HomeMy WebLinkAboutCHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH - PDP / FDP - 29-94C - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTS (3)!7
vKumber: 11 Created: 6/2/2003
No foundation plantings are being ishowEn�; seeq+station &2�1(E)(2)(d)
� U,y4*-T� w'W f
Number: 12 Created: 6/2/2003
Need to see building envelope, footprint dimensions, distances to property lines
Paytgi•^+1 luL` A1#Ie.d �-�ttu to tkc plst• Po ve- n�..l ., envelbioot
Number: 13 d,,.,, K,:.. Created: 6/2/2003
` Building does not meet build -to line requirements, future building envelope won't rl
meet build -to -lines either. •t•o
VII(AkWIL
Number. 14 ° ��°"' P ��" Created: 6/2/2003
Landscape plan needs to include the landscape assurances clause. _TjQ �, •6K �„ r.'I t.
= 471! Coil Ara4.+ccf Re: C14Krc
LNumber: 15 Created: 6/2/2003
Building square footage isn't noted anywhere, number of parking spaces isn't noted.
Need to show typical stall dimensions, back-up distance etc. Lne
go�L.oin+c Are6-4 = 8,?4D s.f THE�G42� 71 PA)e1c,ju&SAc1eJwt ff.4vG• Arg-'tD T b�1 sHEEr 3-B of i3.Number:l6 A a Created:6/2/2003
This is in the neighborhood sign district - if any signage is proposed to be `--
building, its LOCATION needs to be shown on the elevations - not the the actual
signage, just the sign locations. , ,;A ..,+ 4 ice; t#-& S w;l f t�.7 +e -ri^.1 0. f
4Wsure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit. wr~ re fkPA ix t
If you have any questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this
project, please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Sincerely::
Ted Shepard
Chief Planner
Page 5
•
along Ziegler as shown. Water Utilities and Forestry have agreed upon the following
adjustments to address this conflict. The trees are to be changed to ornamentals
and are to be located 5 feet west of the sidewalk.
Topic: Utility plans
Ll4t+nber: 29 Created: 6/11 /2003
Show thrust block on the fire line and the curb stop/meter pit on the domestic water
service. WG cor-PaqeW 4-(,4. C,..L rfe/ cwA a+eit,. p,F lo"41o+. *,,ol y(t F/A-e1,-4,
Thrum 8/e,i-
r#afnber: 30 Created: 6/11 /2003
The sewer service elevation at the sewer main would be more than 0.02 feet (or 0.2
feet) higher than the invert of the sewer. Refer to the sewer service connection
detail. .Z c o�vec4-•t f4/ +ai ;6., f4L f ewe., re-e ✓i« a lev4+,o-,.
fiber: 32 Created: 6/11 /2003
Clarify that the sanitary sewer for the first phase goes to Manhole #5 which is
beyond the line labeled "End Construction". we- xj,�ea -4 rioAe- a f M,+F• 5
Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Jenny Nuckols
Topic: ZONING
zNember: 4 Created: 6/2/2003
There is not a separate site plan - if landscape and site are to be combined in one ,
please note as such on the plan Sheet r )3 -A � 13-8 Show THeS,Te
ar Eua o{
Goes`iv�cira.
LNtMber: 5 Created: 6/2/2003
Handicap spaces are not the correct size - should be 13 feet wide since they are not
next to a pped walk way that is at the same grade as the stall. 3.2.2(K)(5)(a)
We. WL010.,ed +h.� sloac.er ¢0 13,
member: 6 Created: 6/2/2003
Show placement of and label bike rack(s)
WC SA0We.l B"Are- 0a&k
Number: 7 Created: 6/2/2003
1hy is the grass area directly south of the building surrounded by a 3' tall chain link
fence? ''
Number: 8 Created: 6/2/2003
tWhy are there 6' privacy fences surroundin7 little 9 x 14 areas - what are those
areas for? (Directly west of building) +C vn;r, N v AC-
Oda nber: 9 Created: 6/2/2003
Is there oing to be a trash enclosure anywhere? f
WG SKou,e.l Tv4.rk ertrloj. re, tf S•41,�pv��TC �h,JcZ
aMGmber: 10 Created: 6/2/2003
Show handicap ramps at the entrance off of Zeigler
1,✓l�k w4dje k1L do„o+het.!
1-Awps a,-- +Le, oQriuc w`7 bli
Page 4
•
Number: 25 Created: 6/11/2003
cording to the LCUASS, directional access ramps are required for intersections
with detached walks. Please replace the proposed radial stlye ramps at Ziegler and
Charlie Lane with three directional ramps (see red lines). Please note that there are
new ADA standards for access ramps.
We. 1 cnre4t +kt. rvr,?.' at Zle-71e✓ £ 4-o a/rrttc,l r�••l r�KAt
L,M mbe r: 26 Created: 6/11/2003
Please include a vicinity map on the site plan.
Lvc a.l,d..c a Vioii,�--,n.� o. Jh ✓cf 3-4 o-1 13
zD amber: 27 Created: 6/11/2003
According to section 3.2.2 of the City's LUC, bicycle parking needs to be provided.
Please include enough bike parking for 4 bikes near the building's entrance in a
visible secure location and near an accessible ramp. See red lines for suggested
location. LOe. a lded $1ke, f'o, ¢
member: 28 Created: 6/11/2003
The proposed driveway approach from Charlie Lane needs to be replaced with the
standard driveway approach for local streets. See drawings 706 (Type 1 for
detached sidewalk) and 1601 in the LCUASS for the correct driveway and sidewalk
design. toe- ck4,t1e,*i eke. LAVz- del ✓Lwaq 4 b 4 -704 PeIJ
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Jeff Hill
Topic: General
LNdOmber: 20 Created: 6/11/2003
If this project is to be a revision to the approved utility plans then provide all sheets
of the approved plans which show a revision, bubble the revision and note the
revision. If it is not a revision to the approved plans then provide a complete set of
utility plans (i.e. sa)'to�,y �
sewer profile, t pe, deoils etc.).
WWe-C�o�c.( Vt✓�Jraw� � Lo
LNUm-ber: 21 Created: 6/11/2003
The water main in Charlie Lane was installed and according to our records no stubs
were installed for this site. Connections to an existing water main should be made
with wet taps not tees. Correct the notes pertaining to the tees on the fire line and
fire hydrant. w e Corvt,'ied 4 A C- 6v4ie - 1 i'nei 4-& 4-A,^01+7 ra'04aler.
LNumber: 23 Created: 6/11/2003
Place the proposed curb stop 1 foot from the rear of the utility easement and the
meter pit no more than 2 feet downstream of the curb stop. We ce►•e&e.( tic c.kb sfm
See utility and landscape plan for other comments. 44A ^ cf,er p;+ toe.4-r.,.
Department: Water Wastewater Issue Contact: Roger Buffington
Topic: Landscape plan
L-141i'mber: 31 Created: 6/11/2003
Show the 24-inch water main and the fire hydrant near Ziegler on the landscape
plan. There is currently a conflict between the 24-inch main and the row of trees
Fke6 LondScaPG AQ-&Al'-e�+ ck*-1ld foe -'kecJ Xev.Ed Davey .
Page 3
E
Topic: Utility plans
Number: 35 Created: 6/12/2003
use provide revisions to the originally approved plans.
I C�!
i204(e4
.( Wo�wservica�sewersewico�.��rLGfMrgl w�+pr, PwAfrl $Wy.
J;Imvide a phasing plan showing what improvements will be done with each phase.
S Show*at att I-kr- v^ Phase= on X4ee11 3-A o-4 13
cTtms-currently submitted plans do not show where the drainage Qufall is, pplease.
clarify. = a.lded 4Aa V r-v+t— Pa., ro TL
tic- wood.+mil p4A Deti.w4-to-too .4eti
Sl,u+ 3-A of 13. All of �-AG plows are Enclose( JF{oui,.1 Pen.I G�r.
L-Kease pr�vide jar) erosipAcgtrol plan for this partic4lar phase of dev lopment.
we_ S owl Lc- St twc4- �, 4 s�r� lya e's !%+ Pba/'ey o. .f4•<f 3-A of 13
ISMce these plans are part of a new PDP, newer regulations such as water quality
requirements are now in effect. Please either provide some water quality treatment
or request a variance. W-f- ivl--e, e,tloia a v wviwpe a .ra„ wale- �ual�ly.
Provide a drainage and erosion control report addendum discussing drainage,
detention requirements, erosion etc..., and how site requirements are being satisfied
for this first phase submittal.
Department: Traffic Operations Issue Contact: Ward Stanford
Topic: General
Number: 18 Created: 6/4/2003
The TIS for this project was done in 1995. Unfortunately since this development has
��1�
CIA
not started in so many years, the study needs to be revised to reflect current growth.
Topic: Transportation
L Aumber: 33 Created: 6/11/2003
The 1995 TIS needs to be revised to account for current and future area
development. If the project is to be phased, the revision should include discussion
collharr- gihe overall and
d plh�sed elements Y,C- f the development.
LalG R'iAce^ t f [ 4,
Yo�.4
tw& Penaems+ ,f t�� clr�vot�•y F.-e,., ztet/w o..c, „� +�LPAascr Bk,rd,.?
- tTumber: 34 Created: 6/11 /2003
Only received a grading plan. A plan set indicating all improvements by phase would
be appropriate. Sh ct+s a 13 -A a+A 13 - 8 show t ►i c. ► r» p ro c.» er+d,
Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: Tom Reiff
Topic: Transportation
cMdmber: 22 Created: 6/11 /2003
The proposed handicap parking spaces need to be designed to ADA standards - 96"
minimum stall width and either a 60" or 96" accessible aisle adjacent to the stall
along with an accessible ramp. The wider aisle is for a van accessible stall.
W L revtse.� 4ke_ 11414,c.1a p4A'ki^.1 jtOdeer. OK Sbe�f 3-4 e1 13
Page 2
(006mMd)M STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
Cilr of Toil (ollins
STEWART & ASSOCIATES
DICK RUTHERFORD
103 S. MELDRUM
FT. COLLINS, CO 80521
Date: 6/27/2003
Staff has reviewed your submittal for CHRIST FELLOWSHIP CHURCH PDP - TYPE
II (LUC), and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Dave Stringer
Topic: utility plans
L,-M m ber: 1 Created: 6/2/2003
Revision to signed set of plans should be numbered as sheet 3A of 13 Cloud the
area's being changed and use number of revision in a triangle, show in revision
block .Z C4 o"e--( W44erServii.e,� Sewer Se Mr C. Ziet/e \ct../,e L.hz 7?Aw psy
A u p PH4.rc— = B(d9.
Number: 2 Created: 6/2/2003
vAdd note : Phase II to be constructed at future date
WG APP6D l/eTE O,o SiL=E-r 3A o F 13
,--Number: 3 Created: 6/2/2003
Show surface material on 2nd point of acces(southern most) off of Ziegler Road
WE-1413E4Ep 4/VE wAy As AsPNALT•
Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Doug Martine
Topic: Light & Power
Number: 19 Created: 6/9/2003
A landscape plan showing planned streetlights has been sent to
Ted Shepard to be forwarded to the applicant. These planned streetlights must be
shown on the landscape plan, and the street tree locations adjusted to provide 40 ft.
minimum clearance between the trees and each streetlight (15 ft. if the tree is an
ornamental). Z w+11 Q r k the wbo• f fAc J f •i'3 Lid 4�,
Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
Topic: Grading Plan
4—Pdv m be r: 37 Created: 6/12/2003
Plan should show how the proposed grading would tie into existing elevations,
currently the plans do not call out or show existing contours on the subject property,
the future phase, or surrounding property. The currently submitted plan is
inadequate for a complete and thorough review to be done. z Q41-4e 4 l Ae. ProPoJe-(
eJ(Ined. cvn+owes ow Pha.ra.IC ay.( houJ fAcl ECc into fkr, Pheit S B►di.
c—Topic: Off -site easements
Number: 36 Created: 6/12/2003
Please provide a copy of an existing off -site easement if one was obtained with the
original plan approval. If not then an off -site drainage easement is required.
L f_A%C toled TAL 4rv-_L, t e4re.H.•.+ ��.>< c'J o �-s;�c �c fAc Wpodl�..CP.•!r
a4 e, h. T'o- Pewd.
Page I