HomeMy WebLinkAboutFALCON RIDGE PUD - FINAL - 2-94G - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSw
Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
ALL CRITERIA
APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY
CRITERION
Is the criterion
applicable?
Will the criterion
be satisfied?
If no, please explain
Z $
z Y
s
Yes
No
Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA
1.1 Solar Orientation
V1✓
1.2 Comprehensive Plan
V1
✓
1.3 Wildlife Habitat
1.4 Mineral Deposit
1.5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas
reserved
reren,ed
1.6 Lands of Agricultural Importance
1.7 Energy Conservation
1.8 Air Quality
V
✓
1.9 Water Quality
(r
1,10 Sewane, and Wastes
V
✓
A 2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA
2.1 Vehicular Pedestrian Bike Transportation
✓
r/
2.2 Building Placement and Orientation
✓
2.3 Natural Features
2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parking
I/
✓
2.5 Emergency Access
/
1/
2.6 Pedestrian Circulation
✓
2.7 Architecture
2.8 Building Height and Views
2.9 Shading
2.10 Solar Access
t/
✓
2.11 Historic Resources
2.12 Setbacks
✓
V
2.13 Landscape
i/
2.14 Signs
2.15 Site Lighting
V.
V
2.16 Noise and Vibration
2.17 Glare or Heat
I
I
Vi
1V1
2.18 Hazardous Materials
A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA
3.1 Utility Capacity
✓
3.2 Design Standards
v
V
3.3 Water Hazards
✓
3.4 Geologic Hazards
13 Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994
-61-
"fLiT L-r-vF-L- f-L F-VP,,TIOW
,ki,,,. it
-= i
--
-= i
�- -
�i- �ey�L e��y�?iota
.��=��
fNAN cH t,� W� VWFI O"
'W', ,,
GL
MtfNIUL IMHE eye
tua ,epvnta ycEAr+e^: FB' .5' eie
YUYxW+ pBnxe�LVbNr1 "M�'S�1N5 ZBBP.Eeb� 1i1'i B16
d:i-0It�1a tFMbANM65 nAFHx+'eN)VBHKtIFUk 6Y0
.,JvIVr. s9ash MIX
�6uBa I ib FIBty •:a/Ab %MIX mop .on
.NBNBRx ,Juea?mRAye AKF.3A 19.e ry5 5.e
txI1fW6Fue yFK4,i a 56 to L1
niwaxts oPMA EUtfe 10,9 0 V.1
[9FEBN Nuv"BgFA55 .owFn It.1 ryv ry.4
NOtE2.
I. AS y A, 15E 'JFILLBV to b of . ' i4 4o Aq"
ASP btIALL NAVE A FaW 5FM-11 eF i0• OR A �
4. esboec I[[Aa ./ EE H-W 4 Jrtx d 'A A'!
tKs KAis Yi I. roue /Ae. axv eE cFinrEv 4•vR .,.qy
IN}o AMs , L.
AWVB eBBB MY A 4NEe:A �
fHNEWI M.tppBF 1 Yo MAY 15.
Mt
[ ." 1 u s 1—..w...[-i.`...
y >v
I �In k vtvie�w ai uwki�`I - 'u►l,1 TWO
L—r-,----�I -XI
"Mr
--
_ FANp - �I� wrrL 6 4 u"
"sfv'ma v.•.ox•s.r.oc ..r' i'r�.��
- - -- -- - - -- -- ---- - -------' i I ;
I
d WA =
I- I ,I i -_-7 :: `I 51
m' I /
I m I ;
a Z. �r- iinct v' r:nc an r.•aeulc Y ��nLw wvl _ _- 3 -1: ¢#� `I •o i� 1-- i "• i r ..
33
Itta
e y 8 Itl1 I I 'f I �_�_; r----1.. I- --- - ; I,. -- r--s l ~
a it lir lil tla& I I °I•''�
I �_--'ro`-J i - I� i I JF ml i
mi ----------- --
�I �• iL _ II
„ : �,�
:p L,x,' �v L .I rs #1 1 • j ','F / I' ss -KF j .-1 I y '°I ° I d I I 1/ ; I ; #
:-f-- L-- , L!
• w Ljf?•—
I
� { p-s � FALCON RIDGE DRIVE f
mP� Ir ��-r•Y- I "_!
J
-CK�Efi I g wit--- dil7G DA I `M v «'
r _ AU.R54�ESH' NAhE d' �fALGW� klWi PY.D u� yy TIM1LY
�y:� ARDby ARM-19.)MO
�\WNI'Yldl l� f 9 PFT bGNIN4 r p
ry[mpmsso WiE ax4s PANNN
uLLNSiK op 1pYe: 61 P•W{, Npy,C
-�G y _ � __ CE{Robs caxseh— al5 axis/,e.
�\ -1�r Y pllY, LO{ 4LLI[ 695L 5(
_ NAV. 9L Vq. VM.P•q N "�
-v /ARxIYQ `{'ILK 2 Lfr oll YYl{ �-
�;., rove{cAye
ID'Ioam. abx �btw.`• ^^�,•��
YpLI}Y {hN{ i ^E > )6lbA{EO s{ Rm �1 qt5 Ac. {6Y ti r
ge{aL— 19 a1 A4 l oo y.
16'
ttuq sNv. qy aW.
g � UYE � g0 g INIR IPP ArSsaLmaLuUviaaukl. NlxAa Walulew
RM"1
TRAes 01 e aes ryR
- ....
R iyxc.
1111bP:9'U ,/�, LO{i OI MkY 56 YPA Ibt-N Al1mN60 }L
Nevs vawwLaK e',cr5 'rtYp P 6of 'IYer. (RiDf;cAQRe{t �}' e{. wnLct<i9RC5, e1o61�9 WuwILLiWtW1ispvx5�AA.VtgOaumut0
pyvs aKIaULaK <wf
#pRM WKY ek.
n.
emu. ti rrM++•�r+�»u�
se ml` •e..,. »�.a..........
iY% l3lDC� $flVf:t-((I°B PI AFC hurt: i •se
TERRY LAKE
J two -
1� N
Ft6N15_.
� 5
y
3
2
W A P 0 L E
W �
5
Y
m
if
O4
's
e
rERRY R/OSE7
s �
rs 9 g
a
v u Z i
v �
o
n
rip
ITEM.• FALCON RIDGE PUD 0
North
Final
NUMBER: 2-94G
SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
PROPOSAL: FALCON RIDGE PUD -Final
DESCRIPTION: 61 single family homes on 19.34
DENSITY: 3.15 du/acre
General Population
61 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 213.5
SchoolAge Population
Elementary - 61 (units) x .450
Junior High - 61 (units) x .210
Senior High - 61 (units) x .185
(pupils/unit) =
27.45
(pupils/unit) =
12.81
(pupils/unit) =
11.29
Design
Affected Schools
Capacity
Enrollment
Tavelli Elementary
728
020
Lincoln Junior High
740
617
Poudre Senior High
1235
1009
Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G
August 22, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 5
presentation is made at the next succeeding or second
succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table
any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have
had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the
Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects
to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this
condition until the date such decision is made.)
If this condition is not met within the time established
herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final
approval of this planned unit development shall become null
and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this
planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that
the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting
of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for
the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II,
Division 3, of the City Code, the "final decision1l of the
Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of this
conditional approval; however, in the event that a dispute is
presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to
be included in the development agreement, the running of time
for the filing of an appeal of such "final decisionew shall be
counted from the date of the Board1s decision resolving such
dispute.
Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G
August 22, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 4
* The proposal is in conformance with the approved Falcon
Ridge P.U.D., Preliminary.
* The proposal meets the applicable All Development
Criteria of the L.D.G.S..
* The two conditions of Preliminary approval, concerning an
additional access point directly onto Country Club Road
and the Board getting some building sketch plan
elevations for review, have been met. Both of these
conditions were imposed by the Board.
* The Preliminary was appealed to the City Council by two
separate appellants on June 20, 1994. City Council upheld
the decision of the Planning and Zoning Board. A
requirement that the developer provide the subdivision
plat and appropriate P.U.D. documents, signed by the
property owners of record (with the plat being certified
by an attorney), to the City prior to going to the Board
for a decision on the Final P.U.D. has been met.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Final -
#2-94G, with the following condition:
1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit
development final plan upon the condition that the development
agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D. plans for the
planned unit development be negotiated between the developer
and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the
second monthly meeting (October 24, 1994) of the Planning and
Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit
development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not
so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly
meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The
Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it
shall first find that there exists with respect to said
planned unit development final plan certain specific unique
and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of
the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique
hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and
provided that such extension can be granted without
substantial detriment to the public good.
If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to
be included in the development agreement, the developer may
present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such
Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G
August 22, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
as required by the Land Development Guidance System (L.D.G.S.). The
Final P.U.D. is in conformance with the approved Falcon Ridge
P.U.D., Preliminary and meets the applicable All Development
Criteria of the L.D.G.S.. The two conditions of Preliminary
approval, concerning an additional access point directly onto
Country Club Road and the Board getting some building sketch plan
elevations (see attached) for review, have been met. Both of these
conditions were imposed by the Board.
3. Design:
Landscaping:
Street trees will be provided at approximately 50' on -center along
the rear lot lines on Country Club Road and Spaulding Lane.
Additionally, the developer will plant one street tree per lot
frontage throughout the development.
4. Transportation:
Falcon Ridge P.U.D. will gain primary access from Country Club Road
and Spaulding Lane via internal local streets and cul-de-sacs.
There will be two points of access into this development from
Country Club Road - one via existing Ford Lane in the Rimrock
Subdivision (in Larimer County), and one directly into the
development on Fox Den Trail. A single point of access from
Spaulding Lane is proposed at the southwest corner of this
development. Both Country Club Road and Spaulding Lane are
designated as collector streets. The Board's condition of
Preliminary approval that directed staff and the developer to
explore an additional access point directly onto Country Club Road,
before the proposal gets to Final, has been met.
5. Resource Protection:
An existing single family residence, on approximately 2 acres, is
excluded from the Falcon Ridge P.U.D. to enable the
owners/developers to preserve two significant groves of trees in
the middle of this property. The tree groves will be preserved on
the small farmstead.
FINDINGS of FACT/CONCLUSIONS:
In evaluating the request for the Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Final, staff
makes the following findings of fact:
* The gross residential density is 3.15 dwelling units per
acre, exceeding the minimum of 3 dwelling units per acre
as required by the L.D.G.S..
Falcon Ridge PUD - Final, #2-94G
August 22, 1994 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background•
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: R; existing single family residential (on
Larimer County
S: C, Ml; existing single family residential
County (Valley View Subdivision, mobile
E: FA; existing single family residential
County (Rimrock Subdivision)
acreage) in
in Larimer
home park)
in Larimer
W: C, M1, R; Terry Lake and vacant land in Larimer County
The Planning and Zoning Board approved the Falcon Ridge P.U.D.,
Preliminary on June 6, 1994 for 60 single family residential lots
on 19.17 acres (3.13 D.U.'s/acre) with two conditions: 1) Staff and
developer explore the question of an additional access point onto
Country Club Road before the proposal gets to Final; and 2) the
Board get some sketch plan elevations, since the neighborhood has
requested that, prior to the Final.
The Planning and Zoning Board's decision on the Falcon Ridge
P.U.D., Preliminary was appealed to the City Council by two
separate appellants on June 20, 1994. The grounds of the appeals
were that the Board abused its discretion, in that its decision was
arbitrary and without the support of competent evidence in the
record; that the Board failed to conduct a fair hearing in that it
considered evidence relevant to its findings which was
substantially false or grossly misleading; that the Board failed to
conduct a fair hearing in that it improperly failed to receive all
relevant evidence offered by the appellant; that the Board failed
to properly interpret and apply relevant provisions of the Code and
Charter.
City Council heard the appeals on July 19, 1994 and upheld the
decision of the Planning and Zoning Board. However, they did add a
requirement that the developer provide the subdivision plat and
appropriate P.U.D. documents, signed by the property owners of
record (with the plat being certified by an attorney), to the City
prior to going to the Board for a decision on the Final P.U.D.
2. Land Use:
This is a request for 61 single family residential lots on 19.34
acres located east of Colorado Highway 1 (Terry Lake Road) and
North College Avenue, south of Country Club Road, and north of
Spaulding Lane. The gross residential density is 3.15 dwelling
units per acre, exceeding the minimum of 3 dwelling units per acre
ITEM NO. 9
MEETING DATE 8122194
STAFF Steve Olt
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Falcon Ridge P.U.D., Final - #2-94G
APPLICANT: Ed Lawler
Sandcreek Associates, L.L.C.
P.O. Box 9684
Fort Collins, CO. 80522
OWNER: Sandcreek Associates, L.L.C.
P.O. Box 9684
Fort Collins, CO. 80522
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for 61 single family residential lots on 19.34
acres located east of Colorado Highway 1 (Terry Lake Road) and
North College Avenue, south of Country Club Road, and north of
Spaulding Lane. The property is zoned rp, Planned Residential.
RECOMMENDATION: Approval with a condition
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This request for Final P.U.D. approval:
* Provides a gross residential density of 3.15 dwelling
units per acre, which exceeds the minimum of 3 dwelling
units per acre as required by the L.D.G.S.;
* Is in conformance with the approved Falcon Ridge P.U.D.,
Preliminary;
* Meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the
L.D.G.S.;
* Satisfies two conditions of Preliminary approval that
directed staff and the developer to explore an additional
access point directly onto Country Club Road and required
the developer to provide the Board with some building
sketch plan elevations for review. Both of these
conditions were imposed by the Board and have been met;
* Meets a requirement of City Council that the developer
provide the subdivision plat and appropriate P.U.D.
documents, signed by the property owners of record (with
the plat being certified by an attorney), to the City
prior to a decision on the Final P.U.D.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT