HomeMy WebLinkAboutLIND PROPERTY - OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN - 39-94A - CORRESPONDENCE - STAFF'S PROJECT COMMENTSJ:
5 Issue Contact: Mark Jackson
Request that additional width be preserved for bike lanes (6'each side) on
the northern east/west Connector roadway internal to the site. This will be
an important bike connection to the future park site and trail (activity areas
per LUC).
Be sure and return all of your redlined plans when you re -submit.
If you have questions regarding these issues or any other issues related to this project,
please feel free to call me at (970) 221-6750.
Yours Truly,
BRIAN GRUBB
City Planner
3 of 3
I
1
10
Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan.
Drainage Easement - A drainage easement from the Windsor Reservoir and
Canal Company (WRCC) will be needed to allow the flows from the site to enter
their ditch. Without this easement, there will be no nearby outlet for stormwater
from the site. The WRCC has expressed some concern as to the method of
release into their ditch. Please contact them to discuss the different options for
draining the site into their ditch.
Traffic Operations
11
Issue Contact: Eric Bracke
Vine and Lemay Level of Service - I have reworked the TIS analysis. The
adequate public facilities issue at Vine and Lemay can be resolved with
Eastbound/Westbound right turn lanes. These improvements will be the
developer's responsibility.
12 Issue Contact: Eric Bracke
Intersection Level of Service - The intersection of 52/11, Country Club/11,
Lemay/Country Club fail level of service and adequate public facilities
requirements. We need to discuss this further.
Transportation Planning
Issue Contact: Mark Jackson
Does Traffic Engineer agree with the -LOS assessment (existing conditions)
of Vine/Lemay?
2 Issue Contact: Mark Jackson
• Does developer agree to make improvements to roadways identified in
TIS to satisfy LOS in short term period?
3 Issue Contact: Mark Jackson
Will project make improvements to CR 11 & CR 52(Minor Arterial) along
their frontage as shown on MSP? Not stated clearly in TIS or
documentation.
4 Issue Contact: Mark Jackson
Developer will be responsible for building or escrowing funds for bridges
and street connections across canal.
2 of 3
1✓tt.15 coP't
STAFF PROJECT REVIEW
Jack Vahrenwald
Jim Sell Desiqn
153 W Mountain Ave
Fort Collins, CO 80524
Date: 06/19/2001
Staff has reviewed your submittal for LIND PROPERTY OVERALL DEVELOPMENT PLAN,
139-94A, and we offer the following comments:
ISSUES:
Engineering
6 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Does Traffic Engineer agree with the LOS,assessment (existing conditions)
of Vine/Lemay?
7 Issue Contact Sheri Wamhoff
Clearly show the boundary of the ODP - it needs to be the current property
line boundary.
8 Issue Contact: Sheri Wamhoff
Note 4 - Please replace the words "if effective" with "in effect'.
Park Planning
13 Issue Contact: Craig Foreman
Park Location - Park location looks good. Still need to'see how canal
improemnts, grading, will be developed; and impact on the park if any.
Stonnwater Utility .
9 Issue Contact: Basil Hamdan
General - In addition to the following comments, please consider the conceptual
review comments made on 8/21/00 by Glen Schlueter before submitting the
PDP for this project. Since there were no comments on the ODP utility and
drainage plans, they were not returned.
1 of 3