HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTOCKBRIDGE P.U.D. - PRELIMINARY - 27-94 - MINUTES/NOTES - CORRESPONDENCE-NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGNEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING
YnoN Notification
Written
of this meeting?
Address.
Name Address Zip
Yes
No
Yes
No
05Z
a � 5d�►� ��z Pd r5or► Pl do�26
X
/�&k � 44 4 3 - fleY4l Dk
%�
%C
NEIGHBORHOOD INFORIIIATION MEETING
fir
Pr
Meetinzy Lo
Attendees: Please sign this sheet. The information will be used to
update the project mailing list and confirm attendance at neighborhood
meetings. Contact the Planning Department (221-6750) if you wish to
Did You Receive
Correct
receive minutes of this meeting.
Written NotificationAddress?
of this meeting?
Name Address Zip
No
Yes
No
Sonvttizti 363�C2v
\Yes
%0
k-4 oSz
X
� - gLG�S
l�r.•�
_
05- CAt&cAl lZ.. Ft. C. r or 1
X
ka-kh een karr(L 3$4a Lr = erd Dr. Ft. C.
NM i aLd&kr LE 5;731 0ee5 er NT rJr- 61 goy ACo
X
Kam e. t er' N F f C✓ o
pc
.� 2scr s AQtes Fts2
d��s.✓ 34 3 2 CvK
i r
FJ�
,4 R«� S oPE 33Y, RolxfiL 17 Fd�Cd. 8aE02L
NC e J�AtI „ ,eT 3711 &Sf A1r o
20 ,J ')�)Q2 flu-r 3(P�1fl
The
e in
rial
dhave
ck
30. Comment: and we dolwant the eresid residents ofsthis developmentto
be made aware of this. The animals are legal.
21. Question: How much area will the detention pond cover?
Answer: Approximately 3.5 acres.
22. Question: Have you done a market analysis and considered
larger lots?
Answer: No, I have not done that to date.
23. Comment: What is your price range for the homes?
Answer: $120,000 to $140,000 per home.
24. Question: Part of your presentation was that the City
requires a minimum of 3 dwelling units per acre.
The proposed 140 dwelling units is greater than the
minimum density requirement. Have you thought about
an increase in the lot size and what would that do
to the cost of the lot?
Answer: We try to fill a need for a particular type of
housing for certain people. We feel that we need to
provide this product to maintain a certain price.
25. Question: Why have you selected a higher density here,
particularly in light of adjacent neighborhoods?
Answer: We feel that this is the product -line that we do
best.
26. Comment: The housing market, based on the Kingston Woods
project, suggests that there is a market for
slightly larger lots similar to those.
27. Question: Have you done an analysis that determines what
effects this development's utilities will have on
our septic systems?
Answer: Not yet, but that will be part of our development
review.
28. Question: Do you know if you have groundwater problems, and
will you be required to put in an underdrain
system?
Answer: We are looking at an underdrain system.
29. Question: What happens if the water table rises and this
development causes water problems in our basement?
Answer: The underdrain system should take care of that.
12. Question: Will we be looking at a mosquito -breeding pond in
the detention area, with standing water all the
time?
Answer: No, the area will drain in a short period of time
after a storm. The intent is for the PV & L Canal
to accept some of the stormwater overflow.
13. Question: Is there a new pipe for stormwater that must be
installed through and under Skyline Acres?
Answer: Yes. The City's Foothills Drainage Basin Plan calls
for this pipe.
14. Question: Who is responsible for the costs of the stormwater
facilities in this area?
Answer: The costs will probably be shared by the City
Stormwater Utility and the developer.
15. Question: Is there a minimum open space requirement that is
required by the Land Development Guidance System?
The quality of life seems to be threatened without
sufficient open space in the area.
Answer: The L.D.G.S. does not have specific numeric open
space requirements in terms of area.
16. Comment: This development is going to add sufficient traffic
into the system to worsen an already difficult
situation in the area.
17. Question: There are prairie dogs on this site. will you
humanely eradicate or relocate the animals?
Answer: We will definitely eradicate them before earth is
moved.
18. Question: Will these homes have woodburning stoves?
Answer: No, they will not.
19. Question: What is your anticipated schedule for this
development?
Answer: We would like to do it this year, but the timing on
adequate access to all of the development is a
concern.
20. Question: What will the difference be between the elevation
along the east side of Imperial Estates and the
west line of this development?
Answer: They will be about the same.
t
4. Comment: A crosswalk for children going to school is needed
at Royal Drive.
5. Question: What % of the lot is covered by the house? Those
look like very small lots.
Answer: Generally, the lots will be 50' x 100' and the size
of the homes is not yet finalized.
6. Comment: This area does not feel like the "core" of the City
and the core density of 3 dwelling units per acre
does not seem to be compatible with the surrounding
area.
Response: The City has an Urban Growth Area boundary that was
established between the City and Larimer County
that carries within it the minimum density of 3
dwelling units per acre. The developer is trying to
provide homes in a range that is affordable to most
families.
7. Question:
What will the impact on Johnson Elementary School
be from the children generated with this
development?
Answer:
The school is being expanded to accommodate
additional children within the school district.
8. Question:
Will you be putting a fence along the west property
line adjacent to Imperial Estates?
Answer:
The fencing plans are not yet finalized to the
extent that we know what will be where.
9. Question:
Is it possible to put a little buffer along the
west line adjacent to Imperial Estates?
Answer:
We have located some of the larger lots along that
side for the opportunity to provide on -lot
buffering.
10. Question:
Will your engineer provide additional information
on the stormwater detention needs?
Answer:
Yes, he will be providing more information on the
storm drainage. He has already, to date, provided
information to the best of his ability.
11. Comment:
We do not need a street connection from the east
into Imperial Estates. We have been told by the
City that a connection would not be necessary.
CommL _,y Planning and Environmental :rvices
t�Planning Department
a
City of Fort Collins
Neighborhood Information Meeting Minutes
for
STOCKBRIDGE P.U.D.
Date: March 10, 1994
Applicant: Progressive Living Structures, Inc.
4190 North Garfield Street
Loveland, CO. 80538
City Planner: Steve Olt
The potential applicant, Progressive Living Structures, has
expressed an interest in developing a single family residential
project on vacant land located on the south side of West Horsetooth
between Imperial Estates Subdivision and the Pleasant Valley & Lake
Canal.
The purpose of this meeting was to introduce Leo Schuster,
Progressive Living Structures, and his representatives to the
affected property owners and other potentially affected interests
in attendance and enable them to ask questions about, express their
concerns about, or express their support for the development
proposal. The following questions, concerns, and responses were
expressed at the meeting:
1. Question: Will you be responsible for improvements to
Horsetooth Road only along the frontage of your
property?
Answer: Yes, in the City's hierarchy there is an oversizing
and off -site improvement fund that will pay for the
street adjacent to other properties.
2. Question: To the west, in front of Imperial Estates, will
this development cause improvements to Horsetooth
road due to the increased traffic?
Answer: The traffic study that will be prepared for this
development will help determine what necessary off -
site street improvements must be made.
3. Question: Will the development of this property cause
Imperial Estates to be annexed into the City?
Answer: No, it will not trigger annexation at this time.
281 North College Avenue • P.O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6750