The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSTONEBRIDGE GARDEN APARTMENTS PRELIM PUD - 82 93 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDYCOURTNEY PARK, PHASE II SITE ACCESS STUDY FORT COLLINS, COLORADO DECEMBER 1993 Prepared for: Loftus Developments 4700 Walnut Drive Boulder, CO 80301 Prepared by: MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 Banyan Avenue Loveland, CO 80538 Phone: 303-669-2061 0 '"`?Y cF FORT COLI::'iS TRAFF?C EN3iNEERI'13 Site ccae 0000699E N Street: 24.7 AVE. E-# Street: aAK11 ROAD feather a;;:ikY 9ewaents av: r:qary ------------------------------------------------------------------ ----------------------------------------- PEK PRiC AALYS?S FCR TH7:30 A9 C6:3C ;,EE ?RECT?QN START PEAK F:R ........... VOLUNE .,..,....., 1 FRC9 PEAK PCUR FACTCR PEDS Rip* Thru Left Total PE9S Rip*. hru Lef; ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- icrth 1:30 AM 0.93 2 61 112 !22 29S 21. :S 41 :u 0, 1:36 AN 0, "2 I 39 i0 96 ai 21 29 aes, 7:20 P 0.9c s iC ._, 62 !0c. 6 i 39 eeS: 93 S 6G Ki 62 1663 i 23 LEMAY AVE. ;... ---------- ' ' 255 1 [PEDS—]---2 ; 61 ; 112 ; 122 :............ _* N W—+—E S 2 [PEDS 1 ............ ... — — — 295 — — — — -- 43 .......... 716 .................. ... HARMONY ROAD 658 559 ------------ 62 -- 931 1053 60 -- --- 335 ---- [PEDS 1 6 �— 56 ............: 96 ; 150 89 .. 228 ...i i i i LEMAY AVE. PASS: 1 FILE: 96-10-92 )ATE: 10i'2ii'22 HARMONY ROAD ... . 1142 .......... ------------------ 5 [PEDS 1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xxxxxxxxxx x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xzxxxxx x xxxxxxxxxzxxxxxxxxxxxxxa:. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy).... .. 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL -------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN .. TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------ EB WE, NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 35 60 0 0 THRU 447 745 0 0 RIGHT 35 45 70 60 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ----------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 [ 3 -' L.ANF USAGE L + k L R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE PaQe-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS ------- p -------- M --------------------- SH R SH ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB RIGHT 77 849 849 849 772 A MINOR STREET SB RIGHT 66 705 705 705 639 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 39 371 371 371 332 B WB LEFT 66 563 563 563 497 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 : am pm 1993Ch-,t OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ZXZYYYXYYXYZX#YYZXXXYXYZYYX#YX##YYYXZYXYYZZXZZY###YYYYYYXYXZZYYYXZX## IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 AME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.....:. wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST ................... mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION...-. long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE`WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ----- ---- ---- LEFT -- 70 0 190 THRU 0 90 40 RIGHT-- 190 100 0 NUMBER OF LANES EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES -- 2 1 _ 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- ----------------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 77 583 495 .495 418 A RIGHT 209 953 953 953 744 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 209 987 987 987 778 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE AIS..... 12/2/93 : am p� 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long - 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 AME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... monte carlo NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. amt pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT -- 20 0 70 THRU -- 0 50 40 RIGHT -- 40 50 0 .NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- --------------------- LANES -- 2 1 1 . CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SEkVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------ ------------------------ --- MINOR STREET WB LEFT 22 735 701 701 679 A RIGHT 44 996 996 996 952 A MAJOR STREET - SB LEFT 77 1000 1000 1000 923 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... monte carlo. NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton- DATE AND TIME OF THE AtL�SIS..... 12/2/93 am rpm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long, Im m m s�� M. M m m�� r�� 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 zzxxxxxzzzzzzzzzxxxzxxzzzxzzxzxzzzxzzzzzxzzxxzxzzzzxz xxzzxxxzzxzzzzzx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------- ------------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 tME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- LEFT 25 40 0 _ THRU 0 -- 165 25 RIGHT 15 -- 0 85 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB - WE, NB SE, ------- ---- -- ------- ------- LANES 2 - -- 1 - 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paoe-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH -------------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 28 658 641 641 613 A RIGHT 17 997 997 997 980 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 44 999 999 999 955 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE A4AIYSIS 12/2/93 ; am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... lon 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxzxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxa IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 - AME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... Dona INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB --- ---- ---- LEFT 45 15 0 THRU 0 -- 55 10 RIGHT 25 -- 0 50 NUMBER OF LANES ------------ =-------------------------------------------------------- EB WB N6 SIN .------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SEkVICE Pape-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE .RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 50 815 807 807 757 A RIGHT 28 998 998 998 971 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 17 1000 1000 1000 984 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... whea ton DATE AND TIME OF THE 0.NQIySIS..... 12/2/93 am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION... loI I 1 1 1 [1 1 1 11 APPENDIX E 1 1 1 C 1 i 1 1 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ZZZZZZZZ%XZMZZZZZZZZZZZZZXZY:ZXZZ.CZXZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZXZZZZZZZZXZZZXZM.ZX]. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 4ME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..._.. 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Ipml 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION... 101g Y v INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 120 70 0 0 THRU 568 906 0 0 R16HI 100 85 120 100 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------------------------------------- ES WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 2 3 3 1 nKfv I: . . G CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (Pcph) c (poph) c (Pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------ -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB RIGHT 132 759 759 759 627 A MINOR STREET SB RIGHT 110 631 631 631 521 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 132 274 274 274 142 0 WB LEFT 77 441 441 441 364 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME DATE OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... AND TIME OF THE AN YSIS..... wheaton 12/2/93 ; am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION... long Ir r r r �r a■� rr rr r� r� r� r r r a■� �r r r r 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 #t#t#####t####X#It########Y####J.######<##########Y#y###########XX###a IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 AME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS tmm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 90 0 0 THRU 660 450 0 0 RIGHT 150 25 70 75 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------- --------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 2 3 3 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcoh) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET NB - RIGHT 77 696 696 696 619 A MINOR STREET SB - RIGHT 83 853 853 853 770 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 50 568 568 568 518 A WB LEFT 99 360 360 360 261 C IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE IS..... 12/2/93 : aml Pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long ii 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZE[, INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT Z ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZYZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ Z ZZZZZZZZZZ INTERSECTION..wheaton/whalers/lemay AREA TYPE... -..OTHER ANALYST....... m,id DATE.......... 12,<2/93 .a TIME ......... m Pm long COMMENT....... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 60 40 30 85 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 50 50 600 1050 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 40 115 20 40 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 .0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 19.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 19.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X NB LT x TH X TH x RT X RT x PD x PD x WB LT x SB LT x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x GREEN 20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 30.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE ANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.140 0.367 9.6 b 8.8 8 TR 0.165 0.367 8.3 B WB L 0.081- 0.367 9.4 B 9.0 b TR 0.318 0.367 8.9 B NB L 0.190 0.533 5.6 B 5.4 B TR 0.381 0.533 5.4 B SB L 0.226 0.533 5.7 6 7.0 8 TR 0.670 0.533 7.1 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 6.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.526 LOS = b 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION] SUMMARY REPORT YXZXXYYYYXXX###XX###XX#YXXXYX##Y#X#Y##YYX#:F#Y#####X#X####XXX:###X#XXXX#X### INTERSECTION._wheaton/whalers/lemay AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... m,id DATE.......... 12/2/93 TIME.......... am pm long COMMENT....... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB Sb EB W8 NB SB LT 40 20 35 140 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 75 65 1200 840 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 30 115 40 50 12.0 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 Rk 0 0 0 0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS. GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEGS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.8 3 WB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 25.6 3 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 19.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 50 Y 19.8 3 ------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 60.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 Eft LT X NB LT x x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x WB LT x SB LT x x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x GREEN 15.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 6.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 .. 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.127 0.283 12.2 B 11.1 B TR 0.242 0.283 10.7 B WB L 0.053 0.283 11.9 6 11.8 6 TR 0.443 0.283 11.8 8 NB L 0.035 0.617 3.4 A 14.2 B TR 0.903 0.450 14.5 B SB L 0.125 0.617 3.6 A 8.2 B TR 0.651 0.450 8.9 B -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 11.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.614 LOS = B 1985 HCM: UNS16NALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paoe-1 .*...Z3IKY Y..Y.XYl4IKY........ *... * Z'CY. I: A. }:1:> L1..\Y1".#........... #Z'KiXXt.......... IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m,id DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... Iona INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------------------------------------------------------------- E8 WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 40 20 35 140 THRU 75 65 630 441 RIGHT 30 115 40 50 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ----------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB S8 ------- ------- ------------- LANES - LANE USAGE LT + k LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL-OF-SEkVICE Paoe-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARE[) RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH k SH ------ -------- --------- ----=------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 44 79 27 > 50 27 > -76 -17 >F F THROUGH 63 130 95 > 95 > 13 > E RIGHT 33 809 809 809 776 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 22 87 28 > 61 28 > -33 6 >F E THROUGH 72 129 95 > 95 > 23 > E RIGHT 127 727 727 727 600 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 154 496 496 496 342 B N8 LEFT 39 618 616 618 500 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------- NAMEOF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemav DATE AND TIME OF THE pmSIS..... 12/2/93 : am 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... Ion 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Y#YY##Y#YY##Y#YYYY#####YY####>###Y#YYY#YY Y#Y#Y###ZY#YY####Y YYYYM4#### IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 0 pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL ------------------------------------------------------ INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB N6 SB - ---- LEFT 60 ---- 40 ---- 30 --- 85 THRU 50 50 315 551 RIGHT 40 115 20 40 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES - 2 2 2 LANE USAGE Ll + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIA.L MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT66 128 81 > 108 61 > -13 15 >F E THROUGH 55 200 177 > 177 > 122 > 0 RIGHT 44 762 762 762 718 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 44 144 98 > 129 98 > 30 54 >E E THROUGH 55 198 175 > 175 > 120 > D RIGHT 127 885 885 885 759 A MAJOR STREET 58 LEFT 94 743 743 743 649 A NB LEFT 33 546 546 546 513 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ---------------------------------------------------------------- NAME.OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... Wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET._.. lemav DATE AND TIME.OF THE AN XSIS..... 12/2/93 pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... fiong 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORI ##X#XX#cXaXXXa#X##X#XX#X#X##X#####XXX#####XX######X####XXX#..XXX###XXXXXX... INTERSECTIUN..harmony/lemav AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST ....... m_id DATE.......... 2/93 TIME......... a pal 1993 short COMMENT...... long ------------- VULUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 120 230 275 325 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1616 960 390 600 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 220 120 155 250 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 7 12.0 RR 30 30 30 30 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 k 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 29.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 29.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 32.5 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 32.5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PO X WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 13.0 47.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ---------- -------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EL L 0.039 0.558 9.1 B 19.6 C T 0.857 0.408 21.2 C R 0.324 0.408 11.5 6 WB L 0.717 0.558 21.1 C 13.9 B T 0.509 0.408 12.6 B R 0.153 0.408 10.6 B NB L 0.241 0.392 18.7 C 21.6 C T 0.438 0.275 23.3 C R 0.315 0.275 22.4 C SB L 0.353 0.392 20.0 C 24.2 C T 0.673 0.275 26.1 D R 0.555 0.275 25.1 D -------------------------------------------- -------- -- _-------- INTERSECTION: Delav 19.5 (sec/veh) V/C 0.720 LOS C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT XXX#XtX#tYXt#XXX#YYM:X#XXXtiYX#XXXXXX##XX########:K##X###XX####X##t#XXtX#X.R< INTERSECTION..harmony/lemav AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST........ m,id DATE.......... 12/2/Q3 TIME.......... am m 1993 short COMMEND...... long --------------- -------- ---- ---------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRI' EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 250 255 460 150 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1325 1925 700 530 T 12.0 T 12.0 L 12.0 T 12.0 RT 250 380 285 190 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RR 30 30 30 30 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 k 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 29.5 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 29.5 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 32.5 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.95 10 N 32_5 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X. NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PO X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 13.0 47.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 31.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.800 0.556 27.2 D 17.3 C T 0.703 0.408 16.4 C k 0.376 0.406 11.8 B WB L 0.821 0.558 29.3 D 33.2 0 T 1.021 0.408 36.8 D R 0.598 0.408 13.8 B N5 L 0.720 0.392 27.9 0 26.0 D T 0.785 0.275 28.5 D R 0.644 0.275 26.8 D SB L 0.050 0.392 17.2 C, 23.3 C 1 0.595 0.275 25.0 C k 0.404 0.275 23.2 C -----------------------_---- ---------------------------------------- INTERSECTION- Delav -_ 26.5 (sec/veh) V/C 0.884 LOS D 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 xx:xxxxxxxxxx�xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxx>.axxxxxxxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------- ____________________________ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mJd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOU1H CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------- --------------------------=------=------------------------ EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 25 -- 35 0 THRU 0 -- 45 5 RIGHT 15 -- 0 30 NUMBER OF LANES ------- ------------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NB _______ SB ------- ______________ LANES 2 -- 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 _____________________________________________________________________ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH MINOR STREET EB LEFT 28 820 801 801 774 A RIGHT 17 999 999 999 983 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 39 1000 1000 1000 962 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------- ----------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access\ NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... when ton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 : am 1993 shor OTHER INFORMATION.... long ............................ = = = = = 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-1 xxxxxzxxxxzxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxsxx.r IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 30 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET ......... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m,1d DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... Iona INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION - MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 45 -- 15 0 THRU 0 -- 10 5 RIGHT 25 -- 0 10 - NUMBER OF LANES ---------------------------------------------------------- EB WB N6 - SE) ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 -- ------- 1 1 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 ------------------------------------------------------------------ POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- --------------------- ------------ --- MINOR STREET - EB LEFT 50 885 876 876 827 A RIGHT 28 1000 1000 1000 972 A MAJOR STREET NB LEFT 17 1000 1000 1000 984 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... access NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 am Pm,1993 shor\ OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 ssss sss s sssss ssssss sss ssss ssssssssssssssasssss s.asssssssssxssssssx-a sss IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- — AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET.......". harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m_jd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (.mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED .................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------- — EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 15 55 0 0 THRU 620 383 0 0 RIGHT 80 10 55 30 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------------------------ EB WB NG SB ------ ----- ------- ----- LANES 2 2 3 L ANE 11SAGF L k L+ R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE kATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENI v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcphi c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- -------- ------------ ----------- --- MINOR STREET NB RIGHT 61 745 745 745 685 A MINOR STREET qB RIGHT 33 894 894 894 861 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 17 626 626 626 610 A WB LEFT - -61 423 423 423 362 B IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------------ NAME OF THE EAS1/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET..". whea ton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 1212/93 am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 Siii32Yiti>:ki... S1SSS Sii..SSSi...iiKSSiS SSS1S SS..SiSiii......XSSSiii4 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET-....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm) 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 35 10 30 85 THRU 40 30 202 169 RIGHT 20 70 25 45 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ---------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE USAGE LT * k LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paoe-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(ocph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- ----------------------------------------- --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 39 320 263 > 316 263 > 234 215 >C C THROUGH 44 423 384 > 384 > 340 > B RIGHT 22 937 937 937 915 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 11 334 281 > 348 281 > 304 270 >B C THROUGH 33 416 378 > 378 > 345 > B RIGHT 77 941 941 941 864 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 94 845 845 845 751 A NB LEFT 33 838 838 838 805 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemav DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 : am pm 1993 s hort OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS Paae-i X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX t.41Fi.F:R.I.h.1.K.........R1w:i..F).1.1t>.V Y1 rt.AA Y.X XXXX>Y]:XX.Y. t'w. IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemav NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. m,jd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 \ TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................ am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 55 35 25 55 THRU 30 35 158 147 RIGHT 30 90 10 35 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 2 2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + k CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------ --------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 61 386 325 THROUGH 33 516 486 RIGHT 33 959 959 MINOR STREET WB LEFT 39 419 372 THROUGH 39 507 478 RIGHT 99 962 962 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 61 904 904 NB LEFT 28 890 890 366 325 > 275 265 >C C > 486 453 > A 959 926 A > 418 372 > 341 333 >B 6 > 478 > 440 > A 962 863. A 904 844 A 890 862 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ----------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemav DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long M = = M M M M = M 1965 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTEkSECJIUNS SUMMARY REPORT #K#YYYY#YY##YYYY#YY#YYYY#####YY#Y##YYYY#####YYYYYY####YKYYYY#####i##F#Y#YF INTEP.SECTION..narmonv/Iemev AREA TYPE -....OTHER ANALYST....... m_id DATE.......... 12/2/93 TIME......... aan Pm 1993 short COMMENT....... tong ---------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB Wb NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 65 95 165 130 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 1000 610 230 215 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 125 45 120 65 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 30 30 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PEG. BUT. ARR. 'TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 W8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x x NB LT x x TH x TH X RT x RT x PO x PO x WB LT -x x SB LT X x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x GREEN 8.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.055 0.583 8.2 B 13.1 B T 0.689 0.475 13.9 B R 0.148 0.475 8.4 B WB L 0.055 0.583 8.2 B 9.6 B 1 0.420 0.475 9.8 8 R 0.024 0.475 7.9 B NB L 0.050 0.367 18.6 C 23.1 C TR 0.482 0.250 25.1 D SB L 0.050 0.367 18.6 C 22.5 C TR 0.378 0.250 24.2 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delav = 15.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.484 LOS = C 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT FiY.FFFFF#FFiF##FYFF#i####Y##FFF#FF#F###F#F##F#####FFFF####F####YY####Y##I INTERSECTION..harmonv/lemav AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST ....... mid DATE.......... 12/2/3 TIME.......... any am 1993 short COMMENT....... Iona -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB N8 SB LT 120 215 270 65 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 790 1110 335 370 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 195 120 110 65 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 30 30 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 . 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE. HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 11 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT x X NB LT x x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PD x WB LT x x SB LT x x TH x TH x RT x RT x PD x PO x GREEN 8.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ LANE GRP EB L T R WB L T R NB L TR SB L TR ------------- INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS 0.295 0.563 9.8 6 10.3 B 0.544 0.475 10.7 B 0.257 0.475 8.9 B 0.055 0.583 8.2 B 13.7 8 0.765 0.475 15.1 C 0.140 0.475 8.4 8 0.385 0.367 21.9 C 24.8 C 0.603 0.250 26.4 D 0.050 0.367 16.6 C 25.6 D 0.610 0.250 26.5 0 ---------------------------------------------------------- Delav = 16.5 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.624 LOS = C APPENDIX D ■■r M = = = = M M = s = M = = M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 <:KXX««XXM:X<X<XtXXX<it.K«XXX«X.«XT:XY1««<.RX<X««M:KXXXYX<X<>X>.<XXY< IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------------------------------ -------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREEI.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mjd DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ----------------------------------------------- ------------------- EB WB _NB SB - ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 10 21 0 0 THRU 426 688 0 0 RIGHT 6 29 29 4 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EE. Wb Nb SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 '2 3 LANE USAGE L + k L. - k CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- T1AL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (Pcpvl) c = c p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR 51REEI NB LEFT 0 79 75 7S 75 E THROUGH 0 95 91 91 91 E RIGHT 32 874 674 874 842 A MINOR STREET SB LEFT 0 76 72 72 72 E THROUGH 0 98 94 94 94 E RIGHT 4 737 737 737 733 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 11 413 413 413 402 A WB LEFT 23 598 598 598 575 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 : am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long M M M M M M M ■■r M M M M M M M M= M M 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-'I YYYYYYY:KYYYYMtY YRYYYYYYYYY YYYYY.YYYYYYYYY�YYYYYYYYYYYY Y)KYYY<Y%YYYYYYYIY IDENIIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... I AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmonv NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... wheaton NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yv)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. 8 pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE NORTHBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE SOUIHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 3 27 0 0 THRU 595 350 0 0 RIGHT 35 5 29 6 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---------------------------- LANES 2 2 3 3 CANE OSA(.'F L + R L 4 R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3 -------------- — ------- ------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - V LOS p M SH k SH ------------------------------------ ------------ -- MINOR STREET NB RIGHT 32 777 777 777 745 A MINOR STREET SB RIGHT -7 914 914 914 907 A MAJOR STREET EB LEFT 3 661 661 661 657 A WB LEFT 30 463 463 463 433 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... wheaton DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 ; am pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemay NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yv)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am &m 19931 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LE6 MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 30 9 25 61 THRU 28 23 191 177 RIGHT 18 52 23 39 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE ------------------------------------------------ -----------------_-- EB WB NB SB ----------- ----- -------- LANES L- C CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Paae-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT- v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - V LOS p M SH R SH --------------- --------------------------------- --- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 33 364 317 THROUGH 31 460 430 RIGHT 20 947 947 MINOR STREET WB LEFT 10 377 334 THROUGH 25 455 425 RIGHT 57 948 948 MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 67 857 857 NB LEFT 28 855 855 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION > 363 317 > 299 284 >C C > 430 > 399 > B 947 927 A > 395 334 > 360 324 >B B > 425 > 400 > 6 948 891 A 857 790 A 855 $28 A NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemav DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 ; am pm 993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long S m = m m = m = m = = m 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paae-1 XZ<X#IY.XXtIKXXZXYXXXXXXXXX...ZXX.....XZX.X.XXXXXXXXXXX r.XXYTX]: Y:XXIKXX W. W. A. M:X• IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 35 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... lemav NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 12/2/93 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. > am Pm 1993 short OTHER INFORMATION.... long INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL INTERSECTION TYPE: 4-LEG MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: NORTH/SOUTH CONTROL TYPE EASTBOUND: STOP SIGN CONTROL TYPE WESTBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB --- --- ---- ---- LEFT 49 33 20 46 THRU 22 24 149 139 RIGHT 25 64 8 31 NUMBER OF LANES AND LANE USAGE -------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- -------------- ------- LANES 2 2 2 LANE USAGE LT + R LT + R CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT V(Pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------ --------------- ------------ ------------ -- MINOR STREET EB LEFT 54 431 381 > 415 381 > 337 327 >B B THROUGH 24 542 516 > 516 > 492 > A RIGH1 28 962 962 962 934 A MINOR STREET WB LEFT 36 450 410 > 446 410 > 383 374 >8 B THROUGH 26 533 507 > 507 > 481 > A RIGHT 70 965 965 965 894 A MAJOR STREET SB LEFT 51 916 916 916 865 A NB LEFT 22 902 902 902 880 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... wheaton/whalers NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... lemav DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 12/2/93 am pm 199'3\ short OTHER INFORMATION.... long 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT x xxxxxxxxxxx xxxa xx xxxxxxxxx x xxxaxxxxxxxxaaxxxxaa xxaxaxaxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxax INTERSECTION..harmony/lemay AREA TYPE..... UTHEk ANALYST....... mj d Z DATE ........./Z/93 61996 .a omTIME.........short COMMENT ....... Iona -------------------------------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB 148 NB SB LT 62 56 96 122 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 931 559 150 112 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 60 43 89 61 T 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 30 30 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 --------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.6 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 8.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 9.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------------ ------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.055 0.583 8.2 B 12.6 8 T 0.642 0.475 13.3 b R 0.047 0.475 8.0 B WB L 0.055 0.583 6.2 B 9.4 B T 0.305 0.475 9.6 B R 0.021 0.475 7.9 B NB L 0.050 0.367 18.6 C 22.4 C TR 0.330 0.250 23.8 C SB L 0.050 0.367 18.6 C 21.4 C TR 0.238 0.250 23.2 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.4 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.420 LOS = E, 1985 HCM: SI6NA.LI2E0 INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT xaaxxxxxxxxxaxx+xxaaxxxaxxxxaxxxxxxxxxwxxxxxxxzaxxaa• xxxxxxxx x xxxxxxxxaaxr. INTERSECTION.. harmony/lemay AREA TYPE..... OTHER !; ANALYST ....... m/2 /93 DATE ..........1?/2/93 TIME.......... am qE199)- short COMMENT....... ion9 ------------------ ----------------------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB N8 SB EB WB NB SB LT 113 169 126 60 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 728 1036 189 247 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 90 111 72 77 1 12.0 T 12.0 TR 12.0 TR 12.0 RR 30 30 0 0 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 1Z.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 25.6 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 10 N 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 120.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X X TH K TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X R SB LT X X TH X TH X RT X RT X PC) X PD X GREEN 8.0 55.0 0.0 0.0 - GREEN 9.0 28.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.055 0.583 6.2 B 10.0 6 T 0.502 0.475 10.4 B R 0.094 0.475 8.Z B WB L 0.055 0.583 8.2 B 13.1 B 1 0.714 0.475 14.2 B k 0.126 0.475 8.3 8 NB L 0.050 0.367 18.6 C 22.3 C TR 0.355 0.250 24.0 C SB L 0.050 0.367 18.6 C 23.8 -C TR 0.438 0.250 24.7 C __________________________________________________________________________ INTERSECTION: Delay = 14.7 !sec/vehi V/C = 0.485 LOS = B APPENDIX C I 1 1 d d 11 LEVEL -OF -SERVICE CRITERIA SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Level -of -service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frijetration, fuel consumption, and lost travel time. Specifically, level -of -service criteria are stated Jn terms of the average stopped delay per vehicle for a 15-mintil:e analysis period. Level -of -service A describes operations with very low delay, i.e., leas than 5.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service B describes operations with delay in the range of 5.1 to 15.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service C describes operations with delay in the range of 15.1 to 25.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service D describes operations with delay in the range of 25.1 to 40.0 seconds per vehicle. Level -of -service E describes operations with delay in the range of 40.1 to 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be the limit of acceptable delay. Level -of -service F describes operations with delay in excess of 60.0 seconds per vehicle. This is considered to be unacceptobls to most drivers. RESERVE CAPACITY UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS LEVEL OF SERVICE EXPECTED DELAY TO MINOR SWEET TRAFFIC 40U A Little or no delay 300-399 B Short traffic delays 200-299 C Average traffic delays 100-199 D Long traffic delays 0- 99 E Very lung traffic delays * F *When demand volume exceeds the capacity of the lane, extreme delays will be encountered with queuing which may cause severe congestion affecting other traffic movements in the intersection. This condition usually warrants improvement to the intersection. I 1 1 1 i 1 1 1 1 1 APPENDIX B 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY OF" VEHICLE COUNTS Observer Date Day City ' -J 5 R = Right turn _ S = Straight INTERSECTION OF A)F Mpr`i V AND LcJ H L HTO L = Lett turn TIME BEGINS ;'-n �.1 �J r+� T . i TNorthh South l� r A4 ol / f A r' M O ►.1 �/ TOTAL East West TALL from NORTH from SOUTH from EAST from WEST R I S I L I T Rotal I S I L I Total I R I S I L I Total (I R I S I L I Total 10 -73o II �I I I z II. 7 I I I I! I o I /u�l 1 I 1�51 1 I as51 / I a�v II sic; II : �! o�L! rl► P7 qn�` 0900 II a 1 1 1 2 1 q I I G II I _3 l /94`I /51 .z/�II /81 31 1 0 1 33 ss 68/S11 l I ( I III I 1 41 II 1 01/471 4-,1 / 311 q 'RP21 11 'Fr`II y4l U �15� II I I i II I I II I I I I I I I I II II TDTAL II I I la. I I oG II �r 1 5-1a 1 Z71 �qy llvsli/�11 ,� i /17L1 I I I I I I I i II II I I I II I I I i II EMN II I ) i I i I I II I I I I I I I I I II I I f II I I I II II I I I II I I I II ol I I o ICI I I Il G 11413,01 13. /931/97151.5 s.-i q.u; /o l3a.f'I 13u. ' 11 a I /91 s sqL;.' II 55 5:oa''ll > I I I II i I q II 70 II 7 13si71 13,:� II / I a� zl / I PL; 1 .5 I 5 s:/sPll a I I I a it 6 I I I G i 12 13a I �' 13351 / I ao=;l I :V -)r 11 s4 II ., u 9 II I I I I I I I� II I I I I I I I i II -rOTALII 4 agl 1 1 a' II 33 1 a4113111 .2 I /.30,% 1 W I F/! 1 /01 II I I I I I I I it II I I I I I I i I 1 II I I I I I I I I I I �I i = m w A ! m = = m m m S m= m MATTHEW J. DELICH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY Or VEHICLE COUNTS Observer Date Day City jl-�i R = Right turn S = Straight INTERSECTION OF L F M A AND Lif t F Td A'I FI = r 5 L = Lett turn TIME BEGINS Lr1 AJ LEf-tA N� South TOTAL East West TOTALALL from NORTH from SOUTH I tom EAST tram WEST R S I I L Total I I II R S L Total I I I I R S L Total I I Til R S I I L Total ( 173 I1,5- II /67 IiP1 316 I.2-7 Il.cl s I/&1.30 II II as 7:ys 11io 1/.7,0 11 i FZI 9 1 i2- 11 /zQI /o I/.Il v0 II 3 16 113 1 az. II 6 z 7 II719-8 IZ 3 1z�zII /3s II/51 y 1717E. Ilsl I�GI /y it �{S I iSo 119 1S.5"1/4) i 13 1,571-f 1 6ZI II /39 II131 7 1-f IZ3' 11 .9 1 7 1/o I aS 11 3 11 121 it I I I il I I I II 11 I I 7,11 i I I II II ��113i1� 41 6.i.74// II W a931ao13i/ II ns2-I1 1aY1331 /z/ 11A.D-1-L,1 qq 1 016. I �i7 I k69 II I I I II I I I II I I I I � II I I t II II II I I I II I I I II I I I U I I I I I II it I I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I I 4- 3^PII 1 ?4 1 Y 1 it P 1 93 1 s 1 �Z 11 / S 11 /zl 7 14 1 II I IZ 1 iS I ? it aa3 .q:4 11/ I c5-1141/ 11S1.671 `I 9911 ;k32.11/z1,s 1v I I 11 I I7 I 9 II S.'on II /o I l a S' I /,? ,' 1 6 1 /i7 1 I i3z II - 1 /L 1 7 1 3 1 �? 11 S I I /o I �3 i 9 it 966 s,is II 9 17zl // I qii II Y 174 1 6. 11 17 112,1 I 1 i ' 3 II ai z II I I I i I I I Ii II I � I II I I I II I r�ll3'I 332 16 I Y3911a3134,31aSl Yi/ II f9 II 5a.j A31 1 ,,q 11/91A813,1 7 11 16c 11 /609 it I I I II I I I II I I I I II I I I I I CITY :F FORT UTiNS -RA==:C EIJGIHEERiK 'Si:e Caae . 9000009S N-S Street: LE!A'Y AVE E-# Street: 4A.,g0-4Y RCAO Weather : SUNNY ------------------------ mveients ,Y: ',riiary PEAK ?_;iCO ANALYSIS FC.R THE P-31CO: 'a4:30 PM - 05:*0 PM ?RECTiON START =E'•.K 1R it" !UME ...... r:RC:N: .,..,., Km PEAK HOUR =:CTOR ?EOS Right T'nru _aft11 Total ?E'h Ri;ht Thru :aft North 4::0 P4 0.?1 11 11 247 5§ 394 20 64 0 East 4:30 ?M ?' 2 111 103. 1316 1 i9 13 �. South 4:20 PM :,92 9 12 i'? 123 3?7 _ 19 4'? 33 test 30 =M E2 3 90 c3 3 93'. 10 18 East .?1 2 111 4est =2 10 2: ?31 1? 3 2 LEMAY AVE. ;. .; N ---------- ' W—+—E i i . S ........... 413 ... ------[PEDS—] 11 ; 77 ; 247 ; 60 :............: 2 [PEDS ] -----* *------------ --- 384 — — — — 1239 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 1 ... HARMONY ROAD 1316 1036 ---------- ' ---- ------------------ 113 -- �— 169 ?AGE: 1 FiLE: 93-10-92 DATE: 10/26I92 ------------ 728 931 HARMONY ROAD ... ------------ ---- .................. 860 90 -- --- 387 ---- . ................. ----* *------------------ [PEDS ] 3 ............: 126 189 72 9 [PEDS .] .. 506 ...; LEMAY AVE. ; ---------- , APPENDIX A It is recommended that Wheaton Drive be striped as a two lane street with a continuous two-way left -turn lane between Lemay Avenue and Harmony Road. While the traffic volumes do not warrant the center turn lane, there is ample width to provide this cross section along with bike lanes, if that is the desire of the City of Fort Collins. III. Conclusions The following summarizes the significant findings as a result of this study: ' - The Courtney Park, Phase II traffic can be accommodated on the area streets. It is expected that approximately 1230 daily trip ends will be generated by the proposed uses. - Current traffic operation at the area intersections is acceptable. t- in the short range future (1995), the key intersections generally operate acceptably. - In the long range future (2010+), the key intersections will generally operate acceptably. A signal will likely be warranted at the Lemay/Wheaton/Whalers intersection. Harmony Road is assumed to have a six lane plus turn lane cross section. A single lane in each direction with a continuous two-way left -turn lane is recommended for Wheaton Drive between Lemay Avenue and Harmony Road. When land to the east of Courtney Park, Phase II develops, the traffic study for that development should address impacts along McMurray Avenue and revisit the operation along Wheaton Drive, between Harmony Road and Lemay Avenue. I Intersection Table 4 Long Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service AM PM Harmony/Lemay (signal) C D Lemay/Wheaton/Whalers (stop sign) EB LT/T F F EB RT A A WB LT/T E F WB RT A A SB LT A B NB LT, A A Lemay/Wheaton/Whalers (signal) B B Harmony/Wheaton (stop sign) NB RT A A SB RT A A EB LT A D WB LT C B Wheaton/Courtney Park Access EB LT A A EB RT A A NB LT A A Wheaton/Monte Carlo (stop sign) WB LT A A WB RT A A SB LT A A 0 C3 �s�-115/115 °I�° - 50/65 W 1- y 40/20 WAY 1 /� - 60/40 50/75 L o 40/30 ZZ o - Co D N CD O t0 W m Z a w 000 c' CD Ul 120/380 „Cn o N to fn — 960/1925 /- 230/255 120 250 � 1610/11325 -�' o Ln 220/250 - o m Ln o to ^ am uO N h AM / PM Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. � oo G 0 o sod v`C $S Site I 45/25 -� 25/15 - 1 1 0 Lo 'n 1 �- 25/85 In ^ 1225/2470 HARMONY ROAD /r— 90/70 45/120 1800/1550 -#- o 150/100 -� 0 ^ LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 7 Table 3 Short Range Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/Lemay (signal) C C Lemay/Wheaton/Whalers (stop sign) EB LT/T C C EB RT A A WB LT/T B B WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Harmony/Wheaton (stop sign) NB RT A A SB RT A A EB LT A B WB LT B A Wheaton/Courtney Park Access EB LT A A EB RT A A NB LT A A i 0 cc 90/70 "I' "' — 35/30 WHAL *- 35/10 WAYS 1 /' - 55/35 30/40 30/20 -� L o N O r- O In 0 LOnm 3 ? n L 45/120 to - 610/1110 r -- 95/215 65/120 - �) f I 1000/790 —^- n M o 125/195 --� " o 0 N I I HARMONY ROAD AM / PM Rounded to nearest 5 vehicles. 'o Site 45/25 .} 25/15 -� v, L, tn o_ 0 o-10/45 — 730/1420 --- 55/60 15X35 -� 1180 890 -� o 80/35 -� LO LO SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 6 N SHORT RANGE / LONG RANGE TRIP DISTRIBUTION Figure 5 Trip Distribution ' Trip distribution was determined based upon an evaluation of trip attractions and the most likely routes available to travel to those attractions. The directional distribution of the approaching and departing traffic generated at Courtney Park, Phase II is a ' function of: - Geographic location within the City of Fort Collins; - Location of employment and business center uses which are likely to attract trips; - Access to the site. Figure 5 illustrates the trip distribution percentages used in the subsequent traffic assignments. Traffic Assignment and Intersection Operation ' Using the vehicular trip generation estimates presented in Table 2, the site generated traffic was assigned to the area street network. The analyzed intersections were Harmony/Lemay, Lemay/ Wheaton, Wheaton/Courtney Park Access, and Wheaton/Harmony. Figure 6 shows the 1995 peak hour traffic assignment. This assignment includes the increase in background traffic as described 1 earlier in this report and the traffic generated by Courtney Park, Phase II. Table 3 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix D. All ' of the analyzed intersections will operate acceptably. Trips to the east along Harmony Road will likely utilize Monte Carlo Drive to McMurray Drive, then turn east at the Harmony/McMurray signalized intersection. The number of Courtney Park, Phase II trips using this route will be very few. There is sufficient excess capacity at the Harmony/McMurray signal to handle these trips. It is more appropriate that this intersection be analyzed in the traffic study for the aforementioned grocery store based shopping center. Figure 7 shows the long range peak hour traffic assignment. Table 4 shows the peak hour operation at the key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix E. All intersections I will continue to operate acceptably except for minor street left turns and throughs at the Lemay/Wheaton/Whalers intersection with stop sign control. Based upon these traffic projections, this intersection will meet signal warrants. With a traffic signal, the I Lemay/Wheaton/Whalers intersection will operate acceptably. At the traffic levels shown, it is assumed that Harmony Road will have three through lanes in each direction, plus right- and left -turn lanes at appropriate intersections. 1 3 1 HARMONY ROAD N No Scale SITE PLAN Figure 4 Table 1 1993 Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/Lemay (signal) B B Lemay/Wheaton/Whalers (stop sign) EB LT/T B C EB RT A A WB LT/T B B WB RT A A SB LT A A NB LT A A Harmony/Wheaton (stop sign) NB RT A A SB RT A A EB LT A A WB LT A A Table 2 Trip Generation Daily A.M. Peak P.M. Peak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in out in out Courtney Park, Phase II 1230 22 65 60 35 167 Apartment D.U. With the existing control and geometry at the key intersections, the peak hour operation is shown in Table 1. The operation is deemed acceptable at all intersections. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better. Descriptions of level of service from the 1985 Highway Capacity Manual for signalized and unsignalized intersections are provided in Appendix B. Calculation forms for the operation shown in Table 1 are provided in Appendix C. III. Proposed Development Courtney Park, Phase II is proposed to be developed as an apartment complex. A schematic site plan is shown in Figure 4. It is proposed that one access driveway be connected to Wheaton Drive approximately 300 feet north of Harmony Road. This access will serve the 167 apartment units within Courtney Park, Phase II. No connection is proposed to the existing Courtney Park Apartments to the west. It is assumed that Courtney Park, Phase II will be developed by 1995. The vacant land to the east, between Wheaton and McMurray, is being considered for a grocery store and other miscellaneous commercial uses. The status of this development is not known at this time. The short range traffic projections in this study assume no development on the grocery store parcel. The long range traffic projections in this study assume a grocery store based shopping center on this parcel. However, the volumes associated with the grocery store parcel are order of magnitude projections. When a firm development proposal is put forth on this parcel, the traffic study for that development should address specific access intersections and utilize the Courtney Park, Phase II Site Access Study as a source for the background traffic. Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the proposed apartment complex were obtained from Trip Generation, 5th _Edition, ITE. Table 2 shows the trip generation used for Courtney Park, Phase II. Background Traffic Background traffic is defined as the traffic that is and/or will be on the area streets, but is not related to the proposed development. Background traffic was projected to increase at the rate of 3 percent per year to the short range future year considered in this study. The site generated traffic is added to the background traffic. The long range background traffic was developed following review of various traffic studies in this area and the "North Front Range Regional Transportation Plan." 2 1993 Pam) N -- 64/52 "I' `lam 24/23 WHALEWAY / 1 /- 33/9 49/30 --� 22/28 -#- N N 25/18 -�, �co C,4 N W D Z W 6 } W J 1992 �o �N N 43/111 `c — 559 1036 �, - 56/169 HARMONY ROAD 62/113 931 / 28 to rn N 60/90 - �� rn co c Lo 1993 N Z�l "k"- 5/29 ---- 66� 1311 �,-27 21 3/--� r� 1134/81110- f 35/6 - C" N RECENT PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC Figure 3 i 1 iLl 1 1 A* AI PRIMARY STREETS Figure 2 ,I\FR�irV Wj I'IBII 111C)C r rIts �rlr�']rlrE�� J,JI 11-II �L N<II j ]r11 ia RosP �,.. ��r . _— ( I Gravel Plt .. 'll�t, fSr C !j 7I � o Radio Rr ' , •+—!,9oW IS — 23N 19 .l—n 20 I. 2-1� 1 � `1 I= II l�.•. �I_ Drakes — , 71T11�� ( •['�' �1_, �I .'1!� �81 II --�_I._Lii -..- 8M4874... IC ) I, \/ (� 1486 • (1 [� C 4 Ills M51 \ .�1 II IL 1. 26 li l _ "11 2I1 NNN _J ?' 30 l 1 — _ 2211 n 1 0111ep,III 1` II <99 3 s� 32 \. \ 333635 rr07nQc`_, 1 ® 11almonY A� IY RD. 1503 e IX _— — • ;:; ----=--II` -;- ----� - URTNE o PARK, PHASE II 4916 1498 11 „ 12 7 8 - — Q. n Tr 11by der4923 it II Isol / 13 P. � I � /�• I18 �. /� N� �� t o8i;5 J I.ld -- i., 7 1 I Ji4880 NO SCALE SITE LOCATION Figure 1 I. Introduction Courtney Park, Phase II is a proposed apartment residential use, located in the northwest quadrant of the Harmony/Wheaton intersection in Fort Collins, Colorado. The site location is shown in Figure 1. This site access study addresses the short range and long range impacts and operation at key intersections. This study uses data developed in a number of other traffic studies performed for other developments in this area of Fort Collins. The primary streets that will be impacted by Courtney Park, Phase II are: Harmony Road, Lemay Avenue, and Wheaton Drive. These streets, along with others, are shown in Figure 2. Harmony Road is classified as a major arterial on the Fort Collins Master Street Plan. The segment between Lemay Avenue and Wheaton Drive has a four lane, plus left -turn lane at appropriate intersections, cross section. There is a grass median and right - turn auxiliary lanes. There is signal control at the Harmony/Lemay intersection. Lemay Avenue is classified as an arterial street. It has a four lane plus center turn lane cross section. Traffic on Lemay Avenue, both north and south of Harmony Road, will grow as a function of development in the area, especially to the south of Harmony Road. Wheaton Drive is a public street that connects Harmony Road to Lemay Avenue in a semi -circular alignment. It is not classified by the City of Fort Collins, but functions as a minor collector. Wheaton Drive has stop sign control at Harmony Road at a limited right-in/right-out/left-in intersection and stop sign control at an intersection with Lemay Avenue. At its intersection with Lemay Avenue, Wheaton Drive lines up with Whalers Way. Land uses in the immediate area are commercial, residential, and vacant. Retail uses are southwest of the site. Office uses are proposed to be located to the south within Oak Ridge PUD. Residential uses are to the north and west of the site. The initial Courtney Park apartment development is west of this site. There is vacant land to the east across Wheaton Drive. Land in the area is flat. The center of Fort Collins is north of Courtney Park, Phase II. II. Existing Conditions Peak hour intersection counts were obtained in 1992 and 1993 and are shown in Figure 3. These counts are provided in Appendix A. 1