Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWOODLAND STATION PUD - PRELIMINARY - 18-94B - CORRESPONDENCE - CITIZEN COMMUNICATION (9).t island surrounded by quiet, residential acreages and a delicate ecosystem. To apply a generic standard of 3 units per acre to this tract would be a tragic mistake. This is an inf ill parcel and it should be developed in harmony with its surroundings. Please consider the Strachan/Shields tract to be a special case worthy of special planning so as not to destroy the character of our Neighborhood, the wildlife that reside there, and the potential for the City to have an outstanding environmental resource east of County Road 9. We respect the property owner's right to sell and the developer's need to have an economically feasible subdivision. Please allow the Neighborhood and the developer to arrive at an acceptable plan, regardless of the proposed 3 units per acre standard which would create a disaster in this situation. The Neighborhood stands by its proposal presented at the Neighborhood meeting which is: a) that County Road 9 should be the dividing line between urban and rural development and that, b) two acre lots should be created along the Poudre River ridge line which then transition to one acre lots, which then transition to half acre lots along County Road 9. We request that the City be creative in working with the developer to make our development proposal feasible, in order that this sensitive area might be saved. We are confident that through creative planning you can preserve this area forever. Applying a generic density standard to this special area is simply not proper - it would be shortsighted and would exemplify the epitomy of poor planning and incompatible development. We'd like you to be able to drive or bike by this special area 10 years from now and be proud of how you helped to preserve its established character. Thank you very much for your serious consideration of our feelings. We look forward to your response. Sincerely, The Neighborhood Dick & Ellie Chinn Jim & Karen Gleason Bill & Lynn Warren David & Mary Robertson Bill McBride Rhys & Judy Christensen Sam & Catherine Sands Dan & Sue Henderson Dr. David & Sandy Thomas Herb & Elisabeth Murphy cc: City Council City Natural Resource Department Planning and Zoning Board Planning Department Brad Bennett, Developer July 1, 1994 Ted Shepard, Planner City of Fort Collins Planning Dept. 281 N. College Fort Collins, CO 80521 AL _ 61994 D Re: Proposed development of Strachan/Shields properties Thank you for taking the time to meet with our neighborhood on Thursday night. We are writing to present a unified voice to the City Planning Department, the Planning & Zoning Board, the City Council, the City's Natural Resource Department and the developer. First, we would like to define "the Neighborhood" and invite all of you listed above to become intimately acquainted with our Neighborhood. The boundaries are Horsetooth Road on the north, Fossil Creek inlet ditch on the east, Hewlett Packard on the south and County Road 9 on the west (the Neighborhood). This area has long been characterized by its rural nature and residential acreages. The smallest lots are 2.39 acres and range upwards to 18 acres. Currently there are 15 homes in the Neighborhood. Many of the existing homes sit on the Poudre River ridge line with unrestricted views to the east and west. The area to the east of Fossil Creek inlet ditch from Harmony Road to Drake Road has been designated as a unique habitat in the Cache la Poudre Landscape Opportunities Study (L.O.S.). This 1992 study earmarked this area for bird preserves, wildlife habitat, lakes, etc. Please consult this study as part of your planning process. Already the Straus Cabin area and the CSU Environmental Learning Center have been established as natural preserves on ground east of County Road 9. We feel that County Road 9 should be the buffer zone and barrier to high density, urban development. All the ground east of County Road 9 should be designated as residential acreages or open space to preserve this important historical and environmentally sensitive area. The Neighborhood has not protested any development west of County Road 9. We've supported Stoneridge, English Ranch and the NCR plant. However, we are drawing the line at County Road 9. We don't feel it is appropriate to place an urban development smack in the middle of our long established rural area. Placing 135 tract homes amongst our 15 acreages is an abomination. The City's LDGS calls for compatible development. Dropping 135 tract homes in the midst of an established rural area which lies adjacent to a defined historical and environmentally sensitive ecosystem is not compatible development or good design no matter how you look at it. The 35 acres comprising the Strachan/Shields properties is an