Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLIND PROPERTY - OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 39-94A - SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTS - ROUND 3 - PLANNING OBJECTIVESATTACHMENT Lind Property Overall Development Plan Concept Review Letters and explanation of how issues have been addressed Conceptual Review Letter -August 28, 2000 2. Zoning Department comments: a) The Land Use Code (LUC) requires a mix of housing in the development, with a minimum of three housing types in a project that contains 45 acres or more. Section 4.4 (D) (2) (c) of the LUC. Defines housing types. Any single housing type cannot constitute more than 90% of the total number of dwelling units in the development. We have complied with these requirements in our ODP. 3. Engineering Department comments: a) County Road I I will be improved with the use of a shared cost program in conjunction with this development. Thank you for the information. b) Development of this property will require street connections to adjacent properties that are developable or redevelopable. We have provide these connections to the south and west. The northeast boundary of the Lind property is the edge of the UGA. In addition, this boundary is a deeply incised (approximately 30') irrigation canal. c) Street oversizing fees will apply to this development. These fees are based on vehicle trip generations for the proposed land uses in the development plan. Thank you for the information. d) The ODP should follow the City's Master Street Plan and the adopted Mountain Vista Subarea Plan. We have followed the Mountain Vista Plan and the Master Street Plan e) County Road 52 is designated as a minor arterial street. Thank you for the information. ) The internal streets must meet the City's current standards. Thank you for the information. g) A Transportation Impact Study (TIS) will be required with the ODP submittal. An ODP level TIS is included with.this submittal. h) A Development Agreement (between the City and the developer) and a Development Construction Permit, issued by the City Engineering Department, will be required. EAPROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc ATTACHMENT 1V Lind Property Overall Development Plan Neighborhood meeting concerns A neighborhood meting was held April 2, 2001 at the City Streets Department Break room. There were five neighbors present along with, Brian Grubb City Planner, Vaughn Furness, Consulting Planner with Jim Sell Design, and Yvonne Seaman representing Centex Homes. The neighborhood concerns are summarized in below. Centex Homes reply to the neighborhood concerns follows the comment. 1. Density along County Road 11 (Lower Density Preferable) The subdivision on the east side of County Road 11 will take into consideration the lot size and orientation of the existing lots on the west side of County Road 11. 2. Dollar cost of so many ditch crossings The City of Fort Collins requires access to properties at intervals not to exceed six hundred and sixty (660) feet. Centex Homes has asked for alternative compliance to this requirement because of the unusual feature created by the No.8 Outlet Ditch. The proposed crossings are located to facilitate access to the property east of the No.8 Outlet Ditch. 3. Safety of the ditch crossings The crossings will be design to meet city standards for safety and accessibility 4. Traffic on County Road 11 Traffic on County Road 11 is an ongoing concern and has been studied in the traffic impact study. Alternatives to street improvements and designs are being reviewed by the city. The City has a preliminary concept design idea for County Road 11, which shifts it to the east to avoid the existing homes and their driveways. A final decision on the street design has not been made but solutions to the road design will be considered as part of this development procedure. 5. Traffic at the intersection of Vine Drive and Lemay Avenue Traffic in the Mountain Vista Subarea is being studied at this time; the revised traffic study looks at additional impacts on the Mountain Vista Subarea. Alternative solutions to the problems at this and other intersections are being considered. As this and other developments proceed through the process a solution to the traffic concerns will surface. 6. Lack of a primary school in the area The Poudre School District has determined a need for a new elementary school and a senior high school within the Mountain Vista Subarea. An existing elementary site has been dedicated as part of the Waterfield PUD Project off of East Vine Drive and Summitview Drive. An approximately 110- acre site has been acquired by the District for a future senior high school located on the northwest corner of Mountain Vista Drive and County Road 9E. EAPROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc ATTACHMENT III Development Phasing Schedule Phase Parcel Acres Land Use Density or GSF DU's I G 10.95 Single Famil /Du lexes/4-Plexes 6-12 43-131 F 17.93 Single Famil /Du lexes/4-Plexes 4.5-8 81-125 Subtotal 124-256 II 1 12.42 Single Famil /Du lexes/4- lexes 6-11 472-113 65-137 K 10.27 Single Family/Duplexes/Town Homes/Patio Homes 7-11 H 2.07 Neighborhood Center 15,000-20,000sf Subtotal 137-250 III D 20.28 Single Famil /Du lexes/4-Plexes 5.5-8 112-162 E 1.12 Neighborhood Center 10,000-15,000 sf Subtotal 112-162 IV C 28.12 Single Family/Duplexes/Town Homes/Patio Homes 4.5-8 124-193 I 1.17 Neighborhood Center 10,000-15,000 sf Subtotal 124-193 V B 7.71 Single Famil /Du lexes/4-Plexes 4.5-8 127-225 A 15.52 Single Famil /Du lexes/4-Plexes 4.5-8 70-124 Subtotal 197-349 TOTAL 638-1011 &TROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc ATTACHMENT 1I LEGAL DESCRIPTION Legal Description of Lind Property A tract of land Situate in the West % of Section 29, Township 8 North, Range 68 West of the Sixth P.M., City of Fort Collins, County of Larimer, State of Colorado, which, considering the West line of the Southwest '/4 of said Section 29 as bearing NORTH and with all bearings contained herein relative thereto, is contained within the boundary lines which begin at the Southwest Corner of said Section 29, and run thence NORTH 2638.36 feet to the West'/4 Corner of said Section 29; thence N00°06'29"W 1983.21 feet along the West line of the Northwest '/4 of said Section 29 to a point on the Westerly line of the Outlet Ditch of the Elder Reservoir; thence along said Westerly line, S43°04'02"E 122.95 feet, and again S39°33'l l"E 106.35 feet, and again S15°55'58"E 79.09 feet, and again S32127'38"E 20.55, and again S55°35'59"E 43.98 feet, and again S59°59'15"E 130.23 feet, and again S53°23'14"E 51.90 feet, and again S40°06' 12"E 50.00 feet, and again S32°47'45"E 49.28 feet, and again S38142'29"E 58.25 feet, and again S45022'26"E 52.41 feet, and again S47°05'11"E 147.43 feet, and again S49010'35"E 193.70 feet, and again S60°29'29"E 77.63 feet, and again S70°05' 13"E 245.82 feet, and again S55058'26"E 41.35 feet, and again S40'03'07"E 32.23 feet, and again 33°18' 14"E 98.29 feet, and again S27624'33"E 87.69 feet, and again S17°13'47"E 55.09 feet, and again S09°47'56"E 50.23 feet, and again S16' 06'34'E 43.71 feet, and again S22045'43"E 131.56 feet, and again S20054'47"E 188.56 feet, and again S09028'06"E 50.07 feet, and again S03°28'05"E 129.41 feet, and again S07°48'09"E 82.28 feet, and again S18027'25"E 71.01 feet, and again S28°17'22"E 163.02 feet, and again S26000'19"E 74.06 feet, and again S18'46'07"E 61.24 feet, and again S09039'04"E 61.84 feet, and again SO4°17'30"E 126.83 feet, and again S31005'15"E 69.77 feet, and again S29°27'26"E 250.68 feet, and again S10°26'57"E 162.55 feet, and again S18°18'31"E 60.95 feet, and again S38038'54"E 82.75 feet, and again S42°57'23"E 429.68 feet, and again S43°06'53"E 369.56 feet, and again S50023' 18"E 134.43 feet, and again S41°59'47"E 288.90 feet, and again S07°30' 11"W 117.94 feet, and again S15023'38"E 161.33 feet, and again S06026'34"W 104.58 feet, and again S06001'18"W 106.23 feet, and again S03032'06"E 132.31 feet, and again S05°14'36"E 105.45 feet, and again S00°20'33"W 117.31 feet, and again S02'15'56"E 121.40 feet to the South'/4 Corner of said Section 29; thence S89045'59"W 2638.22 feet along the South line of said Southwest'/4 to the point of beginning, containing 172.6071 acres, more or less, and being subject to a road right-of-way for County Road 11 over the West 30.00 feet thereof, and also subject to a road right-of-way for County Road 52 over the South 30.00 feet thereof. EAPROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc c) Fire flows of 1,500 gallons per minute at a residual pressure of 20 pounds per square inch must be provided. We will meet this requirement. 10. Advance Planning Department comments: a) This property does not meet the City's 116 development contiguity requirement until Richard's Lake PUD development completes its improvements. See the attached letter requesting a Waiver/Exception for contiguity requirements from Centex Homes, dated March 26, 2001. b) Potential off -site street improvements will be determined by the TIS for this project. Thank you for the information. c) If structures exist on this property, the applicant should evaluate the potential historic value of the structures right away. These structures have been evaluated. d) The property is the LMN- Low Density Mixed -Use Neighborhood Zoning District. This district has a minimum density requirement of 5 net dwelling units per acre and a maximum density requirement o(8 gross dwelling units per acre. A single phase of development may be up to 12 dwelling units per acre. The LMN District permits limited commercial uses. The ODP meets these density requirements. 11. Current Planning Department comments: a) This development request will be subject to the City's development review fee and the Fee Schedule that is available in the Current Planning Department ofce. The fee is due at the time of submittal of the required documents for the Overall Development Plan, Project Development Plan, and the Final Compliance phases of development review by City staff and affected outside reviewing agencies. Thank you for the information. 12. This development proposal is subject to the requirements as set forth in the City's LJ specifically Articles 2. Administration (Development Review Procedures), Article 3. General Development Standards, and Article 4. [Zoning] Districts. Thank you for the information. EAPROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc 5.Light and Power Department comments: a) Power is available from existing facilities on the south side of County Road 52. b) Services and facilities will need to be coordinated with the ELCO Water District. c) The normal electric charges will apply to this development. Thank you for the information. 6. Natural Resources Planner comments that an Ecological Characterization Study must be done for the ODP on this property. An ecological characterization has been included with this submittal. 7. Transportation Planning Department comments: a) A T/S will be required with your ODP submittal. A TiS has been included with this submission. b) Bicycle and pedestrian connections should be provided within the development and to surrounding properties. We have provided for significant internal bicycle and pedestrian connections within the site c) The off -site and internal street network should follow the City's Master Plan. There maybe an amendment to the Master Street Plan in the near fixture. We will be following this plan but suggest consideration that the collector not follow the northeast perimeter of the site. d) The City's Park Plan shows a futture bicycle/pedestrian trail in this area, possibly partially on this property. We have provided for this bicycle/ pedestrian trail to cross the site near the intersection of County Roads 11 and 52. In addition, we have provided significant interior connections to it. 8. Parks Planning Department comments: a) The residential portions of this development will be subject to the City's neighborhood and community parkland fees. The fees will be assessed on each dwelling unit and are based on the square footage of the unit. Thank you for the information. 9. Poudre Fire Authority comments: a) The addresses on the buildings must be visible form a street. We will meet this requirement. b) Afire hydrant must be within 300' of all buildings and hydrants must be spaced at 600' on -center. We will meet this requirement. EAPROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc We understand and have no problem with this requirement. 4. Water/ Wastewater Department comments: a) Service in this area will be provided by the ELCO Water District the Boxelder Sanitation District. Thank you for the information. 4. The ELCO Water District states that there is a 14" high pressure water line County Road 11 that will serve this property. There is adequate capacity in this existing line. Thank you for the information. S. Stormwater Utility comments: a) The site is located in the Cooper Slough Drainage Basin, where there are currently no new development fees, although that may change near the end of 2001 or the beginning of 2002. Thank you for the information. b) - The standard drainage and erosion control report and construction plans are required and they must be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. We have provided an ODP level drainage report with the ODP and will provide PDP and FDP reports with those submittals. c) On -site water quality extended detention is required to treat the runoff. We will address this issue with the PDP drainage report and drainage plan. d) Since there is no approved drainage master plan for this basin, Anderson Consulting Engineers will begin one this year. Thank you for the information. e) The No. 8 ditch has been identified as the out/all and the applicant is proposing to have setbacks and a park along this ditch. An outfall needs to be built to the No. 8 ditch, which may be plugged temporarily until the ditch company and the City work out an agreement to accept the f ows. We have addressed this issue in our drainage report. f The Richard's Lake PUD project has detention facilities that are 2 times the volume of the design storm and have a manual shut-off controlled by the ditch rider. Due to previous problems with the current system, the ditch company seeks a new overall approach to discuss with the City. We have addressed this issue in our drainage report. g) Any temporary retention will need to have a way to be drained after a storm when the ditch can handle the f ow. If the pond location can be shown to percolate, that would be acceptable, but if not it would have to be pumped. We have addressed this issue in our drainage report. EAPROJECT FILES\LAND\20841 Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc Yvonne Seaman, Land Acquisition Planner 9250 East Costilla Ave #200 Greenwood Village, CO 80112 Development Phasing; Schedule (See Attachment III) Thank you for your consideration and we look forward to working with you throughout the development review process. Sincerely, JIM SELL DESIGN, Inc. L. Vaughn Furness Director of Community Planning cc: Lind Property Overall Development Submittal E:\PROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc • The City will make all capital improvements in accordance with the adopted Capital Improvement Program and the Capital Project Management Control System. • The City will identify estimated costs and funding sources for each capital project requested before it is submitted to City Council. • The City will use intergovernmental assistance to finance only those capital improvements that are consistent with the Capital Improvements Plan and City priorities, and whose operating and maintenance costs have been included in the operating budget forecasts. Policy GM-4.3 Adequate Public Facilities. The City shall develop criteria and level of service standards to ensure that adequate public facilities are available. City Plan Principles and Policies Growth Management Infrastructure improvements are already underway through a cooperative agreement between various area developers and the city. Proposed and Existing Open Space Buffering Landscaping, Circulation, Transition Areas, Wetlands, and Natural Areas: The No. 8 Outlet Ditch borders the site to the northeast. This project proposes a buffer a minimum of 100' wide along this ditch. Part of the open space will be a naturalized buffer to enhance a protect the ditch and adjacent slopes. The remainder will be a neighborhood park. Within the open space buffer and park, a trail will be constructed to serve the residents and surrounding neighborhoods. The park will be located within the development so that at least 90% of the residential dwellings will be within 1/3 mile of the park measured along the street frontage. A multi -use trail is identified on the City of Fort Collins Parks and Recreation Policy Plan as a proposed off-street trail, which crosses the southwest corner of the site. There will also be an off-street trail system throughout the development connecting the proposed Neighborhood Commercial Center and the surrounding Residential Neighborhoods with the City trail system. All open space, parks, and landscaped buffer areas will be constructed by the developers of this project and will be maintained by a Home Owners Association. Estimate of number of employees for commercial and industrial uses: 10 — 50 employees, note this is a best estimate and is subject to change with Land Use. Description of rationale behind the assumptions and choices made by the applicant: See Appropriate City Plan Principles and Polices achieved by this O.D.P. Written narrative addressing each concern/issue raised at the neighborhood meetings: See attachment IV - Letter responding to neighborhood meeting issues and concerns. Name of the project as well as any previous names the project may have been known by: • Lind Property A narrative description of how conflicts between land uses are being avoided or mitigated: At the site planning stage, land uses will be planned to have like uses facing like land use to the maximum extent feasible to mitigate potential conflicts between different land uses. Conceptual Review Letter and explanation of how issues have been addressed (See Attachment I) Legal Description: (See Attachment II) Name and address of each owner of Property in the ODP area: Centex Homes E:\PROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc Policy CAD-2.1 Civic Buildings and Grounds. Civic facilities -- such as community buildings, government offices, recreation centers, post offices, plazas, libraries and schools -- should be placed in central locations as highly visible focal points. The urban design and architectural quality should express permanence, importance, and respect for broad citizen preferences and community identity. Major public buildings should have a civic presence enhanced by their height, mass and materials. In addition, public buildings should: Be accessible by motorized vehicles, transit, bicycles and pedestrians. Be integrated into a setting that includes generous landscaping and/or public outdoor spaces. City Plan Principles and Policies Community Appearance & Design Civic elements will be centrally located. The Neighborhood Center is in a central location at the intersection of two Collector Streets. With the design of the streets, it is possible that public buildings will terminate the vista of the two Collector Streets in three different directions. Policy ENV-7.6 Watershed Approach to Stormwater Management Policy. In addition to flood control and drainage functions, stormwater systems will be designed to minimize the introduction of human caused pollutants. Educational programs and demonstration projects will be pursued to enhance public understanding of pollution prevention efforts. Tributary systems will be designed for water quality control, with appropriate use of buffer areas, grass swales, detention ponds, etc. Receiving water habitat restoration and protection will be included in stormwater master plans, in conjunction with habitat mapping efforts. City Plan Principles and Policies Environment Water quality techniques will be incorporated. Detention ponds, +/- 6.5 acres, are provided for water quality and water quantity storm detention. Policy NOL-1.2 Urban Development. The City will conserve and integrate natural areas into the developed landscape by directing development away from sensitive areas and using innovative planning, design, and management practices. When it is not possible to direct development away from natural areas, it should integrate them into the developed landscape in a manner that conserves their integrity. The City will encourage and assist efforts by private landowners and organizations to integrate natural areas into new development and to protect, restore, or enhance privately owned natural areas. There will be an appropriate buffer for all areas adjacent to the canal. A Park as been planned to be adjacent to the canal. Policy NOL-1.2 Urban Development. The City will conserve and integrate natural areas into the developed landscape by directing development away from sensitive areas and using innovative planning, design, and management practices. When it is not possible to direct development away from natural areas, it should integrate them into the developed landscape in a manner that conserves their integrity. The City will encourage and assist efforts by private landowners and organizations to integrate natural areas into new development and to protect, restore, or enhance privately owned natural areas. Natural and man-made drainage areas will be enhanced by laying back the steep slopes of the existing No. 8 Outlet Canal for better slope stabilization. Areas will be planted with appropriate plant materials to help stabilize the slopes. There will be a pedestrian/bicycle trail along the canal with crossings at all vehicular crossings and two additional pedestrian/bicycle crossings.` PRINCIPLE GM-4: Investment in capital facilities and services will be reviewed comprehensively and made within a framework that balances and evaluates the costs and the relative importance of competing needs. Policy GM-4.1 City Commitment to Providing Capital Facilities. Recognizing the limits of the City' s financial resources, the City commits to deriving the greatest value possible from its investments in infrastructure by assuring maintenance of existing capital facilities, gradually remedying existing deficiencies in facility provision over time, and providing facilities adequate to serve the new growth that occurs under City Plan. Each of the categories of facilities provided by the City shall be funded at a level determined to be appropriate in accordance with the capital improvements plan of the City. Policy GM-4.2 Capital Improvement Policy. The City will continue to operate under the following Capital Improvement Policies: C The City will develop a multi -year plan for capital improvements, which shall be reviewed and updated on an annual basis. E:\PROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc a. Building entries as viewed from the street should be clearly marked. Buildings should be sited in ways to make their entries or intended uses clear to and convenient for pedestrians. b. The location and pattern of streets, buildings and open spaces must facilitate direct pedestrian access. Commercial buildings should provide direct access from street corners to improve access to bus stop facilities. Shopping areas should provide for pedestrian and bicycle connections to adjoining neighborhoods. C. Creating barriers which separate commercial developments from residential areas and transit should be avoided. Lot patterns should be provide safe and direct pedestrian connections from residential areas to schools, parks, transit, employment centers, and other neighborhood uses. d. Direct sidewalk access should be provided between cul-de-sacs and nearby transit facilities. This project will include a civic core rich with pedestrian activities. Policy T-5.3 Continuity. The City shall provide a safe, continuous and understandable pedestrian network incorporating a system of sidewalks, crossings and trails throughout the community. Bridges and crossings should be provided over railroads, rivers, drainage -ways, and other features that may be major barriers to a continuous pedestrian network. Connections will be provided to all existing adjacent neighborhoods. Principle T-6: Street crossings will be developed to be safe, comfortable, and attractive. Policy T-6.1 Street Crossings. Street crossing standards should be established that include crosswalks, lighting, median refuges, comer sidewalk widening, ramps, signs, signals, and landscaping. Crosswalks should be well marked and visible to motorists. They should be designed to fit and enhance the context and character of the area, and provide for safety for all age groups and ability groups. Policy T-6.2 Intersection Improvements. Traffic calming and sight distance improvements at intersections should be developed where appropriate to enhance the safety of street crossings. Painted intersection " stop striping" should be provided to keep vehicles clear of pedestrian crossings. Curb radii should be minimized to reduce the speed of right turning vehicles and reduce the distance for the pedestrian to cross the street. Policy T-6.3 Pedestrian Signalization. The City will ensure that signals, signs, and markings have clear vehicular and pedestrian indicators for street crossings. Automatic pedestrian phases at high demand intersections and pedestrian buttons at low demand areas should be provided. Protected pedestrian signal phases to improve safety should also be provided in high pedestrian demand areas. These elements will be an integral part of the overall design theme. Principle T-7: The City will encourage the development of comfortable and attractive pedestrian facilities and settings to create an interesting pedestrian network. Policy T-7.1 Pedestrian Facilities. The City will encourage the provision of pedestrian scale improvements that fit the context of the area. The color, materials, and form of pedestrian facilities and features should be appropriate to their surroundings, as well as the functional unity of the pedestrian network, through means such as: a. Developing attractive improvements which enhance the character and pedestrian scale of the urban environment including streetscape design, vertical treatments, widened sidewalks, and furnishings. b. Incorporating special design features, public art, and site details that can enhance the pedestrian scale of streets and become an urban amenity. C. Encouraging outdoor cafes and activity areas that contribute to the character and human scale of the sidewalk environment. Building design and details should support the human scale of the street incorporating such elements as windows and other openings, porches and recesses, awnings, and patios. Pedestrian spaces will be incorporated into the site. PRINCIPLE CAD-2: Public spaces, such as plazas, civic buildings, outdoor spaces, parks, and gateway landscapes should be designed to be functional, accessible, attractive, safe and comfortable. E:\PROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc Principles and Policies PRINCIPLE AN-2: A wide range of open lands, such as small parks, squares, greens, play fields, natural areas, orchards and gardens, greenways, and other outdoor spaces should be integrated into neighborhoods. Policy AN-2.1 Neighborhood Parks and Outdoor Spaces. Each neighborhood should have small parks or other outdoor spaces located within walking distance of all homes. Outdoor spaces should be designed in conjunction with streets and walkways, to be a formative, purposeful part of any land development, and not merely residual areas left over from site planning for other purposes. They should be mostly surrounded by streets or house fronts, to maintain safety and visibility. Lind ODP has planned for a neighborhood park and a neighborhood center outdoor public space. Policy AN-2.2 Ownership of Outdoor Spaces. Some parks, common open lands and outdoor spaces will be publicly owned, while others will be privately owned. The proposed park will be dedicated to the City of Fort Collins and will be constructed and maintained by the Parks Department. Policy AN-3.3 Neighborhood Edges. The edges of a neighborhood should be formed by features shared with the adjoining neighborhoods, such as major streets, changes in street pattern, greenways, and other features such as rivers, streams and major irrigation ditches. Landscaped outdoor spaces and trails may be used to create an attractive environment at a neighborhood's edge. The Number 8 Outlet canal will provide a neighborhood edge. It will be enhanced by laying back the slopes and planting vegetation. A trail has been planned in the buffer area of the canal. Policy LMN-2.3 Neighborhood Center Location. A Neighborhood Center should be encouraged to locate near the center of the neighborhood, but will be permitted to be located elsewhere such as on an edge. Neighborhood Center is planned in the center of the development. Policy LMN-2.9 Outdoor Spaces. Small neighborhood parks, squares and other common outdoor spaces will be included within new neighborhoods. These spaces should be attractive settings, highly visible and easily observed from public streets. An Outdoor Public Space has been planned in the neighborhood center of the Lind Property ODP. Policy T-1.4 Adequate Facilities. The City will ensure the provision of adequate facilities for the movement of goods and people while maintaining the integrity of existing streets and minimizing travel -related impacts within residential neighborhoods. As growth occurs, appropriate transportation investments should be made to support increased demands for travel. A cooperative program for arterial street improvement is currently being implemented by the city and area developers. T- 4 Bicycle access should be improved to major activity centers, schools and neighborhoods, and barriers removed in these areas to improve circulation. Facility development, safety and convenience should be established throughout these destinations. Level of service standards for bicyclists should be higher within these areas. Bicycle access will be provided between the residential and commercial land use. Policy T-5.1 Land Use. The City will promote a mix of land uses and activities that will maximize the potential for pedestrian mobility throughout the community. Policy T-5.2 Connections. Pedestrian connections will be clearly visible and accessible, incorporating markings, signage, lighting and paving materials. Other important pedestrian considerations include: E:\PROJECT FILES\LAND\20841 Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.jusc.revised.2.doc .V a•Z September 11, 2000 Revised March 27, 2001 Revised May 16, 2001 Planning and Zoning Board Members City of Fort Collins 281 North College Avenue Fort Collins CO 80524 RE: Lind Property — Overall Development Plan (ODP) Statement of Planning Objectives Dear Board Members: Overall Development Plan The Development Team of the Lind Property is requesting approval of the proposed Overall Development Plan. The proposed O.D.P. is for the 172 acre Lind Property Low Density Residential Mixed -Use Development located at the northeast corner of the intersection of County Roads 11 and 52. The site is bound by County Road 11 to the west, County Road 52 to the south, the No. 8 Outlet Canal to the northeast. The site is zoned LMN. The existing site is been used for agriculture. It is owned by the Lind Family Trust and is under contract to Centex Homes. A portion of the site slopes gently to the south, another portion slopes to the east. There are currently no identified wetlands on this site. The O.D.P. uses `Neo-traditional' style planning concepts of concentrating higher density residential uses around a neighborhood commercial area with lower density residential uses radiating out to the east of the site. The residential areas will be connected through a proposed neighborhood natural area that will serve as a pedestrian/bicycle corridor and drainage way. The proposed land uses for the property are to include: Parcel Acres Land Use Density DU's or G.S.F. A +/- 15.52 Single Family/ Duplex/ Four-plex 4.5 — 8 70 - 124 DU's B +/- 7.71 Single Family/ Duplex/ Four-plex 4.5 — 8 127 - 225 DU's C +/- 28.12 Single Family/ Duplex/ Four-plex 4.5 — 8 124 - 193 DU's D +/- 20.28 Single Family/ Duplex/ Four-plex 5.5 - 8 112 - 162 DU'S E +/- 1.12 Neighborhood Center 10,000 — 15,000 s.f. F +/- 17.93 Single Family/ Duplex/ Four-plex 4.5 - 8 81 - 125 DU's G +/- 10.95 Single Family/ Duplex/ Four-plex 6 — 12 43 - 131 DU's H +/- 1.17 Neighborhood Center 10,000 — 15,000 s.f. I +/- 2.07 Neighborhood Center 15,000 - 20,000 s. f. +/- 12.42 Single Family/ Duplex/ Four-plex 6 - 11 65 - 137 DU's K +/- 10.27 Single Family/ Duplex/ Four-plex 7 — I 1 72 - 113 DU's Sub -Total 638 —1,011 DU's +/- 18.95 Right -of -Way +/- 22.04 Parkland/Open Space +/- 4.36 Neighborhood Center +/- 127.26 approximate area Net Acreage +/- 172.61 TOTAL E:\PROJECT FILES\LAND\2084J Lind\Docs\ODP\jb2084ODP.just.revised.2.doc