HomeMy WebLinkAboutK & M REZONING ..... 6/07/94 CITY COUNCIL HEARING - 17-94 - REPORTS - SECOND READING.4 rip
F1 "s
1 RLP
AI rm
Vacant
32 i g
Vacant
�r ■ ::: PROP05E41=?
-, .�.,.
■ •'.�i��i�i�inu�n�nFi1 11isIll Kim Rill 112111#i1iii1i1funuIll
y
•+, r' ...
■ ' �' i
i.
■ `` \'
■ i
igr
Vacant
Vacant
1
OUT ■ ' � �
■ V Vacant
■ Vacant
■
■
■�■■■■■■�■r5r�s ouT VINE DRIVE C NTY ROAD 48
■
■
i
ITEM: K &
M
REZONING
''
1,,
NUMBER: 17-94
\�J
�w
DATE: May 17, 1994 3 I ITEM NUMBER: 10
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the requested zones. Staff also recommends all
zones have a PUD condition attached.
PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD RECOMMENDATION
The Planning and Zoning Board, at its regular monthly meeting of April 25, 1994,
voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the requested rezoning. A copy of the Board's
minutes is attached.
DATE: May 17, 1994
20 , ITEM NUMBER: 10
change the zoning for a property in the T Zone to another zoning district
included within the Zoning Code.
The surrounding zoning and existing land uses are as follows:
N: R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential, undeveloped
I-G, General Industrial, undeveloped
E: I-G, General Industrial, undeveloped
S: FA-1 Farming, undeveloped
T-Transition, undeveloped
W: FA-1, Farming,undeveloped
M, Multi -Family Residential, Adriel Hills residential development at
approximately 5 units/acre
The requested zones of I-P, B-P, and R-L-P would help implement the City's land
use policies which encourage a mixture of land uses and residential densities
within all parts of the city. The I-P designation is for light industrial park
areas containing controlled industrial uses; the B-P designation is for areas
planned as a unit to provide business services while protecting surrounding
residential areas; and, the R-L-P designation is for areas planned as a unit to
provide variation in use, density, and building placement. In addition, the I-P
district is designed for industrial uses in proximity to areas zoned for
residential uses and along arterial streets.
The property, given its large size, will probably eventually develop with a
mixture of land uses including business, commercial, residential, and industrial
uses. A PUD condition on the property would require all development proposals
to be reviewed according to the criteria of the LAND DEVELOPMENT GUIDANCE SYSTEM.
With a PUD condition, the underlying zoning district has no bearing on the
ultimate land use approval for development proposals on the property. The LDGS
"point charts" are used to determine appropriateness of proposed land uses. The
PUD process would also assure that proposed uses are compatible with surrounding
existing uses as well as potential uses on undeveloped properties.
As indicated, according to the City's LAND USE POLICIES PLAN, areas should
provide for a mixing of land use types and residential densities. This site
offers great opportunities to address the City's differing land use locational
policies. There are no immediate development plans for the property.
Both Mountain Vista Drive (County Road #50) and Summit View Road (County Road
H9E) are planned as arterial streets (4-lanes) according to the Northeast Area
Transportation Study (NEATS). City water and sewer lines would need to be
extended into this area in order to serve development of the property, or
development of the property could also possibly utilize district utilities. Any
development will be required to address the City's off -site street policy, which
requires access to an improved arterial street (minimum 36 foot wide pavement
constructed to arterial standards) and to pay City development fees for water and
sewer (if City utilities are used), storm drainage, parkland (for residential
uses), and street oversizing. Thus, there are some significant infrastructure
issues which need to be addressed in the development of the property.
Findings
The requested I-P, Industrial Park, B-P, Planned Business, and R-L-P, Low
Density Planned Residential, Districts are in conformance with the
policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan.
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: 10
DATE: May 171994
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL Ken 17, 1
STAFF:
SUBJECT:
Hearing and First Reading of Ordinance No. 70, 1994, Amending the Zoning District
Map of the City of Fort Collins by Changing the Zoning Classification for that
Certain Property Known as the K & M Rezoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the requested zones. Staff also recommends all such
zones have a PUD condition attached. The Planning and Zoning Board voted 7-0 to
recommend approval of the requested zones.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This is a request to rezone approximately 350 acres from the T-Transition
District to the following zones: 30 acres of B-P, Planned Business, District;
60 acres of I-P, Industrial Park, District; and 260 acres of R-L-P, Low Density
Planned Residential. The T Zone is for properties in a transitional stage with
regards to ultimate development. The property is located south of County Road
#50, on either side of Summit View Road and one-half mile north of East Vine
Drive. The I-P portion is to be located east of Summit View and south of County
Road #50; the B-P portion is to be located southwest of the Summit View/County
Road #50 intersection; and the balance of the property would be zoned R-L-P.
According to the Code of the City of Fort Collins, within sixty days from the
date the matter is considered by the Planning and Zoning Board, the City must
change the zoning for a property in the T Zone to another zoning district
included within the Zoning Code.
APPLICANT: K & M Company
c/o Lucia Liley
110 East Oak Street
Fort Collins, CO 80524-2880
OWNER: Same
BACKGROUND:
The applicant, Lucia Liley, on behalf of the owner, K & M Company, has submitted
a written petition requesting rezoning of approximately 350 acres from the T-
Transition the following zones: 30 acres of B-P, Planned Business District; 60
acres of I-P, Industrial Park District; and 260 acres of R-L-P, Low Density
Planned Residential. The T Zone is for properties in a transitional stage with
regards to ultimate development. The property is located south of County Road
#50, on either side of Summit View Road and one-half mile north of East Vine
Drive. The I-P portion is to be located east of Summit View and south of County
Road #50; the B-P portion is to be located southwest of the Summit View/County
Road #50 intersection; and the balance of the property would be zoned R-L-P.
According to the Code of the City of Fort Collins, within sixty days from the
date the matter is considered by the Planning and Zoning Board, the City must
AGENDA ITEM SUMMARY ITEM NUMBER: 13
DATE: June 7, 1994
FORT COLLINS CITY COUNCIL STAFF- Ken Waido
SUBJECT:
Second Reading of Ordinance No. 70, 1994, Amending the Zoning District Map of the
City of Fort Collins by Changing the Zoning Classification for that Certain
Property Known as the K & M Rezoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on Second Reading.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This Ordinance, which was unanimously adopted on First Reading on May 17, rezones
approximately 350 acres from the T-Transition District to the following zones:
30 acres of B-P, Planned Business, District; 60 acres of I-P, Industrial Park,
District; and 260 acres of R-L-P, Low Density Planned Residential. The T Zone
is for properties in a transitional stage with regards to ultimate development.
The property is located south of County Road #50, on either side of Summit View
Road and one-half mile north of East Vine Drive. The I-P portion is to be
located east of Summit View and south of County Road #50; the B-P portion is to
be located southwest of the Summit View/County Road #50 intersection; and the
balance of the property would be zoned R-L-P. According to the Code of the City
of Fort Collins, within sixty days from the date the matter is considered by the
Planning and Zoning Board, the City must change the zoning for a property in the
T Zone to another zoning district included within the Zoning Code.
APPLICANT: K & M Company
c/o Lucia Liley
110 East Oak Street
Fort Collins, CO 80524-2880
OWNER: Same