HomeMy WebLinkAboutWEST VINE STORAGE - FDP - FDP180019 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 2 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSUnderstood
Department: PFA
Contact: Andrew Rosen, 970-416-2599,
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1
arosen@fcgov.com
Comment Originated: 08/30/2018
O8/30/2018:
The emergency access easement shown on the provided documents seems to
show part of the tracking impacting the curb at the south and north ends of
building 8. PFA requires an Auto -turn exhibit that verifies one fluid motion to the
turns including the area at the north end of building 5. The PFA Truck Auto -turn
template should be shown.
The configuration of Building 8 has been changed. Building 5 is not affected.
Current PFA template has been demonstrated.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 08/30/2018
08/30/2018:
ADDRESSINGMAYFINDING
>To assist with prompt emergency response the address shall be clearly visible
from the street in no less than 8" numerals not 6" as stated in the provided plan
set.
Note has been changed.
>Buildings 10 and 11 shall have the full address, including street name,
attached to the west elevations.
Note has been added.
>The west entrance on Vine which is shown as emergency traffic only should
have a sign on it indicating Fire Access
Fire Access sign was previously shown to be located on both sides of the gate to this emergency access
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/30/2018
08/30/2018:
PRIVATE HYDRANT
The private hydrant is noted at the north end of Building 7. A maintenance plan
for this hydrant will be required at building permit stage.
Understood
Department: Traffic Operation
Contact: Tim Tuttle, 970-221-6820, TTUTTLE@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: Signing and striping comments will be provided at the staff review
meeting.
Stripping Plan has been revised as per redline.
Understood
Department: Forestry
Contact: Molly Roche, ,
Topic: Landscape Plans
mroche@fcgov.com
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
9/6/2018:
City Forestry spoke with Development Review Coordinator, Todd Sullivan, on
9/6/18. The below comment is to confirm that the three existing trees (#12, 14,
15) are remaining on site. Based on the site plan, these trees appear to be
retained on site. Thank you!
9/4/2018:
The two existing conifers (Engleman Spruce and Ponderosa Pine) appear to be
retained now. Please confirm.
These three trees are to remain on site.
Department: Light And Power
Contact: Tyler Siegmund, 970-416-2772, tsiegmund@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: Electric capacity fees, development fees, building site charges and
any system modification charges necessary to feed the site will apply to this
development. Please contact me or visit the following website for an estimate
of charges and fees related to this project:
http://www.fcgov. com/utilities/b usiness/b u i lde rs-and-developers/plant-investme n
t-development-fees
Understood
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: Please submit load requirements for the project once known.
A commercial service information form (C-1 form) and a one -line diagram for
the commercial meter will need to be completed and submitted to Light &
Power Engineering. A link to the C-1 form is below:
http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers/development-
forms-g uidelines-regulations
Understood
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: Light & Power will need AutoCAD files of the site plan, utility plans,
and landscape drawings once approved.
Understood
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: Please contact Tyler Siegmund at Light & Power Engineering if
you have any questions at 970.416.2772. Please reference our policies,
construction practices, development charge processes, and use the fee
estimator at http://www.fcgov.com/utilities/business/builders-and-developers
E
www.fcgov.com/utility-development.
Understood.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Standard Comment: Please note that all City of Fort Collins Utility
Customers are subject to City Code requirements for wastewater. These
requirements include Section 26-306 Wastewater Discharge Permit
Requirements and Section 26-332 Prohibitive Discharge Standards. A permit
may be required depending on activities on the site; however, discharge
standards apply to every customer, both large and small, regardless of what
activities take place on the site. Please contact Industrial Pretreatment,
(970)221-6900, to discuss these requirements and how they apply to this
development.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 09/05/2018
09/05/2018: Please review the site and utility plans for consistency. Note
details about utility construction should not be called out on the site plan.
Utility Details of construction have been removed from the Site Plan.
Department: Environmental Planning
Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-4290, sblochowiak@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: UTILITY PLANS. It does not appear PDP comment 19 delivered
March 2018 from Rebecca Everette has been addressed.
03/26/2018: FOR FINAL PLAN: Please label the Natural Habitat Buffer Zone
on the landscape plan, grading and drainage plan (C3.0, C3.1, C3.2), erosion
control plan (C4.0), and utilities plan (C5.0). Please ensure the habitat note is
on each of these plans as well.
Natural Habitat Buffer Zone and Habitat Note has been added to the Landscape Plan, Erosion
Control plan, Grading and Drainage Plan, and Utility Plan/
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: DCP. Prior to issuance of Development Construction Permit
(DCP) provide:
A. Estimate to be approved by Environmental Planning of natural habitat buffer
zone (NHBZ) installation and labor and weed management plan. Securities are
held for 3 years or until success criteria have been reached.
B. Security for NHBZ at 125% cost of estimated installation and labor.
C. Estimate to be approved by Environmental Planning of natural habitat buffer
zone (NHBZ) weed management.
D. Security for weed management of NHBZ at 125% estimated cost.
Understood
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: DA. The Development Agreement (DA) for this project will include
Natural Resources language including natural habitat buffer zone (NHBZ)
establishment criteria and weed management plan. Standard Natural
Resources language and NHBZ success criteria language will be provided by
City staff, but the weed management plan needs to be provided by the
Applicant.
0
Comment Number: 12 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Standard Comment: Please note that all City construction detail
drawings are to be used in their original, unaltered state. ANY modification(s)
must be clearly distinguished and all City logos/identifiers must be removed
from the modified detail. Detail drawings can be found in both .pdf and .dwg
formats through the links to "Construction Drawings" on
www.fcqov.com/utility-development.
Understood.
Comment Number: 13
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Is phasing of this project being considered? Stormwater
certification is typically required for this type of project prior to issuance of the
first certificate of occupancy; this certification includes site grading, detention
basins, Low Impact Development facilities, etc. Please let me know if this
certification timing will work for your project or if you would like to consider
phasing of stormwater improvements.
Project is planned as a single phase.
Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-2932, Ischlam@fcgov.com
Topic: Erosion Control
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 08/28/2018
08/28/2018: Erosion Control Comments have been resolved. If you need
clarification concerning the Erosion Control Material Requirements or
Comments presented above please contact myself. Jesse Schlam (970)
224-6015 Ischlam @fcgov.com
Thank you.
Department: Water -Wastewater Engineering
Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-305-5989, dmogen@fcgov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: A maintenance agreement for the proposed private hydrant will be
required as a part of the development agreement.
Underst000d.
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: It appears that landscape separation requirements are not being
met for the proposed water lines between buildings 1 & 2. Please review and
revise as necessary to provide adequate separation.
Separation from water utilities and shrubs is noted on the Landscape Plan and meets the City criteria.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Please see redlined utility plans (PDF).
Redline information has been added to the Plans.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Standard Comment: Please note that all City construction detail
drawings are to be used in their original, unaltered state. ANY modification(s)
must be clearly distinguished and all City logos/identifiers must be removed
from the modified detail. Detail drawings can be found in both .pdf and .dwg
formats through the links to "Construction Drawings" on
7
the proposed drainage on site and how it meets requirements.
Additions have been made.
Comment Number: 6 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: The landscaping for the proposed rain gardens appears to call for
shrubs and other plantings including a blue spruce, which is not appropriate. An
ornamental tree would be better suited for this type of location.
Is ground cover such as rock cobble proposed as well? Please clarify on the
landscape plan.
The evergreen tree in the east Rain Garden has been replaced with an ornamental tree.
Rock cobbles are provided for the cover surface of the raon garden with plantings placed between
the cobbles.
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Please provide evidence that the detention basin is in compliance
with drain times per Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602(8). More information
on this statute is available at http://tinyurl.com/RevisedStatuteMemo, and a
spreadsheet to show compliance is available for download at
http://tinyurl.com/ComplianceSpreadsheet. Please contact Dan Mogen at
(970)305-5989 or dmogen@fcgov.com with any questions about this
requirement or for assistance with the spreadsheet.
The release rates are in compliance with Items 2 and 3 of the Urban Drainage and
Flood Control District. The compliance spreadsheet has been down loaded.
Comment Number: 8
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: This comment is a carry-over from PDP.
03/26/2018: Repeat comment. Nothing was seen in this submittal to address
this comment.
10/27/2017: It appears the eastern pond will be used to treat and detain these
flows. Please show sizing for these flows in the eastern pond. It appears flow
from other areas will be treated by rain gardens prior to entering either
detention pond; therefore, it is not required to provide water quality for this runoff
as it will be treated by the rain gardens.
05/23/2017: It is required that half of the street frontage be brought into the site
as it has historically flowed. This flow needs to be both detained and treated for
water quality. LID treatment is not required.
The off -site flows do enter the site and are detained in the detention ponds.
Comment Number: 9 Comment Originated:
09/03/2018: Please see redlined drainage report and utility plans (PDF).
These revisions have been made.
Comment Number: 10 Comment Originated:
09/03/2018: Carryover: Please note that additional comments maybe
forthcoming upon future submittals as additional details are discovered.
Understood.
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated:
09/03/2018: Please add the following note to the proposed rain gardens on the
grading and utility plans:
Please refer to the erosion control plan sheets and report for temporary control
measures and construction sequencing that shall be used to prevent loading of
this drainage facility with sediment during construction.
Note has been provided.
09/03/2018
09/03/2018
09/03/2018
0
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/06/2018
09/06/2018: Please dedicate a 10-fcot 'Access and Maintenance Easement',
overlaying the drainage easement, along the property line adjoining the Arthur
Ditch, to the Arthur Irrigation Company. The drainage easement currently shown
on the plat will allow access for City personnel only, so the irrigation company
will require an easement to allow access by their employees and equipment.
An easement has been added to the north property line for Arthur Ditch on the plat and plans.
Department: Stormwater Engineering
Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-305-5989, dmogen@fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Please note that many of my comments from PDP review were not
addressed and still remain to be addressed at this time despite the comment
response letter saying the comments have been addressed or information has
been provided.
I will reject future submittals as incomplete if they do not adequately address
comments and redlines provided with this review.
Redline comments have been addressed.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: An agreement is required in order to have this site outfall to
Arthur's Ditch. Please contact Mark Taylor at 970 416 2494 to coordinate.
Agreement will be required prior to final plan approval.
Owners have the draft copy of the agreement.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Please provide discussion and an exhibit in the drainage report to
show how water quality and Low Impact Development (LID) requirements are
being met for the site. Additional information is needed to show the rain
gardens are appropriately sized for the site and appropriately designed per City
requirements. Please see redlines for additional comments.
Carryover from PDP (2 separate comments):
03/26/2018: Clarification is needed to understand what is being proposed.
The plans show 3 rain gardens; however, sizing calculations are only shown for
2 rain gardens in the drainage report. Please help me understand what is being
proposed; I'm happy to discuss the intent with you and explain what I'm looking
for.
Additional information has been provided.
03/26/2018: Repeat comment. This submittal did not address these questions.
10/27/2017: Please expand discussion of water quality and low impact
development requirements. It is noted that the majority of the site will be treated
with the proposed rain gardens and areas that are not treated by the rain
gardens will have extended detention water quality provided and sized in the
proposed detention basins. No discussion of off -site flows was seen. Please
address.
Additional information is provided in the report.
Comment Number: 5 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Please expand narrative in the drainage report to clearly convey
5
to the plans if needed.
Comment Number: 6
Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: The smaller & bold text does not scan or reproduce well. The text
needs to increase in size & changed to normal text. See examples of problem
text on redlines.
Font size and type has been changed.
Department: Engineering Development Review
Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcqov.com
Topic: General
Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: Please remove the City Utility Plan Approval Block from the plat.
The Arthur Ditch signature block is required to the extent that they have an
easement or other interest within the platted boundary.
The Engineering Signature block has been removed from the Plat. The Arthur Ditch signature block
remains.
Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: There are some potential readability concerns with the size of the
text that would be more apparent with the production of hard copies. Please
provide full size paper copies with the next submittal for review and ensure that
the information depicted is legible at time of mylars.
Font size and style has been changed.
Comment Number: 3
Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: STA 5+00 shows a cross slope of 5.4%, however presuming a
straight grade to the flowline elevation of 11.93, my calculation of the cross
slope is more at 4%. Is there an intention of not maintaining a straight line grade
from the existing edge of asphalt? In that regard the plans should label both an
existing cross slope to edge of asphalt and a cross slope for the new pavement.
Correct; the existing grade has a .74' drop in 13' but because of the utilities,
we will be able to regrade the cross slope. The new grade is 3.6% (the straight grade
is to the lip of gutter not to flowline). This change has been added.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 09/04/2018
09/04/2018: The plans in how they were generated electronically should ideally
not be separate PDF's for each sheet and should be more "print to PDF"
instead of "save to PDF" to address generation and viewing for review.
Plans will be placed in one folder for Construction Plans and one for Site Documents.
Paper copies will be provided as previously for review.
Department: Outside Agencies
Contact: Mark Taylor, 970-416-2494, mtaylor@fcqov.com
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: Arthur Irrigation will not approve the plat until an agreement has
been signed between the irrigation company and the developer. At this time, the
agreement is being prepared by the irrigation company attorney.
Owners have received the draft copy of the agreement.
4
Topic: General
Comment Number: 10
Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: EMERGENCY SERVICE PLAN: There are line over text issues.
See redlines.
Line over issues on Emergency Plan have been changed.
Topic: Landscape Plans
Comment Number: 7
Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: The smaller & bold text does not scan or reproduce well. The text
needs to increase in size & changed to normal text. See examples of problem
text on redlines.
Font size and style has been revised.
Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: There are text over text issues. See redlines.
Text over issues have been resolved.
Topic: Lighting Plan
Comment Number: 9
Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: The smaller & bold text does not scan or reproduce well. The text
needs to increase in size & changed to normal text. See examples of problem
text on redlines.
Font size and style has been revised.
Topic: Plat
Comment Number: 1
Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: Please make changes as marked. If changes are not made or you
disagree with comments, please provide written response of why corrections
were not made. Please provide any responses on redlined sheets and/or in
response letter.
Changes to the Plat have been made as marked.
Topic: Site Plan
Comment Number: 2
Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index do not match the sheet
titles on the noted sheets. See redlines.
Index has been revised.
Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: The legal description is not necessary. The sub -title serves as the
legal description.
Legal description has been removed.
Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: Please revise the Basis of Bearings statement as marked. See
redlines.
Bases of bearing has been revised.
Comment Number: 5
Comment Originated: 08/31/2018
08/31/2018: The property boundary on the Subdivision Plat may change.
Please verify whether or not the Subdivision Plat changed, and make changes
3
moved to the NAVD88 vertical datum, and as of January 1, 2015, all projects
are required to be on NAVD88 datum. Please provide the following information
for the Benchmark Statement in the EXACT format shown below.
PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION
ELEVATION:
PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL
DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29
UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR
VERTICAL DATUMS.
IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS
DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION
SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT
COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 - X.XX'.
Benchmark call outs have been revised as well as the notes as above.
Comment Number: 15
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Some of the sheet titles in the sheet index have duplicate names.
See redlines.
All Sheets have individual titles.
Comment Number: 16 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: The legal description is not necessary. The sub -title serves as the
legal description.
Legal description has been removed.
Comment Number: 17
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Please revise the Basis Of Bearings statement as marked. See
redlines.
Text has been revised for Bases of Bearing
Comment Number: 18
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: The smaller & bold text does not scan or reproduce well. The text
needs to increase in size & changed to normal text. See examples of problem
text on redlines.
Font size and type has been revised.
Comment Number: 19 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Line over issues as noted on the redlines has been addressed.
Comment Number: 20 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: All benchmark statements must match on all sheets.
All benchmark statements have been revised.
2
Fort Collins
Community Development and
Neighborhood Services
281 North College Avenue
PO Box 580
Fort Collins, CO 80522
970.221.6750
970.224.6134 - fax
fcgov. com/developmentreview
September 07, 2018
Michael Rein
5950 Fossil Creek Parkway
Fort Collins, CO 80525
RE: West Vine Storage, FDP180019, Round Number 1
Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing
agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about
any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through
the Development Review Coordinator, Todd Sullivan, at 970-221-6695 or tsullivan@fcgov.com.
Comment Summary:
Department: Technical Services
Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-6588, *county@fc-gov.com
Topic: Building Elevations
Comment Number: 11 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: There are line over text issues. See redlines.
Line over issues have been resolved as shown on the redlines.
Comment Number: 12
Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: The smaller & bold text does not scan or reproduce well. The text
needs to increase in size & changed to normal text. See examples of problem
text on redlines.
Text size has been increased and areas of bold that would not reproduce well the font has been changed
line type style.
Topic: Construction Drawings
Comment Number: 13 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: Please revise the sub -title as marked. See redlines.
Subtitle has been revised.
Comment Number: 14 Comment Originated: 09/03/2018
09/03/2018: The Benchmark Statement has been updated. The City has