrt Y W W e.M atl Lees b M 15. Yiv e i NORTH irngmM .:II: On au1M44[ 6q rytlM. 1pA9.. r 4ac ielcn. yr MOON b[°lims n:q
r ^'°ee paig epg0¢4eO m r.O.i.e y ale
GVY p� me Nay b e. anYrteM
06� Win AIIIIIIocuT" AKLAVED FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN.
�r[.LY�����PFOFOBBO LAND Dom. CLUSTER SINGLE FAMILY P.U.D.
EXUIZONO: RP ( )
ND
��`A��� WY.a<�Y�we i�.f Y�rolOi.RrY�io-aa
L . YT YM111
SHEET OF J
5/11 9a %ss%11
J%]1�� r 9Jt/Ie1f.10
s . �
AMENDED INDIAN HILLS DV oLLDAGE P.U.D.THE iAN U.D L(LOTS 35-43
CITY OF FORT COLLINS. COUNTY OF LARIMER. STATE OF COLORADO
61(l
APPROVALS AND CER111"AilO145 : CD R
AA. w_ .
TYPICAL ELEVATION CHARACTER
AND ESTIMATED SQUARE FOOTAGES
®nMa m �� •°0 vvPlsl
s wol+n
AND TRACT B)
SITE TABULATION
GROSS SEE AREA :
210.7n SF 6215 ACRES IDOX
SEE DENSITY :
/7 LOIS/6.2,5 ACRES - 7.M W/ACRE
•GROSS
. PueuC R.O.W. :
6].Iso ss I *S1 ACRES zM
• ORNEMAY ONES :
W.WS SF 0.771 ACRES in.OPEN
SPACE (0.5.) '
M.7 . SF OAn ACRES ITS
scn.I ao •• NE, pE4ELOPN]lE (LOTS) :143.182 SF 3.2117 ACRES 53S
MOTS
• 1 UAvX,AMX4 -0 IXCORPOm1E3 vMMIxG •' 90[w'Y%5 MIMX ME X.0 w
.I. .. • AMORAL1KIIL3 N
CIAa IT 011xR . [SIW.IED IaY IIGW 4RA NKI IN1O a fIX MET. Rl LD1 91L. 10 AT OLIEIM®
wRN mvL 4K:w1ECNa 6 aLSTioFm
. EMDAK EN.YIAPL wA n
. RAOD a BlMlwl. iw( AREA To LOI sat - z'+w—s • fl]X
cvc MIK,, . F LOP ., ARE OwYw)
UNIT STAi15TIC5
BEBROOMs1UNE 1-3
_ MAXIMUM BLOC. How :!35'
• PROWDAC0 RETAIN FOF.OTPRI
NT Tyf ,31. 1IP10 SF SfEXCLUDINC GNALC )
UNIT TABULATIONCLUSTER SINGLE FAMILY '.
CLUSTER SINGLE FAIRLY(D PLEXXES) AEHED ES) x
1/ IOIITS C1 WPLEXES)
101AL /x MTS QDID W/ACRE)
•MIN nm Mat Inal
SOLAR ORIENTATION ORDINANCE '.
7LOTS �E� UR ORIENTATION
/OR
(YE PTAH APET Q)
ML
• A VARIANCE TO ME REOVIREMENM C/ TM SOLM ONDIHMICC MA5 GRIATCD AT
FOR ITL OF THE NON-OON.IIYING LOTS
TIME OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL
(53S • ITS - 65% CM REWAEMEMI
tmlAPrmuc
P
A VARMNCE TO ME REQUIREMENTS OF THE SWAB OROINWCE IS REQUESTED KIM
THE THEMENDED35-43 FORAWEION4 310Tti
(6S)MImICH DOE, HOT HOT 1MEES,,DQ ORDINANCE
PUPwwu R
(5]S OMGINK SITE PIM. /7S MRNOEO SHE PLAN
�� xaA
♦ LOTS (1, 21 (42. 43) (/6. /]) WY BE WEE% UNITS
TYPICAL BLDG. ENVELOPE/LOT SIZE DIAGRAM
35- MmmUM LOT
LOIS VARY EICOI 3T' •7'1
MINIMUM SETBACK
1E' MIT E
-
(ENVELOPE V BERYEEN Y9' - 39'1
N� BL➢f.. ]' . RPDW
ENVEIORI RD ETEACK TM
LOT TYPE LEGEND
ERLOTx IM)
OR SUPERL01 CONOUIOu7
OR
❑� ID 32'! 35- WIDE LOT
O 9 m S9' ANN LOT
TB •0- - n' WIDE LOT
4T
1/.5' MIM. Il11LIn EASEMENT k
MINIMUM FRONT SEIBACA
GENERAL NOTES
PARKING
MXLAO� .M. w..WOYM.
Atl aiD . %xu[ UM alx • rcO�ww. w�'P �wx
IRAXn n �� AA.ar un
AcxSTAw PIauP Nw� uPR. X n Pan a �DIs
5111. PAmING IN WRAfiES IN $PACL6 (T S SPAO LOl) MLI. ua3..41 tMIML V 1.'IT IIWx
39 SPACES (D.[J SPACEi/L01) 1 PICA .1•. �Y IRI a .x p•MHp wN Nrt22
L1rtST PWIIIXG
w4aCAP POKING 1 SPA¢
ARIA
•1 MOIL N a[-91Mx RSaVA2
� w Mart 1 K
iolN PORING SPACES : 13•
•. •0 A
NO, .. BICYCLE PARNVL IX AAMAS
AMENDED FINAL P J D
-
SITE PLAN (LOTS 35 43 AND "-
PROPOSED LAND USE CLUSTER SINGLE FAMILY (P_U.O,)
EXISTING ZONING RP
0
Indian Hills Village PUD - Amended Final, 481-93C
May 22, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
tapered to no change from the original design along Indian Hills
Circle to the east and Lot 35 to the south.
5. Neighborhood Compatibility:
The developer has notified the Busch Court Neighborhood (to the
west) and provided them with information about the proposed lot re-
orientations. A copy of a general acknowledgement form, signed by
8 of the 11 Busch Court residents, is attached to this report.
FINDINGS of FACT/CONCLUSIONS:
In evaluating the request for the Amended Indian Hills Village
P.U.D. (Lots 35 - 43 and Tract B), Replat and Amended Final, staff
makes the following findings of fact:
* It meets the applicable All Development Criteria in the
L.D.G.S.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Amended Indian Hills Village
P.U.D. (Lots 35 - 43 and Tract B), Replat and Amended Final - #81-
93C.
Indian Hills Village PUD - Amended Final., #81-93C
May 22, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background.
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: RM; existing residential (Bristol Subdivision)
S: rp; existing residential (Indian Hills West)
E: RL; existing single family residential (Indian Hills
Subdivision)
W: RL; existing single family residential (Parkside Subdivision)
The Indian Hills Village P.U.D., Final was approved by the Planning
and Zoning Board on May 23, 1994 for 47 residential dwelling units
(35 single family and 12 duplex) on 6.2 acres.
2. Land Use•
This is a request to replat a portion of the property and amend the
approved final Indian Hills Village P.U.D. by rotating Lots 38 - 40
from their original north -south orientation to an east -west
orientation and reconfigure Lots 35 - 43. This rotation results in
the elimination of the previously platted Daemian Drive and a
portion of Private Drive G that connected to Indian Hills Circle.
Private Drive G will now continue north to intersect with Private
Drive H. The request meets the applicable All Development of the
Land Development Guidance System.
3. Engineering:
The rotation of several lots results in the elimination of the
previously platted Daemian Drive and a portion of Private Drive G
that connected to Indian Hills Circle. Private Drive G will now
continue north to intersect with Private Drive H. The replat will
dedicate the required public access, pedestrian access,
maintenance, landscape, utility, and drainage easements and will
vacate unnecessary utility, drainage, and public access easements.
Daemian Drive, a dedicated public street, will be vacated by
separate document if approved by City Council.
4. Storm Drainage:
The developer is reconfiguring the grading and drainage along the
western boundary of the project (adjacent to the Busch Court
Neighborhood) to address groundwater and surface water issues
associated with the reconfiguration of the lots. The finished floor
elevations for Lots 46 and 47 have been raised approximately 3' in
order to raise basements and minimize potential groundwater
problems. The 3' increase in the finished grade elevation has been
ITEM NO. 7
MEETING DATE 5/22/95
STAFF Bob Blanchard
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Amended Indian Hills Village P.U.D. (Lots 35 - 43
and Tract B), Replat and Amended Final - #81-93C
APPLICANT: Wonderland Hill Development Company
c/o Ayres Associates
3665 J.F.K. Parkway, Bldg. 2, Suite 300
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
OWNER: Wonderland Hill Development Company
601 East Stuart Street
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request to amend the approved final Indian Hills Village
P.U.D. to rotate Lots 38 - 40 and reconfigure Lots 35 - 43. The
property is located on the south side of East Stuart Street,
between Indian Hills Circle and Busch Court and is zoned rp -
Planned Residential.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This request for approval to replat a portion of the property and
amend the final P.U.D:
* meets the applicable all Development Criteria of the
L.D.G.S.;
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT