The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLONG POND WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY - FDP - FDP180016 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 3 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSBENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: BENCHMARK # w/ DESCRIPTION ELEVATION: PLEASE NOTE: THIS PLAN SET IS USING NAVD88 FOR A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. IF NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) = NAVD88 - X.XX'. Contact: Jesse Schlam, 970-218-29329 jschlam@fcqov.com Topic: Erosion Control Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 09/25/2018 09/25/2018: Less than 10,000 sq.ft of disturbance, No ESC Review needed. Department: Environmental Planning Contact: Stephanie Blochowiak, 970-416-42909 sblochowiak@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 07/27/2018: No comments. Department: Technical Services Contact: Jeff County, 970-221-65889 jcountV@fcqov.com Topic: Construction Drawings Comment Originated: 07/27/2018 Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/30/2018 - TM9TWnot been d 2 18: Please provide the followin the EXACT format shown below. i n T.._ :: ' fION ION: PLEAS AN R A VERTICAL DATUM. SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENTS HAVE USED NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) FOR THEIR VERTICAL DATUMS. `NGVD29 UNADJUSTED DATUM (PRIOR CITY OF FORT COLLINS DATUM) IS REQUIRED FOR ANY PURPOSE, THE FOLLOWING EQUATION SHOULD BE USED: NGVD29 UNADJUSTED (PRIOR CITYCIFAW Q i iN nATUM) = NAV, AS'. Topic: Easements Comment Number: 7 Comment Originated: 10/08/2018 10/08/2018: Review of the easements will be done when we get the okay from Development Review Engineering, that they have been finalized. Topic: General Comment Number: 8 Comment Originated: 10/08/2018 Ftement 8Please provide the followinMMW in the EXACT format s PROJECT DATUM: NAVD88 Department: Light And Power Contact: Rob Irish, 970-224-6167, rirish@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/25/2018 10/08/2018: Would it be possible to expand the Utility Easement a little to the North where I have indicated on the attachment sent to Tenae. The electric box they are showing in the existing utility easement behind the ROW is where the feed will be coming from for there transformer. It would give us a straighter shot out of the existing cabinet. Otherwise we have to go south to the drive entrance and then up the driveway. Thanks, Rob Not possible 07/25/2018: The proposed access easement shown will also need to be a utility easement if electric is expected to be in the access easement. All of Light & Power's electric facilities are required to be in an easement. Department: PFA Contact: Andrew Rosen, 970-416-2599, arosen@poudre-fire.orq Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated: 10/03/2018 10-3-2018 >The area shown as proposed 20ft access and utility easement should labeled as and Emergency Access Easement and shown on the Plat a' dedicated by separate legal document. M Per conversation with Andrew Rosen on 10/15/18, proposed emergency access as shown will be acceptable so no change required. 07/31/2018: FIRE LANE > The fire lane shall be dedicated and labeled as an Emergency Access Easement and not an Access Easement. Please revise all related plans and exhibits. > Minimum inside turning shall not have a radius less than 25'. The site plan does not currently meet this minimum. Please revise the 90 degree turn to the publish south. Department: Stormwater Engineering Contact: Dan Mogen, 970-305-5989, dmogen@fcqov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/31/2018 10/08/2018: Please see updated redlines (PDF). 07/31/2018: Please see redlined drainage report (PDF). Comment Number: 2 Comment Originated: 07/15/2018 $: Light & Power has pr to the legal description. Also, please change the wording from "Access" t ,Emergency Access". ? 08/03/2018: As a follow-up to this item from the staff review, a deed of dedication to the City of Fort Collins of a utility and emergency access easement is required for the alignment that is shown on the plans. A legal description for this (in the same manner that a previous access easement and a previous utility easement was prepared, but are no longer applicable.) A draft of the deed of dedication will be emailed separately to the project planner for coordination. The City will review the legal description and any proposed changes to the deed of dedication. The completed fully signed deed of dedication by the grantor/owner along with a notary and attorney certification signature will be needed for City acceptance and is tied to the plan approval. 07/15/2018: One easement dedication to the City Transportation Development Review Fee (of $250) was paid for. I'm unclear as to what this pertains to, but presume this might be the fire lane that's identified as 20' access easement on the plan set. This should depicted on the set as an emergency access easement, dedicated to the City ). Further clarity on the plan set should be indicated on the proposed 10' utility easement -- is this dedicated to the City of Fort Collins as well? (which would require an additional $250). Legal descriptions for dedication of easements would need to be provided and I can provide our standard form for easement dedications sot the City. Recording fees would need to also be provided for any dedications to the City. Comment Number: 3 Comment Originated: 07/15/2018 10/09/2018: This did not appear to be provided. 08/03/2018: As a follow-up from the staff review meeting, the information sheet we require from the developer/applicant to begin drafting the development agreement will be email to the project planner for coordination. This information sheet will need to be filled out and returned in order for the City to begin drafting the development agreement. 07/15/2018: A development agreement will need to be entered into on this project indicating that future development/redevelopment of the property could require the improvement of Turnberry Road in accordance with 24-95 of the City Code. At time of a final plan approval for the project the drafting of the development agreement with information provided by the developer, would occur. Comment Number: 4 Comment Originated 10/09/2018: There is still the confusion of referencing both an access and A emergency access easement on the plans and legal description use have this rectified. 08/03/2018: Please ensure that the plans reflect/label the �pf a„ the alignment indicated as an access easement on the plans. The easement should be more specific in terms of it being a private ea indicate who are the parties to that easement (an access easemer property owner to Verizon perhaps?) 08/03/2018 Fort Collins Community Development and Neighborhood Services 281 North College Avenue PO Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522 970.221.6750 970.224.6134 - fax fcgovcom/developmentre view October 12, 2018 Mike Powers Atlas Towers 3002 Bluff St. Unit 300 Boulder, CO 80301 RE: Long Pond Wireless Telecommunications Facility, FDP180016, Round Number 2 Please see the following summary of comments from City staff and outside reviewing agencies for your submittal of the above referenced project. If you have questions about any comments, you may contact the individual commenter or direct your questions through the Development Review Coordinator, Tenae Beane, at 970-224-6119 or tbeane@fcgov.com. Comment Summary: Department: Engineering Development Review Contact: Marc Virata, 970-221-6567, mvirata@fcgov.com Topic: General Comment Number: 1 Comment Originated wo p aft sets were apparently providervirith oven 1-11myornidtion, different than the option referenced below. If civil drawin%strip ufti nAtel desired b the a licant then the site plan drawing can be 08/03/2018: As a follow-up to this item from the staff review, the submittal may be a combined site/civil set as submitted, the plans for approval would then not be P.E. signed stamped. 07/15/2018: There were several sheets in the overall set that were given City Utility Plan Approval Blocks on the lower right of the page. Civil drawings with this approval block are their own separate set and would not be merged in the submittal package with the other sheets. That said, there may not ultimately be a need for a civil set (pending perhaps verification on Stormwater's comment regarding the amount of impervious area). Further discussion should occur to coordinate whether a separate distinct civil plan set will be needed and how portions of the existing set are either incorporated in a civil set done by a Colorado licensed P.E., or left into the existing set with the utility plan approval 07/15/2018 blocks removed.