HomeMy WebLinkAboutWATERGLEN PUD - FINAL ..... APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL - 71 93B - CORRESPONDENCE - CITY COUNCILHPDesk Local Print for Ron PHILLIPS
Start of Item 22.
Message.
Subject: Waterglen
Sender: Gina JANETT / CFC/01
TO: Ron PHILLIPS / CFC52/01
Part 1.
FROM: Gina JANETT / CFC/01
TO: DISTRIBUTION
Part 2.
Re: Appeal
Dated: 01/03/95 at 1632.
Contents: 2.
Below are some questions for tonights mtg. that I will ask (if they aren't
covered first). Sorry they are late but we have a hugh amount of info.
1. Does Boxelder Sanitation District now have sufficient treatment capacity
in its lagoon system for 500+ more houses? (i.e. if it has treatment
capacity, why is it seeking .an expansion of the lagoon system?) Was
lagoon capacity covered in preliminary or final approval? Seq`
�ul�er� ;%��
2. What is City's policy for off -site street improvements, is rehabilitationn145.
of existing road an existing policy option or a new precedance. / � i
-S(o' x�u ca ` iIo �4 oisy/L , .wi% 3Ci W&e
3. If storm drainage criteria cannot be adequately met in development agree- au ah
ments, will project go back to P & Z?
(4� Does street layout meet the planned infrastructure of Master Street Plan
�� and NEATS study? YZ:
5. Is City negotiating with developer to purchase natural area and parkland?
6. If developer can ask that the record of the Preliminary PUD mtg. be included
in the record for Final does that open the Preliminary decision to review?
`8 How does the City evaluate whether 2 access roads out of 500+ housing
subdivision is adequate? Standards?T-;,i`ELrv�,; %- %s� ,, /•G`,; baser%/K
The condition placed on the Final to have a one year, developer operated
jitney. ..how is it legally enforceable? (since it won't happen until after
the development is largely built)
Thanks in advance... drink your java or eat some chocolate... it could be
a long one.
Gina
End of Item 22.