The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutCHOICE CENTER FILING 3 (FORMERLY 1721 S. COLLEGE TOWNHOMES) - PDP ..... 8/14/17 ADMINISTRATIVE HEARING (CONTINUED FROM 7/10/17) - PDP160042 - REPORTS - CITY STAFFCHOICE CENTER & CHOICE CENTER SECOND FILING - MINOR AMENDMENT SITUATED M TI/E SOUTHEAST QUARTER SECTION IT, TOIAMSHIP 7 NORTH. RANGE 89 NEST OF THEM PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN CT' OF FORT COLLINS, COUNTY OF LARIMER, STATE OF COLORADO CHOICE CENTER SECOND FILING - LOT I CHOICE CENTER CHDIGE CENTER -LOT t C� a i I i PROPOSED CHOICE CENTER THIRD FILING - LOT I a f¢pt'tl �@A x�.s1 aL wsA •s.ca - -�� -- I - 1 HIT I I onw r»nu-.m. I .l s.cs I , I I I I I cur .ra. <..a I arm 1 Iwo®an'�wae'w.w�l I H I Vos�asa¢I I 0 e 2A - ELEVATION NET j. 4...._ SOIRNELEVATION. 6,— 3 NORiN ELEVATION . .-error ausMmu ANTUNOV ASSOCIA' �xnev..uimm:u mwRao uu rrw AE OESNM mi1Oiw�m® m e im.Nm •I NWIEYdNINN Ntoura�v.ulwn. art Ne uNAa® ', . nct[tenenrxaoRLw 'i 'I WESTERN ELEVATNMI6 L. n. •a i IFJ3f ELEV0.TNJN. EAONIOMNER ORNEWAY WATER RESISTWE RARRER E MRKK SHEATHING HOR'ZONipL TRIM __ 3 } 71 X 1 i 2' SPACRIG AI CEMEM PN •J VERT�C SD I —FURRING f II TYPICAL FBEN CEMENT i?9tMOOW LWE REVEAL }.. �ELEVATIGN MEY rwe 1 WESTE ATION- FACING NA:R DRIVEWAY A`a r,r fB— I - POP MMWTTAL 'CORE a�idva� i m +'Efi, u IDA4EYaIWIN NN /IIMPPVLEiNi L4al 1tEl® e+aw® AE OESIGN moxrmtP�iae oAVM R EY_HORN vwieFra:E4AU. [u vAecmv mara�m QIOP3 CBIIFA T19NiAM EASIFRN EIEVAT10118 [Y611Nb LOIM [>M[IMG IGLIL iM[ING •L1MG,FAMGM/GF MO LGXG -MCK *[: IIYIIONr IIMl10f eG1Ua1 HGWVJ Y[RSIIMnMT YKFSM[MIIO •MONG YXE RRNGMMI eAQMGeM".Mp WfLLal[F eM(IY.• tMRI/'pE e9Y!IT eRq+pF9 enIUM! Y.,LIIemNp® H911Mf T-A'1-Sednnmn •• 1 1016 1 1 0.75 G75 Aran aaess) 1 1 2-Sedrootn 1 1011 2 2 1 i I jampao] I 1 3-Bedrodm 7 m 3 21 I-M ILB 2 14 2 1 SBednnom I i0% 5 51 15 1.5 2 2 2 2 TOTAL 11g196 2B 12 • •NOTE: u-9te NwOor Nke tab located at northeast canner of property ]See site plan) TOW Mike Fading Intent, a Eatetiory 30 '•NOTE:Po Womdo Bevised5tatue,M3 TItleT AdevelopmentofmuniUmquims6'a iNitypoimi. _ CORE "W.M. Pent, - Town Aare development srtll acid...requimd 6 actessibili I,poOft bprov iding viding (1)Type-A dw2 ellingun D1k6L9018 mvaL.1 AssrmeA �asn �3 �AMW218R WTRIX 9IMNRY f n �s ; S ENCLOSED BIKE PARKING EGUWkBrt OasrsvwAv _. ------------ 'sn.s.ra ii.:aw I i SITE PLAN PLAN a +N sae JJ ? L N K ,� LIXIGTEPL b � PARONE �AL4 _— � NVAC HJA.. IMNG BPACE VAN AIX£GGIBLE 9 PAAK.aG SPM m. ------------------- VANACEE5GIBLE ADXSL5MSLE L, UPF9i TYPE-AA®PMA ♦AAA"AAfD1EED FLOOR LUYOU�� HVAO - �� O ys -- _ PAPIR109PACE m _;� 1111G1ETN i IOLLEYJIORN —. ��' / rrPtcAL ygmmTw La�A[® e.mmae. r --------------- _____ lwetO SAGE It1RGTi3i•1 � ' PARQC 9PALE � u....na� AE DEGKiN f i mamwr mao�r Q TVPIGl3g911AlfT-GN2AGEIAYOUT '•^ .. _ IOLLEYJidii L � l avu.v meY.IMIEIGp Ares IDEI® RVAC TYPICAL ?r `}T GOUNDFUXM OMIiI�IYIf� FN wtcSPetE le LIVING SPACE EIRAIM PAM= PLAW 7-_1_T 4 19 c� N e -�, 70 �=11WGIRAGE tAYOUTIAYOD2 7 /�Vr 9 ll.� TO ee»e.r -... ---: °'�"P' •�_ "'_ F' w COLOR TENPEAAnt (M AS CLOSE c� •�._. ...MISSESi.x..wde aF •1F i0 ]DWM &SSFD OM AV�II WWI _ - eo+ em 7. u..nw�•ArW _ 4 CORE I. - Ry'�Mf IMRA . " ANTLINOVIC71r ASSOCIATES MIRMIN �--� uMrwem.elao. .._ .. 11 � is � •E ocsl� _ Iry��_ 1 - _ __ ..� MRE RIIGIIY•F fYN I� iLMMNGKM 'IGMNORAN 6 OF 9 ..umn. .I CHOICE CENTER THIRD FILING ...1 � �„ Call mmr.rw aw .caa r.m PUNT 9CXEm0ULE . ��• I OF.9H J3 Q!' : laS�l!pi€ C�,w! ffi 9f.LX'U se �1'yY Q s wuu.m•nawrr,uu. uu.mry w.,�aw.vr �w aw •u � � a4iomrM N.R Glr f�...FI M.e a.. {�.,NI �a veNu '� [ u .n A,p �ivamuna veuvem nOuuannNr v., I co.uoinu®.is:arti� O �d so Ify W a ¢z �g �a z S Imr.. an.,W LLa P WP_A os6 xr 40F9 21 t .otuns The PDP complies with process located in Division 2.2 — Common Development Review Procedures for Development Applications of Article 2 — Administration. The Modification of Standard to Section 3.2.2(L)(1) meets the applicable requirements of Section 2.8.2(H) -- Criteria (3) and (4), and the granting of this Modification would not be detrimental to the public good. The PDP complies with relevant standards located in Article 3 — General Development Standards, provided that the Modification is approved. This includes the Increased Occupancy request, staff finds that this meets the requirements of Section 3.8.16 The PDP complies with relevant standards located in Division 4.21, General Commercial (C-G) of Article 4 — Districts. Fort of Staff recommendation: The request for Increased Occupancy meets the requirements of Section 3.8.16 The applicant has provided sufficient additional amenities to sustain the activities associated with multi -family residential development, including the following amenities on Lot 1 of Choice Center Second Filing and Lot 2 of Choice Center — On -site manager services, ten guest parking spaces in the north parking lot of Choice Center Second Filing Lot 1, one additional shared handicap parking space on Lot 2 of Choice Center, exterior landscape courtyards, pool, hot tub, fire pit seating areas, climbing boulders, volleyball courts, interior study lounges, media lounge, fitness rooms, and game rooms that will also be made available to the Choice Center Third Filing PDP residents to adequately serve the occupants of the development and to protect the adjacent neighborhoods. Section 3.8.16 — Occupancy Limits; Increasing the Number of Persons Allowed Applies to any units with more than 3 bedrooms r The decision maker shall not increase said number unless satisfied that the applicant has provided sufficient additional amenities, either public or private, to sustain the activities associated with multi -family residential development, to adequately serve the occupants of the development and to protect the adjacent neighborhood. Such amenities may include, without limitation, passive open space, buffer yards, on -site management, recreational areas, plazas, courtyards, outdoor cafes, limited mixed -use restaurants, parking areas, sidewalks, bikeways, bus shelters, shuttle services or other facilities and services. (..owns Staff recommendation: Criteria 4 (2.8.2(H)(3): Staff finds that the depth and size of the site is constrained, and that the relatively small size of the site is suitable for the townhome style buildings proposed. Staff concurs that due to the depth constraints and College Avenue improvements required, including the 10' sidewalk, T tree lawn and right-of-way dedication, this condition does represent a hardship not caused by the applicant that would justify the granting of the modification. t Collins Staff recommendation: Criteria 4 (2.8.2(H)(4): The granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good. While the drive aisle will be narrower and potentially less convenient for some residents, the functional use of the garages spaces remains viable. Additionally the size of the project is relatively small, urban in character and will be marketed to students. The potential impacts to residents of the project do not appear to be significant, as compared to a larger project where a similar garage parking configuration could be more impactful to the viability of the project. The narrow drive aisle, as evidenced by the turning radius templates provided by the application, will allow ingress/egress, and the potential inconvenience of the narrower drive aisle is nominal. Because of the project's urban infill location, limited scope of the modification, and nominal reduction in the function of the parking area, staff finds that the modification is nominal and inconsequential and that the plan continues to advance the purposes of the Land Use Code. t cowns ,0000�1 Staff recommendation: The granting of the Modification would not be detrimental to the public good and is because the drive aisle reduction is limited to 18 garage spaces on a constrained site and the reduced drive aisle allows an overall better plan with a townhome style building configuration that enhances the neighborhood scale and provides an appropriate building transition from the taller buildings in the vicinity; Collins Staff recommendation — approval of the Modification: The project design satisfies Criteria 4 (2.8.2(H)(3): By reason of exceptional physical conditions or other extraordinary and exceptional situations, unique to such property, including, but not limited to, physical conditions such as exceptional narrowness, shallowness or topography, or physical conditions which hinder the owner's ability to instal a solar energy system, the strict application of the standard sought to be modified would result in unusual and exceptional practical difficulties, or exceptional or undue hardship upon the owner of such property, provided that such difficulties or hardship are not caused by the act or omission of the applicant. The project design satisfies Criteria 4 (2.8.2(H)(4): The plan as submitted will not diverge from the standards of the Land Use Code that are authorized by this Division to be modified except in a nominal inconsequential way when considered from the perspective of the entire development plan. and will continue to advance the purposes of the Land Use Code as contained in Section 1.2.2; FILING I � � GYr�• SITE fKAN NOTES Offi- wsrv'srvPM 1�� T �. • "e LEGEND 4 -- tz ?n 2 or LUC Section 3.2.2(L)(1) -- Driveway Width When garages are located along a driveway and are opposite other garages or buildings, the driveway width must be increased to 28 feet. The applicant requests a modification to allow the drive aisle between the garages to be reduced from 28 feet to 24 feet. of ollins M �— ...1 ' �BM1W-rrcw»Enpy�{Nyr Colors, textures and materials used are appropriate; emphasize and articulate overall _Cy�� building forms; CORE Garage doors include windows ° =E= to provide more detail; Inset windows used Al t Lowns 4W , A2 Unit entrances face streets and walkways, with entrance canopies used to define the individual unit entrances. Appropriate proportion of brick and masonry caps which wrap building ends and interior parking aisle. Varied door styles used; Collins CHOICE CENTER & CHOICE CENTER SECOND FILING - MINOR AMENDMENT ' ._....rN.. slfl✓.IEOM,MFHWMEPei IXNRRN6ErnWnlUWBMm I NC M.wGfMNtsT w TIE R4 FPMCWUM[RNIa ' Gnw.rM cm as•rnrcauu cwNr. as umcm, s..re ascawoo 1 I I J W NOTED REQUIREMENTS is I Transit -Oriented Development overlay zone (TOD) Residential and commercial off- street parking quantities apply Parking provided in accordance with the TOD standards — 10 spaces required; 18 provided on the site in garage spaces 10 guest spaces reserved in north parking lot of Lot 1 — Choice Center 1 shared HC space on Lot 2 t uottins �-1_ CHOICE CENTER THIRD FILING Qg SITE W. TMLE VLEGENG 30F9 Section 4.21 (D) --Land Use Standards This section states that the maximum building height shall be four (4) stories. The project proposes two-story buildings in compliance with this standard. t..otuns i =s -------------------- 10F8 v (C-G) General Commercial Zone District Section 4.21(B) — Permitted Uses - multi -family residential land use is permitted subject to a Type 1 administrative review and public hearing No Text t Lottins Multi -family use proposed 10 residential dwellings; 2 buildings (5 units each) 0.35 acre site 28 off-street parking spaces • 18 garage spaces on the site • 10 guest spaces located in north parking lot of Choice Center Lot 1 Modification request -- drive aisle width Occupancy Limit (LUC 3.8.16) — increase requested for one dwelling unit (5 bedroom unit) CY.EIN:MIU�Y,NLT F1 � 0 L Y PYYi.YY.4W.Y. .. YOYINNY..Y IOT ,. NDIIIIMIYYi IOI NYpy,P ,.,,CO IO�,.NY NYY.IWi ,Y YIMI.DY� N11f OlpglMllY NQYI Aerial Map i )61 1 f�� - J1 IK 9 t Collins _10000w�� E L-M-N C-G Site (Csu) Zone District: (C-G) General Commercial Transit -Oriented Development overlay zone (TOD) I J Rd Choice Center Third Filing Project Development Plan #170001 Continued Administrative Hearing August 14, 2017