The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCOLOTEX ELECTRIC SUPPLY (LOT 11, GOLDEN MEADOWS BUSINESS PARK) - IP SITE PLAN REVIEW - 20-94 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - TRAFFIC STUDY1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Paoe-t x xxrxxxxxxxxMxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx x:a xxxxxxxxxxxx�xxxx..x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ------------------------------------ ------------------------------ AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... innovation NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 3/17 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am Pm 1994 +Site OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES EB WB NB SB ---- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 0 0 -- 0 THRU 0 585 -- 0 RIGHT 0 10 -- 6 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB W8 NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 -- 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE --------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (Dcph) c (Pcphl p M ------------------------ Paoe-3 ------------------------------ SHARED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY c (pcoh) c = c - v LOS SH R SH ---------------------- --- MINOR STREET SB RIGHT 7 793 793 793 786 A IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... innovation DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/17 Pm 1994 +site OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Fage-1 Y YM: Y:: K:K%XKY: Y: t.a.K tZY.t<1.Y.Y'ZZttK'KtMMZt<Y.tY.X KYK2Y[Y tYXtY: M.K YX.R KY:K KFh.K%kZtY'.<X Y IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET --------- harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... innovation NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 3/17 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1994 +site OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL . --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ---------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ---- ---- LEFT 0 0 0 THRU 0 1256 -- 0 RIGHT 0 10 -- 24 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ----- ------ LANES 2 2 -- 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE --------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) p M ------------------------ Paoe-3 --------------------------- SHARED RESERVE CAPACITY CAPACITY c (pcph) c = c - v LOS SH R SH ---------------------- --- MINOR STREET SB RIGHT 26 534 534 534 507 A TIR.'1l��iGGi IDENTIFYING INFORMATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... innovation DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/17 ; am pm 1994 +si OTHER INFORMATION.... 0 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZEO INTERSECTIONS Pane-1 #X\:MKXXK#K##.K#XXX:I:>X####X.K.K###XM#####tX#MX.KK#X##XX#X##Y.t #1Y:X##:#X##.K#♦ IDENTIFYING INFORMATION AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... innovation NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)...... 3/17 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1994 +site OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES ES WB NB SB --- ---- ---- ---- LEFT 0 0 -- 0 THRU 0 585 -- 0 RIGHT 0 16 -- 14 NUMBER OF LANES --------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ------- ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 -- 2 # CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------- -------- ------- ------------ ------------ --- MINOR STREET S6 "- RIGHT 15 790 790 790 774 A MOWN IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... innovation DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/17 am m 1994 +site OTHER INFORMATION.... I 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT X�:XXX.X;%XX%.:fXXXXXXX%XXXXXXX X.XXXXXXXiXXXiXX%iX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXYiXXXXXX INTERSECTION.. h a rmony/mcmurr a AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... m,id DATE.. ..... /17 TIME......... am om 1994 +site COMMENT....... --------------------------------------- -- - ----- -------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB WB NB SB LT 58 46 32 43 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 859 522 5 7 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 95 26 38 31 ; T 12.0 T 12.0 k 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 2.0 20 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV AUJ PKC BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.8 4 W8 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 ES LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 8.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0' 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS .ES L 0.044 0.711 2.9 A 5.1 B T 0.487 0.578 5.4 B R 0.096 0.578 4.0 A WB L 0.044 0.711 2.9 A 4.4 A T 0.296 0.578 4.6 A R 0.008 0.578 3.8 A NB L 0.095 0.222 21.1 C 19.7 C T 0.014 0.222 17.6 C k 0.060 0.222 17.8 C SB L 0.130 0.222 21.3 C 20.2 C T 0.020 0.222 17.7 C R 0.037 0.222 17.7 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 5.9 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.339 LOS = 8 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT XXCXXXXXXXXXXIXXXXXXXLtYXXXXXXXYXXXKXXX XXXXXXXXtXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX%X INTERSECTION..harmony/mcmurray AREA TYPE... -.OTHER ANALYST....... mjd DATE ..........3/17 TIME ........ _ an, am 1994 +sit COMMENT....... ------------------------------- - --------------------------------------- VOLUMES GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB : EB WB NB SB LT 30 42 59 30 : L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 795 1170 7 7 : T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 96 44 26 33 : T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 20 20 : R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.8 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 31:8 3 SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WS LT X X SB LT K TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 8.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------- --------------------------------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.044 0.711 2.9 A 5.0 B T 0.450 0.578 5.2 B R 0.097 0:578 4.0 A WB L 0.044 0.711 2.9 A 7.2 B T 0.663 0.578 7.4 B R 0.031 0.578 3.8 A NB L 0. 177 0.222 21.6 C 20.8 C T 0.020 0.222 17.7 C R 0.020 0.222 17.7 C SB L 0.088 0. 222 21,1 C 19.7 C T 0.020 0.222 17.7 C R 0.043 0.222 17.8 C INTERSECTION: Delay 7.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.459 LOS B APPENDIX C 1985 HCM: UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Page-1 %xZX K%:KYZ#R:I.Kxx.%:<ZxFxx.xY.%1x.KYx>.%::t%:xY.<xiY.ti%KYxKKxx <:k'K .W.t x.x xXKK R%Ki.k :4%% IDENTIFYING INFORMATION -------------------------------------------------------------- --- AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET.. 55 PEAK HOUR FACTOR ..................... 1 AREA POPULATION ...................... 100000 NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET......... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET....... innovation NAME OF THE ANALYST .................. mid DATE OF THE ANALYSIS (mm/dd/yy)..._.. 3/17 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED ................. am pm 1994 +site OTHER INFORMATION.... INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL --------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION TYPE: T-INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN TRAFFIC VOLUMES --------------- EB WB NB SE ---- ---- ---- --- LEFT 0 0 -- 0 THRU 0 1256 -- 0 RIGHT 0 7 -- 17 NUMBER OF LANES -------------------------------------------------------------------- EB WB NB SB ----- — ------- ------- ------- LANES 2 2 -- 2 CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE Page-3 --------------------------------------------------------------------- POTEN- ACTUAL FLOW- TIAL MOVEMENT SHARED RESERVE RATE CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY CAPACITY MOVEMENT v(pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c (pcph) c = c - v LOS p M SH R SH ------------------------------------------------ --- MINOR STREET SB RICHT 19 535 535 535 516 A �i IDENTIFYING INFORMATION --------------------------------------------------------------------- NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET...... harmony NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET.... innovation DATE AND TIME OF THE ANALYSIS..... 3/17 ; am m 1994 +site OTHER INFORMATION.... 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT YXYYXXXYYYXXXXXXXXXXYYYXXXXXYXYXXXYYXXXYXXXXXXXYX#YYYX YXXXXMXYYYXXXXXXXXxX I NTERSECT ION.. h a rmony/mcmurr a AREA TYPE ..... OTHER ANALYST....... mid DATE......... .1/17 TIME... ... (:D pni 1494 site COMMENT....... ------------------------------------------------------------ ------ VOLUMES - GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB Eft WB NB SB LT 50 45 32 36 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 12.0 TH 859 515 4 7 T 12.0 1" 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 95 26 35 31 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12_0 RR 20 20 20 20 R 12.0 R 12_.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------ ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.6 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 31.8 3 58 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------- ----------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X WB LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 8.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 13.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ---------------------------------------------------------- ------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C C/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.044 0.711 2.9 A 5.1 B T 0.487 0.578 5.4 B R 0.096 0.576 4.0 A WB L 0.044 0.711 2.9 A 4.4 A T 0.292 0.578 4.6 A R 0.008 0.578 3.8 A NB L 0.095 0.222 21.1 c 19.8 C T 0.011 0.222 17.6 C R 0.060 0.222 17.8 C SB L 0.114 0.222 21.2 C 20.1 C T 0.020 0.222 17.7 C R 0.037 0.222 17.7 C -------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTERSECTION: Delay = 5.8 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.335 LOS = B 1985 HCM: SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS SUMMARY REPORT ##Xx#xK####xxxxxxxKx##xxxxYxx##x#X#:kxx#xxx#.#####xxxxxxxx#x#X#Xx.Kx##K#x##xa. INTERSECTION.. harmony/mcmurray AREA TYPE..... OTHER ANALYST ...... mid DATE .......... 3/17 TIME.......... an, om 1994 +site COMMENT....... --------------------------------------------------- -- ---------------- VOLUMES q GEOMETRY EB WB NB SB EB W8, NB SB LT 26 41 59 26 L 12.0 L 12.0 L 11.0 L 12.0 TH 795 1164 6 7 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 T 12.0 RT 96 44 26 33 T 12.0 T 12.0 R 12.0 R 12.0 RR 20 20 20 20 R 12.0 R 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ADJUSTMENT FACTORS GRADE HV ADJ PKG BUSES PHF PEDS PED. BUT. ARR. TYPE (%) (%) Y/N Nm Nb Y/N min T EB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.6 4 WB 0.00 2.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 25.8 4 NB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 31.8 3 SB 0.00 1.00 N 0 0 0.90 5 Y 31.8 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- SIGNAL SETTINGS CYCLE LENGTH = 90.0 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 PH-1 PH-2 PH-3 PH-4 EB LT X X NB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PO X WE, LT X X SB LT X TH X TH X RT X RT X PD X PD X GREEN 8.0 50.0 0.0 0.0 GREEN 18.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 4.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 YELLOW 5.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ------------------------------- LEVEL OF SERVICE LANE GRP. V/C G/C DELAY LOS APP. DELAY APP. LOS EB L 0.044 0.711 2.9 A 5.0 B T 0.450 0.578 5.2 B R 0.097 0.578 4.0 A WB L 0.044 0.711 2.9 A 7.2 B T 0.659 0.578 7.4 B R 0.031 0.578 3.8 A NB L 0. 177 0.222 21.6 C 20.9 C T 0.017 0.222 17.7 C R 0.020 0.222 17.7 C SB L 0.076 0.222 21.0 C 19.6 C T 0.020 0.222 17.7 C ________k_______0_043___0_222______ 1_7__8______C _____ =--0-4--5-7 ----- Delay = 7.0 (sec/veh) V/C = 0.457 LOS = R APPENDIX B MATTHEIN J. DELICH, P.E. - 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO S053S TABULAR SUMMARY OF VEHICLE COUNTS -7 Day r 0AJ ity PD /2 7 (? L n C. I -A) s R = Right turn Observer Date 3 C T INTERSECTION OF �L— ,AJA.1n J A'r 10,P% t4 A Z �0AJ V S = Straight AND L = Left turn BEGINSTIME 2.UNo4JA. ':l�l from SOUTH N°rth` I South 14Al2MQ4)t TEast I West TOT from NORTH from EAST trom WEST R S I L Total R S I L I Total R I S I L I Total II R I S I L I Total ?30 11 1 1 I I I II 41r4 rs2-11 11 4-5'll2 I I I II l i 1 sl I r&Co II I 11 II s��o II Z I I I I I II I I aa-I � 4 s II i� I I II ors' II 1 1 I I I II Ild IiZ81 I ►3211 I I 1 II I I II I I II I I I II I I I I I 3o-g3vl I I II I I II II1 Is�si I s�sl I I II it I I I II I I II I I I I II I I I I II II i I II I I I II 1' I I 1 II 1 1 1 I II II Iti I 11 I I I II I I I I II I I I ( I I II I i II I f I I II i I I II II II i I I II I I II II I I I II I I I I II 4 �0 1 3 1 I I II i i II II Z 12- I I I E573 II I I I I II 44s114 I I I I I I II Z 13 I 13i1 I I I I I !:100 i s l II I I II 11 3351 13 3Co it I. I I I s�� sl I II I I I II IIZI II 13�31 I I I I II I I I I II i I I II I I I it i i I I ? �IZ�� Irt�5 MATTHEtN J. DEUCH, P.E. 3413 BANYAN AVENUE LOVELAND, CO 80538 TABULAR SUMMARY /OF VEHICLE COUNTS Observer Date3 9 DayC1ty �oeY �GC. /41 S R = Right turn C r> P eA `� 4q a �u.0�t/ S = Straigm INTERSECTION OF AND L = Left tum TIME BEGINS NIcM,)eeAP 11itG1uvee>QY TOTAL North South 9A2/�oyy t�,OQjL461J East TOTAL West TOTAL ALL from NORTH from SOUTH from EAST from WEST R S I L Total II R S L I Total R I S I L I Total II R S L I Total '730 1 - 1 o 10 11-7 & Is 11 3Z I T1131 ►'14I15Z 11f4IZs1 ►Z 7-7-7 11 429 114(ol -245- Its i 1 g 114- 119 I Il0 Zo II 34 17 LER11311(o3 11Z71150 11417,31 4-00 11 34- 'ZCO 11-5-1 4- to 1 19 111 Z 0 1131 Zf II 44- 11 4-112(01 9 I1 39 11zo jai S I IG ZSZ 13 II 433 3116- 11144 I Z 10 1 zco Z 131 1 4- II 4-0 I $ 1109 I 1 1 Z(o 11341zo319 124 7Z II I Z II I I +1,- 1 1 II 111 1 I 1 I 1 I 1 11 730?501131 1331 72 1138 4- 13Z1 7 41 15-0112ia1615451 6-8(01195-1859 h5011004-1 1 s90 11 1-740 II I I I I I I II I I I i II I I I it II I I I II I I I II II I I I II I I I I II won" it 7— II I I II I I I 1 II ► I I l I I II II I I I II I I II I I I I I I I II II I I I II I I I LI II I I I II I I I II II 430 1114-1 1 (S 1 zO 11 'a Z lip IZG 11 4& 11 (fa I7-4-Z13 1z,5&111411$(p13 IZo' 146411 s10 44-!5 11 4- 1 3 4 1 11 113 1 Z III I 1 co 11 z 7 I& I Z9 91 s' 1310 111 G 117SI !- I I Wo 11 Sofa 11 s3 3 Soso 113 12 1 2 III I I 1101 1 II 2 1 jj1*jZ90jJGj-3jLJ (IZ(olzoo I6 I Z3Z I r1 it si's0 sIs 117- 110 I z3 II I 1 IZZI 32- 11 s's IIIT 13331131364 I4-0JZ341 7 I0`8I 1164-s 11 700 I I i i II I I I II II I I I II I I I II 30-5�0II33I -7 144111�414-1 11 II9(1-79.5IZ&I 91 -7 11 Z�� II23Z3 APPENDIX A NOM. MONTE CARLO 40 0 go" TRIP DISTRIBU-"ION FIGURE 3 HARMON? AM/PM (SIT&) EXISTING & SITE GENERATED rtAK HOUR TRAFFIC F,cuRe 4 Table 1 1994 Peak Hour Operation Intersection Harmony/McMurray (signal) Harmony/Innovation Right-in/Right-out SB RT Land Use Colotex Electric Table 2 Trip Generation Level of Service AM PM B B A Daily A.M. Peak Trips Trips Trips in out 150 14 12 Table 3 W P.M. Peak Trips Trips in out 8 10 Site & Existing Traffic Peak Hour Operation Level of Service Intersection AM PM Harmony/McMurray (signal) B B Harmony/Innovation Right-in/Right-out SB RT A A ONTE w V L SIGNAL. CARLO z HARMONY RAAD RIGMT-IN/RIGHT-OUT SCHEMATIC OF THE STREET SYSTEIVI FIGURE I momm o�c a Z. N J L �4.5 41 s &G -j `1 T (� Boo/ T9S -r N k- to/T .,J .4— 56511 2 5-Co NA R MOAI Y AM/PM 1994 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC FIGURE 2 with the manager of the Colotex facility in Loveland. Table 2, Trip Generation reflects the maximum expected daily and peak hour trips resulting from that discussion. The trip distribution for this use is subject to where the developing areas of Fort Collins are. Most traffic will be to/from Harmony Road. In consideration of this, the trip distribution shown in Figure 3 was used in this study. Figure 4 shows the site generated and existing traffic at the key intersections. Using this traffic, the key intersections operate as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. All intersections will operate acceptably. The increase in traffic due to the Colotex Electric facility at the Harmony/McMurray intersection is expected to be 1%. This is considered to be negligible. The change in operation at the key intersections is imperceptible, even from a technical analysis perspective. A grocery store based shopping center is proposed in this area. This center will have a significant impact on traffic in this area. When/if this occurs, the traffic generated at the Colotex Electric facility will comprise an even smaller portion of the traffic in the area. Since the shopping center will require a comprehensive traffic study, it is more appropriate that the Colotex Electric traffic be incorporated in that study, rather than the shopping center traffic be incorporated into this study. It is concluded that all intersections will operate acceptably. The Colotex Electric generated traffic will be negligible compared to the existing and future traffic in this area. c ` CD MEMORANDUM o co 0 o To: Gene Buck, Mountain Plains Constructors W C4 Fort Collins Transportation Division o Fort Collins Planning Department O v c From: Matt Delich z g Date: March 18, 1994 w O Subject: Colotex Electric traffic study (File: 9421MEM1) w Z) z > Colotex Electric is proposing to locate a wholesale a supply facility at the northeast corner of Harmony Road and a Innovation Drive. Prior to beginning this traffic study, zz contact was made with the Fort Collins Transportation Division m staff. This study addresses the specific concerns discussed M with staff. M Figure 1 shows a schematic diagram of the street system. Harmony Road is a four lane, plus auxiliary lanes, highway in the south portion of Fort Collins. In this area, Harmony Road is posted at 45 mph. There is a signal at McMurray Avenue. Innovation Drive intersects Harmony Road from the north at a right-in/right-out access with auxiliary lanes. Harmony Road has a landscaped center median. McMurray Avenue is a collector street north and south of Harmony Road. It serves commercial, industrial, and residential trips. Monte Carlo Drive is a local east -west street, connecting McMurray Avenue and Innovation Drive. Land uses south of Monte Carlo Drive and east of Innovation Drive are commercial/light industrial. The W existing uses are not dissimilar to the proposed Colotex Electric facility. There. is an elementary school on the W northeast corner of the McMurray/Monte Carlo intersection. LLi J A grocery store based shopping area is proposed for the vacant a' parcel located west of McMurray Avenue. = o Traffic counts were obtained at key intersections in v a March, 1994, as shown in Figure 2. Raw traffic data is W provided in Appendix A. Table 1 shows the current operation e a at the key intersections. Calculation forms are provided in aAppendix B. A1.1 intersections operate acceptably. cc The Colotex Electric wholesale supply facility primarily 3 LL serves electrical contractors. Some general retail sales may W LL occur, but there will be no showroom (displays). Typically, = �. a ¢ electrical contractors will purchase items related to a �- specific contracting job. Trips will be from job site to Q Colotex to job site, except for initial morning purchases, which will be made on the way to a job site. Contact was made