Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTOCKBRIDGE P.U.D. - PRELIMINARY - 27-94 - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 1 - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSDENSITY CHART Maximum Earned Criterion Credit If All Dwelling Units Are Within: Credit a 20% 2000 feet of on existing or approved neighborhood shopping center. b 10% 650 feet of an existing transit stop. I D C 10% 4000 feet of on exsbr)g or approved regional shoppingcenter. d 20% 3500feetofanedstingorreservedneighborhood parkcommunity park orcommunit,facility 20 We 10% 10DO feet of a school, meeting all the requirements of Me compulsory education laws of Me State of Colorado. I O QM t 20% 3000feetofamajoremplovm9ntoenter. �--r g 5% 1000feetotochildcorecenter. h 20% 'North'Fort Collins 20% The Central Business Distnct. A project whose boundaryis contiguous to Basting urban development. Credit may be earned as follows 0%-Far projects whose property boundary has O to 10%contguily, 10 to 15%-Far projects whose property boundary has 10 to 20% contiguity . 30 o 15to 20%-Far projects whose property boundary has 20 to 30%contiguity 20 to 25%-Far projects whose property boundary has 30 to 40%contiguity 25 to30%-Fail projects what properly boundary has 40 to 50%contiguity If itcon be demonstrated thattheprolectwill reduce non-renewable energy useage either throwugh the opplicahon of alternative energy k sysfemsor through conmmffed energy conservation measures beyond that morrralty required by Cfly Code.a5% bonus may be eamed for every 5%reduction In energy use. I Calculate a l% bonus for every50 acres inauded in the project. r'(1 CaMssWte the percentage of the total acres in the project that are devoted to recreational use. enter l2 of that percentage as a bonus. it the applicant commits to preserving permanent oftsite open space that meets the Citysminimum requirements, calculate the percentage n of this open space acreage to the total developmentacreoge. enter this percentage as a bonus If part of the total development budget is to be spent an neighborhood public transit fablitieswhich ale not otherwise required by COY Code, O enter 29/6bonus for every$100 per dwelling unit nvested If part of the total development budget is to be spent on neighborhood foakhesand services which are not otherwise required by city Code. P enter l%bonus for every $100 per dwelling unit invested. COO If a commitment is being made to develop a specified percentage of the total number of dwelling units fa low income fart iei enter that 4 percentage as a bonus, up to a maximum of 30%. If a commitment is being mode to develop a specified percentage of the tool number of Welling units far Type Wand Type B' handicapped Z }housing as defined by the City of Fort Collins, calculate the bonus as follows O F ts Type'A'— .Slimes Typeun1l i— f1 s r r7o-t-a-lu-nifF Type'B'—in times Type-w units In no case shall the combined bonus be greater than 30%. 0the site or adjacent property contains an historic building or place, a bonus may be earned for the following: 3% — For prevenlfrgor mitigating outside influences (e.g. envirordnentol. land use, aesthetic, ecan is and social factions) adverse to Bs preservation; S 3% — For assuring that new structures will be in keeping with line character of the building on place. while avolding fatal unite 3% — Fa proposing adaptive use of the building orploce>ndtw41lead to its continuance, preservation and improvementin on appropriate manner. If a portion or all of the required porting in the multiple family, project is provided undefground within the building, or In an elevated padding structure as an accessary use to the primary structure, a bonus may be earned asollows t 9% — For providing 75% or moreof the porlang in a structure: 6% — Fa providing50-74% of" parking in a stnrclure. 3% — For providing 25-49% of the parking in a structure. U If a commitment is being mode to provide approved automatic fire e#Ingulshing systems for the dwelling units, enter a bonus of 10%. TOTAL 49) -30- ACTIVITY: Residential Uses DEFINITION: H All residential uses. Uses would include single family attached dwellings, townhomes, duplexes, mobile homes, and multiple family dwellings; group homes; boarding and rooming houses; fraternity and sorority houses; nursing homes; public and private schools; public and non-profit quasi -public rec- reational uses as a principal use; uses providing meeting places and places for public assembly with incidental office space; and child care centers. CRITERIAEach of the following applicable criteria must be answered "yes" and implemented within the develop- ment plan. Yes No 1. On a gross acreage basis, is the average residential density in the project at least three (3) dwelling units per acre (calculated for residential portion of the site only)? ® ❑ 2. DOES THE PROJECT EARN THE MINIMUM PERCENTAGE POINTS AS CALCULATED ON THE FOLLOWING "DENSITY CHART" FOR THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF THE RESI- DENTIAL PROJECT? THE REQUIRED EARNED CREDIT FOR A RESIDENTIAL PROJECT ❑ ❑ SHALL BE BASED ON THE FOLLOWING: 30-40 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 3-4 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 40-50 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 4-5 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 50-60 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 5-6 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 60-70 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 6-7 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 70-80 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 7-8 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 80-90 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 8-9 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 90-100 PERCENTAGE POINTS = 9-10 DWELLING UNITS/ACRE; 100 OR MORE PERCENTAGE POINTS = 10 OR MORE DWELLING UNITS/ACRE. —29— design Mr. Steve Olt May 3, 1994 Page 5 Fencing along Horsetooth Road frontage — 6' wood fence Fencing in interior areas — 4'6" wood fence Please let me know if you require any additional information at this time. Sincerely, bha design inc. by: Benjamin A. Herman, AICP Principal enclosures desiorn Mr. Steve Olt May 3, 1994 Page 4 15. Pedestrian / Emergency Access at Highbridge Court / Imperial Drive This facility is proposed as a pedestrian / bicycle connection between the Imperial Estates neighborhood and Stockbridge. It is also intended to serve as a temporary emergency access point until such time as Seneca Street is connected through Mountainridge. A concrete pathway will be provided, and it is envisioned that some form of barrier, such as breakaway bollards, will be installed to prevent use by vehicles other than for emergency purposes. 16. Drainage Report As of May 3rd, we have not received any comments from the City's Stormwater Department, thus we have no response at this point. We are prepared to respond once comments have been received. 17. PV & L Ditch We do not anticipate lining the PV & L ditch. The homes in Skyline Acres to the east of Stockbridge are dependent upon water flows from ditch leakage to keep their existing wells viable. In addition, based upon review of the geotechnical information for the Stockbridge site, it does not appear that lining is required to protect the homes to be located within Stockbridge. 18. Soils Report Our initial submittal did include two copies of a soils and geotechnical report. Additional copies will he provided at time of Final PUD, if required. 19. Daycare Center The applicant has considered your request, and has determined that a daycare center does not fit in with his development program for the site. 20. Right -of -Way Width Comments are noted and have been incorporated into our plans. 21. Densities for Surrounding Developments The densities for Kingston Woods, Imperial Estates, and Mountain Ridge have been added to the plan. 22. Fencing After further review, and discussions with residents of Imperial Estates, we have determined that the following fence criteria shall apply: • Fencing along west boundary — 6'wood fence with facia and cap, finished both sides • Fencing along east boundary (adjacent to open space and ditch) — 4'6" wood fence design Mr. Steve Olt May 3, 1994 Page 3 8. Open Space Landscaping We are currently giving consideration to the appropriate landscape treatment for the detention and open space areas. We will discuss this item with Rob Wilkinson prior to preparation of final plans, including consideration of the City's desired treatment and financial participation in landscaping of the regional detention facilities. 9. Parks and Recreation Comments The revised plan shows a future City trail along the PV & L Ditch. It is our understanding that the ditch road is located on the west side of the ditch, thus the trail is shown as such. This can be revised at time of final plan, if required. 10. Residential Uses Density Point Chart Attached is a revised point chart. Based upon further review, it was determined in discussions with Gailene Rossiter of the City's Transfort bus system that there is an existing transit stop at Seneca Street and W. Horsetooth Road. This stop is located approximately 200 feet from the project site, thus we are able to meet the requirements of the LDGS. At present, eastbound buses must pull off the road in an undesignated location. In order to improve this situation, we are suggesting that a bus stop be located at the southeast corner of the Horsetooth/Seneca intersection, as shown on the preliminary plan. 11. Seneca Overall Development Plan Included with this submittal is an amended Overall Development Plan for this property. 12. Architectural Elevations Included with this submittal are architectural elevations for the homes to be constructed in Stockbridge. 13. Fire Hydrant Locations Comments are noted and will be incorporated into utility plans. 14. Emergency Access Emergency access requirements will be dependent upon the timing of improvements to Seneca Street, particularly the connection south through the Mountainridge PUD. The initial phases of development is anticipated to be the two cul-de-sacs located closest to Horsetooth Road, for which access requirements can be met from Seneca Street and Horsetooth Roads. Subsequent phases will receive secondary access from the emergency access connection to Imperial Drive. If necessary to satisfy the 900' limit requirement, temporary emergency accessways will be designated through reserved lots between cul-de-sacs until such time as the Seneca Street connection is completed. Details of emergency access will be provided at time of final plan. design Mr. Steve Olt May 3, 1994 Page 2 5. Street Names Bridge Court has been renamed to High Court, in order to avoid duplication. 6. Street Tree and Streetlight Spacing Comments are noted and will be incorporated into final plans. 7. Transportation Division Comments Pleasant Valley & Lake Ditch access The primary purpose of the tract along the property's east edge is to provide for access to the ditch, as well as for drainage purposes. In accordance with comment #9 below, we are providing this tract for the purposes of a future City trail. East Parcel Access Based upon our review of the area and discussions with the property owner, our understanding is that access to this parcel would be obtained from Horsetooth Road, per the existing access point. Providing access from our property would require the extension of a roadway to the property line, and construction of a bridge across the ditch, without any benefit whatsoever to the Stockbridge development. Additionally, it should be noted that there is an existing platted cul-de-sac within Skyline Acres which abuts the east edge of this parcel. Northwest Parcel The outparcel on the northwest corner is an existing residence and is unlikely to be redeveloped. The residence obtains its access from Horsetooth Road. Providing access to this parcel from within Stockbridge would be impractical to accommodate within the land plan, and would result in the loss of several lots as well as the construction of additional roadway, again without any benefit whatsoever to Stockbridge. It should be noted that if this parcel ever were to develop, it would likely accommodate a maximum of 2 or 3 homes. The impact of resulting traffic generated onto Horsetooth Road would be insignificant, and would not warrant a street connection from Stockbridge. Horsetooth / Seneca Intersection Improvements Comments are noted and will be incorporated into final plans. Seneca Street Bicycle Lanes Seneca Street will be constructed as a standard collector street section, and will include bicycle lanes on both sides of the street. May 3, 1994 d C S I (r Il LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Mr. Steve Olt URBAN DESIGN Planning Department PLANNING City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80522 RE: Stockbridge P.U.D. Preliminary Plan Revisions Dear Steve, BHA DESIGN, INC. 2000 VERMONT Enclosed herewith is our revised submittal for Preliminary PUD Plan approval for FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 the above -referenced project. The following information is provided in response to TEL 303 223.7577 specific staff comments contained in your letter dated April 22, 1994. FAX 303 226-3055 In addition to responding to staff s comments, it should be noted that, as a result of comments received from residents of Imperial Estates, and subsequent discussions and meetings with those residents, we have revised the plan to provide more of a transition along the west edge of the property. We have pulled the cul-de-sacs located along our common boundary back an additional 30 to 40 feet, have increased the lot sizes in that area, and have agreed to include buffer plantings within the rear yards of our lots. We also will be providing a consistent fence along the west boundary. These changes have resulted in a reduction in the density of the plan, from 126 to 117 homes. 1. Columbine CableVision Comments Utility easements (9' front and 6' rear) are shown and marked on the site and landscape plan, as are all open space areas. 2. U.S. West Comments Comments are noted and will be incorporated into final plans. 3. Public Service Comments Comments are noted and will be incorporated into final plans. 4. Zoning Department Comments Our intent is to provide varied front setbacks in order to soften the building frontage line along the streets. It is often difficult to predetermine the setback until it is known which home will be located on a particular lot. However, if required to do so, we will specify the front setbacks for each lot at time of final plan.