No preview available
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLIND PROPERTY, 2ND FILING - PDP - 39-94D - CORRESPONDENCE - RESPONSE TO STAFF REVIEW COMMENTSI appreciate your time in reviewing these plans. If you have any further questions, please feel free to contact me. Cc Yvonne Seamen, Centex Homes Jim Allen -Morley, Sear Brown Group. Lind Property Filing Two Response 91 to revisions 5/18/04 8 Number: 40 Created: 4/23/2004 [41231041 No roundabout analysis was provided for the intersections meeting the criteria of Resolution 2001-120. Please provide those analysis. The Lemay and Vine, and the Timberline and Vine intersections can be excluded. Number: 41 Created: 412312004 [4123104] Full review of the TIS and the area intersections has not been completed yet. Full review will be completed the week of April 26th. Due to this additional comments may be forth coming by the end of that week also. Reference revised utility plans. Department: Transfort Topic: General Number.' 5 No Comments Issue Contact: Garold Smith Created: 4/6/2004 Department: Transportation Planning Issue Contact: David Averill Topic: Pond Location Number: 27 Created: 4/21/2004 [41211041 Sidewalk Access ramps at street crossing should be directional and not the radial style that are shown. The ones shown actually are directional, due to the scale of the plans, this is difficult to notice. Number.- 31 Created: 412112004 [4121104] Please provide signing and striping plan to for review by Transportation Planning. Reference revised utility plans. Department: Zoning Issue Contact: Gary Lopez Topic: zoning Number: 6 Created: 41712004 [417104] Don't include single family detached elevations in final submittal for recording in event these might change. Single family detached elevations are not necessary as the LUC will dictate garage standards, etc. Acknowledged Number: 7 Created: 417/2004 [417104] New LUC change recently added was 3.8.26 requiring buffering requirements for (in this case) heavy industriaUextraction with proposes well While refers to existing such development we may want to see buffering standards met with the proposed oil well. We would prefer that the buffering requirements be met at the time the drill site is activated, as per the following comment, this will require a separate review. Number: 8 Created: 41712004 [417104] Related to proposed oil well LUC 3, 8.14 requires preemption uses (heavy industrial in LMN) be reviewed as a type 2 review. The future well development will require this review. Acknowledged Lind Property Filing Two Response #1 to revisions 5/18/04 Topic: Grading Number: 50 Created: 412312004 [4123104] Any off -site grading would require grading easement. Please avoid rear yard swales whenever possible. If drainage is directed between lots from other upstream lots, then a side yard drainage easement should be provided at the downstream lots. Reference revised utility plans. Topic: Master Plan Regional Channel Number. 51 Created: 412312004 [4123104] Pond location and trail should be coordinated with future parallel Swale carrying storm runoff from upstream basins. Location of swale should be in line with what was reserved for the Maple Hill property. The City does not intend to build any of these improvements in the near future but would want to have the right of way reserved for such a long-term future improvement. The ditch should carry about 715 cfs at County Road 52 according to the Cooper Slough/8oxelder master plan. This has been resolved, we are matching the planning criteria for Maple Hill. Topic: Pond Location Number: 21 Created: 412012004 [4120104] The location of the detention pond in the northeast corner of the site should make sure that it does not preclude the future construction of a parallel drainage channel adjacent to the ditch. Separation from the ditch to the pond shall be such that a channel or a storm sewer capable of carrying 715 cfs can be accommodated between the existing ditch and the proposed pond location. Reference revised utility plans. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 23 Created: 412012004 [4120104] Please provide more detailed preliminary utility plans. It would be good if the grading information layer was turned off on the utility plan sheet. Number: 52 Created: 412312004 [4123104] At final a larger scale is recommended for the utility plans. Please clarify on the utility plans which facilities are to be built with the first filing and which are to be built with the second or any future filings. The final plans should clearly call out the limits of what gets built with this particular filing. Reference revised utility plans. Department: Traffic Operations Topic: Traffic Issue Contact: Ward Stanford Number: 39 Created: 4/23/2004 [4123104] TIS indicates a LOS of E in the short term at Vine and Lemay. This is a failing condition at this intersection. Some level of improvements are required to mitigate the LOS back to an acceptable level, per the APF code requirements. Lind Property Filing Two Response #1 to revisions 5/18/04 Acknowledged. Department: Light & Power Issue Contact: Monica Moore Topic: General Number: 2 Created: 41112004 [411104] All electric facilities must be shown on the utility plans. This includes electric line locations, vaults, streetlights, meters, etc. Contact Monica Moore (224-6150) to coordinate the electric design. Number: 3 Created: 41112004 [411104] Streetlight locations must be shown on both the landscape plan and the utility plan. A streetlight layout can be provided upon request. Street trees must maintain minimum clearances to streetlights. (15ft from ornamental trees and 40ft from shade trees.) Number: 4 Created: 41112004 [411104] Normal electric development policies and practices will apply. Acknowledged. This information will be shown on the final compliance plans with the final landscape plans. Department: PFA Issue Contact: Michael Chavez Topic: General Number: 10 Created: 411212004 [4112104] PFA has no new comments. Department: Police Topic: General Number: 9 W121041 No comments Issue Contact: Joseph Gerdom Created: 411212004 Department: Stormwater Utility Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan Topic: Drainage Calculations Number: 22 Created: 412012004 [4120104] For a preliminary submittal the level of the calculations is adequate. Additional information will be required upon final plan submittal including street, inlet and storm sewer hydraulics. Detention pond calcs look like they are conservative, final design should be done using more detailed SWMM modeling. Reference revised utility plans Topic: Erosion Control Number. 53 Created: 412312004 (4/23/04] Please note that these comments are for a final submittal: SedimentlErosion Control Plan Comments Lind Property 2nd Filing April 12, 2004 1. There are no erosion control notes, plans, calculations, etc. Please provide. At preliminary a section should be included in the report mentioning that erosion control final calculations shall be provided with a final submittal. It should also describe in general what BMP measures are envisioned at this time. Lind Property Filing Two Response #1 to revisions 5/18/04 5 Number: 18 (4/19/04] Please label adjoining properties. Created: 411912004 Number: 36 Created: 412112004 [41211041 From Technical Services: Legal and plat do not close and do not match. See redlines. Number: 37 Created: 412112004 [4121104] From Technical Services: Make sure all tracts have use shown, ie: utility easement, etc. Number: 38 Created: 412112004 [4121104] From Technical Services. Access to the lots in Block 1? Reference changes on revised plat. Topic: Site Number: 12 Created. 411912004 [41191041 Incomplete submittal. Only received sheets 1 and 2. Please resubmit sheets 1 through 7 for review on the next round. The proper number of submittal sheets were submitted for review. I do not know why you did not get them. Number: 13 Created: 411912004 [4119104] The question was asked in staff review if the Site and Landscape plans could show the contours. We discussed it internally and it was decided that yes, the site and landscape plans could show contour lines as long as a note was placed on the sheets stating that if there is a conflict between the site/landscape/utility plans, then the utility plans prevail (something to that effect). Acknowledged. Number: 15 Created: 411912004 [4119104] Please label all tracts. The tracts that are labeled do not match the plat. Acknowledged, these have been revised. Topic: Soils Report Number: 28 Created: 412112004 [41211041 Please provide another, copy of the Soils Report (this can be done any time from now through final compliance). We have a copy in the 1st filing file but we need another for the 2nd filing file (the files need to be complete in and of themselves). Thanks very much! Acknowledged. Topic: Traffic Number: 45 Created: 412312004 [4/23/04] Please provide long term geometry. Acknowledged. Topic: Utility Plans Number: 49 Created: 412312004 [4123104] Proposed grading needs to tie into existing. Lind Property Filing Two Response # l to revisions 5/ 18/04 4 Number: 42 Created: 412312004 [4123104] This project is responsible for the design of the ditch crossing at Brightwater as well as their 1/2 of their local street portion. This project may elect not to construct the crossing at this time, but rather put up the dollar amount of those improvements instead. An estimate for the improvements must be submitted for the city's review and approval and then the dollar amount will then go into the DA as a contribution in aid to be paid prior to the issuance of the first building permit. Acknowledged, this issue will be worked out with final compliance plans Number.' 43 Created: 412312004 [41231041 This project is required to construct a pedestrian crossing in lieu of an additional street connection to the east. Please see comment under Planning/Altemative Compliance. Acknowledged, this has been shown, and an alternative compliance has been added to the site plan. Number: 44 Created: 412312004 [41231041 Please provide letters of intent from the Ditch Company and/or other property owners for offsite grading in order to go to hearing. The actual easement can be provided during final compliance. These will be provided prior to hearing. Number: 48 Created: 412312004 [4123104] The sidewalk from Tract L to Brightwater should line up with the ramp across the street at the proposed street cut. The sidewalks coming from the east at Tract G should line up with a ramp across the street. Suggest moving the ramp proposed on the south side to the north side. You can move the one storm inlet at Bowside to the south and eliminate one manhole as well. The ramp crossings have been revised as requested. Topic: Landscape Number: 11 Created: 411912004 [4119104] Not reviewed, incomplete submittal. Only received sheets 4 and 5. Please submit sheets 1 through 7. The proper number of submittal sheets were submitted for review. I do not know why you did not get them. Number: 46 Created.-'412312004 [41231041 Show all utilities and easements (sight, utility, etc). These will be shown with final landscape plans. Topic: Plat Number. 16 Created. 411912004 [4119104] Please provide a tract table listing the tracts, what they are for, who owns and who maintains. This may be a little more clear than labeling each one within the tract itself and making the tract a little less crowded. Not all tracts are currently labeled with what they are for. Should tracts G and H have access easements? See redlines for other Qs. Lind Property Filing Two Response #1 to revisions 5/18/04 Number: 19 Created: 4/20/2004 [41201041 Sight distance easements are required at Galewind, Bowside, and the alley at Beachcomber. Please see redlines on sheets CS503, 505, and 506 and figure 7-16 to property calculate. All sight distance triangles need to be dedicated on the plat, shown on all utility, site, and landscape sheets. Site distance easements are now shown on the plans. Number. 20 Created: 412012004 [41201041 Please complete the new Appendix E4 and submit with the next round of review. All the highlighted items need to be complete before going to hearing. I can email this document if you'd like -just send a request to me at sjoy@fcgov.com This is being completed by StanTec. Number: 29 Created: 4/21/2004 [4121104] The MF units off County Road 52 may not be fire accessible. Please contact PFA before resubmitting. These units do meet fire access requirements, drive lanes do not exceed 150 feet. PFA does not have any known issues. Number 30 Created: 412112004 , [41211041 Don't plat the curb returns in Tract M unless they are being built with this filing. At such time the street configuration changes in the future, a replat and revisions to utility, site, landscape plans can be submitted. These have been removed. Number: 32 Created: 412112004 [4121104] Will need to plat and construct the street along the frontage of lot 13, block 7, at Beachcomber and Thoreau if you want to sell/build lot 7. This area has been modified as requested. Number: 33 Created: 4/2112004 [4121104] Rear access only off lots 3-6, block 6 at the roundabout, possibly even lots 2 and/or 7. A statement on the plat and site plan to this effect is required. See table 7 for separation distances from driveways to intersections. These lots all have rear alley access, so this is not an issue. This note has been added to the site plan. Number. 34 Created: 412112004 [41211041 Any variance request must be submitted for review and approval prior to going to hearing. Acknowledged Number: 35 Created: 412112004 [4121104] Please provide signature blocks for the Ditch Company, ELCO, and Boxelder. Acknowledged Lind Property Filing Two Response #1 to revisions 5/18/04 R EA C E rrI�� V E D I -a n d s c a p e A c h i t c c t u r e -I I)�.v 3 M S i t e P 1 a n n i n g CURRENT PLANNING G r a p h i c s May 18, 2004 Bob Barkeen, Project Planner Current Planning Division City of Fort Collins 281 N. College Avenue Fort Collins, CO 80524 Dear Bob, Attached are revisions to the preliminary development plans for Lind Property Filing Two. They have been revised in response to City staff and agency review comments. The comments made and revisions requested have been addressed as follows: Department: Current Planning Issue Contact: Bob Barkeen Topic: Pond Location Number: 24 Created: 412012004 [4120104] The neighborhood Center within the project needs to begin taking shape. Permitted uses will need to be identified, building footprints based on allowable setbacks, parking locations, drive cuts, utilities stubbed to the site, etc. The center shouldn't be final designed. Ideally, enough information should be included consistent with PDP level of review, to allow future uses to be processed as a minor amendment. This information has been included on the site plan as requested. Typical building elevations have been included as well. Number: 25 Created: 4/20/2004 [4120/04]The adjacent ditch should be shown on the PDP site plan. This information has been included on the site plan as requested. Number: 26 Created: 4/20/2004 [4120104] Fence locations will need to be shown on the site/Jandscape plan, consistent with the legend shown on the PDP. This information has been included on the site and landscape plans as requested. Since we don't have single family lots backing up to arterials, the privacy fence was deleted, and an open rail fence was shown adjacent to open spaces. Department: Engineering Issue Contact: Susan Joy Topic: General Number: 14 Created: 4/19/2004 [4119104] See Appendix E6 for all scanning requirements and bring the plans sets into conformance. Most of the scanning requirements have been met, all will be met at the time of final compliance submittal Lind Property Filing Two Response #1 to revisions 5/18/04 1 -Civic Center Village 144 North Mason Street Suite 2 • Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 (970) 472-9125 • F7 x;(970) 494-0728 0vAJQ ,�Esrov,r� lc�Ti�7t