HomeMy WebLinkAboutK & M REZONING - 17-94 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 -0
Mr. Ken Waido
March 15, 1994
Page 2
complying with the City's request, the owners of the property do
not waive any rights which they may have on the additional
submissions and, payment is made under protest.
Our clients feel that the B-P planned business zone is the
most appropriate for this property. If the Planning Staff would
like to have discussions regarding the requested zone, our clients
and Eldon Ward are open to scheduling a meeting upon Lucia Liley's
return. We will contact you early in the week of March 21st.
Very truly yours,
MARCH & MYATT, P.C.
By:
J. Brad March
JBM/jps
Enclosures
CC: Ms. Wanda Krajicek
City Clerk, City of Fort Collins
ARTHUR E. MARCH. JR.
RAMSEY D. MYATT
ROBERT W. BRANDIES. JR.
RICHARD S. GAST
LUCIA A. LILEY
J. BRADFORD MARCH
LINDA S. MILLER
WILLIAM C. BEYERS
JEFFREY J. JOHNSON
MARCH & MYATT, P.C.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
110 EAST OAK STREET
FORT COLLINS. COLORADO 80524-2880
(303) 482-4322
TELECOPIER 13031 482-3038
Mr. Ken Waido
City of Fort Collins
Planning Department
281 North College Ave.
Fort Collins, CO 80521
March 15, 1994
ARTHUR E. MARCH
1909-1981
MAILING ADDRESS:
P.O. BOX 469
FORT COLLINS. CO 80522-0469
HAND DELIVERED
Re: K & M Company Petition to remove property from
T-Transition Zone
Dear Ken:
Pursuant to your request, we are submitting the following
items as a supplement to the K & M Company Petition to Remove
Property from the T-Transition Zone which was filed with the City
Clerk on March 9, 1994:
1) Petition (4 additional copies);
2) Reason for Request (5 copies);
3) Planning Department Application Form;
4) Check for $55 ($50 application fee and
$5 per page of petition); and
5) List of Affected Property Owners.
I understand that you are requiring these additional items
because of Planning Staff's position that the K & M Company
petition is a rezoning request and, therefore, subject to the
submittal requirements for "Rezoning Review" in the City's
Development Manual.
In accordance with Section 29-423 of the Code, it is our
position that the owner of the property has an absolute right to
request removal of the property from the T-Transition zoning
district and that upon such request being made, the City is
required to place the property in an appropriate zone which will
accommodate the development of the property for an urban use.
Therefore, we believe that the requirements which have been made
are not proper. Nevertheless, we are making this submission in
order to insure that the petition for zoning the property will be
referred to the Planning and Zoning Board and heard at its next
regular meeting on March 28, 1994 as required under the Code. In