HomeMy WebLinkAboutHARMONY NEIGHBORHOOD CENTRE P.U.D. - PRELIMINARY - 33-94 - LEGAL DOCS - CITY HALLPassed and adopted on final reading this 1st day of November. A.D. 1994.
ayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
ORDINANCE NO , 1994
AMENDING ORDINANCE 7U. 103, 1994,
PERTAINING TO THE TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF "�• `•�
APPLICATIONS FOR RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENTS AND SITE PLAN REVIEWS
WITHIN THE HARMONY CORRIDOR
WHEREAS, on July 5, 1994, the City Council adopted on second reading
Ordinance No. 103, 1994 ("the Ordinance"), which established a six-month
suspension of the processing of applications for retail and commercial planned
unit developments and site plan reviews within the Harmony Corridor, except for
those applications that had received preliminary or final approval by the City
on or before the effective date of the Ordinance: and
WHEREAS, on August 11, 1994, the Colorado Court of Appeals decided the case
of Marshall v. Aspen, which held that building permit applications must be
processed under the criteria existing at the time of the filing of the
application, unless an ordinance establishing different criteria was "pending"
at the time of the filing of the application: and
WHEREAS, although the foregoing decision of the Colorado Court of Appeals
may or may not be applicable to the Ordinance and the circumstances under which
it was adopted, the City Council believes it to be in the best interests of the
City to apply the rationale of said decision to the Ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF FORT COLLINS
as follows:
Section 1. That Section 4 of Ordinance No. 103, 1994, is hereby amended
to read as follows:
Section 2. That, except as amended in Section 1 above, the provisions of
Ordinance 103, 1994 shall remain in full force and effect.
Introduced, considered favorably
this 18th day of October, A.D. 1994, and
1st day of November, A.D. 1994.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
on first reading, and ordered published
to be presented for final passage on the
Mayor
October 18, 1994
No. 103, 1994. Under the settlement, the King Soopers application (as well as
another project known as Timberline PUD Corner Stores) would be exempted from the
Ordinance, and those applications would be processed according to the existing
LOGS criteria. In the event that either of these current applications were
denied by the City, any new applications for these or other sites in the Harmony
Corridor would be governed by the LOGS criteria in place at the time that any
such applications are filed with the City.
��'�E
fi 1�1 /'� SUMMARY
AGENDA
ITEn, NUMBER:
DATE: October 18. 1994
COLLINS CITY COUNCIL
,FORT
STAFF: Steve Roy
SUBJECT:
Ordinance No. 1994 Amending Ordinance No. 103, 1994. Pertaining to the
Temporary Suspension of Applications for Retail and Commercial Planned Unit
Developments and Site Plan Reviews Within the Harmony Corridor.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends adoption of the Ordinance on First Reading.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
On July 5, 1994, the Council adopted Ordinance No. 103. 1994 which established
a six-month moratorium on the processing of applications for retail and
commercial planned unit developments and site plan reviews within the Harmony
Corridor. The proposed ordinance would amend Ordinance No. 103, 1994 so as to
exempt from its application not only those planned unit developments and site
plan reviews that had received preliminary or final approval before the effective
date of the Ordinance, but also all applications for such uses which were filed
before that date (even though they have not yet been reviewed or approved by the
City's Planning and Zoning Board).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The adoption of Ordinance No. 103, 1994 temporarily suspended the processing of
applications for retail and commercial PUD's and site plan reviews within the
Harmony Corridor. Exempted from the application of the Ordinance were those
PUD's or site plan reviews that had received preliminary or final approval
before the effective date of the Ordinance. The Ordinance did not exempt,
however, applications that had been filed for PUD review under the LDGS before
that date if those applications had not yet received preliminary or final
approval by the City.
On July 13, 1994. James M. Sullivan filed a lawsuit against the City in the
United States District Court contesting the City's position that the moratorium
applied to the pending PUD development proposal that Mr. Sullivan had submitted
for a particular site in the Harmony Corridor and which was proposed for the
possible development of a King Soopers shopping center. That lawsuit was
subsequently dismissed without prejudice and refiled in State District Court,
where the action is still pending.
On August 11 of this year, the Colorado Court of Appeals rendered a decision in
the case of Marshall v. Aspen, in which it determined that building permit
applications must generally be processed according to the regulations in
existence at the time of the filing of the application. Because of this
decision, a tentative settlement of Mr. Sullivan's lawsuit against the City.has
Dennis B. Polk, Esq.
October 7, 1994
Page 2
amending ordinance had become effective, the City would propose that the pending court action
be dismissed with prejudice.
In order to afford adequate time for the amending ordinance to be considered by the
Council, the hearing on your client's Motion for Temporary Injunction would be continued until
the earliest available date after November 11, 1994.
Obviously, time is of the essence if we are to resolve this matter by agreement. As you
know, the Motion for Temporary Injunction is scheduled for hearing next Thursday, October
13, 1994. If it becomes necessary for the City to proceed, with the hearing on that motion, then
this offer of settlement will be withdrawn.
Please understand that the intent of this offer is to enable the City to begin to immediately
process your client's proposal. In doing so, however, we have to be cognizant of the fact that
such processing needs to be ratified by the City Council through the amendment of the
Ordinance.
Your immediate response to this offer would be greatly appreciated.
Very truly yours,
/*`X
Stephen J. Roy
City Attorney
SJR: ted
Enclosures
cc: City Council
Steve Burkett, City Manager
Greg Byrne, Director of CPES
Bob Blanchard, Chief Planner
Ted Shepard, City Planner
Josh Marks, Esq.
A
Attc.
City of Fort Collins
October 7, 1994
Dennis B. Polk, Esq.
Suite 100, Building 19
Denver West Office Park
1667 Cole Blvd.
Golden, Colorado 80401
Re: Sullivan v. City
Civil Action No. 94 CV 535-3
Dear Mr. Polk:
TELEFAXED
The purpose of this letter is to extend an offer of settlement in the above -entitled case.
City staff is willing to recommend that the City Council amend Ordinance No. 103, 1994 (the
"Ordinance"), which imposed the Harmony Corridor moratorium. The amendment would revise
the Ordinance so that the moratorium would not apply to applications for proposed planned unit
developments that were filed with the City on or before July 5, 1994. City records indicate that
Mr. Sullivan's application for approval of the King Soopers proposal was filed with the City on
June 6, 1994. Therefore, if the amending ordinance were adopted, your client's application
would be exempted from the moratorium, and processing of the application under the existing
LDGS criteria would begin upon execution of the settlement agreement.
If we are able to immediately agree upon a settlement of this matter, we would begin
processing the application the early part of next week. I have been advised that the preliminary
PUD could likely be submitted to the City's Planning and Zoning Board at its regular meeting
on December 12, 1994. Sufficient time would have to be allowed, however, for an additional
neighborhood meeting, as well as staff review and the submittal of any additional information
required by staff. Therefore, it is impossible at this time to guarantee the particular date that
the matter would be reviewed by the Board.
Because the immediate processing of the application would be contrary to the provisions
of the Ordinance as presently worded, the continued processing of the application would be
contingent upon City Council's adoption of the amending ordinance. Copies of the proposed
amending ordinance and agenda item summary are enclosed. We have tentatively scheduled that
ordinance for Council's consideration at its next regular meeting on October 18, 1994, with
second reading on November 1, 1994. According to the City Charter, the amending ordinance
would become effective ten days after second reading, absent the filing of any notice of protest
under the Charter's referendum -procedures. As a condition of this settlement, once the
300 LaPorte Avenue • P. O. Box 580 • Fort Collins, CO 80522-0580 • (303) 221-6520