Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTHE DETAIL CENTER PUD - PRELIMINARY & FINAL - 22-94 - REPORTS - RECOMMENDATION/REPORT W/ATTACHMENTS• CIPt OF FORT COLLINS ENERGY CONSERVATION WORKSHEET This worksheet must be completed and submitted at the time of application for all non-residential Preliminary PUD's requesting energy conservation points on the applicable Land Use Activity Point Chart. Please choose one of the two methods below. Be realistic in determining your commitment for energy conservation mea- sures. Failure to fulfill a commitment made for energy conservation measures may result in disqualification of a project under the applicable criteria of the LDGS. NAME OF PUD: T(e METHOD ONE: Co,, Submittal Date: 0 I propose a percent reduction in the annual energy consumption for the structure(s) in this proposed PUD. This reduction receives point(s) for energy conservation. NOTE FOR THOSE PROJECTS USING METHOD ONE: Certification by a professional engineer, licensed in Colorado, and a summation of the engineer's calculation methods and results will be required to document energy conservation measures at the time of building permit application. METHOD TWO: I propose the following energy conservation measures for the structure(s) in this proposed PUD: Measure fif � �.�4Y :� n� eu1-nc .,,2 t✓gll jo �(oor �� s q r Total Points received from Method 2: Points l e sy Z/ / Preparer's Name: C Stb L le'O� e2 i ^ CONFLICTS IN LAND USE Impacts from this proposed use would be on auto related or professional office uses at neighboring sites. Additional impact at more remote sites are felt by residential areas to the West. Primary considerations were given to visual and auditory impacts. No significant potential for additional conflicts are anticipated beyond those for any development of this site. Visual impact of overhead garage doors had potential for conflict with existing uses to the East and West" Existing uses South and North of the site are auto related dealerships with multiple overhead doors. To minimize the impact of overhead doors they were not placed of the East elevation" One door is proposed on the West elevation and is designed in an exterior wall set back from the main facade on the West. This placement minimizes the visibility of overhead doors along site lines from the non -auto related uses. The two overhead doors on the North elevation (facing Swallow) have been placed at opposite sides of the building and in walls that are set back from the entry announcement. The fenestrations of doors and windows on this elevation have been designed to add a symmetry and continuity to the building and make the overhead doors a logical element :On the building's overall appearance. The remaining overhead doors are in the South elevation facing the back parking lot of a car dealership. The site lines from McClelland of these doors are broken by landscape elements intended to soften any visual impact. Auditory impact has been mitigated by keeping all equipment with potential for high decibel level noise production with in sound attenuated rooms at the interior of the building. ° AUTO -RELATED AND ROADSIDE COMMERCIAL POINT CHART D CHART D For All Critera Criteria Only Applicable Criteria only Criterion Is The Crttedon' Applicable Yes No IV Circle The Correct Score Yes VW No MultIplier Ponts ts Earned 1XII Maximum Applicable Applicable Points P Is .q.,_-Not attwo arterials X Xig 01 2' 4 b. Part of planned center X '91201 3,. 6 ce On non -arterial X X 1 *0 4 8. d. Two acres or more X X 22' 3 d 6 e. Mixed -use X X, 2 0 3 6 f, Joint parking 1 2 0 3 g. Energy conservation X 1 2 0 use 4 - 6 8 .h. Contiguity X X 01 5' 1 10 1. Historic preservation 1.20 2 J. 1 2 0 k 1 2 01 I.11,210, • VW —very Well Done Totals V VI Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points VI\A=Ml a continued Yes No 4. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST 501 OF THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED ON "POINT CHART D" FOR THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA? _ a. Is the activity located other than at the intersection of two arte- rial streets? b. Is the project contiguous to and-functionally.a part of an existing neighborhood or community/regional shopping center, office or industrial. park? Yt� ci Is the +primary access to the activity from a non -arterial street?�es d: 'Is the project on at least two acres of land? rr t 0. Does the project contain two or more significant uses (for instance;,retail, office, residential, hotel/motel and recreation)? Nd f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on -site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off -site parking areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces?`lie S g. Does the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage, through the application of alternative energy systems, use of existing build- ` ings, and through committed energy conservation measures beyond that normally required by City Code? N 5 h. Is the project located with at least 1/6th of its property boundary contiguous,to existing urban development? qfn i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event occurred, which has special public value because of notable archi- tecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill the following criteria. i. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation; ii: Assure that new.structures and uses will be in keeping with the character of the building or place. Imitation of period styles should be avoided; and iii.-Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will lead to its continuance, conservation, and improvement in an appropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the neighborhood. 0 ACTIVITY Auto- Related; and ,, Roadside Cbmmerc�a X DEFINITION Those retail and wholesale commercial activities which are generally con- sidered and typically found along highways and arterial streets. Uses include: free standing department stores; auction rooms; automobile service stations, repair facilities, car washes; boat, car, trailer, motorcycle showrooms, sales and repair; fuel and ice sales; greenhouses and nurseries; warehouses .and storage; repair. or rental of any article; exterminating. shops; drive-in! restaurants; adult, book stores.; eating places withadult amusement or entertainment; adult photo studios; adult theatres; any uses intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment; and, other uses which are of the same general character. CRITERIAEach -of the following 'applicable criteria must b# answered "yes" and implemented within the develop-• n men plan. Yes No NA . '. Does the project gain its primary vehicular access from a street other than South College Avenue? Are all repair,ipainting and body work activities, including storage of refuse and -vehicular parts, planned to take place within an enclosed structure? If the project contains any uses intended ®, to provide adult amusement or entertainment, does it meet the following requirements: a. + Is the use "establ i shed. i, operated or maintained no less than 500 feet from a residential neighborhood, church and/or. school meeting .all the requirements of the compulsory education laws of the State of Colorado? M b. Is the use established, operated or maintained no less than 1,000 feet from another similar use? continued Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY $ the cm mn vw me 8201waft? be sw~ CRITERION Yes No If no. Please explain Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA 1.1 Solar Orientation 1.2 Ccmprehensive Plan 1.3 Wildlife Habitat 1.4 Mineral Deposit 1.5 Ecclo ically Sensitive Areas 1.6 Lands of A ricultural Importance reserved 1.7 Energy Conservation 1.8 Air Qualitv A 7 Vehi 2.3 Natural Features 2.4 Vehicular Circulation and 2.5 E.mergency Access CR 2.9 2.10 Shading Solar AC:ess 2.11 Historic Resources 2.12 Setbacks 2.13 land e 2.14 Signs 2.15 Site Lighting 2.16 Noise and Vibration 171 2.17 Glare or Heat 2.18 Hazardous Materials A 3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity . 3.2 Design Standards' 1.3 Water Hazards 3.4 Geologic Hazards THE DESCRIPTION OF RATIONAL BEHIND ASSUMPTIONS AND CHOICES One of the primary considerations of the location of this facility at this site was to reduce the requirement for automobile travel. Development on the East side of the site is residential in appearance. Buildings are two story frame structures with shingled roofing. Development to the West along Swallow Road is residential. Though the rail road separates the proposed development from existing residential uses this Project will barrow design elements from residential buildings to enhance its blending into the fabric of the neighborhood. Candscaping and siting of the building are intended to be consistent with residential uses to further enhance the blending with existing uses. a ESTIMATED NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES There will be a maximum nine (9) employees. STATEMENT OF PROPOSED OWNERSHIP Butch and Maureen Stockover are the sole owners of this project. 4 LAND USE POLICIES 3. (c), 50. This project is with in the area served by the existing mass transit system. 3. (d) The project provides employment with in one block of an existing residential development. 22. The site is with in an existing developed area. 26.9 29° All utilities and services are present at the site. 43^ (a)(e) 49. The services that will be made available by d facility currently require several cross town the proposeautomobile This business currently only offers auto detailing a trips by privatetailnd is ^ located on North College Avenue which is across townfromthe dealerships it serves. The location of this facility central to the dealerships it serves and the consolidation of several services (auto LTpholstery and glass repair, paint repair, and car d � detailing) at the new site will reduce the length an number of trips required, 43 51" The requirement for irrigation of landscaping ma^terials has been kept to a minimum by providing large pinting areas with in the parking lot to reduce the effect � moisture content of plantings, of heat from the asphalton 44 Activities associated with car detailing are planned entirely with in the proposed building. The location of noise producing equipment is with in the building at areas away from exterior walls and with in sound attenuated rooms. Not only does this reduce the noise level outside the building but it reduces the noise pollution for employees. STATEMENT OF PLANNING OBJECTIVES AUTO -RELATED AND ROADSIDE COMMERCIAL POINT CHART D For All Criteria Applicable Criteria Only Criterion Is the Criterion Applicable Yes No I II III IV Circle the Correct Score Multiplier Points Earned Ixll Maximum Applicable Points a, Not at Two Arterials X X 2 0 2 4-. 4 b. Part of Planned Center X X 2 0 3 (0 6 c. On Non -Arterial X X 2 0 4 8 d. Two Acres or More X X 2 0 3 p 6 e. Mixed -Use X X 2 0 3 6 f. Joint Parking 1 2 0 3 (o ('0 g. Energy Conservation X 1112340 2 p 8 h. Contiguity X X 2 0 5 l D 10 i. Historic Preservation 1 2 0 2 j. 1 2 0 k. 1 2 0 I. 1 2 0 Totals ZjA- GjA- v vi Percentage Earned of Maximum Applicable Points V/VI = VII Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 _ - - — - — - -- -70- Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial (continued) f. Is there direct vehicular and pedestrian access between on -site parking areas and adjacent existing or future off -site parking areas which contain more than ten (10) spaces? g. Does the activity reduce non-renewable energy usage through the application of altemative energy systems or through energy conservation measures beyond those normally required by the Model Energy Code as adopted by the City? Refer to Appendix "E" for energy conservation methods to ' use for calculating energy conservation points. h. Is the project located with at least one -sixth (1/6) of its property boundary contiguous to existing urban development? ' i. If the site contains a building or place in which a historic event occurred, has special public value because of notable architecture, or is of cultural significance, does the project fulfill the following criteria? 1. Prevent creation of influences adverse to its preservation; ■ 2. Assure that new structures and uses will be in keeping with the character of the building or o place. Imitation of period styles should be avoided; and 3. Propose adaptive use of the building or place that will lead to its continuance, conservation, and improvement in an appropriate manner while respecting the integrity of the neighborhood. Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial DEFINITION; Those retail and wholesale commercial activities which are generally considered and typically found along highways and arterial streets. Uses include free-standing department stores; auction rooms; automobile service stations, repair facilities, car washes; boat, car, trailer, motorcycle showrooms, sales, and repair; fuel and ice sales; greenhouses and nurseries; warehouses and storage; repair or rental of any article; exterminating shops; drive-in restaurants; adult book stores; eating places with adult amusement or entertainment; adult photo studios; adult theaters; any uses intended to provide adult amusement or entertainment; and, other uses which are of the same general character. CRITERIA; Each of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the development plan. Yes No N/A 1. Does the project gain its primary vehicular access from a street other than ❑ South College Avenue? 2. Are all repair, painting and body work activities, including the storage of ❑ ❑ refuse and vehicle parts, planned to take place within an enclosed structure? 3. If the project contains any uses intended to provide adult amusement or ❑ ❑ entertainment, does it meet the following requirements? a a. Is the use established, operated or maintained no less than 500 feet from a residential neighborhood, church, and/or school meeting all of the requirements of the compulsory education laws of the State of Colorado?; b. Is the use established, operated, or maintained no less than one thousand (1,000) feet from another similar use? 4. DOES THE PROJECT EARN AT LEAST FIFTY (50%) PERCENT OF ❑ THE MAXIMUM POINTS AS CALCULATED ON POINT CHART "B" FOR THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA? a. Is the activity located other than at the intersection of two arterial streets? b. Is the project contiguous to and functionally a pan of an existing neighborhood or community/regional shopping center, office, or industrial park? c. Is the primary access to the activity from a non -arterial street? d. Is the project on at least two (2) acres of land?. e. Does the project contain two (2) or more significant uses (for instance retail, office, residential, Land Development Guidance System for Planned Unit Developments The City of Fort Collins, Colorado, Revised March 1994 — — -"— ma Activity A: ALL DEVELOPMENT CRITERIA ALL CRITERIA APPLICABLE CRITERIA ONLY i CRITERION Is the criterion applicable? Will the criterion be satisfied? If no, please explain r N C a Z I Yes ' No Al. COMMUNITY -WIDE CRITERIA 1.1 Solar Orientation 1.2 Comprehensive Plan ✓ 1.3 Wildlife Habitat 1.4 Mineral Deposit ✓ 1.5 Ecologically Sensitive Areas reserved reserved 1.6 Lands of Agricultural Importance 1.7 Energy Conservation 1.8 Air Quality 1.9 Water Quality 1.10 Sewage and Wastes 145- .1 A2. NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY CRITERIA 2.1 Vehicular, Pedestrian, Bike Transportation 2.2 Building Placement and Orientation 2.3 Natural Features 2.4 Vehicular Circulation and Parkin 2.5 Emergency Access 2.6 Pedestrian Circulation 2.7 Architecture ✓ 2.8 Building Height and Views 2.9 Shading 2.10 Solar Access 2.11 Historic Resources ✓ 2.12 Setbacks 2.13 Landscape 2.14 Signs 2.15 Site Lighting✓ tk7 2.16 Noise and Vibration 2.17 Glare or Heat 2.18 Hazardous Materials A3. ENGINEERING CRITERIA 3.1 Utility Capacity 3.2 Design Standards 3.3 Water Hazards 3.4 Geologic Hazards YAM LZTn FLUOR PLAN A,Ow, SA.-IL-5 GLnss bL.,k W.-J.0 5 (i6LP �f y,ni u.+5 P, e(L N-. y..y a No i .... •i •maws ,.......�� .��.. ....• nnoESESam . .���. ..... to ti � ti O ' � taro a,u�lue p..-.- 1i•1, /I/,/, XM YWM.o 0iIw0[M,uwM' II /� % x x x GRADING PLAN i 1 si ol 2 VA I MLA MMIG The Detail Center PUD - Preliminary and Final, #22-94 May 23, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 4 time unless it shall first find that there exists with respect to said planned unit development final plan certain specific unique and extraordinary circumstances which require the granting of the extension in order to prevent exceptional and unique hardship upon the owner or developer of such property and provided that such extension can be granted without substantial detriment to the public good. If the staff and the developer disagree over the provisions to be included in the development agreement, the developer may present such dispute to the Board for resolution if such presentation is made at the next succeeding or second succeeding monthly meeting of the Board. The Board may table any such decision, until both the staff and the developer have had reasonable time to present sufficient information to the Board to enable it to make its decision. (If the Board elects to table the decision, it shall also extend the term of this condition until the date such decision is made.) If this condition is not met within the time established herein (or as extended, as applicable), then the final approval of this planned unit development shall become null and void and of no effect. The date of final approval for this planned unit development shall be deemed to be the date that the condition is met, for purposes of determining the vesting of rights. For purposes of calculating the running of time for the filing of an appeal pursuant to Chapter 2, Article II, Division 31 of the City Code, the 11final decisionew of the Board shall be deemed to have been made at the time of this conditional approval; however, in the event that a dispute is presented to the Board for resolution regarding provisions to be included in the development agreement, the running of time for the filing of an appeal of such "final decisionve shall be counted from the date of the Board's decision resolving such dispute. The Detail Center PUD - Preliminary and Final, #22-94 May 23, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 3 park to the east, will be provided in the area between the parking lot on this site and the parking lot to the south. There will be deciduous and evergreen shrubs in the planting areas associated with the parking lots and driveways, as well as along the foundation on the west side of the building. Parking: There will be 19 outside parking spaces on -site, being located along the west side of the building and along the south property line adjacent to a large parking lot on the rear of the Dellenbach Automobile Dealership property. There will be shared parking by this use and the office park to the east. The parking is considered to be adequate for this use. 5. Transportation: This property will gain its primary access from West Swallow Road, while providing a secondary point of access from McClelland Drive at the southwest corner of the property. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending approval of the Detail Center P.U.D., Preliminary & Final - #22-94, based on the following findings of fact: * It earns 63% on the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial Point Chart of the Land Development Guidance System, compared to the minimum requirement of 50%. * It meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. Staff is recommending a condition of approval stating that: 1. The Planning and Zoning Board approves this planned unit development final plan upon the condition that the development agreement, final utility plans, and final P.U.D. plans for the planned unit development be negotiated between the developer and City staff and executed by the developer prior to the second monthly meeting (July 25, 1994) of the Planning and Zoning Board following the meeting at which this planned unit development final plan was conditionally approved; or, if not so executed, that the developer, at said subsequent monthly meeting, apply to the Board for an extension of time. The Board shall not grant any such extension of The Detail Center PUD - Preliminary and Final, #22-94 May 23, 1994 P & Z Meeting Page 2 COMMENTS: 1. Background• The surrounding zoning and land uses are as follows: N: HB; vacant S: HB; existing automobile dealership parking lot (Dellenbach) E: HB; existing office park W: RL; existing railroad tracks and church The property was annexed into the City with the South College First Annexation in November, 1970. This site was subdivided as part of the Swallow Subdivision Replat that was approved by City Council in August, 1976. 2. Land Use• This is a request for a 4,950 square foot automotive detailing shop on 0.57 acres located on the southeast corner of West Swallow Road and McCelland Drive. It was evaluated against the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial Point Chart, earning 63% of the maximum applicable points, and meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. The proposal earned points for: a) being located other than at the intersection of two arterial streets; b) being contiguous to and functionally part of an existing office park (to the east); c) gaining primary access from a non -arterial street (West Swallow Road); d) having joint parking (with office park to the east); e) being located with at least 1/6 of its property boundary contiguous to existing urban development. 3. Design: Architecture: The building will be one-story, 21.5' in height, and will be constructed with tan decorative split block siding and glass block windows, asphalt shingle roofing material, and overhead bay doors with glass windows for automobile entry and exit. Landscaping: There will be deciduous shade and ornamental trees as street trees along West Swallow Road and McClelland Drive, with planting beds containing evergreen shrubs on both sides of each entry to the site. Trees and shrubs (both deciduous and evergreen), consistent with the landscaping along the south property line of the office ITEM NO. 2 MEETING DATE 5/23/94 STAFF Steve Olt PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD J STAFF REPORT PROJECT: The Detail Center P.U.D., Preliminary & Final - #22-94 APPLICANT: William C. and Maureen D. Stockover 1849 Ramsgate Court Fort Collins, CO. 80524 OWNER: Same as Applicant PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This is a request for a 4,950 square foot automotive detailing shop on 0.57 acres located on the southeast corner of West Swallow Road and McCelland Drive. The property is zoned HB, Highway Business. RECOMMENDATION: Approval with a condition EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: This is a request for a 4,950 square foot automotive detailing shop on 0.57 acres located on the southeast corner of West Swallow Road and McCelland Drive. It earns 63% on the Auto -Related and Roadside Commercial Point Chart and meets the applicable All Development Criteria of the Land Development Guidance System. The building will be one-story, 21.5' in height, and will be constructed with tan decorative split block siding and glass block windows, asphalt shingle roofing material, and overhead bay doors with glass windows for automobile entry and exit. There will be deciduous shade and ornamental trees as street trees along West Swallow Road and McClelland Drive, with planting beds containing evergreen shrubs on both sides of each entry to the site. Trees and shrubs (both deciduous and evergreen), consistent with the landscaping along the south property line of the office park to the east, will be provided in the area between the parking lot on this site and the parking lot to the south. COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 281 N. College Ave. P.O. Box 580 Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 (103) 221-6750 PLANNING DEPARTMENT