HomeMy WebLinkAboutWESTBURY PUD, SECOND FILING - FINAL - 11-94B - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTSS
Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA
ALL CRITERIA cRlA I APPLIC. BLF CRITERIA ONLY
Is the c-tenon I Will the c.-tenen�
acClicadle7 to satisted?
�ICRITERION = � E.6 Yes No If no, please explain
Al. COMMUNI T Y-WIDE CRITERIA.
1.1 Solar Oriemaiicn I 11 1 I V Ia�%aucecrrt eclw/P�l
7 c s I I I I I IItW �4
1._ C..morCn..n„1 re Plan
1.3 Wiiclife Habitat I I I l I
1.4
Mineral Deccsit
I I I 1 I
1.5
Te
cciccicaily, Sensitive Areas
Lands of Acricuitur2l Imecrance
I reserved I I I
I reserved I 1
1.7
v ^cr,
Enerc t.�. �c.^/atlCn
I 1✓I �'
-1. 8
Air Qualitv
I
I ✓ I I 1
1.9
W2:er Qu2iity
I I I I I
1 10
Sewace arc "" ast=s
I I ✓1 I I I
1.11
Wa-=r�on e^/^ v n
I I
I
1.12
Residenti2l Density
I I 1 j ✓
2
NE'.GHSCRH000 CONIPA71BIL4TY
CR1T==IA.I
2.1
Ve^Icu;ar. Fcr-s,;an. Bike Transccration I I I I I I
2.2
Buiicirc P!_ce,ment and Orient=_ticn
I I V 1 I✓ I I
2.3
Natural F=-t..res
I I I I I
2.4
Ve^icular Circuiaticn anc Perrino
I I ,/I I ,/
2.5
E^ergencv Acc=cs -
I I✓ I I✓ I i
2.
Fecestrian Circulation
I I I I I
2.7
Arc: ,itec:ure
I I I 1
2.8
Suiicinc Heicnt =_nd Views
I I I V1 I I
2.9
Shading
I I ✓1
2.10
Scl2r Access
2.11
Historic Resources
I I I I I I
2.12
Setcacks
2.13
Lancsc=ce
I I /( I I
2.14
2.15
Sicns
Site Lichting
I I I A 1 1 tali au S
2.le
Noise and Vibration
I 1 ) I✓ I I
2.17
Glare or Heat
2.18
Hazardous Materials
1
A 3.
ENGINEERING CRITERIA
3.1
Utility Capacity
✓
3.2
Desicn Standards
I ✓I I
3.3
Water Hazards
3.4
Gecicoic Hazards
Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments
The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised . ch 1994
- 61- A--�3 "':�:)I
SCHOOL PROJECTIONS
PROPOSAL: WESTBURY PUD, 2nd Filing
DESCRIPTION: 57 housing units on 16.48 acres
DENSITY:
General Population
3.46 du/acre
57 (units) x 3.5 (persons/unit) = 199.5
School Age
Population
Elementary -
57 (units) x
Junior High -
57 (units) x
Senior High -
57 (units) x
.450
(pupils/unit) =
25.65
.210
(pupils/unit) =
11.97
.185
(pupils/unit) =
10.55
TYPICAL FRONT ELEVATION
TYPICAL REAR ELEVATION
TYPICAL SIDE ELEVATION
WESTBURY P.U.D.
FILING TWO
THE VILLAGES AT WESTBURY
CHARACTER ELEVATIONS
GREG D. FISHER, ARCHITECT
ms C" s
F. CO., w e 4 -�MU
SHEET 1 of 1
ai c°acne'
>aar+ l.a+n
noNN a ns
laxor+�c ti
r 7 — to 48 z-re
/ "�
49 /
50
/ 0--ol
• aanYr 8 9 ]O it 12 13 14
II 51 1 2 3 4 s 6 T LEGEND
pr pt
0 52 __- .-w m>Nc n�N ro Nvw
48 BELLEVIEW DR N
53 +-csc t-co 2-1v 1ILUT
II 47 / 1-w fcn— 1 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15
e-Px ez . ,-PD 1)^ a Nsm enox r, z
MNMUMON PN E 1
I RF 3-PPG J
2_P 1_�
�1 Co . omN '—"I \ e
45 I \ — / rt.EEDNw xI.1NE 30 1 to
G1 D1smRKE \ 31 32 33
MEAS HG CNNL z_
1II 41 \ \ ` _ 2-1
44 5-U et
36 35 �� w5
a3 42 �.,-Pc 34 �� WESTBURY DR.
7P�Cr P � _ _ 1 IyPNOMIWIE LOGTON
i tsnNc +e' Rre
10nccm e, awr .w
' nM m+OC>[ Pmmtcw
enm corw.nerl >P nN Pma rvo
PENCE DETML
xm *o srre
PLANT NOTES
PLANT LIST
!/ LuMan�'
4eP.ya m
f-4 Nei NNOR
BURY JP UD
��I.un r.m
�WEETSv��7C
Nmm� mro _
- 1P ll1ldWV11II ll VV®
Fl. PSW54
••• .. ""�'�' rYUNVillb PPOJECT NO. SSW
v SGLE- 1 �30'
LANDSCAPE PLM
. ,, eNEPNIDDON3-2O-95
RENSIONS:
t
o so IW uo snEEr Ib.2 a 2
- IMCf •6•
IP ism
CCKInfrE R06Rl r.M
P. mwma m >M Ima vw.
SINGLE FAMILY CGRESS)
DELiureDq o.w vnR
.
t�
W
W
2
H
LEGEND
J
W
_ .. uussesn+eu.
iD mEnmunan slc.
H ,ore rernw —AA
7 4..,.se aD�.e,axn
IsJ7L Eve*
FRONT RANGE
COMMUNITY LOLL
- 5' DErADHED WALK
- D+PCESS IW N.ADJ DG PROPER Cl f
1ARED E ADO SHIELDS
PS STRO I I
(SHARED ACCESS DO SHIELDS STREET)
(FINAL LOGiION WY VARY)
ATE LDCADO.
T5' RCP
YICJNITY_MAR--- Cl —
GENERAI NOTES !/ LAND USE BREAKDOWN SIGNATURE BLOCK C �y 1/ - D @
groan design, inc
en
r:.'sn'---en.
A _ Anse m.0 I.
j�jy9Vvj�j�fVj J�
j�-jLj�\e77//�/ee /LLfY IB mil/ R 11 11 \Y A-vi
�. ... 2E�RIIIJyII //fi�np PUN
RAW i ae..
..::. SITE _...:. ...- .. - mlAL un, I<-00<14'.1LL Sn hT2 (s ILnLS N ev da xD. 1.
ALE Oi VREPMURDX:�
PENSIONS:
ROPERTY DESCRIPTION
...
=I _
0 5o iw �w SHEET xD 1 DE 2
rip
VICINITY MAP
HARMONY ROAD RLP
SITE
F��°"tF� g� Go\`69`
00F
11-94B WESTBU RY PU D, 2nd Filing
Final
07/17/95
No Text
Westbury PUD, Filing Two, Final, 411-94B
July 24, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 4
end of Mariposa Court (in the Westbury P.U.D., First Filing) to the common line with
the Neilon property.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the Westbury P.U.D., Second Filing - Final, #11-9413, with the
following condition:
The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan
upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D.
plans for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer and City
staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (September
25, 1995) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this
planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed,
that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an
extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of time unless it shall
first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan
certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of
the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or
developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without
substantial detriment to the public good.
If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the
development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for
resolution if such presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding
monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both the
staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to
the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it
shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made.)
If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as
applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null
and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development
shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining
the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an
appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 3, of the City Code, the "final
decision" of the Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of this
conditional approval; however, in the event that a dispute is presented to the Board for
resolution regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the
running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final decision" shall be counted
from the date of the Board's decision resolving such dispute.
Westbury PUD, Filing Two, Final, #11-94B
July 24, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 3
5. Transportation:
This property will be directly accessed from South Shields Street by an internal local street, Westbury
Drive, that will continue north through the First Filing to West Harmony Road. The majority of the
lots will be accessed by two cul-de-sacs, one on either side of Westbury Drive. About 12 of the lots
will take direct access from Westbury Drive. A condition of Preliminary approval requiring that
sufficient right-of-way for a future local street connection from Westbury Drive to the west property
line be provided was met with the inclusion of a 48' wide right-of-way dedication from the west end
of Mariposa Court (in the Westbury P.U.D., First Filing) to the common line with the Neilon
property.
6. Resource Protection:
There is an existing grove of (predominantly) Siberian Elm trees in the northeasterly portion of this
development. The City Forester has inspected the trees and has stated that they have no ornamental
value; however, the applicant plans to preserve as many of the trees as possible, depending on their
visual and habitat value. This will be determined as each home is sited and built. The trees that are
lost will be replaced with appropriate non -pest trees.
Findings of Fact/Conclusions:
In evaluating the request for the Westbury P.U.D., Second Filing - Final, staff makes the following
findings of fact:
The Second Filing is in conformance with the approved Westbury P.U.D. -
Preliminary.
2. The project meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development
Guidance System.
3. The gross residential density is 3.46 dwelling units per acre. Subsequent filings within
the Westbury P.U.D. will be required to include sufficient density for an overall
density of 3.1 dwelling units per acre as approved in the Preliminary P.U.D.
4. The additional traffic generated by the project can be accommodated on the existing
and future street system.
5. A condition of Preliminary approval requiring that sufficient right-of-way for a future
local street connection from Westbury Drive to the west property line be provided
was been met with the inclusion of a 48' wide right-of-way dedication from the west
Westbury PUD, Filing Two, Final, 411-94B
July 24, 1995 P & Z Meeting
Page 2
COMMENTS:
1. Background:
The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows:
N: RLP; existing single family residential (Westbury P.U.D., First Filing)
S: RLP; planned single family residential (Cottonwood Ridge)
E: RLP; existing community college (Front Range)
W: RLP; existing single family residential (The Ridge)
The Westbury P.U.D. - Preliminary was approved, with conditions, by the Planning and Zoning
Board on April 25, 1994 for 56 single family lots and 20 townhome or duplex lots on 24.5 acres. The
subject Second Filing portion of the preliminary plan contained 33 conventional single family lots, 4
lots for patio -style homes, and 20 lots for attached homes, totalling 57 dwelling units.
2. Land Use:
This is a request for final P.U.D. approval for a total of 57 residential dwelling units, consisting of
32 single family lots and 25 attached homes on individual lots, on 16.48 acres. The Second Filing is
in conformance with the approved Westbury P.U.D. - Preliminary and meets the applicable All
Development Criteria of the L.D.G.S. The gross residential density of the Second Filing is 3.46
dwelling units per acre. The Preliminary P.U.D. addressed the overall gross residential density for the
entire development, with that density being 3.1 dwelling units per acre.
3. Design:
Landscaping:
The applicant is, in addition to the preservation of as many existing Siberian Elm trees as possible,
providing street trees in the parkway along West Harmony Road at 40' on -center. There will also be
shade, ornamental, and evergreen trees provided in the active open space and common open space
areas.
Solar Orientation:
There are 19 of the 32 single family lots (equalling 59%) that are in compliance with the City's
adopted Solar Orientation Ordinance requiring that a minimum of 65% of the lots meet the definition
of a solar oriented lot. A variance to the Solar Orientation Ordinance, as it relates to the Westbury
P.U.D., was requested by the applicant with the Preliminary P.U.D. and the variance was granted by
the Planning and Zoning Board.
ITEM NO. 1 n
MEETING DATE 7/24/95
STAFF ctc3up Q1 t
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD
STAFF REPORT
PROJECT: Westbury P.U.D., Second Filing - Final, 411-94B
APPLICANT: Westbury LCC, a Colorado Limited Liability CO.
c/o Cityscape Urban Design, Inc.
3555 Stanford Road, Suite 105
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
OWNER: Westbury LCC, a Colorado Limited Liability CO.
3500 J.F.K. Parkway, Suite 221
Fort Collins, CO. 80525
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
This is a request for final planned unit development (P.U.D.) approval for a total of 57 residential
dwelling units, consisting of 32 single family lots and 25 attached homes on individual lots, on 16.48
acres located on the south side of West Harmony Road and west of South Shields Street. The
property is zoned RLP - Low Density Planned Residential.
RECOMMENDATION
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Approval with a condition
This project was granted preliminary approval by the Planning and Zoning Board on April 25, 1994.
This application for final approval conforms with the preliminary approval. In addition, the Final
P.U.D.:
* provides for a gross residential density of 3.46 dwelling units per acre. The
Preliminary P.U.D. addressed the overall gross residential density for the entire
development, with that density being 3.1 dwelling units per acre;
* meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance
System (L.D.G.S.);
* has addressed a condition of Preliminary approval requiring that sufficient right-of-
way for a future local street connection from Westbury Drive to the west property line
be provided. The condition was met with the inclusion of a 48' wide right-of-way
dedication from the west end of Mariposa Court (in the Westbury P.U.D., First Filing)
to the common line with the Neilon property.
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (303) 221-6750
PLANNING DEPARTMENT